Tag Archives: Trump

Oppose the Right-Wing Attack on Vermont Unions

From the U.S. to Australia, Let’s Fight for
Revolutionary, Internationalist Leadership of our Trade Unions

Oppose the Right-Wing, Bureaucratic Attack on
the Vermont AFL-CIO Union Federation

18 June 2021: In the latter part of 2019, a new slate was elected to the local leadership of the AFL-CIO (the biggest U.S. union federation – a U.S. equivalent of the ACTU) in the USA’s northeastern state of Vermont. Alongside vowing to make the union’s operations more transparent to its 10,000 rank and file members, the new leadership promised more independence from the Democrat Party, a focus on standing by migrant workers, more active support for the Black Lives Matter struggle and a greater willingness to use strikes to defend workers rights. The national leadership of the AFL-CIO, which is protectionist and conservative in its outlook and which subordinates the union movement to the capitalist Democrat Party (one of the two parties that alternately run American capitalism alongside the right-wing Republicans), met the election of the new slate in Vermont with suspicion and alarm. Before long, the national AFL-CIO leadership, headed by the federation’s president Richard Trumka, began bureaucratic manoeuvres against its Vermont branch.

Tensions between AFL-CIO national Executive Committee (henceforth referred to as National EC) and its Vermont branch (henceforth referred to as VT AFL CIO) have now reached breaking point. This follows an overwhelming vote on November 18 by delegates of the VT AFL-CIO to authorise the branch leadership to “call for a general strike of all working people in our state” should Donald Trump and his supporters seek to launch a coup for Trump to remain in the presidency despite his losing the election. After trying to stop the Vermont strike resolution at the time, four months later, Trumka went further and announced that the National EC would be investigating the “recent conduct” of the VT AFL-CIO, threatening “further action.” These are steps towards removing the elected Vermont leaders and putting the branch under the direct administration of the federation’s National EC. This bureaucratic campaign to suppress and punish class-struggle mobilisation must be defeated!

That the threat of a far-right coup in the U.S. was real was seen just a month and a half after the Vermont resolution when fascist white-supremacists and other rabid right-wingers stormed the U.S. Congress building on January 6 with the aim of restoring Trump to the presidency. The workers movement has a real interest in opposing such a far-right coup. However, opposing such a coup does not mean that one should give any support, however critical, to new president Joe Biden. Biden must be 100% opposed! The correct stance to have taken at last November’s presidential election was to oppose a vote to both Trump and Biden. Today Biden and his war-mongering secretary of state, Antony Blinken have taken off from where Trump and Mike Pompeo left off in ratcheting up the imperialist Cold War drive against socialistic China. Biden has even resuscitated a thoroughly discredited Trump-era conspiracy theory that COVID escaped from a Chinese lab, a despicable suggestion that is being used to not only whip up mass hostility to China but which is helping to incite yet more racist violence against people of Chinese and other East Asian backgrounds in the U.S., Canada and Australia. Meanwhile, under the reign of Biden and his new vice-president Kamala Harris, racist cops continue to murder black people and other people of colour throughout the USA. And Biden and Harris are overseeing the brutal incarceration of thousands of child refugees in over-crowded detention camps near the U.S.’s border with Mexico. However, should a coup to restore hard-right Trump to the presidency have succeeded, it would have necessarily been accompanied by further attacks on the democratic rights to organise of unions, black rights activists and other leftists and would have greatly emboldened violent far-right, that is fascist, forces. To prepare working class industrial action against the prospect of such a coup was a very supportable and necessary step. However, Trumka and Co. want workers to rely only on the capitalist Democratic Party to oppose the threat of far-right forces. This is a losing strategy! January 6 proved to the whole world the half-heartedness of U.S. repressive organs for opposing the threat of violent far-right groups. It also showed the downright collusion of some elements of these state organs with fascistic forces.

Neither the capitalist parties, like the Democrats, nor the organs of the capitalist state can be a force against far-right threats. This is because the mainstream capitalist parties and the U.S. state institutions both serve the same capitalist class as far-right forces. By seeking to suppress working class mobilisation against a right-wing coup, Trumka and Co. are tying the hands of the one social force with the power and consistent interest to lead resistance against far-right coups and attacks on remaining democratic rights. Therefore, Trotskyist Platform adds our voice to that of the many trade unionists and anti-fascists in the U.S. and around the world who are opposing the campaign of the national AFL-CIO Executive Committee bureaucrats against the Vermont AFL-CIO branch. We have signed on to an open protest letter to national AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka, defending “the right of the VT AFL-CIO to have passed a motion authorising a General Strike if the 2020 election results had been overturned in a coup” and demanding that Trumka, “immediately drop the vindictive and retaliatory `misconduct’ investigation into the VT AFL-CIO.”

The Open Letter was initiated by the circle associated with the Australian far-left website, Class Conscious. We congratulate them on taking the initiative on this issue. Thus far, nine pro-working class organisations around the world have signed onto the Open Letter. So have dozens of individuals, many of whom are union activists. Alongside Trotskyist Platform, one other Australian group has signed onto the Open Letter, which is the leftist, anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian, Melbourne-based group, Jews Against Fascism. Trotskyist Platform calls on all trade union activists and officials who believe in class struggle and the centrality of the working class to the fight against right-wing repression, as well as all staunchly anti-fascist groups, to also sign the Open Letter to AFL-CIO national president Richard Trumka. To sign the letter use this link to go to the relevant page on the Class Conscious website: https://classconscious.org/2021/05/17/sign-open-letter-to-richard-trumka-againt-themisconduct-investigation-into-vermont-afl-cio-defend-labors-right-to-fight-against-fascism-and-dictatorship/ . Note that those who sign on through this link will only be endorsing the actual four-sentence Open Letter and not necessarily the preamble by Class Conscious (while this preamble makes many very good points there are aspects of its analysis that we do not fully endorse).

See this link for a list of signees of the above Open Letter as of 30 May 2021:
https://www.facebook.com/vtworkers/posts/2886823191539923

AFL-CIO Bureaucrats Sorry History of Supporting
Counterrevolutionary Forces and Right-Wing Coups

Although we were very happy to take a stand against the bureaucratic attack on the VT AFL-CIO branch by signing the Open Letter, there was a sentence in the letter that we felt uneasy about. It said that the VT AFL-CIO motion authorising a general strike if Trump’s election defeat had been overturned in a coup, “was in the proud tradition of labor fighting together against the threat of fascism and dictatorship.” Unfortunately, the tradition of the AFL-CIO includes, under the pre-text of fighting for “democracy” and “against dictatorship,” intervening abroad to support U.S. imperialist machinations against both socialistic workers states and independent-minded governments in the “Third World”.

It was in Latin America where top AFL-CIO bureaucrats conducted their most notorious work. Their methods included training local anti-communists to gain influence within Latin American trade unions to combat the influence of leftists within the unions. These local allies would then seek to split leftist-led unions in order to build business-loyal unions that would help U.S. multinationals operating within Latin America to maximize profits by keeping wages poor. Meanwhile, working closely with some of the USA’s biggest and most notoriously anti-union mining corporations, agricultural giants, oil companies and banks, the AFL-CIO’s “American Institute for Free Labor Development” (AIFLD) would help disburse CIA and U.S. State Department funds to help the political work of anti-communist union officials, to bribe union leaders into joining the “democratic camp” and to grant affordable housing to workers who switched over to membership of anti-communist-led unions. Then, if leftist governments gained the ascendancy in Latin America, even when democratically-elected within capitalist state structures, AIFLD-backed labour groups would foment unrest and use U.S. government funds to sustain strikers. This would then help pave the way for bloody, U.S.-backed right-wing coups, which AFL-CIO local allies would then work to suppress any labour resistance to. In this way, in the name of “democracy” and stopping “communist dictatorship”, the AFL-CIO tops worked hand in glove with the CIA to bring down elected, left-leaning, or otherwise anti-colonial-minded, governments in Guatamela in 1954, Guyana, Brazil and the Dominican Republic in the early-mid 1960s and Chile in 1973. In all these cases, except to a partial degree in Guyana, the AFL-CIO aided, CIA-orchestrated overthrow of elected governments was through bloody coups that resulted in right-wing dictatorships that committed murderous terror against leftists and workers rights activists on a massive scale. Meanwhile, in Indonesia, AFL-CIO bureaucrats helped the CIA and Australia’s ASIS overseas spy agency to orchestrate a coup in 1965 that led to one of the worst slaughters in human history. The CIA/ASIS/AFL-CIO backed coup forces led by General Suharto massacred between one and two million Indonesian communists, trade unionists, women’s rights activists and ethnic Chinese people in the process of consolidating their horrific right-wing dictatorship.

The AFL-CIO bureaucrats’ most important service to U.S. imperialism was in their support for the capitalist rulers’ drive to overthrow workers states. They collaborated closely with the CIA to stir up worker unrest in state-owned enterprises in Red China, in the former Soviet Union and in the other former deformed workers states in Eastern Europe. Their operations were most successful in Poland. There, with the open backing of the Vatican and rabidly anti-union U.S. and British heads Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher and with support from the pro-ALP leadership of Australia’s ACTU, the AFL-CIO tops and CIA propped up a large anti-communist “union” called Solidarnosc. In 1989-90, Solidarnosc would lead a capitalist counterrevolution in Poland that would open the door to the counterrevolutionary destruction of the Soviet Union and all the Eastern European socialistic states within the following two years.

Much of this despicable counterrevolutionary work was conducted by the AFL-CIO heads behind the backs of their membership. More recently, national AFL-CIO leaders in the post-Soviet period, including Trumka, have sought to distance themselves from the federation’s role during the anti-Soviet Cold War. In 1997, the AFL-CIO shutdown its discredited AIFLD. However, today the AFL-CIO’s National EC are back at it again! They replaced the AIFLD with a new organization called Solidarity Center that conducts much of the same work as the AIFLD. Solidarity Center is funded by USAID, the State Department and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the U.S. government’s main vehicle for open funding of counterrevolutionary and pro-imperialist movements that goes alongside their covert funding through the CIA. The NED is notorious around the world for spearheading pro-imperialist “color revolutions” and right-wing coups. In 2002, Solidarity Center-backed right-wing forces in Venezuela tried to carry out a coup to overthrow the elected, leftist Chavez government. Since then Solidarity Center has continued to nurture, train and encourage pro-imperialist opponents of the anti-colonial Venezuelan government.

Today, a main international focus of the National EC is to, under the guise of supporting “democracy,” back forces within China seeking to emulate Polish Solidarnosc – that is forces seeking to use legitimate worker grievances within China not to improve workers social position by crushing capitalist influence or by strengthening the socialist character of the workers state but to restore capitalist rule.  The main organised force seeking to build such a Chinese version of Solidarnosc is the China Labour Bulletin (CLB) led by Han Dongfang. And the AFL-CIO’s National EC is right behind the CLB, even presenting Han Dongfang with its highest “human rights award.” Last year, Trumka presented this same award to Hong Kong’s Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF), the principal force in the violent, pro-colonial, anti-Beijing movement in Hong Kong. The CHRF is funded by the NED and by right-wing, Hong Kong media billionaire, Jimmy Lai, who is aptly known as “Hong Kong’s Rupert Murdoch”. The CHRF represents rabidly anti-communist members of Hong Kong’s upper-middle class and large chunks of her capitalist upper class, both of whom are nervous about losing their privilege should Beijing start to bring socialism to Hong Kong. Among the affiliates of the CHRF is the mainly (but not exclusively) white-collar, Hong Kong Confederation of Trade Unions (HKCTU), the smaller of Hong Kong’s two main union federations. The HKCTU, whose leaders want it to become Hong Kong’s Solidarnosc, is not only backed by the NED and the AFL-CIO tops but by the Laborite bureaucrats heading Australia’s ACTU. Today, as Biden emulates Trump in escalating Washington’s new Cold War drive against socialistic China and Australian imperialism enthusiastically eggs him on, we can expect the AFL-CIO and ACTU heads to step up their support for capitalist counterrevolutionary labour groups within mainland China and Hong Kong unless revolutionary activists within these union federations are able to change the agenda leading our unions.

However, despite our concerns about the possible implications of that sentence in the Open Letter to AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka that lauds labor’s “tradition” of fighting against the threat of “dictatorship,” we note that this formulation did not specify or allude to any particular counterrevolutionary or pro-imperialist act by the AFL-CIO and indeed does not actually even specifically mention the AFL-CIO. Therefore, the chance that endorsement of this Open Letter would be understood as also giving support for the AFL-CIO’s continued backing of anti-communist and pro-colonial movements is small. Hence, given the importance of opposing the National EC’s right-wing bureaucratic attack on the VT AFL-CIO, we on balance decided to sign the Open Letter and are urging others within the Left and workers movement to do so as well.

In doing so we point out that, the national AFL-CIO leadership’s attempts to quash class struggle resistance to far-right attacks on democratic rights within the U.S. is the domestic equivalent of their support abroad for right-wing forces seeking to use the guise of “fighting for democracy” to undermine socialistic states and anti-colonial governments.

Right-Wing Coups and the Threat of Fascism

Should the fascist forces, that formed a key component of the January 6 rioters, been sufficiently large, united, disciplined and armed, then if they and their allies had been able to stage a successful overturn of the election result on January 6, this could have opened the road to the fascists making a bid to impose the fascist form of capitalist rule in the short term. Fascism is a form of capitalist rule created through the complete physical smashing of all leftist parties and independent workers organisations through right-wing terror. Such a catastrophe is possible in periods of acute capitalist economic and social crisis, when in the absence of a powerful working class struggle for socialist revolution, right-wing demagogues, backed by decisive sections of the capitalist class, are able to mobilise large chunks of the insecure and embittered middle class – alongside portions of the unemployed poor – into squads dedicated to unleashing reactionary violence.

History however proved that in early 2021, the fascists and the right-wing conservatives that then allied with them did not yet have the clout to even overturn the election result. This is because right now the bulk of the U.S. capitalist class feels that the benefits of ruling through “democratic” means, in terms of fooling the masses into believing that they have a decisive say, combined with the risk of resistance of the sort indicated by the Vermont general strike resolution should they try to impose fascist rule, outweigh the potential benefits of physically crushing the workers movement. To be sure, their deep concern about the decay of their own system, their terror over the bitter grievances of their own population, their fright about the emergence of a socialistic power in the Peoples Republic of China and their skepticism about their ability to maintain super-profits without exploiting their workforce at an even more intense level, mean that even now some sections of the American capitalist class are supporting fascist forces. Another larger section of the capitalist class, typified by Trump, have not yet definitely decided to go down the road of fascism but are ensuring that they have the option to go down that road in the future by today nurturing violent far-right forces.

Given the current balance of forces between rival sections of the American capitalist class, a more realistic possibility on January 6 than a full-blooded coup that opened the road to a short-term bid for power by fascists was the overturn of the election result in the form of some sort of compromise power-sharing arrangement between the rival bourgeois camps. Such a partial coup resulting from fascist and other far-right mobilisation would still have greatly emboldened the violent far-right forces and thus made resistance like the sort foreshadowed in the Vermont general strike motion absolutely crucial. A coup of this sort did occur in France in February 1934 when after a violent mobilisation by fascists and other reactionaries, the “progressive” liberal capitalist government headed by Daladier of the Radical Party was replaced by a right-wing, bonapartist government. That new government headed by Doumergue rested on the right leg with the fascists and on the left leg with the Radical Party. French workers responded to the coup with a general strike six days later. Although, the political and economic situation in France then was quite different to that in the U.S. today, it is worth leftists today reviewing Leon Trotsky’s brilliant analysis of the situation then in France. Trotsky pointed out that in the context of a deep economic crisis, France and its middle class were becoming deeply polarised. If the working class did not show that it can be a serious contender for power, the fascists and their seeming radicalism would win over the desperate middle class. Trotsky emphasised the need to build workers militias to defend the workers movement against fascist threats and to use the mobilisation of such militias to energise the advance towards workers revolution. Here are links to some of Trotsky’s key writings from that period:

The occurrence of acute prostatitis is abrupt with symptoms of high fever, chills, pain in the levitra shop buy lower abdomen and lower back, difficulty urinating, frequent and urgent urination, etc. Make sure that you do not use this product. http://deeprootsmag.org/2013/02/19/elizabeth-cooks-gospel-set/ buy viagra online One can look all over the Internet and buy price levitra Kamagra tablets within few clicks. During the process connected with insulating this areas and also making a request your selected carry out, specialized polymers are accustomed that will act like buy viagra on line gum somewhere between sections.

Today, in the U.S., some in the Far Right will be demoralized that their coup did not succeed. On the other hand, that fascists and hard-right conservatives were able to storm into the parliament building, occupy it for several hours, intimidate many congress members inside it and all the while gain assistance from some in the state organs would have given many of them great encouragement. Meanwhile, the fact that Trump had to, eventually, somewhat distance himself from the rioters will lead to some right-wing conservatives who supported the Capitol storming dispensing with their faith in parliamentary democracy and move fully in with the fascists. That the less conservative Biden has now become president will likely only accelerate this drift. More fundamentally, while plenty of temporary swings in political mood and economic conditions will occur, the long term trend of capitalism, if it is not first overthrown, is to descend into its fascist form because ultimately this is the capitalist class’ last hope of saving its own class rule in the face of the relentless decay of its own system and the rise of a socialistic giant in the form of the Peoples Republic of China. That is why we must mobilise now to oppose the fascist threat. The general strike planned by the VT AFL-CIO is certainly a powerful form of such resistance. However, most immediately we need to oppose physical attacks by fascists on their targets. Such attacks take place every single day – even when fascists are not making an immediate bid for power. Resisting such attacks is crucial to demoralising the fascists on the one hand and on the other, helping the working class to develop the organisation, discipline and activity needed to fight the new Biden administration and the U.S. capitalist class as a whole. As we emphasised in our statement following the January 6 events in Washington (see: https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/how-to-resist-the-growing-threat-of-the-violent-far-right-in-america/):

“… it is urgently necessary for politically aware workers, black liberation activists and leftists to organise workers at multiracial workplaces together with black communities, other non-white communities and anti-racist activists into disciplined action squads to physically resist the threat of violent attack from far-right forces.

“… Especially given that the fascists are often armed with guns, the working class-based, anti-fascist defence squads that must be built should take advantage of the right to bear arms that exists in America – as granted by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution – to acquire arms.”

Indeed, any general strike mobilisation against far-right forces like the one prepared by the VT AFL-CIO would need to be defended against physical attacks by fascists through the deployment of workers defence guards and workers militias.

From the U.S. to Australia: Let’s Fight for a
Revolutionary, Internationalist Agenda to Lead Our Workers Movements

The fact that Trumka resumed his attack on the VT AFL-CIO over the general strike resolution some two months after Biden was inaugurated – and thus long after the strike resolution ceased to be potentially operational – shows that his attack is about more than the general strike resolution itself. Trumka and Co. want to bring to heel a union branch that is, in his eyes, too independent of the Democrat Party, too willing to wage strikes and too real about supporting anti-racist struggles.

However, the VT AFL-CIO leaders, while clearly more left-wing than the National EC, have a program that is still short of the revolutionary, internationalist program that the workers movement needs. Thus in their November general strike resolution, while they recognise “that democracy in the United States is hobbled by the archaic structure of the Electoral College and entrenchment of the two-party system”, they basically accept that the U.S. system is otherwise generally “democratic.” However, while any attacks on democratic rights from far-right forces, conservatives and liberals alike should be opposed, the “democracy” that exists in the U.S. is fundamentally not a democracy for all but in practice a democracy only for the capitalist exploiting class. This is because it is the capitalist class who has the means at their disposal to shape public opinion and sway elections. It is they who own the media and print houses. It is the rich capitalists who disproportionately have the money to finance political parties, pay for political advertising, set up NGOs and think tanks and hire lobbyists. In practice, “democratic elections” in the U.S. end up being a matter of different factions of the ruling class wrestling for administrative control, with the masses reduced to largely serving as voting fodder for the rival capitalist cliques. Meanwhile, no matter who wins elections, any party that wins office will be administering a state machine that has been built up and maintained for the very purpose of enforcing capitalist rule over the masses and which is controlled through thousands of strings by the capitalists. Therefore, the “democratic” form that exists in capitalist countries like the U.S, Australia, India, Brazil and South Korea masks a social order that is very much a dictatorship of the capitalist class over the working class masses.

Furthermore, while the Vermont union leaders are less willing to blindly support the Democrat Party than the National EC, they do not have a principled opposition to supporting candidates from this capitalist party. Thus the Vermont branch leadership called for support to Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential candidacy bid. But Sanders is a member of the capitalist Democrat Party, who while he wants greater social inequality accepts the sanctity of the capitalist state and thus would be incapable of achieving many of the progressive measures that he seeks. Moreover, through advocating strident trade protectionism, Sanders damages working class unity and thus undermines the class struggle resistance that could actually win gains for the working class masses. Meanwhile, like other progressive Democrats such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Sanders fully enlists in the imperialist campaign of lies against China over Muslim Uyghurs in China’s northwestern Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and is a strident supporter of the anti-communist, anti-China opposition in Hong Kong.

However, it is significant that the VT AFL-CIO leaders have the determination to defend their more class-struggle, left-wing agenda against bureaucratic attacks from Trumka. Resisting this right-wing attack from the national AFL-CIO tops inevitably brings up a discussion about what else is wrong with the national AFL-CIO leadership’s program and opens the possibility of a more complete break with Trumka’s class-collaborationist, protectionist and pro-imperialist outlook. That is why revolutionaries should join the united front opposing Trumka’s attack on the AFL-CIO’s Vermont branch.

It is not just in the U.S. where there needs to be a new, revolutionary agenda to guide the working class movement. Here in Australia, the ACTU’s strategy of reliance on the Labor Party, divisive economic nationalism, subordination to anti-strike laws and support for Australian imperialism’s agenda has proved disastrous to the workers movement. Over the last three and a half decades the share of national income going to workers has dropped drastically in favour of ever greater profits for the capitalists. Meanwhile, more and more workers have been driven into insecure casual and gig jobs, social welfare has been slashed and rental accommodation and housing have become more unaffordable for working class people. The revolutionary, internationalist program that must guide the workers movement here includes:

  • Rely on strikes and picket lines, including in defiance of anti-strike laws and Arbitration courts, to defend workers rights rather than the dead end of relying on the ALP and the Greens.
  • Fight for permanency and all the rights of permanency for all currently casual and gig workers.
  • Refuse to accept the capitalist bosses right to sack workers. Fight to ban all profitable companies from slashing jobs and force them to increase hiring at the expense of their profits. When the capitalists inevitably scream back that such measures will lead to economic collapse, then explain to workers that, since capitalists say that their system cannot survive if the measures needed to bring jobs for all are taken, this proves that the economy needs to be ripped out of the capitalists hands and brought into public ownership under workers control.
  • Fight for the granting of the full rights of citizenship for all visa workers, refugees and international students.
  • Oppose all protectionist demands that set local workers against our working class sisters and brother abroad. For a fighting unity of workers against the capitalist exploiters everywhere!
  • Mobilise mass action of workers to defend Aboriginal rights and to oppose racist state terror against Aboriginal people.
  • The workers movement must champion the fight to enable women’s full participation in social, economic and political life: Demand free, 24-hour, public-provided childcare; free, nutritious school lunches for school students and free, after-school and holiday sporting, cultural and hobby activities for children with free public-provided shuttle services to them from school/home.
  • Build joint mobilisations of workers contingents, Aboriginal people, Asians, Muslims, Africans and all other people of colour together with all anti-racists to crush provocations by violent far-right forces.
  • Oppose any support for any pro-imperialist labour groups and anti-communist “democratic” and “human rights” forces seeking to undermine socialistic rule in China or Red China’s sovereignty over her Hong Kong territory. Stand with the Chinese, North Korean and other workers states against the U.S./Australian Cold War drive.

By standing by a leftist branch of the U.S. union movement that is resisting a bureaucratic attack from more conservative union officials we can advance the struggle to build a class struggle leadership of the American workers movement. This can only encourage the fight to build the revolutionary, internationalist leadership of the working class that we so badly need here too in Australia.

UPDATE, 30 June 2021, 10:20am (AEST): About two hours ago, the Vermont AFL-CIO and its leader David Deusen announced that the national AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka had sent its Vermont branch a formal letter stating that although its General Strike Authorization resolution was deemed “misconduct”, he would NOT be taking disciplinary action against the Vermont branch. So victory in this struggle!

Congratulations to Vermont trade unionists and all others who took a stand in this struggle. We should also note that yesterday another Australian-based pro-union group took a stand by sending a protest letter to Richard Trumka. That group is the Australian Chinese Workers Association. Below is the letter that they E-mailed to Trumka:

Letter E-mailed by the Australian Chinese Workers Association on 29 June 2021 to national AFL-CIO president Richard Trumka opposing the “misconduct” proceedings against the Vermont AFL-CIO branch.

How to Resist the Growing Threat of the Violent Far-Right in America

Above: Thousands of white supremacists and other right-wing extremists storm the U.S. congress building on 6 January 2021

As a Smooth-talking Imperialist and 
Upholder of the Racist Capitalist Order Prepares to Replace a Brazenly Racist Billionaire as President

How to Resist the Growing Threat
of the Violent Far-Right in America

  • The same forces that spearheaded the January 6 riot are the very ones that have been inciting and perpetrating racist violence and abuse on the streets against black people, Chinese background people, Muslims and other people of colour.
  • It is urgently necessary to organise workers at multiracial workplaces together with black communities, other non-white communities and anti-racist activists into disciplined action squads to physically resist the threat of violent attack from far-right forces.
  • As their system decays, as they take fright at the bitter grievances of their own population and as they worry about the emergence of a socialistic power in the Peoples Republic of China, the U.S. ruling class is tearing itself to pieces as it scrambles to find a strategy that will best protect its rule of exploitation.
  • No to Trump! No to Biden!
  • America’s “Democracy” is a Dictatorship of the Capitalists, a Democracy for the Rich. But We Must Mobilise to Oppose Fascist Attacks on It.
  • We Can Never Rely on the Capitalist State to Stop Violent Far-Right Attacks.
  • The Fascist Threat Will Not End With the Departure of Trump from the Presidency.
  • Fascism is a mass movement of those sections of the middle class – or to use the more precise Marxist term the petit bourgeoisie – who in a time of capitalist crisis are whipped into extreme opposition to the struggles of the working class, oppressed communities and the Left.
  • In reality the Far Right’s “anti-establishmentarianism” is really an ultra-establishmentarianism!
  • Mobilising Against the Fascist Threat Will Advance the Struggle for Workers Rule.
  • The U.S. Capitalist “Order” Suffers a Big Blow to its International Prestige. Good!
  • Support the Struggle Against Fascism and Capitalism in the U.S. by Mobilising Against Australia’s Capitalist Rulers and the Fascist Shock Troops That They Spawn.

11 January 2020: The storming of the U.S. congress building (known as the Capitol) five days ago by thousands of right wing extremists, including neo-Nazis, shows how emboldened violent far-right forces are in America. Some brandishing weapons, the rioters occupied the building for several hours while making death threats against politicians that they oppose. Incited by current president Donald Trump, many of the rioters thought that they could stage a coup by intimidating congress members into confirming hard-right Trump as president for another term rather than actual election winner, Democrat Joe Biden.  

Even though far-right groups had made clear their intentions for weeks preceding their January 6 rampage, the police presence as they besieged the seat of the U.S. parliament was conspicuous by how strikingly light it was compared to the size of the mob. Many have contrasted the relatively gentle treatment meted out to the far-right rioters by the police with the extreme brutality that police have unleashed on those protesting against racist state attacks on black people. Indeed! But many police were not just gentle in the way that they handled the rioters. Some downright colluded with the right wing extremists! Some cops stood aside to let through the far-right forces, others assisted the rioters to climb over obstacles and barricades and some even took selfies with the rampaging extremists. Most telling were the decisions of the United States Capitol Police to reject offers of reinforcements in the lead up to the long-planned pro-Trump action and the minimal numbers that this lavishly funded and massively staffed force deployed for the event. Then even after the riot had started, Pentagon officials repeatedly delayed the deployment of the National Guard and then minimised the role it was authorised to play in quelling the riot. In short, the storming, occupation and vandalising of the Capitol could not have occurred without the complicity of significant sections of the American regime’s forces. It is evident that U.S. state agencies are deeply divided. This is just like the capitalist ruling class that they serve. As their system decays, as they take fright at the bitter grievances of their own population and as they worry about the emergence of a socialistic power in the Peoples Republic of China, the U.S. ruling class is tearing itself to pieces as it scrambles to find a strategy that will best protect its rule of exploitation.

The same forces that spearheaded the January 6 riot are the very ones that have been inciting and perpetrating racist violence and abuse on the streets against black people, Chinese background people, Muslims and other people of colour. This was evident at a far-right, pro-Trump rally in Los Angeles held at the same time as the march on the Capitol in Washington. When 25-year-old black woman, Berlinda Nibo, walked past the demonstration as part of her usual stroll through her own LA neighbourhood, some 40 of the far-right activists turned on her. They brutally assaulted and pepper sprayed her while screaming out the N-word and chanting, quite ironically, “All Lives Matter” (in opposition to the slogan of “Black Lives Matter” used by the anti-racist movement). Such white supremacist attacks, as well as far-right terror against LGBTI people, have escalated during the Trump presidency. In response to the anti-racist resistance that erupted during the U.S. summer, triggered by the horrific police murder of 46 year-old black man George Floyd, white supremacists have rammed their vehicles into anti-racist activists and even opened fire on Black Lives Matter protesters. They have murdered many anti-racist protesters. Last August, a member of a fascist militia shot dead two people, Anthony Huber and Joseph Rosenbaum, who were protesting against the heinous police shooting of 29 year-old black man, Jacob Blake in Kenosha, Wisconsin. As with the storming of the Capitol there has been plenty of collusion between far right militias and the state enforcement organs in their attacks on the Black Lives Matter movement. Police in Kenosha encouraged the racist armed patrols of the fascist who murdered Huber and Rosenbaum by giving water bottles to him and his militia squad and by encouraging them with the words, “we appreciate you guys, we really do. ” And that was just minutes before he started shooting at the anti-racist activists!

That the fascist-led forces were able to storm into the parliament building, occupy it for several hours, intimidate many congress members inside it and all the while gain assistance from some in the state organs has given them great encouragement. This means that they will pose an even greater threat. That is why it is urgently necessary for politically aware workers, black liberation activists and leftists to organise workers at multiracial workplaces together with black communities, other non-white communities and anti-racist activists into disciplined action squads to physically resist the threat of violent attack from far-right forces. Black liberation protests must be defended! The Left and workers movement must be defended! Black communities, ethnic Chinese people, Muslim people, Jewish people, all people of colour and LGBTQI people must all be protected! All violent attacks by the Far-Right must be combated – even those on liberal and mainstream conservative politicians which if they succeed embolden the fascists to physically attack the Left even more intensely.

No to Trump! No to Biden!

Just because it is urgently necessary to mobilise resistance to the physical attacks of fascists and other rabid Trump supporters, that does not mean that one should give any political support to his Democrat rivals. No political support, no matter how critical, should be given whatsoever to the new Democrat president Joe Biden – not even on the basis that he is a “lesser evil” to Trump. Biden must be 100% opposed! The correct stance to have taken at last November’s presidential election was to oppose a vote to both Trump and Biden.

To be sure many black and other people of colour, class conscious workers and progressive-minded youth voted for Biden not out of much faith for him but merely to get rid of Trump. Trump is indeed vileness personified! He is a billionaire capitalist exploiter, a racist and a misogynist who revoltingly boasts about groping women. Soon after assuming office in early 2017, Trump issued racist orders to ban people from several Muslim majority countries from entering the U.S. In the middle of 2020, as a mass movement opposed to racist police terror against black people swept the country, Trump denounced protesters and pushed for ever more brutal repression against the mobilisations. His main economic and social policy has been to cut tax rates for corporations and the rich while denying millions of poor and sick people access to medical care. Then when the COVID-19 pandemic hit the world, Trump resisted the social distancing, masking and lockdown measures needed to curb the pandemic. As a result the U.S. has been the worst affected country in the world from the pandemic with over 380,000 lives lost.

The Trump administration’s main “response” to the pandemic has been to blame China and Chinese people. Trump despicably called the coronavirus the “China Virus.” He and his ultra-hawkish secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, and his warmongering vice president, Mike Pence, even fabricated a ridiculous conspiracy theory that the virus was deliberately leaked out of a Chinese research lab. All these claims helped incite a terrifying torrent of white supremacist attacks on ethnic Chinese people residing in the U.S. The U.S. regime also used their crackpot claims over the pandemic to further escalate their hostility to socialistic China. Even before the pandemic hit, the Trump administration had ratcheted up by several gears the regime’s Cold War drive against the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Now in the last days of the administration, Trump, Pence and Pompeo’s anti-China drive has been on super overdrive. Earlier the administration had taken measures to slap tariffs on Chinese imports, restrict Chinese companies operating in the U.S., persecute Chinese researchers and international students residing in America and block visits by members of the Communist Party of China. Meanwhile, the administration provided finance, technical aid and political support for the pro-colonial, anti-PRC rioters in Hong Kong and spread a conspiracy theory – just as ludicrous as its claims of large-scale cheating in the November elections – that Beijing was persecuting Muslim Uyghurs in the country’s northwest.

The other features of the Trump administration’s foreign policy include a drive towards a U.S. war on Iran, increased support to the Saudi monarchy’s brutal war on Yemen and encouragement of its Israeli ally to conduct an even more murderously severe persecution of the Palestinian people. Meanwhile, Trump and Co. loosened the already very nominal requirements that U.S. pilots and drone operators had to minimise civilian casualties in air strikes, leading to even more carnage of civilian women, children and men in U.S. military strikes in Afghanistan, Syria and Iraq and drone strikes in Pakistan and Yemen.

Yet Biden’s planned foreign policy agenda is not fundamentally different. On the key aspect of Trump’s international agenda of Cold War against Red China, Biden is at one with Trump. The election campaign saw the two try to outbid each other in their hostile promises against the PRC. And while Biden’s China policy may end up being a little less hysterical, let’s not forget that Biden branded PRC president Xi Jinping a “thug” during the election debates – an extraordinary statement by a presidential frontrunner about the leader of a country that the U.S. is not officially at war with. In the end, U.S. foreign policy depends not primarily on the personal preferences or character of who is president but on the interests of the U.S. capitalist class that any administration serves. And America’s capitalists cannot tolerate the presence of a socialistic superpower because it undermines their ability to superexploit the peoples of the developing world and because it potentially gives their own masses “bad ideas” – that is, the knowledge that there is an alternative to the misery and insecurity that they endure under capitalism. That is why whether it is Trump or Biden or even a hypothetical more progressive president like Bernie Sanders, whoever presides over capitalist rule in the U.S. will be waging an aggressive Cold War against socialistic China. Indeed, today, the most progressive Democrats like Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fully enlist in the imperialist campaign of lies against China over Muslim Uyghurs in China’s northwestern Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and are strident supporters of the anti-communist, anti-China opposition in Hong Kong.

Left: Then Vice President under Barack Obama, Joe Biden hails the U.S./NATO regime change intervention in Libya during a speech in New Hampshire on 20 October 2011. Right: Libyan children survey the destruction to a school following a NATO air strike. The imperialist forces murdered tens of thousands of Libyan people in their 2011 operation. No less than Trump, Joe Biden is a dangerous imperialist warmonger
Photo credit photo on right: Reuters/Caren Firouz
As per research made on patients, urinary tract infection Changes in vision such as blurring Kamagra medication is a generic medication of the brand name of the medicine Discover More Here order cheap levitra. These medicines may be available as Kamagra, levitra price , Silagra and others are essentially PDE-5 inhibitors. Reason for impotence or not being able to get an erection without any stimulation even if you have taken see here viagra samples from doctor. One major contributor cialis uk http://amerikabulteni.com/2019/05/17/okumaya-hic-vaktimiz-yok-ama-her-gun-bir-roman-okuyoruz/ to a decrease in sexual desire.

Similarly, because Biden – and indeed the more progressive members of his party – are members of a party that embraces capitalists and is funded largely by wealthy donors, he will preside over a regime that like Trump will seek to keep employment conditions “flexible” for the bosses, while continuing to allow the capitalists the “freedom” to hire as few workers as they want and to retrench workers whenever their bottom line demands it. Although Biden has promised to roll back some of Trump’s measures further excluding the poor from health care, his platform rejects anything approaching universal, free health care. It is true that the most progressive of the Democrats do support Medicare (public health insurance) for all. However, they refuse to stand for the bringing of the health sector itself into public ownership. That means that while their proposed schemes would be a big advance on the current system where millions are denied basic health coverage, their program would mean that an even more enormous portion of the public budget would end up subsidising the infamously exorbitant profits extracted by American pharmaceutical companies and corporate X-ray, pathology, physiotherapy and medical centre operators (this corporate profiteering is so extreme that the U.S. spends a much larger proportion of its national income on health care than other wealthy countries while having inferior health outcomes). As a result, the plans of the progressive Democrats are sure to continue to incite strident opposition from taxpayers from the middle class and better-paid sections of the working class whose taxes would end up subsidising the greedy, capitalist health sector operators while the latter would continue to laugh all the way to the bank. That means that a Democrat administration, even with the maximum possible “pressure” of progressive Democrats, is unlikely to be able to push through anything much better than the half-baked reforms favoured by Biden.

Biden did distinguish himself from Trump by not outright condemning the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests and instead claimed to share concerns about racism. However, this was largely cynical politicking. Rejecting calls to defund the police, Biden even called for more funding for police during the presidential debates with Trump. Indeed, Biden has a despicable record of enforcing the racial oppression of black people. As a senator in the mid-1970s, Biden spearheaded opposition to the anti-segregation busing program to bus black kids into better-funded white schools. His racist activities helped ultimately to defeat the anti-segregation program. During a 2019 fundraiser for his presidential bid, Biden even boasted of his close relationship with two white supremacist politicians notorious for their rabid insistence on racial segregation. Inside, Biden has much of the same racist flesh that Trump is full of but masks this in order to get the black vote and to channel in support from the popular anti-racist movement. No one should be under any illusion too that more progressive and black Democrats would pressure Biden into actually doing something meaningful to alleviate the racial subjugation of black people. Following on from the horrific days of slavery, the forcible confinement of black (and increasingly brown) people today as a persecuted, largely very low-paid, last-hired, first-fired layer of the workforce provides a huge source of cheap labour to America’s capitalist bosses. The profits of big sections of the capitalist class
– and indeed the economic stability of their system – relies on this racist status quo being maintained. So all parties that include capitalists, that rely on funding from the corporate bigwigs and which uphold the capitalist order – which means both the Republicans and the Democrats along with all their respective factions – are completely incapable of ending the all-sided racial subjugation of black people. During the presidency of Democrat Barack Obama, America’s only ever black president, U.S. cops killed over 1,000 people every year – disproportionately black, Hispanic and poor.

America’s “Democracy” is a Dictatorship of the Capitalists,
a Democracy for the Rich.
But We Must Mobilise to Oppose Fascist Attacks on It

The violent storming of the Capitol has been described by U.S. ruling class politicians and the American and Australian mainstream media as an “attack on America’s great democracy” and “a violation of the people’s house.” But let’s get real! America far from being a democracy for all is a tyranny of the tycoons. A system where all people have equal real power would not allow a few capitalists to acquire staggering wealth while consigning hundreds of thousands of people to sleeping on the streets as occurs in the “United States”. America’s political system is one that locks up poor, black and otherwise non-white skinned people in such astounding numbers that the country has by far the greatest number of people in prison in the world, despite having less than a quarter of China’s population. The USA’s prison population is so huge that it is about the same as the entire population of Brisbane!

Regardless of who wins elections, the state enforcement organs in the U.S. – the police, the National Guard, the FBI, CIA, the military, prisons, courts and the bureaucracy – are completely tied to and subordinate to the capitalist exploiters of labour. That is why these bodies attack protests for racial equality and the picket lines of striking workers. It is why the FBI and police assassinated Black Panther Party (BPP) leader, Fred Hampton, in 1969 and later dozens of other BPP activists. It is why the National Guard shot dead four Kent State University students in their 4 May 1970 massacre of students protesting against the U.S. military’s expansion of its war in Vietnam. It is why the U.S. military invades Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and many other countries in wars that help American tycoons secure greater resources and markets but which are completely against the interests of the U.S. working class – not to mention the peoples of the invaded countries. Far from being a democracy for all, democracy under capitalism is a dictatorship of the capitalist class over the toiling masses.

Theoretically in capitalist “democracies,” like the U.S., everyone has an equal right to engage in politics and an equal vote in elections. But even if that were actually the case and union, leftist and anti-racist movements were not subjected to repression, surveillance and intimidation, such a reality would still be terribly biased against working class people. For even if everyone has the same political rights, it is the rich capitalists who are able – greatly disproportionate to their numbers – to shape political opinion and swing elections through their ownership of the news media, publishing houses, movie studios and social media companies as well as through their disproportionate ability to fund political parties, pay for political advertising, finance and thus control the arts sector, hire lobbyists and fund “independent” think thanks. As in Australia, elections in the U.S. are all about big money. They are in good part decided by the relative ability of rival candidates to attract money from rich donors. In the recent runoff elections for two senate seats in Georgia alone, largely super wealthy, political donors poured in over $A570 million (i.e. $US443 million) to the Democrat and Republican parties! In practice “democracy” under capitalism is more like a million dollars for a million votes rather than one person, one vote!

So let’s be clear: although we strongly oppose the fascist-led invasion of the Capitol building that is not because we have sympathy for America’s democracy for the rich. Our opposition is entirely because the Capitol was stormed by the wrong people for the wrong reason. If instead, for example, people fighting against racist oppression of black people had stormed the Capitol we would be fully supporting and cheering such an action. Mind you, the anti-racist movement would need much greater forces and the power of the organised workers movement behind it to pull off such an action. For we sure won’t have any collusion from any of the regime forces like the far-right rioters did on January 6. Indeed, if leftist or anti-racist protesters had stormed the Capitol with just the same forces as the white supremacists did on January 6, we would likely have been massacred by the cops and National Guard.

However, we should not be indifferent to the political form through which capitalists exert their power. Parliamentary democracy under capitalism, as fraudulent is the claim that it is “a democracy for all”, does allow working class people comparatively greater freedoms than those that exist when capitalist rule is administered through a military dictatorship or outright fascism. So while the working class and oppressed are still totally disenfranchised in even the most liberal of capitalist parliamentary democracies, this particular form of capitalist rule nevertheless allows the masses relatively greater opportunities to organise to fight to defend their rights – and eventually to topple the capitalist order itself. That means that we must oppose attacks on capitalist parliamentary democracy and its institutions by the Far Right – such as when fascist-led forces on January 6 attempted to use violent intimidation to overturn the results of last November’s presidential elections. Any such trampling on capitalist democracy by extreme right-wing forces would necessarily be accompanied by a curtailing of democratic rights for the masses. It is telling that in the call outs for the January 6 right-wing mobilisation, organisers not only demanded the return of Trump as president for another four years but also demanded that Antifa (the name given to left-wing staunch anti-fascist groups) be declared a terrorist group. In other words, the January 6 rampage was in part an action pushing for a crackdown on the Left. Moreover, if Trump had been restored to presidency through the action of extreme racist forces – some of whom were carrying the Confederate flag of slavery while others sported racist tattoos and t-shirts (including ones hailing the Nazi Holocaust of Jewish people) – he would have necessarily been pushed to implement, still more savagely, the most racist aspects of his agenda. Indeed, after January 6, neo-Nazi groups that took part in the riot jubilantly declared that the action represented the “beginning of the start of the white revolution” – in other words the start of a systematic, more extreme subjugation, expulsion and mass murder of black, yellow and brown-skinned peoples.

We Can Never Rely on the Capitalist State to
Stop Violent Far Right Attacks

Left: A policeman poses for a selfie with one of the far-right rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol building. The storming, occupation and vandalising of the Capitol could not have occurred without the complicity of some sections of the American regime’s forces. Right: In contrast to the way that they dealt with the fascist and ultra-conservative Capitol rioters, U.S. police are notorious for unleashing savage violence against black rights protesters. Here police place Nakia Wallace, an organiser with Detroit Black Lives Matter movement, in a chokehold during a 10 July 2020 protest.
Photo credit for photo on right: Adam J. Dewey

With the type of extreme right-wing forces that stormed the Capitol expected to attempt new attacks over the coming days on the institutions, symbols and representatives of capitalist democracy, politically aware workers, black liberation activists and leftists must organise to oppose these attacks. We cannot rely on the capitalist state to resist these attacks. We saw where that leads on January 6! The biggest factions of the capitalist class were stunned by the events of January 6 and are now determined to more forcefully defend their own institutions against their own fascist attack dogs. However, the will and ability of capitalist state institutions to oppose fascist violence is severely undermined by the presence of a large number of far-right rednecks within the police, National Guard and military. Although people join U.S. enforcement institutions for a variety of reasons, a good number enlist because they are racist reactionaries who want a chance to be able to attack leftists and beat – and even kill – black, brown and yellow-skinned people in a “legal” way. More fundamentally, the mainstream capitalist state institutions serve the same capitalist class just like the fascists do. That is the main reason why the state organs are so soft on violent far-right forces. Imagine an owner of two big attack dogs. One is his currently preferred dog who he keeps on a very long leash. This dog is cute looking but terrifyingly cruel when the owner sets it upon his opponents. The other is an ugly, fierce and nasty dog that gives him a bad name with other dog owners. This dog the owner keeps on a short leash for the moment. The owner still wants to have this nasty dog in case he is feeling vulnerable and his favoured dog is unable to attack his enemies savagely enough. The owner is analogous to the mainstream of the capitalist class and their regime, the dog on the very long leash to the institutions of capitalist “democracy” and the nasty dog on the short leash is like the fascists. Now if the nasty dog turns on the owner’s presently favoured dog, the owner will of course want to break up the fight between his dogs. However, although he would be most concerned to ensure that his currently favoured dog is not hurt at all he would still also do everything possible to ensure that his nasty dog in reserve is not injured too badly either. Such is the attitude of the capitalist class and their state to the fascists.

Given that, to the extent that they do not actually collude with the fascists, the American state enforcement organs will be arrayed to restrain fascist attacks on “democratic” institutions over the coming weeks, the worker/black/brown/Asian/leftist defence guards that must be mobilised to oppose the fascist threat should seek to take a military non-aggression posture towards these state organs. We would seek to avoid a physical clash with these enforcement organs while we and they are – somewhat nominally in their case – mobilised to protect the institutions of capitalist democracy from the fascists. At the same time we must ensure that our mass anti-fascist contingents remain completely independent from these state enforcement organs both politically and organisationally.

Especially given that the fascists are often armed with guns, the working class-based, anti-fascist defence squads that must be built should take advantage of the right to bear arms that exists in America – as granted by the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution – to acquire arms. Such multi-racial, workers-organised militias should coordinate with the left-wing and black militias that already exist. Building worker/black/people of colour militias is not only a task for the able-bodied people able to bear arms. Rather it is a political task requiring a mass mobilisation. For starters there needs to be a campaign of mass agitation to motivate the need to build armed militias to defend workers and oppressed peoples from fascist forces. Then people need to organise to reliably supply the guns, ammunition and other provisions needed to equip those carrying the guns in the multi-racial, anti-fascist militias. Others need to be involved in organising and communicating patrol and training rosters. Although, right now, anti-fascists outnumber the fascists in America, the latter are far better organised for physical combat, better trained and better armed. This needs to change fast!

Of course, we should also understand that the situation is highly fraught right now. We should avoid suicidally deploying contingents to areas where we would be outnumbered or outgunned by the fascists. The police, National Guard and military sure can’t be trusted to protect anti-fascists from fascists! Therefore, we should carefully select, from among the many sites where fascist provocations are planned, a few locations where we can concentrate our forces and be confident that we can mobilise sufficient strength to outnumber and outgun the fascist presence at those sites.

Now some social democrat leftists and progressive liberals would respond that our proposal is a bad strategy because it would divert the ruling class from targeting the violent Far Right at a time when the capitalist rulers are incensed with the July 6 far right riot. Such reformist leftists would no doubt argue too that pursuing the course that we are advocating would also allow the capitalist rulers to paint anti-fascists as being “as bad as” the fascists and would thus enable them to target the Left. However, such arguments are deeply flawed. For they assume that the capitalist rulers actually want to crush the fascists which, as we have explained, is definitely not the case. Moreover, if we lie low when the fascists confront the institutions of capitalist “democracy” and hope that this will ensure that the state enforcement organs do not target the Left, the very opposite will actually happen. Let’s take a reality check! All the current mobilisation of state forces in the U.S., the new restrictions on where “extremist” protests can be held, the precedents set in terms of “special” regulations and curfews and even the social media censorship, all of which are today nominally aimed against violent far-right forces will tomorrow be used against the Far Left, the staunch wing of the BLM movement and the workers movement. After all we constitute the main target of the capitalist state! In as much as the U.S. regime is seeking to put its fascist dogs back on their leashes and confine them to their designated spaces for the time being, it is merely a question of the capitalist rulers trying to put their own camp in order. But they are trying to put their camp in order so as to better attack our camp! So rather than doing nothing, if the workers movement, black liberation movement and Left mobilise our own forces to stop the expected fascist assaults on capitalist democratic institutions in the coming period then we can improve our level of organisation, self activity and militancy all the better to resist the coming crackdown on working class and progressive movements. Moreover, such activity will also improve our preparedness to defend black and other non-white minorities, LGBTIQ people, the BLM movement, our unions and the Left when the violent Far Right realise that they do not yet have the forces to displace mainstream state institutions and will return their focus back to their stock in trade of racist terror and violent attacks on the BLM movement and the Left.

The Fascist Threat Will Not End
With the Departure of Trump from the Presidency

The fascists and extreme conservatives did not have the forces to pull off their wished for coup on January 6. But if more sections of the capitalist class were behind them and they had larger, more centralised militias, then the January 6 coup could have been a step towards outright fascist rule. Fascism is a form of capitalist rule involving the complete smashing of all parties and organisations of the Left and working class (like trade unions). Beginning with a coup on January 6 that overturns the November election result and then bans “Antifa” (i.e the Far Left), fascist militias could then have started cracking down on broader and broader sections of the Left and then moved onto breaking up our trade unions (or imposing fascist leaders on these unions and thus converting them into completely pliant bodies unrecognisable from their current state). Let’s recall that Hitler’s Nazis began turning their parliamentary influence into fascist rule by first brutally smashing the Communist Party of Germany and then attacking more moderate left parties, the trade unions and Jewish, Roma and other ethnic minorities.

As events in the days following January 6 have shown, at the moment the majority of the capitalist exploiting class in the U.S. do not want to abandon parliamentary democracy in favour of the fascist form of capitalist rule. Even as trust in government evaporates, the pretensions of “democracy” remain an effective way for the capitalist exploiting class to trick the masses into believing that they actually have influence on the direction of society. Additionally, should the U.S. capitalists embrace the fascist form of rule it would undermine their ability to meddle in countries abroad under the pretext of fighting for “democracy.” Moreover, if the bulk of the capitalist class were to try to impose fascist rule it entails great risks for them. For such an attempt could provoke staunch resistance from the working class masses that could end up with the capitalists being toppled from power!

It is only when they feel especially vulnerable that the capitalists begin to consider abandoning the “democratic” form of their rule over the masses. A crisis of capitalism indeed exists right now, which is why some sections of the capitalist class are supporting far-right forces. These are frequently the capitalists who feel most insecure in their social and economic position. They are often smaller-scale bosses exploiting a lesser number of – and in some cases just a tiny handful of – workers. They feel that to make a decent profit they need wages and workers’ conditions driven down even further which can only be achieved by crushing union and leftist organising. Moreover, they want to super-exploit low-paid, black and immigrant labour even more, which requires black and brown people to be terrorised by more severe racist attacks and more open discrimination in order to make black and migrant workers fearful and compliant enough to accept still crueller working conditions. Meanwhile, even though the national-centred leaders of socialistic China do little to support the class struggle in the U.S. and other capitalist countries, capitalists are all too aware that the mere presence of such a large state where workers rule – in however deformed a way – and where socialistic public ownership plays the dominant role is a threat to both their own rule at home and their ability to exploit the peoples of South and Central America, Africa, Asia and the Middle East. Some U.S. capitalists have thus concluded that they need to be even more aggressive in their Cold War – or even launch a hot war – against Red China, which they know can only be prosecuted by unleashing fiercer repression of the Left at home in order to ensure that there is complete domestic unanimity for the difficult task of confronting a workers state that happens to be the most populous country in the world.

For all of the above reasons, some in the capitalist class are providing violent far-right groups with money and other forms of material support, while some sections of the capitalist media legitimise them. Some of the capitalists backing extreme right-wing forces have not yet decisively decided to go down the road of fascism but are ensuring that they have the option to go down that road in the future. Trump is an example of and a representative of this section of the capitalist class. From his statement that there were “very fine people” among the white supremacist thugs who murderously rampaged in Charlottesville, Virginia in August 2017 to his legitimisation of attacks on BLM protests by Proud Boys fascist militia, to his incitement of the January 6 riot to his praise of the fascist-led rioters that “we love you, you’re very special,” Trump has certainly appealed to and sought to ally himself with fascist forces. He has been more than flirting with the idea of ditching the norms of capitalist democracy – including by trying to stay in the presidency after losing last November’s elections. However, as his later condemnation of the January 6 rioters showed, Trump is not yet willing to irrevocably turn his back on using capitalist “democracy”. In a way, Trump’s schizophrenic attitude to capitalist democracy personifies the vicious internal conflicts within the U.S. ruling class. The capitalist rulers are split between, on the one end, those like Biden and the Democrats who still basically advocate parliamentary democracy and, on the other end, a smaller section who want outright fascism. In between these ends, there are numerous intermediate positions respectively held by various members of the capitalist elite, including the one occupied by the hard-right, influential owner of Fox News, Australian billionaire Rupert Murdoch.

Beijing, June 2017: China’s next generation “Fuxing” bullet train at Beijing South Railway Station about to make its debut into service. China has the world’s best and fastest high speed rail system whose length of high speed rail lines makes up 60% of the world’s entire high speed rail. As they worry about the emergence of a socialistic power in the Peoples Republic of China, as their own system decays and as they take fright at the bitter grievances of their own population, the U.S. ruling class is tearing itself to pieces as it scrambles to find a strategy that will best protect its rule of exploitation.

After the January 6 storming of the Capitol failed to put Trump back in the presidency, Trump and the hard-right section of the ruling class have been on the back foot in the face of a political offensive by liberal and mainstream conservative members of the Congress, of the corporate elite and of the media. These factions of the ruling class as well as many honest liberal and left-leaning people amongst the masses hope that the coming end of Trump’s presidency will see the demise of the hard-right politics pushed by Trump. Unfortunately, this will not happen. As we have explained, the rise of extreme right-wing movements comes from the crisis of capitalism itself. This will not change no matter what happens to Trump personally.

Who Are the Mass Base of the Far Right?

August 2017: Violent racists rampage through the streets of Charlottesville, Virginia. In the present absence of a powerful revolutionary working class movement, the decay of U.S. capitalism and the consequent insecurity of the middle classes are leading to the frightening growth of fascist forces in the USA. The rise of these fascists preceded the advent of Trump to the presidency but accelerated during his term in office.

In order to impose fascist rule on a country, those sections of the capitalist class that choose to go down that road cannot do it by themselves. They are too small in number for that. In “normal” times the capitalists have their state organs to enforce their rule. Their cops, courts, National Guard, military, prisons and spy agencies are effective tools to murderously enforce their interests abroad and to suppress the resistance of the masses at home. However, under fascist rule the working class and oppressed and their struggles will not just be repressed: all their organisations will be violently smashed. The existing state organs are not fully up to such a task. After all, while enforcing capitalist exploitation, “democratic” capitalist state organs still have to pretend that they are there “to serve all the people” in an “impartial” manner. To wage a brazen class war against the organisations and activists of the working class and other subjugated sections of society, the exploiting class need an additional, more fanatical force. That mass force is provided by fascist militias consisting primarily of backward, ultra-reactionary members of the middle class.

In summary, fascism as a movement (rather than when the word is used to describe a form of political rule) is a mass movement of those sections of the middle class – or to use the more precise Marxist term, the petit bourgeoisie – who in a time of capitalist crisis are whipped into extreme opposition to the struggles of the working class, oppressed communities and the Left. The petit bourgeois are members of that class of society who are neither exploiters of labour – i.e. they are not capitalists – nor are they people whose labour is directly exploited by capitalists (in other words they are not wage workers). This very diverse class includes not only people who are traditionally thought of as “middle class” – small business owners not using hired labour, accountants, doctors, low-level managers, architects, engineers, self-employed computer programmers, lawyers and farmers – but also other self-employed people who are often colloquially referred to as “working class” but who are actually part of the petit bourgeoisie because of their self-employed/contracting means of earning an income. The latter include those “tradies” (plumbers, electricians, handymen, carpenters, tilers etc) who are self-employed, as well truck drivers owning their own truck and self-employed cleaners, hairdressers and landscape gardeners. Due to their often intermediate position within the class conflict between capitalist bosses and workers, members of the petit bourgeoisie can end up lining up behind either one of these two main classes.

For much of the petit bourgeoisie, especially lower income sections of this class, it is overwhelmingly in their interests to stand behind the working class struggle against capitalism. After all, they are hurt by capitalism in many ways. If they are self employed they are often bullied by the banks or the big landlords from whom they rent their business premises from. Skilled personnel (or, for instance, owner truck drivers) having their own business and relying on contracts from corporations for their income are often ripped off by the latter. Meanwhile, capitalism creates economic instability and crises which causes great hardships for many parts of the petit bourgeoisie. The children of the petit bourgeoisie can often end up being part of the exploited working class. However, in “normal” times the petit bourgeoisie tend to be conservative and follow the capitalist class. Here, in Australia, the petit bourgeoisie overwhelmingly vote for the Liberal-National Party or parties further to the right. In the U.S. they have been largely backing Trump. Because this class does not have much social power – it is hard for them, for example, to unite like workers at a workplace to stand up to a capitalist boss – they tend to follow the main class that is stronger at any given time. Many a petit bourgeois self-employed business owner hopes to gain enough profits to one day hire labour – i.e. become a capitalist – and make still greater profits from exploiting these workers. Meanwhile, the higher income sections of the petit bourgeoisie have enough money to invest in shares and, therefore, see their interests as being aligned with the big capitalist shareholders of corporations.

There are also some sections of the petit bourgeoisie – including highly educated sections working in “intellectual” pursuits – who are currently more small-l liberal in their outlook. Take, for example, the accountant at a manufacturing company who gets on well with the shop-floor process workers and secretly despises the greedy business owner and the arrogant top managers who act as the owner’s henchmen. However, when there is conflict between the unionised workers and the boss, the accountant does not want to openly side with the workers fearing that she will lose her relatively well-paying job. So the accountant stays quiet and wishes, quite hopelessly, that “everyone can get on” and there will be peace between the bosses and the factory workers, so that she is not squashed in the middle. Such is the economic basis for the small-l liberal outlook within some sections of the educated petit bourgeoisie.

Today the petit bourgeoisie is suffering from much insecurity. The deep recession triggered by the pandemic has ruined many a small business in the U.S. – and to some extent Australia too – and brought many more to the brink of ruin. Even before the pandemic hit, the truth is that the capitalist economies never fully recovered from the late noughties Global Recession and many a self-employed person has been terrified by such an economic collapse ever since. Meanwhile, a large number of self-employed “tradies” have stopped receiving enough contracts from corporations to make ends meet. Far-right demagogues have been able to exploit all these insecurities to mobilise the most politically backward section of the petit bourgeoisie into a fanatical hatred of the struggles and advocacy organisations of the working class, oppressed black people and the Left. Since it is far harder for the petit bourgeoisie to kick upwards at the powerful capitalists – whose system is the real cause of their hardships – reactionary sections of the petit bourgeoisie are led to kick downwards savagely at the working class and oppressed below them. Workers’ strikes, climate change direct actions, BLM struggles and other staunch left-wing street protests are blamed for impeding the flow of supplies and products to their businesses, for increasing their insurance costs and for otherwise disrupting their operations. Meanwhile, they are whipped into an irrational frenzy against overseas producers, against supposedly “unfair” competition from China and against racial minorities and refugees – all of whom are scapegoated for the petit bourgeoise’s economic difficulties or blamed for soaking up their tax dollars. Those vulnerable to such demagogy include former wage workers who have been retrenched from their jobs and have now been involuntarily forced into opening self-employed businesses or contracting in order to make ends meet. Vulnerable in their new vocation, some a few years after being retrenched and many episodes of watching Fox-News-documentaries later, forget that it was capitalists who initially put them in their precarious current position; and consequently – especially since their new self-absorption in their own individual business has gradually thinned their ties with their former worker mates and drawn them ever more into an individualistic, self-obsessed outlook – fall for crazy claims blaming oppressed communities, imported goods and that all purpose bogey man, Red China, for their precarious situation.

One crucial reason that the frustrations of the middle class can be channelled against the working class and other oppressed sectors is that the petit bourgeois fears that if those below them demand and win greater rights, they will lose their relatively privileged position in comparison with these layers and even end up being plunged into the same social position that working class people currently endure. Although union struggles for workers rights are, at the moment, at an all too low level in the U.S., struggles for black liberation have a similar effect upon reactionary parts of the white petit bourgeoisie. This is especially the case since black people are not only a community facing racist persecution but are, in their majority, a group forcibly pushed to the lowest income layers of the working class. Insecure petit bourgeois right-wingers irrationally fear that if black people are able win greater rights and are able to free themselves from discrimination, the white middle class will end up not only being displaced from their current social position but will be forced to replace working class blacks at the bottom of society. Hence the obsession of the Far Right with ridiculously asserting that as a result of “reverse discrimination” it is white middle class people who are actually oppressed!

There is a particular feature of the contemporary Far Right that is more pronounced than in earlier fascist movements. And that is that they are a very male movement not just in composition but in prejudices. Petit bourgeois males have their economic insecurities magnified by fears that the privileged position of men over women in capitalist societies is threatened by women’s rights movements and anything that smacks of giving women greater rights: from abortion rights to affirmative action programs to women fighting back against workplace sexual harassment. Thus similar to, albeit less fanatical than, their hostility to black liberation struggles, the right-wing portion of the male petit bourgeoisie is fervently opposed to women’s rights movements which they fear will plunge them down to the oppressed position of women.  

In addition to reactionary sections of the petit bourgeoisie, there are two other components of the mass base of fascists. One is those sections of the impoverished, unemployed population who are isolated from the working class movement. This especially includes former self-employed petit bourgeois or even small-scale capitalist exploiters whose businesses have gone bust and are now forced to join the ranks of the unemployed. Then there are skilled professionals and former lower and middle managers who because of their relatively high pay have been among the first to be laid off when companies decide to downsize. Since all these layers would likely never have had a pro-working class outlook, they are prone to somehow blame the working class and oppressed communities for their plight. In contrast, those newly unemployed workers who retain ties to the union movement or to current wage workers are more likely to blame the bosses and the corporations for their situation. However, some longer term unemployed workers who have gradually been isolated over the years from existing wage workers can easily fall prey to demagogues blaming racial minorities for “taking our jobs.”

Like the petit bourgeoisie, isolated unemployed people can often be influenced by right-wing conspiracy theories. Whereas workers, especially those at bigger worksites, have their trusted co-workers to bounce ideas off several times a week and through collective in-person discussion weed out theories that are obviously whacko, isolated unemployed people and self-employed petit bourgeois often do not have the chance to have such frequent in-person discussions with large numbers of trusted people. Their source of ideas and discussion is the internet and social media intercourse rather than real world discussion with people that they actually know well in the real world. Naturally then, crazy conspiracy theories that would not hold up to serious scrutiny in the real world can infect their minds.

A final group that adds to the mass base of the Far Right are current and retired police, prison guards, military soldiers and National Guard troops. Extreme right-wing ideologies give these people solace by “justifying” their repression of workers struggles, the black rights movement and the Left at home and, in the case of military personnel, their participation in the Cold War drive against socialistic China. Moreover, by fanatically opposing those leftists and black rights activists who protest police, prison guard and military atrocities, fascists gain favour with these state enforcement personnel.

Right-wing sections of the petit bourgeoisie, current and former police, soldiers and prison guards, smaller-scale capitalist exploiters and those sections of the unemployed isolated from the workers movement, these were indeed the mass base of Hitler’s Nazis. And today they are the mass base of fascist movements in both the U.S. and Australia. This is confirmed by information trickling out about those arrested in the July 6 far-right riot. They include several small business owners, a CEO of a small company, a self-employed furniture maker married to a doctor, a real estate broker, an insurance company’s lawyer, a West Virginia politician, a lecturer, the son of a retired local supreme court judge, an army captain, a retired Air Force officer, a former Navy SEAL and two currently serving police officers.  

Since the embittered petit bourgeoisie mobilised behind extreme right-wing movements have much anger at the current state of society, far-right demagogues must espouse an “anti-establishmentarianism” to win the trust of their base. Trump promised to “drain the swamp” in Washington, a term he used to signal opposition to corrupt high-ranking government bureaucrats. Often outright fascist leaders also appeal to the petit bourgeoisie’s and small-scale capitalists’ fury at being bullied by the banks and big capital by promising to the curb the power of finance capital. Hitler claimed hostility to the banks. However, given that it is only the working class that has the power to successfully fight against the most powerful capitalists – the finance capitalists – and given that fascist movements are all about smashing working class political action, anti-working class mass movements of the petit bourgeoisie, i.e. fascist forces, have no ability to resist the power of finance capital. Moreover, in the absence of the working class leading a struggle to overthrow the capitalists, both the petit bourgeoisie and small-scale capitalist exploiters – the people who make up the mass base of the fascists – despite all their resentment about the banks, are economically dependent on the finance capitalists. As a result, fascist movements promising their base that they would both, on the one hand, crush the workers movement and oppressed peoples and, on the other hand, bring finance capitalists into line, are left only being able to deliver on their first promise and far from being able to deliver on their second one, end up being the most extreme enforcers of the interests of all the capitalists – including the bankers, fund managers and insurance bosses. In the end, the supposed “anti-establishmentarianism” of the Far Right is actually an opposition to the “establishment” making any concession, however small, to the struggles of the working class and oppressed peoples. It is the “rebelliousness” of carrying the Confederate flag which is a “rebellion” against any move to reduce the discrimination and segregation suffered by black people and in literal terms actually a “rebellion” against the ending of slavery! It is an “anti-government” opposition to governments collecting taxes to fund even the most minimal medical insurance for some of the poor. In reality the Far Right’s “anti-establishmentarianism” is really an ultra-establishmentarianism!

Mobilising Against the Fascist Threat Will
Advance the Struggle for Workers Rule

Although those capitalists moving towards opting for the fascist road do currently back violent far-right groups, the two components leading towards fascism – the movement of a section of the capitalist class towards support for ruling through the fascist form and the assembly of a mass fascist base centred on the reactionary portion of the petit bourgeoisie – can develop somewhat independently. Fascist leaders may for a while be able to sell to their petit bourgeois and small-scale capitalist base that they are independent of the big capitalists. However, at a certain point, when decisive sections of the capitalist class decide that they have no option but to take the fascist path, the anti-democracy wing of the capitalist class comes together with the fascist mass movement based on the petit bourgeoisie. Thus an important step in the ascendancy of Hitler’s Nazis to power was when in November 1932, twenty-two leading German finance, industrial and agricultural capitalists signed a petition – the infamous Industrielleneingabe – demanding that then German president Hindenburg make Nazi head, Hitler, the chancellor.

Right now in the U.S., the amount of workers struggle has not reached a level that could either scare the majority of the capitalist class to abandon support for capitalist “democracy” or to drive the mass of the embittered petit bourgeoisie into supporting fascist movements. However, this could change very quickly. Moreover, as we saw on January 6, the crisis of capitalism is at such a level that it has already driven a sizeable minority of the petit bourgeoisie, smaller-scale capitalists and state enforcement personnel into extreme right-wing movements. And Joe Biden becoming president is not going to change this! Although the Democrats now securing control of the Senate will allow the incoming Biden administration to pass a big stimulus bill and the roll out of vaccines will gradually ease the suffering caused by the pandemic, the deeper, longer term crisis of capitalism remains. This crisis will continue to threaten the livelihoods of not only the working class and the very poor but also self-employed people. Meanwhile, with Biden, or even the most progressive Democrats, having no program whatsoever to stop capitalists from retrenching workers at will or from confining their hiring to casual positions, more and more workers unable to gain secure wage-earning jobs will be pushed into establishing unviable new businesses in order to have a hope of gaining a livelihood. All this will ensure that there will be plenty of insecure self-employed business owners and smaller-scale capitalists heading into the ranks of fascist outfits. The fact that Biden, who fully supports capitalism, will not be able to fundamentally close the massive gap in wealth between the rich and poor in America will mean that the capitalists and their media will need to promote racism and protectionism in order to divide and divert the exploited masses and stop them uniting against their common capitalist enemy. Such propaganda will serve to legitimise fascist movements.

Indeed, the fact that Trump will no longer be president will likely accelerate the conversion of right-wing conservatives into outright fascists. With right-wing conservatives now seeing that they have no vehicle for their agenda through the “democratic” process they are more likely to resort to violent means. This trend will be further intensified by the reality that many far-right activists feel betrayed by Trump who, under pressure from leaders of his own Republican Party, eventually condemned the January 6 rioters. This is likely to lead to many extreme conservatives concluding that even their best-case president could not satisfy their “aspirations” and that, therefore, democracy should be completely rejected and the full fascist agenda should be embraced.

However, it does not need to be this way. When the working class show that they are able to not only protest and strike for better rights but are strong enough to actually challenge for political power, the petit bourgeois now streaming towards the fascists will think twice. When they see that it is possible to challenge the big capitalist oppressor they will start to see that their fanatical squabbling with and bullying of layers of the oppressed more subjugated than them is pretty pointless. Why fight over crumbs when big slices of the cake are going to be retrieved for the benefit of all from the very few that were hoarding them! The formerly far-right portions of the petit bourgeoisie will then start to become politically neutral. Meanwhile, the more progressive sections of the petit bourgeois masses will rush enthusiastically into open support for the insurgent working class. The worker-friendly accountant who we spoke about earlier will now feel confident enough to openly declare her support for the workers struggle at her workplace and with delight will be able to finally show her capitalist boss what she really thinks of this greedy exploiter.

To finally get rid of the threat of a new Nazi-style regime gaining the ascendancy in the U.S., Australia or any other capitalist country we need to sweep away capitalist rule for good through socialist revolution. When we have a system of workers rule based on socialist public ownership of the means of production we will be able to put an end to unemployment, insecure work, inequality and economic crises. In other words we will be liberated from the economic conditions that spawn racism and fascism.

A socialist revolution cannot be prepared by mere propaganda or organised from scratch. It is prepared through the working class and other oppressed groups being mobilised in many partial struggles and in the course of these strengthening their unity, gaining greater confidence in their own power and, with the assistance of a revolutionary party, learning to distrust all parties and political institutions of the capitalist class and to, instead, see the need for themselves to collectively seize political power. This is why mobilising mass worker/black/leftist action against fascist attacks is especially crucial. For not only does such action resist the fascist threat, it also helps us to develop the organisation, discipline and activity needed to fight the incoming Biden administration and the capitalist class as a whole. Fascists still only make up a minority – albeit a quite significant one – of Trump’s supporters and a smaller minority of the whole population. They are still deeply hated by the majority of the population. So our trade unions, the black liberation movement and the Left have certain political space to develop and use certain means against the fascists – including armed militias and mass direct action to disperse fascist assemblies – that we cannot at this time use against the capitalist state. However, in unleashing such actions against the fascists we are organising and preparing ourselves for future staunch action to defend ourselves against the capitalist regime. It is worth noting that the immediate prelude to the October 1917 Russian socialist revolution was the Bolshevik-led workers mobilising direct action to defeat a far-right military coup led by general Lavr Kornilov. Because the active sections of the working class defeated the coup by their own mass action they gained the confidence in their own power, unity and organisational strength needed to seize state power less than two months later.

Of course, mobilising against the fascist threat is just one crucial component of the resistance that we must wage in the coming period. There also needs to be powerful class struggle action against job slashing by capitalist corporations. We must struggle for secure jobs for all workers by fighting to force all profitable companies to increasing hiring at the expense of their profits. Counterpoised to the Democrats minimal promised medical insurance reforms, we must demand completely free, high-quality public health care for all. Crucially, the workers movement must mobilise its industrial power to back black people’s struggle against racist state terror. We must build on the powerful action by U.S. dock workers on June 19 last year when they shut down all West Coast ports in solidarity with the BLM movement; and with the action of tens of thousands of fast food, ride-share, nursing home and airport workers in more than 25 cities who walked off the job on July 20 in opposition to racist police brutality.

Led by determined and capable black activists, the massive – and at times very militant – BLM protests in the U.S. summer of last year show the potential for staunch resistance against the racist, capitalist order in America. However, like other worker and progressive movements, the BLM movement dwindled as the election approached and waned further after Biden’s election. This shows how much illusions in the Democrats harm the struggle against exploitation and racism. Therefore, even as we need to mobilise to physically resist attacks from fascists who right now have Democrats as one of their main targets, we need to fight for a complete political break of the workers movement, the BLM movement and all progressive movements from the Democrats.

The U.S. Capitalist “Order” Suffers a
Big Blow to its International Prestige? Good!

The shock waves from the dramatic events of January 6 have reverberated around the world. The deep – and indeed violent – divisions within the U.S. ruling class have been exposed for the whole world to see. Although overall the January 6 riot is a terrible event in that it shows how emboldened violent far-right forces are, one important positive to take from the events is that it has been a blow to the prestige of America’s capitalist rulers. Their supposed “democratic” system has been proven to be weak, damaged and crisis ridden. This undermines their ability to meddle in other countries under the guise of “promoting democracy.” The Chinese government has rightly pointed out the hypocrisy of U.S. House speaker Nancy Pelosi who, while denouncing the January 6 rioters, had earlier praised the anti-PRC rioters [from the pro-colonial, rich people’s opposition in Hong Kong] storming and vandalising the Hong Kong parliament building as a “beautiful sight.”

Australia’s capitalist rulers are very worried that all this damage to the U.S. regime’s prestige will harm their own interests. The Australian capitalist class superexploits the peoples of the South Pacific and plunders their natural resources. However, they rely on the power of their U.S. big brother allies to guarantee this tyranny. Over the last few years, the Australian regime has chosen to put itself at the very forefront of the Western capitalist Cold War drive against socialistic China. They did so, however, on the premise that Washington would be right behind them. Now with Red China, by far Australia’s largest source of export income, finally pushing back, Australia’s rulers look at their rear view mirror for backing from their American big brothers… only to find that their big brothers are too busy beating each other up to stand up for their Aussie capitalist mates! Australia’s ABC News reported that when the January 6 riot was taking place, Australian politicians and foreign policy bureaucrats were glued to their televisions watching the events in horror.

Perth, 8 April 2018: Hard-right Liberal MP, Andrew Hastie, heads a rally calling for special refugee status for rich, white South African farmers. Not only was the demonstration attended by some of Australia’s most notorious far-right racists it was littered with openly white supremacist slogans including ones demanding, “Let the Right Ones In”, which is meant to mean to let only white people in and not dark-skinned refugees. Hastie is lionised by fascist groups for his championing of this white supremacist cause celebré (which was also championed by proudly racist, former federal MP, Fraser Anning), for his attacks on Australia’s Muslim community, for his fanatical opposition to Red China and for his strident calls to completely remove laws proscribing racist hate speech. And now the Morrison government has chosen this same Andrew Hastie to head an inquiry that is supposed to look into right-wing extremism in Australia! All he needs is a mirror!

Trump’s incitement of the January 6 riot and the thuggish behaviour of his supporters who invaded the Capitol have politically damaged many pro-Trump movements around the world. This includes the hard-right government of India led by Hindu chauvinist and mass murderer of Muslims, Narendra Modi. Another largely pro-Trump force is the pro-colonial, supposedly “pro-democracy,” opposition in Hong Kong. Many in this movement have carried pro-Trump slogans and most wanted Trump to win the November elections. The key figure and financier of the movement is far-right media billionaire, Jimmy Lai, known as Hong Kong’s Rupert Murdoch, whose news outlets have been unashamedly pro-Trump. Especially in the wake of the January 6 riots, the ardent support of the bulk of Hong Kong’s anti-PRC opposition to Trump exposes the fraudulent nature of their “pro-democracy” pretensions. Another fervently pro-Trump movement is the far-right Chinese pseudo-religious organisation, Falun Dafa, and its newspaper outlet, Epoch Times. Epoch Times has become a main force spreading all of Trump’s most ridiculous conspiracy theories from ones about the origins of COVID-19 to the one that helped incite the January 6 riot: that Trump was cheated out of victory in last November’s election. Indeed, the claims of Falun Dafa’s Epoch Times have been so ludicrous that even Youtube recently suspended for two weeks its Hong Kong edition, despite Falun Dafa’s fervently pro-Western agenda. People who recognise the completely fake nature of their conspiracy theories about the U.S. presidential elections should distrust all the other assertions pushed by Falun Dafa and Epoch Times – including the whacko claim that the Chinese government executed Falun Dafa prisoners to harvest organs for sale.

Support the Struggle Against Fascism and Capitalism in the U.S. by
Mobilising Against Australia’s Capitalist Rulers and the

Fascist Shock Troops That They Spawn

As the Australian regime’s main ally, events in the U.S. have a major effect on Australian politics. Current Australian prime minister, Scott Morrison, and many of Australia’s most powerful capitalists including Gina Rinehart and Anthony Pratt are close to Trump. It is undoubted that the advent of Trump to the presidency and the rise of the Far Right in America has emboldened fascist groups in Australia. Far-right MPs in Australia’s ruling Liberal-National coalition have been openly cheering Trump. Today these government politicians like George Christensen and Craig Kelly repeat many of the lies peddled by Trump – including claiming that the November election was stolen from him as well as repeating Trump’s earlier anti-scientific opposition to mask wearing as a means to slow the spread of the pandemic. Prime minister Morrison has pointedly refused to condemn these MPs for their statements. Meanwhile, deputy – and currently acting – prime minister, Michael McCormack, sought to downplay the January 6 riots and despicably equated this rampage by white supremacists with the BLM anti-racist protests.

Yet progressive struggles in the U.S. also shape this country. The BLM struggle in the U.S. in the middle of last year inspired the antiracist movement in this country. The weekend of June 6-7 saw the biggest anti-racist protests in Australia in a long time. Tens of thousands of people marched through Australian cities not only in solidarity with the BLM struggle in the U.S. but in opposition to racist state murders of Aboriginal people in custody.

The working class and oppressed of Australia face many similar lessons to our sisters and brothers in the USA. One lesson is the simple truth that capitalism breeds fascism. Although fascist forces here are currently not as organised as they are in the U.S., they are nevertheless already a substantial threat. They help incite the thousands of violent and verbal racist attacks that are perpetrated by garden-variety racists all the time in this country. Moreover, less than two years ago, an Australian white supremacist who was nurtured in the racist climate created by Australia’s capitalist society murdered 51 Muslim people in New Zealand’s Christchurch in the biggest single terrorist attack ever committed by an Australian individual.

Melbourne, April 2020: Despicable racist graffiti targets Australia’s Chinese community. Like in the U.S., middle class insecurity, mass unemployment and Cold War nationalism are fuelling the growth of violent racist forces. The last few years have seen a spate of attacks on Australia’s Chinese and other East Asian communities. Such attacks intensified further during the last year as the U.S.-Australia Cold War drive against socialistic China cranked up several gears.

Another crucial lesson that we should learn from U.S. events is that one cannot rely on the capitalist state to repulse the fascist threat, as was proven during the January 6 storming of the Capitol. There has been ample evidence of this here too. The Australian white supremacist shooter who perpetrated the Christchurch massacre was never monitored by the Australian Federal Police (AFP) or ASIO despite being very active online spewing racist filth and making threats. Instead the AFP and ASIO have been busy intimidating and raiding the offices of our trade unions – including the AWU and the CFMEU – and arresting whistleblowers who expose the atrocities of the Australian regime, including David McBride the former military lawyer who exposed the horrific war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan. They were also engrossed in persecuting socialist political prisoner, Chan Han Choi, who spent three years in prison without trial due to his sympathy for socialistic North Korea and is now under house arrest facing trial on charges of trying to organise trade deals to help the people of North Korea avoid cruel economic sanctions. It was a political choice by the AFP and ASIO to target the union movement, Chan Han Choi, whistleblowers and even journalists, rather than monitor the rabid white supremacist who would end up murdering 51 people.

Based on this recent history and examining the January 6 riot in Washington, we should have zero confidence that the inquiry into “extremist” groups in Australia that was reluctantly announced last month by the right-wing Morrison government will do anything meaningful to curb far-right violence in Australia. That inquiry was enacted by hard-right home affairs minister, Peter Dutton – the very same Peter Dutton who has been greatly responsible for inflaming racist sentiments through his overseeing of Australia’s cruel incarceration of refugees in offshore detention camps, through his statements inciting fear of African youth and by his rant that it was a mistake to let Lebanese Muslim migrants into Australia. Even more tellingly, the person chosen to head this inquiry is far-right Liberal MP, Andrew Hastie. This is the same Andrew Hastie who has criticised Australia’s Muslim community and who was lionised by fascist groups for his strident calls to completely remove laws proscribing racist hate speech. Moreover, this same Andrew Hastie champions the white supremacist cause celebre pushing for special refugee status for white South African farmers; a “cause” based on the racist myth that these farmers – often notorious for their brutal and sometimes murderous exploitation and repression of black farm workers – are facing “white genocide.” “Adolf” Hastie even led rallies demanding fast tracked visas for these rich white farmers. At these events, Hastie rubbed shoulders with some of Australia’s most notorious and violent fascists who, in turn, carried despicable white supremacist placards like, “Let the Right Ones In” [i.e. white South African farmers and not dark-skinned refugees] and “White Lives Matter.” And now this Andrew Hastie is heading an inquiry that is supposed to look at right-wing extremism in Australia! All he needs is a mirror! As in the U.S., we must not rely at all on capitalist politicians, capitalist institutions or the capitalist state to defeat the threat posed by violent far-right forces. We must rely only on mass mobilisations of the working class united will all the intended targets of the fascists.

Just as progressive struggles in the U.S. inspire struggles in Australia, if we mobilise actions here against fascist threats, against racist state terror against black people in this country, for increased hiring of workers at the expense of capitalist profits and against the U.S./Australia Cold War drive against socialistic China then this will encourage similar struggles in America. As black and brown people in the U.S., alongside Chinese people, Muslims, Jews, the workers movement and the Left face a heightened threat of fascist terror to go along with mass unemployment, low wages and the carnage caused by the American regime’s fatally flawed “response” to the pandemic, the best solidarity we can offer to our embattled sisters and brothers in the U.S. is to intensify our struggle here against the capitalist ruling class of Australia and the fascist shock troops that serve their interests.

Sydney, 8 February 2020: Workers at British-owned food delivery service, Hungry Panda, demonstrate against wage cuts and the sacking of workers who complained about poor treatment. The demonstrations and strikes by these workers, many of whom are of ethnic Chinese background, is one of the first examples of industrial action by gig economy workers in Australia. The united, multi-racial working class is not only the force that has the ability to resist capitalist exploitation but is the class that has both the necessity and power to smash the violent racist forces.

Israeli Terror Machine Supercharged by Trump’s Jerusalem Statement

Israeli Terror Machine Supercharged by Trump’s Jerusalem Statement

Oppose the U.S. and Australian Regimes that Support the Subjugation of Palestinian People

 

Israeli forces arrest a Palestinian youth during protests against Trump’s Jerusalem decision.

 

9 December 2017 – Israeli Air Force jets pounded Gaza overnight. They killed two Palestinian people and injured dozens of others. Several children were among those hurt. Hours earlier, Israeli troops shot dead two other people as they unleashed live fire ammunition on Palestinian protesters. The Israeli terror machine has been supercharged by Donald Trump’s announcement that the U.S. will recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

Trump’s statement openly legitimized Israel’s seizure of East Jerusalem and the rest of the West Bank (and Gaza) in 1967. Within America, Trump has been busy inciting a wave of violent fascist and redneck attacks against Muslims, blacks, Asians, Native Americans, gays, Jews and Hispanics. That’s what his racist, ultra-right wing rants against Muslims, Mexicans and other oppressed minorities have served to do. Now this capitalist billionaire has charged up the Israeli terror machine to churn out yet more savage crimes against the oppressed Palestinian people.

Palestinian people have responded with typically brave resistance. There have also been large protests across the Arab world as well as in Indonesia, Malaysia and Pakistan. Meanwhile, opponents of racist oppression have joined Palestinian and other Arab migrants in protests in Western cities too.

Fake Criticism of Trump’s Decision by Enemies of Palestinian Liberation

Netanyahu meets Turnbull in Australia
Netanyahu meets Turnbull in Australia

U.S.-allied governments in Australia, Britain, France and elsewhere have, rather cynically, made some criticisms of Trump’s decision.  But what the ruling class of Australia and co. really only object to is that Trump has so openly shown the Western imperial powers’ contempt for Palestinian people. Successive Australian governments – whether Liberal or ALP – have joined their Washington senior partner in steadfastly supporting Israel no matter how ghastly that regime’s crimes. They have proven their true stance on the Jerusalem issue by giving Israel the nod and the wink to implant hundreds of thousands of right-wing “settlers” in East Jerusalem and to divide up the West Bank with heavily fortified highways that Palestinians are not allowed to use.  Six weeks ago, prime minister Turnbull went to Israel to sign an agreement for still greater Australia-Israel defence co-operation. Today, all that he and other Western rulers have to worry about in Trump’s statement is that by being so brazen he will stir up Palestinian resistance, reduce Western influence in the region and trigger rebellions against Western-subordinated Arab governments.

Similarly, most capitalist governments in Arab countries have criticized Trump’s decision only in order to avoid ending up being targets of the anger of “their own” people. However, much of the masses of those countries can see right through this. They know that these governments have no intention of taking any real action in solidarity with Palestinian people. These governments are firmly tied to the imperialist bullies who they depend on not only for access to markets and technology but in order to help protect them from their own restive masses. The main, U.S.-backed Arab power, Saudi Arabia has been secretly co-operating on intelligence matters with Israel for years. Last month its aggressive, young leader Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman dropped a bombshell. Acting for the Trump regime, he secretly sought to pressure Palestinian Authority (PA) leader Mahmoud Abbas to accept an insulting “deal” which would see Palestinians get a “state” with only limited sovereignty, which would be geographically divided by the Israeli settlements in the West Bank – nearly all of which would remain – and where there would be no right of return for Palestinian refugees (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/03/world/middleeast/palestinian-saudi-peace-plan.html).

Yet, the PA leadership itself is under the grip of the Western imperialist powers. When Abbas met Trump in May, long after Trump had declared support to Israeli PM Netanyahu’s moves to further subjugate Palestinians, Abbas gushed to Trump that: “I believe we are capable under your leadership, courageous stewardship, and wisdom … to be true partners to bring about a historic peace treaty”! Today, Abbas is doing his best to hold back Palestinian resistance and restrict protest to formal statements of condemnation. However, the overwhelming calls from the Palestinian masses for a new Intifada may be too much for PA leaders to resist.

Cutting off Supply to the Israeli Killing Machine and Jamming It Up from Within

The bitter reality is that despite the courage of their resistance, the Palestinian people are heavily outgunned. They face an Israeli military that has been armed to the hilt by its imperialist backers. And they have been repeatedly stabbed in the back by the Arab capitalist governments that claim to support them. The force that can potentially decisively tip the balance in favour of the Palestinian people is the international workers movement – including the working class movements in the Arab countries. As a force that stands against its own exploitation, the working class naturally has an interest in supporting all those – like the Palestinian people – who are downtrodden by the same capitalist world order that oppresses them. The working class around the world must demand: No moving of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem! No theft of Jerusalem by the Zionist occupiers! All Israeli troops and settlers out of all of the West Bank and Gaza! Working class protest action must ramp up to industrial action targeting the imperialist ruling classes in the U.S., Britain, Australia and elsewhere that are fueling the Israeli terrorist machine.

2011 Israeli Leftists Protest
Over 300,000 in Israel back in 2011 protested against social inequality and high costs of living.

The working class within Israel itself could act to undermine the fanatical Zionist agenda. Although the Zionist ruling class claims to stand for all Jewish people, it like every other capitalist class exploits its own workers. To be sure, the massive subsidies that the U.S. and other Western governments have provided to Israel have allowed the Israeli working class to obtain a significantly higher standard of living than their neighbors. This is of course a conservatizing force and makes it harder to win significant sections of the Israeli working class to take the side of the Palestinian resistance. Yet the Jewish masses in Israel still suffer most of the hardships of capitalism. Israel has one of the highest levels of inequality. Even excluding the subjugated Palestinian people in the Occupied Territories, Israel has more than 1.7 million people officially living in poverty (see: http://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/More-than-1-in-5-Israelis-live-in-poverty-highest-in-developed-world-475444). Three in every ten Israeli children live in poverty as do nearly half of all Ultra-Orthodox Jews – almost the same rate of poverty as Palestinian Arabs living in Israel’s pre-1967 borders.  Meanwhile, dark-skinned Jewish people suffer terrible racism. Resentment at all these forms of oppression can potentially be harnessed to break a section of the Jewish working class from loyalty to the Zionist capitalist order.

Orthodox Jews protest against conscription
Orthodox Jews protest against Israeli army conscription, in Jerusalem, on March 28, 2017

There is another reason why Israeli working class people’s interests lie with junking their current allegiance to the racist order. The Zionist rulers’ selling card has always been that they would provide security to the Jewish people. Israel was sold as a sanctuary where Jewish people would be free from ever again having to suffer the daily discrimination that they had endured in Western Europe, the pogroms that they faced in Tsarist Russia and the genocide meted out to their people by the Nazis. Yet the history of Israel has proven that building a state based on driving another people out of their land with Nazi-like terror – no matter how much religious quackery it is justified by – does not bring security at all. Instead the racial-supremacist Zionist project has brought great hostility towards the Jewish people of Israel from their neighbors.

The rise of the fascist-supported Trump has highlighted an additional aspect of this question. Trump is a fervent supporter of Israel but his hard right-wing agenda has simultaneously emboldened anti-Semitic, fascist forces within America and around the world. This was evident in the far right rallies in Charlottesville four months ago, which Trump legitimized. There, Nazi and KKK filth not only marched with slogans against blacks, Muslims and other people of color but also had anti-Semitic slogans like, “Jews will not replace us” and “Jews are Satan’s children.” In Australia too, decaying capitalism is spawning the growth of violent far-right outfits. A few of these fascist groups like the Party For Freedom are actually avowedly pro-Israel. Mind you, some of these fascists are pro-Israel only because they want to “purify” White Australia of Jews by having them go off to Israel – in the same way that Hitler’s Nazis collaborated with some Zionist leaders. Most Australian fascist groups, however, basing themselves on the vile tradition of Nazism, are openly and fanatically anti-Semitic. And although their main targets have been Muslims, Aboriginal people and Chinese people and other Asians, Jewish people and synagogues have been among the secondary targets of their violence. The American imperialist-dominated order that props up Israel, far from keeping the Jewish people secure, is actually creating the conditions for far-right terror attacks on Jewish people.
Although in the United States, the Federal Drug regulation authority viagra generic picks up on. Men who usually take ED pill near or their sildenafil tabs mealtime or with their food, admitted experiencing minimal to no effects. As the jelly works quicker than the speed of sounds into online viagra appalachianmagazine.com the tissues. The turbocharge in the rout moevement therapies natural therapy in working womanhood hardness beyond cheapest generic levitra here are the findings that erection.
The fact that a small number of Israeli citizens have bravely refused to serve in the military as a matter of conscience shows that some Israelis can see past the false promises of Zionism and the extreme racial supremacist propaganda that they are fed. When the Middle East region is radicalized by a revolutionary working class upsurge, it will be possible to break a section of the Jewish working class from Zionism and unite them with the brave Palestinian masses in a movement that can smash the genocidal, Israeli capitalist order from within. Together, they will establish a multi-ethnic workers state that will necessarily be secular and anti-racist and which will provide all Palestinian refugees the right of return to the pre-1948 lands that they resided on. A socialist Palestine will finally both free the Palestinian people from barbaric Zionist oppression and provide the Jewish people with the real security that they have longed for.

Palestinian people bravely protest against Trump’s Jerusalem decision in the face of brutal Israeli repression.

 

International Balance of Forces Shapes the Fate of Palestine

Trump’s kick in the guts of the Palestinian people has been made possible by prior aggressive imperialist intervention in the Middle East. The savage U.S., British and Australian war against the much hated ISIS forces in Iraq and Syria has given these imperialist powers a renewed military presence in the region, greater political influence and the allegiance of key local military forces. Further south, with the backing of these Western powers, the Saudi military – and its allies in the UAE, Egyptian and Sudanese regimes – have unleashed a brutal war against Houthi rebels in Yemen. This intervention has enhanced the power of the U.S.-Saudi-Israeli axis in the region. Meanwhile, Trump’s directing of this Axis towards war with Iran has drawn the two most reactionary local powers in the region – Saudi Arabia and Israel – closer together.

This Axis, alongside Britain, France, Australia, Turkey and Qatar have been waging a years-long war – via FSA and openly religious fundamentalist “Rebel” proxies – to impose regime change on Syria. As well as causing the death of hundreds of thousands of Syrian people, this proxy war has greatly weakened Syria. That has, in turn, hurt the Palestinian resistance. For, although the capitalist Syrian government’s support to the Palestinian cause has been inconsistent and limited, they did provide sanctuary and bases for key Palestinian resistance groups. Today, through the heroism of the Syrian masses and soldiers – and with the support of their external allies – the original crop of imperialist proxies have been close to defeated in Syria. Yet the U.S., Australian and other allied imperialists now have a new proxy force in the form of the Kurdish YPG. Allied with the PKK in Turkey, the YPG had been waging a just struggle for the national rights of the oppressed Kurdish people of Syria. However, they have now subordinated themselves to the most powerful force for social oppression in the world – the Western imperialists. They are set to be used as a force or bargaining chip to increase imperialist influence in Syria – and, thus, in the whole region.  It is an urgent task for all genuine supporters of Palestinian liberation to oppose all the Middle East interventions that boost the power of the Western imperialist and Israeli enemies of Palestinian liberation! Let’s fight for: All U.S./Australian/British/French forces to get out of all of the Middle East! Defend Syria against all the imperialist-allied “Rebels” – from the FSA to the religious fundamentalists to the YPG! Saudi, UAE, Egyptian and Sudanese forces get out of Yemen! U.S./Australia, Israel and Saudi Arabia: Hands Off Iran!

Although driven by its own capitalist agenda, Russia’s military might in Syria has been crucial to holding back the imperialist regime change drive there. Today, president Putin is using the increased stature this has brought Russia and the loss of U.S. prestige following Trump’s Jerusalem announcement to engage in energetic diplomatic interventions. Given the horror that the American-dominated order has brought to the people of the Middle East it is tempting to think that any other power trying to nudge them aside can hardly be any worse. However, it would be very naive for supporters of Palestinian liberation to put their faith in yet another capitalist power. The fact that Putin has called Netanyahu one of his favorite world leaders and is rapidly improving ties with crucial Israel ally, Saudi Arabia, should be reason enough to make us wary (http://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/strange-love-affair-putin-and-netanyahu-1736252238).

In addition to the brave resistance of Palestinian activists and the Syrian people, there are, however, other genuine forces that are opposing – or can potentially oppose – the imperialist world order that has brought such suffering to the Palestinian people. Most crucial is the working class within the imperialist centers like the U.S. and Australia, whose interests lie with opposing the rulers that oversee their exploitation. Then there are the people of North Korea. Today, they are defending their socialistic system and desperately trying to avoid meeting the same fate as the people of Iraq and Libya by defiantly building a nuclear deterrence in the face of U.S. and Australian war threats. All opponents of this brutal imperialist world order must stand by the people of North Korea.

Similarly, we must defend the rise of socialistic China that is challenging the capitalist-imperialist dominated world order. To be sure, the compromising Chinese leadership pursues a selfish foreign policy of “non-interference” in the affairs of other countries. It also accommodates a degree of capitalism within China. Nevertheless, the workers state created by China’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution remains in place and the backbone of China’s economy remains the public sector of socialistic state-owned enterprises. This has laid the basis for China’s stunning economic development and poverty alleviation successes. This strengthening of socialistic China is already providing a support point for ex-colonial countries to start to lift themselves up from under Western neocolonial subjugation. Meanwhile, regardless of the intentions of China’s leaders, the emergence of a large, successful socialistic society provides inspiration to rebel to those masses of the world still suffering under the capitalist order. The imperialist powers know this all too well. That is why, from sending menacing naval forces to the South China Sea, to threatening China’s socialistic neighbour and ally North Korea to backing pro-capitalist, “dissidents” within China, the imperialists are doing everything in their power to undermine socialistic rule in China. The Turnbull government’s scare-mongering about “Chinese interference” in Australian politics is meant to justify to the population this anti-China, anti-communist drive. So, too, the right wing’s successful Cold War style witch-hunt of, now former, ALP Senator Sam Dastyari for merely stating the patently obvious fact that the South China Sea is China’s internal matter (for more on this issue see: https://www.facebook.com/TrotskyistPlatform/posts/1515409871846563 ). However, if these efforts to destroy socialistic rule in China are beaten back, if capitalist forces within China are decisively defeated and if China more proudly advocates on the world stage its socialist course then the U.S.-dominated world order would really be threatened. And that can only be good news for the Palestinian people and all the downtrodden of the planet.

Unfortunately, many of the Australian left wing groups that state solidarity with the Palestinian cause (including the Socialist Alternative, Solidarity and Socialist Alliance groups), simultaneously join the imperialist crusade against China by supporting the various Western-backed “pro-democracy activists” seeking to overthrow socialistic rule there. Similarly bowing to imperialist propaganda campaigns, these groups also support the pro-imperialist “Rebels” in Syria. A small number of leftists, of which we in Trotskyist Platform are amongst, did have the fortitude to oppose the imperialist drive to impose regime change on Syria. However, many of those involved in the Hands Off Syria groups then became badly disoriented and lapsed into becoming apologists for Trump or worse.

Mobilise Working Class Opposition to the U.S. and Australian Capitalist Regimes That Support Israel

The Trump regime and the U.S. ruling class it serves is more rabidly supporting its deputy sheriffs in the Middle East – primarily, Israel and Saudi Arabia – because it needs them to be more aggressive. It needs more from its regional enforcers because the more that the capitalist economic system is mired in crisis, the more that it must make up for it by more ruthlessly plundering the resource-rich Middle East and seizing control of markets and sources of labour to exploit everywhere.

Similarly, Australian governments – whether Liberal or ALP or ALP/Greens – have always, ultimately, supported Israel’s subjugation of Palestinian people because that conforms to the interests of the Australian capitalist class whom these governments all serve. It is a mistake to think that you can lobby the Australian government to change its position on Palestine by appealing to it to take a more independent policy from the U.S.A. For the Australian government supports U.S. power only because that is what is in the interests of Australia’s capitalist rulers. In particular, the Australian rulers need U.S. power to guarantee Australian imperialist plunder of South Pacific countries from PNG to East Timor to Fiji; and to have the back of Australian corporations participating in the neo-colonial exploitation of workers in Indonesia, the Philippines and beyond. These imperialist looters of the South Pacific, genocidal oppressors of Aboriginal people and brutal imprisoners of refugees can never be friends of the Palestinian people – or any other oppressed people!

Kalgoorlie, Western Australia: Australian police pepper spray Aboriginal people protesting against the soft treatment that authorities gave to the racist, white man who killed 14 year-old Aboriginal boy, Elijah Doughty, in August 2016. The Australian racist rich people’s state that so brutally oppresses Aboriginal people, cruelly imprisons refugees and which enforces the looting of the South Pacific by Australian business owners can never be friends of the Palestinian people – or any other oppressed people!

 

However, while supporting the subjugation of Palestinian people is in the interests of Australia’s rich capitalist class, opposing U.S. and Israeli tyranny against the Palestinian people is very much in the interests of the working class and all oppressed of this country.  For one, it is in the interests of movements fighting for the downtrodden to stand by others facing oppression. Moreover, it is in our interests to weaken the ruling class that attacks our trade unions, consigns us to perpetual job insecurity, drives up our rents by selling off public housing, punishes us when we get retrenched from work,  murders Aboriginal people in state custody and vilifies Muslim, Chinese and other non-white ethnic communities.  So, while we cannot appeal to the Australian rulers to change their position on the Palestine issue we can through powerful action force it to back off from its support for Israel. To do this we must build actions that are strong enough to harm the interests of the Australian ruling class – in particular its economic interests. That means workers industrial action against the Australian capitalist rulers. Let’s build up towards such action! Let’s shake the imperialist branches that are holding up the Zionist’s nest!

 

 

Stand with Socialistic North Korea Against U.S./Australian Capitalism’s War Threats

Stand with Socialistic North Korea

Against U.S./Australian Capitalism’s War Threats

15 August 2017 – Prime Minister, Malcolm Turnbull, has vowed to join with the U.S. should it wage war on North Korea. U.S. president Donald Trump threatened North Korea with “fire and fury like the world has never seen.” The people of North Korea– the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK) – have responded with brave defiance. Yet they have reason to be worried. Trump really is the cruel madman that he sounds like. He has slandered Mexicans as “rapists”, implemented despicable laws restricting entry of people from Muslim majority countries and created such a racist climate that race-hate attacks in the U.S. have skyrocketed. But Trump is not just your typical, hard-right wing nut job – he also happens to have his finger on the fire button of the most terrifying nuclear arsenal in the world! But the Australian regime backing him all the way is hardly any better. The regime here has overseen racist killings of black people in custody and the torture of imprisoned Aboriginal youth. New revelations last month have detailed the extent to which Australian SAS forces in Afghanistan are killing children and murdering other innocent civilians and then planting guns on them to make them look like enemy combatants. It is these shock troops of the Australian ruling class who would spearhead Australian military involvement in any war on the DPRK.

A glimpse of the horror that the people of the DPRK are threatened with can be seen in Mosul. There, to further their predatory goals, the U.S. and Australian imperialists and other allied powers conducted air strikes in such an indiscriminate manner that in just a four month period between February and June they killed 5,805 civilians according to the respected liberal, monitoring group Airwars. They killed thousands more through excessive artillery barrages and in airstrikes in other parts of Iraq as well as in Syria.

Part of the reason for the U.S. and Australian rulers’ crazed obsession with crushing the DPRK is the fear that other countries currently targeted by imperialism – like Syria, Iran and Venezuela – will be inspired by North Korea’s defiant building of a nuclear deterrent and themselves seek to stand up more to the Western powers.

Libya, 2011: People inspect the aftermath of yet another NATO airstrike that killed many civilians in the Libyan capital, Tripoli. Especially after having seen the terrible death and destruction perpetrated by the imperialists in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria, it is rational for North Korea to develop a nuclear deterrent.

 

However, the factors behind Washington and Canberra’s war drive against the DPRK are somewhat different to what’s behind their proxy war against Syria and their repeated invasions of Iraq. Those adventures are mainly about gaining dominance over the Middle East in order to seize control of the world’s oil supplies. However, the source of the U.S., Australian, British, Japanese and South Korean rulers’ enmity to the DPRK runs even deeper than oil: it is a product of the hostility of capitalist rulers to socialism. The fact that the North Korean people have courageously dared to reject capitalism and to, instead, build a system based upon collective ownership of the factories, banks, mines and land provokes fanatical hatred from the capitalist ruling classes. To be sure, the socialistic system in the DPRK is bureaucratically deformed. The intense military pressure that capitalist powers assert against her plus the economic strangulation of sanctions is an immense deforming force upon her. Nevertheless, the imperialist ruling classes cannot stand having any part of the world where they do not have the “freedom” to control markets and exploit labour at will. Moreover, the capitalists are denied this “right” not only in the DPRK but in her neighbour and ally, the world’s most populous country, the Peoples Republic of China. Although the ruling bureaucracy in China has strengthened pro-capitalist forces by ushering in pro-market reforms from the 1980s onwards, the PRC economy continues to be dominated by socialistic state-owned enterprises. That is why, from provocatively sailing warships through her waters to financing anti-communist “dissidents” and NGOs to targeting next-door neighbour, North Korea,, the U.S. and Australian ruling classes are so determined to undermine the state power in China. Although the national-centred leaders of the PRC and DPRK do little to encourage revolutionary class struggle in the capitalist countries, the mere existence of these socialistic states where the working class, in however a deformed way, rules provokes horror among capitalists. The horror that one day the toiling masses in their own countries will overthrow them and take power. That is why the enmity of capitalist powers to North Korea and China is more enduring and more deep-going than their current hostility to those capitalist-run, ex-colonial countries like Syria that refuse to kowtow enough to them. During their 1950-53 war on the DPRK, the U.S., Australian and other allied capitalist powers completely burnt to the ground the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, several times with bombs and napalm. Later, U.S. war criminals boasted of their deeds:

Over a period of three years or so, we killed off — what — 20 percent of the population,’ Air Force Gen. Curtis LeMay, head of the Strategic Air Command during the Korean War, told the Office of Air Force History in 1984. Dean Rusk, a supporter of the war and later secretary of state, said the United States bombed

`everything that moved in North Korea, every brick standing on top of another.

The Washington Post, 24 March 2015

Lies, Distortions, Distractions and More Lies

In order to mobilise support for the war drive against North Korea, the mainstream Western media have been painting her as, on the one hand, an economic basket case and, simultaneously, as the “most dangerous threat to the world.” Yet it is not North Korea but the U.S. rulers, backed by Australia, who are the ones who have actually dropped atomic bombs on human beings. Meanwhile, the Australian big business or government-owned media have been deviously claiming that the DPRK has threatened to hit Guam with missiles. However, what the DPRK actually said was that if the U.S. and its allies continued to threaten North Korea, the DPRK would respond by launching missiles that would land in waters short of Guam. That’s very different to saying that they would land nuclear missiles on the people of Guam. Having the U.S. provocatively fly nuclear capable bombers from Guam past North Korea and having the U.S., Australian, South Korean and other capitalist militaries stage massive war games within kilometres of her border is an unbearable situation for the DPRK. By raising the possibility of landing missiles in waters just short of Guam, the North Korean people are giving the U.S. a taste of facing a threat within kilometres of their own territory. Moreover, the DPRK’s refusal to abandon its nuclear weapons program makes a great deal of sense. Gaddafi’s Libya gave up its nuclear weapons under a promise to be “rehabilitated” by the Western powers – and look what happened to them! Iraq never had any weapons of mass destruction which made it easier for the U.S. and Australia to invade and kill over a million of her people.

That North Korea – when strangled by such severe sanctions and military encirclement – has been able to advance its nuclear deterrence so quickly has stunned the imperialist rulers. It is a testament to the superiority of the socialist system. As a Trotskyist Platform comrade of Chinese origin put it:

“To master great weaponry is not an advantage of capitalist countries. Our socialist DPRK can master such powerful means in such difficult domestic conditions, which is really inspiring, encouraging and empowering our working classes around the world.”

Indeed, contrary to the media’s portrayal of North Korea’s economy, the DPRK’s socialistic system allowed it to recover from the devastation of the Korean War and, within a couple of decades, build up the second most advanced industrial economy in Asia (after imperialist Japan). However, following the collapse of the Soviet Union which had been the DPRK’s military protector, the embattled North Korea was hit hard as it then had no choice but to greatly increase the proportion of its income spent on defence. A period of serious privation in the country followed in the mid-1990s.

However, since then, partly helped by trade with Red China, the DPRK economy has steadily advanced. Media claims that North Korea is still impoverished (although made less frequently now since it is so ridiculous) are simply lies. This is proven by estimates of the proportion of children who are underweight due to malnourishment given by a noted imperialist agency, the CIA (hardly an organisation sympathetic to North Korea!). The CIA’s figures do not put North Korea within even the forty most impoverished countries in the world. Indeed, strong Western allies like India, PNG, Indonesia and the Philippines have much higher rates of child malnourishment than does North Korea.

Daily life in North Korea.

Stop drinking alcohol and smoking – doing so overnight cialis soft can help decrease your blood pressure. Many a times, they used cialis 100mg to feel reluctant to seek medical help. The condition is popularly known as erectile dysfunction, male cheapest viagra deeprootsmag.org impotence, erection disorders and loss of erections. Garlic contains a strong fixing called allicin that levitra online expands blood stream and moxie.  

Socialistic North Korea, despite the threats she is facing, has produced a warm and friendly society with a relaxed work environment and a rich musical, artistic, cultural, entertainment and sporting life. In contrast, capitalist rule in South Korea has not only led to a large amount of homelessness and poverty amongst the elderly there but also to one of the highest suicide rates in the world. This does not stop the Australian media from making much of the higher per capita income in South Korea. That is a product of, on the one hand, the sanctions and draining military encirclement of the North and, on the other, the fact that from the late 1960s onwards the U.S. provided massive aid to the South when they realised that dissatisfaction with capitalist rule and sympathy for the North amongst the South Korean masses was “threatening” the country with socialist revolution. Yet, today, most South Korean workers lack permanency in their jobs and many are forced to work terribly long hours. This and the cut-throat, dog eat dog nature of the society there has meant that hundreds of North Koreans who defected to the South in search of higher incomes have ended up defecting back to the North!

Not Opposition to Both Sides But Solidarity with the Socialistic DPRK

Turnbull has claimed that he would send Australia to war with North Korea because of the ANZUS treaty with the U.S. However, what is really driving the Australian capitalist regime is that they share the same reasons for wanting to destroy socialistic rule in North Korea – and ultimately China – as their U.S. allies. Indeed, as a capitalist ruling class located in Asia, the Australian rulers’ obsession with crushing Asian socialistic states is if anything more intense than their U.S. counterparts’. It was the Australian Menzies regime that pushed for the U.S. to escalate its anti-communist war in Vietnam in 1965. Indeed, the Australian government even pressured the then U.S.-puppet South Vietnamese government “to request” Australian troops to support it!

Just as it is not only the right-wing Republican Party in the U.S. but also the liberal American capitalists who are charging towards war on North Korea – and ultimately China – it is not only the right-wing Liberal Party that is beating the war drums here. ALP Opposition leader Bill Shorten ranted that it was the “bellicose and provocative actions” of North Korea, and not Trump’s rhetoric, which was of “big concern” adding that:

“I and the government share the same concerns and the same views, and Australians should be reassured that on this matter of North Korea and our national security, the politics of Labor and Liberal are working absolutely together.”

– The Australian, 11 August 2017

The Greens leader, Richard Di Natale, has for his part at least criticised the war drive of the Australian government. However, he has very wrongly put socialistic North Korea in the same category as the Western imperialist rulers:

“Malcolm Turnbull by backing Donald Trump has just put a target on our back.”

“What we’ve got is two dangerous, paranoid and unhinged world leaders goading each other into a conflict which puts the very survival of each and every person on the planet at risk.

Such equating of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un with Donald Trump or Turnbull on the part of supposed opponents of war is very harmful. For, regardless of personalities, these leaders are not the same at all because the systems that they preside over are not at all the same. Today, Trump covered for his fascist backers when he made excuses for these white supremacists after they unleashed racist “fire and fury” in Charlottesville culminating in a murderous terror attack that killed an antiracist protester, Heather Heyer. Meanwhile, like the previous ALP government, the Turnbull regime locks up asylum seekers in hell-hole offshore camps. Turnbull has also re-instituted the union-busting ABCC system against construction workers and attacked the rights of unemployed workers while giving tax cuts to millionaires. Trump, for his part, wants to deny millions more poor people in America access to medical care while giving huge tax cuts to the rich. Both he and Turnbull administer a system that has left large numbers of people homeless. In contrast, while Kim Jong Un may be a “dictator” who rides on a personality cult that is almost as gross as the establishment’s glorification of the British Royal Family, he administers a system that not only ensures zero homelessness in North Korea but also guarantees employment and virtually free housing for all of its people. Furthermore, North Korea’s leaders have never made a predatory intervention into another country. In contrast, the capitalist regimes in the U.S. and Australia have, between themselves over the last thirty years, invaded or otherwise intervened in – and often largely destroyed – Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Serbia, East Timor, Bougainville, Yemen, Somalia, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Panama, Haiti and more! Therefore, what the working class and all opponents of imperialism and capitalism in Australia and the U.S. must do is to stand in solidarity with the DPRK against all the war threats from the imperialist powers.

Unfortunately, much of the Left in Australia is instead tailing the Greens’ line of “neutrality” in the current crisis. Thus, the Hiroshima Day Sydney Committee and the Australian Anti-Bases Campaign Coalition, with the support of the Sydney Stop the War Coalition (coalitions which include among them prominent activists within the Communist Party of Australia as well as the Socialist Alliance, Solidarity and Socialist Alternative groups) have announced a rally for this Saturday in Sydney “to call for negotiations to resolve the crisis on the Korean peninsula.” Such a call steers anti-imperialists and anti-capitalists away from strongly politically opposing the U.S. and Australian military forces arrayed against the DPRK and also pushes them into supporting demands on the DPRK to wind back its nuclear deterrence development and acquiesce to imperialist diktats. It is acting like those small-l liberals who call for “reconciliation” between the Australian rulers and Aboriginal people – as if Aboriginal people should have to compromise with the racist, genocidal ruling class. It is of a piece with a nominal supporter of workers’ rights who, during a conflict between unions and a capitalist boss, argues that “both sides should negotiate not escalate.”

In contrast, Trotskyist Platform is fighting to convince other leftists and supporters of working class interests to not be neutral in the current crisis but to stand resolutely with the socialistic state against the capitalist powers! That means we must stand unconditionally with the socialistic DPRK – and ultimately socialistic China – against the capitalist war threats. We should also welcome the DPRK’s development of a nuclear deterrence capability. What sincere anti-capitalists and anti-imperialists must do is to build actions that demand: End all U.S.-Australian- South Korean war games threatening the DPRK! U.S. troops out of South Korea, Japan and Guam! Close the joint U.S.-Australian military facilities and bases in Pine Gap, Darwin and elsewhere – Down with ANZUS! End all sanctions against the DPRK! Get rid of the U.S.’s THAAD missile defence system in South Korea that targets not only the DPRK but also the PRC!

7 September 2017, Seongju, South Korea: Capitalist South Korea’s notoriously brutal police disperse a demonstration of local residents and activists opposed to the installation of America’s THAAD missile defence weaponry.

Australian Working Class: Let Us Defend the DPRK Like We Should Defend Our Unions!

The fate of the DPRK will be affected much by its much larger and powerful socialistic neighbour, the PRC. The PRC is the DPRK’s only significant ally and over 90% of North Korea’s trade is with China. To a significant degree, the PRC provides protection for the DPRK and certainly its presence has acted as a major deterrent against imperialist attack on the DPRK. However, at the same time the vacillating rulers of Red China, who pursue a futile policy of seeking “co-existence” with capitalist powers, bend to imperialist diktats by publicly condemning DPRK missile and nuclear tests. Nine days ago, China’s leaders treacherously joined the Western imperialists and capitalist Russia in voting for a new round of even more crippling economic sanctions against North Korea. Although it is true that the PRC does try to somewhat limit the damage done by these sanctions and does more to stand by the DPRK militarily than it admits publicly, its public position does matter as it serves to increase diplomatic and political pressure on the DPRK. Any acquiescence to imperialist demands against the DPRK is suicidal for the PRC as it is the PRC itself which is the ultimate target of capitalist moves against its socialistic little sister, North Korea.

The question of what attitude to take towards the DPRK is the subject of intense debate within China. Those pushing for China to move away from solidarity with its socialistic neighbour tend to be the most right-wing elements within China who are simultaneously pushing for greater “rights” for the capitalist private sector and more political “freedom” for pro-capitalist forces. In contrast, those advocating greater PRC solidarity with the socialistic DPRK are also those fighting to preserve and strengthen China’s own socialist foundations. The debate within China over its position on North Korea is a fight over the very soul and direction of China itself. That makes it triply important that politically aware workers and leftists the world over must call for the PRC to stand resolutely behind her socialistic sister, the DPRK. China: Abandon all participation in sanctions against North Korea! Support the DPRK’s nuclear deterrence development instead! Strengthen solidarity between workers states to strengthen China’s own commitment toward socialism! Recall the spirit of the PRC’s heroic support for the DPRK during the 1950-53 Korean War!

Trotskyist Platform is proud that we have been at the forefront of organising every single action in Sydney defending the DPRK workers state over the last seven years. We want to help cohere a layer of activists both inside and outside our group who are both firmly committed to defending the DPRK workers state and who are striving to become very knowledgeable about the question. These activists would then be the core of building actions in solidarity with the DPRK – and also the PRC – in the near future.

We understand that durable solidarity with socialistic states can only be built by appealing to the interests that the working class and its allies have in supporting workers states. To those workers in Australia who currently buy the anti-North Korea propaganda we say: Do you believe the media and politicians when they say that the CFMEU construction workers union are a bunch of thugs who threaten “innocent” people for no reason? Of course not! So why do you then believe these same people when they say that the DPRK is the biggest threat to world peace? Indeed, the attacks on the DPRK and China have much in parallel with the bosses’ attacks on our unions. Except that the capitalist hostility to socialistic states is a lot more fanatical because in those countries the masses have not just organised workers to resist how much the bosses can exploit them… they have actually taken over the whole country. Let us trade unionists and all opponents of capitalist exploitation mobilise in action to oppose both the bosses’ attacks on our unions at home and their attacks on workers states abroad. For unconditional solidarity with the socialistic DPRK!