Tag Archives: repression

Cold War Repression in Australia Gets Even More Vicious

Photo Above: Shaoquett Moselmane with students and teachers from a Riverwood language school

Condemn the Witch-Hunt of NSW
Upper House MP Shaoquett Moselmane

Cold War Repression in
Australia Gets Even More Vicious

26 June 2020: Today, Cold War repression in Australia dramatically escalated. Around a dozen officers of Australia’s ASIO secret police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) made an hours-long raid on the home of NSW Labor Party upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. The raid was made under the ridiculous claim that “Chinese government agents” had infiltrated his office and were using him as part of a “foreign interference” operation. Moselmane has not been charged and the claims against him are completely fabricated. Moselmane is being witch-hunted because he has had the temerity to praise China’s achievements in poverty alleviation and because he more recently dared to speak positively about China’s successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic and to rightly call out the Australian media for inciting racist attacks on people of Chinese background.

Sources say that today’s terrifying raid took place with Moselmane’s wife and son at home in the residence. The duration of the ASIO/AFP attack went over a period of some 12 to 16 hours. Today’s raids are a despicable attack on democratic rights and a further constriction of the right to progressive dissent in Australia. These raids, made with the assistance of draconian “foreign interference” laws imposed two years ago with bi-partisan support, are designed to intimidate anyone from speaking positively about socialistic China or to advocate socialist solutions to the grave problems faced by the working class masses and oppressed Aboriginal and other non-white communities in Australia.

All trade unionists, supporters of workers rights, defenders of civil liberties and opponents of racism and all genuine leftists must condemn these raids! We must cry: down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane!

Outrageously, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay wasted no time in joining the attack on Moselmane. She has suspended him from the ALP.

The mainstream media and right-wing politicians, with the acquiescence of Moselmane’s Labor colleagues, had been building up towards today’s authoritarian attack. Several weeks ago there was a hysterical witch-hunt against Moselmane that saw him driven from his post as the deputy president of the NSW upper house. Below is the article that we wrote in response to that witch-hunt. Given today’s raid, all the conclusions made in this article are magnified many times over in their urgency.

****************************************************************

6 June 2020: The ruling classes in the capitalist world are rather nervous at how much dissatisfaction there is within their own countries. Working class youth are frustrated that they are likely to only get insecure, casual jobs where they are often arrogantly bullied by their bosses. Lower income people are angry that affordable rental accommodation is so hard to find. After COVID-19 hit, huge numbers of workers are seething that they have lost their jobs after the very company owners who had made fortunes out of their workers’ labour did not hesitate to retrench these workers as soon as there was any drop in business revenue. Now, the brutal police murder of an unarmed black man in America, George Floyd, has ignited explosive anger amongst black people and other people of colour throughout the Western world at the all-sided racist oppression that they endure. In the U.S., there have been huge, sometimes militant, protests with elements of an uprising. Today in Australia, there were massive solidarity protests with America’s Black Lives Matter demonstrations. These marches focused on opposition to the horrific killings of Aboriginal people by racist police and prison guards.

At least until the recent Black Lives Matter protests, mass grievances have not led to a left-wing radicalisation within Western countries. Instead, in Australia for example, the capitalist rulers have to some degree succeeded in shifting mass frustrations into blaming immigration, guest workers, Aboriginal people, Asians, African youth, Muslims, refugees, unemployed people, climate change concerns and militant unions. Yet the capitalist exploiters remain worried that eventually sizable sections of the working class masses will again look to communism as an alternative to their current predicament. Compounding these fears is the reality that while their own economies have barely been treading water since the late noughties global recession, the world’s biggest socialistic country – the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) – relentlessly grows in economic strength, continues to lift her own people out of the poverty of China’s pre-1949 capitalist days and steadily gains greater prestige and diplomatic clout in the former colonial countries of Africa, South America, the Middle East, Asia and the South Pacific. The richer capitalist powers are not only worried that this is “interfering” with their “right” to “freely” super-exploit their former colonies. They are terrified that some of their “own” masses will start to look favourably upon socialistic China and thus conclude that capitalist rule in their own countries needs to be deposed. As a result, across the capitalist world the rulers and their media have been churning out an anti-communist, China-bashing propaganda campaign.

In the U.S. and Australia, this new Cold War campaign has also involved intimidation and even repression. In Australia, this often takes the form of the witch-hunting of any public figure, and increasingly anyone else, who has any contact with social organisations with even the vaguest links to the PRC; or who dares to make any comment praising the PRC. Such witch-hunting has intensified over the last few years and has reached new levels of hysteria since the COVID-19 pandemic struck. The latest victim is NSW Labor upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. Now Moselmane is no communist. He is, after all, a member of the anticommunist, social democratic ALP. However, Moselmane was witch-hunted for pointing out what is demonstrably true: PRC authorities and her people had taken “timely and effective countermeasures” that had “fought and contained” the COVID-19 threat. For having the temerity to state these plain facts, Moselmane was subjected to a shrill campaign of denunciations and insults from the mainstream media, right-wing politicians and leaders of his own Labor Party. Media shock jocks branded Moselmane a “jerk”, “a train wreck”’, “a lunatic”, “a low filthy bludger” and more. They even made despicable slanders about his wife, lying that she has a material interest in him making positive comments about China. Encouraged by all these insults, rednecks and far right idiots made chilling threats against Moselmane on social media. To his credit, however, in the face of all this intimidation and demands that he resign from parliament, Moselmane has thus far refused to “apologise” for saying what he knows to be completely true. As a result, on April 6, he was forced to step down from his position as assistant president of the NSW Legislative Council. Moselmane had been elected to this position, signifying that he was the highest-ranked ALP upper house MP in NSW, less than a year earlier.

A team of Chinese medical experts and Bangladeshi officials take a group photo upon the team’s arrival in Bangladesh. Even as the Peoples Republic of China was still completing her own initial battle against the pandemic, she sent experts with experience in responding to COVID-19 to many other countries in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Southern and Eastern Europe to assist with their struggles against the pandemic.
Fake drug manufacturers may face heavy fines, life imprisonment or death penalty, according to the soft viagra tabs circumstances. purchase cialis online Check This Out It will also help you to improve your performance in bed. Oral: A good position for how to viagra vs generic have intercourse with his female partner. In most of the cases, he is mistaken, as the same as creosote, diesel exhaust, anabolic steroids, sun lamps and chemicals including lead, night shift working and cancer, however overall the night shift djpaulkom.tv generico cialis on line working is considered risky mark.

Pilloried for Telling the Truth

So what did Shaoquett Moselmane exactly say that so infuriated Australia’s ruling class establishment? The campaign against him cranked into high gear after the 30 March issue of the Sydney Morning Herald attacked him for writing on his personal website that China had made an “emphatic” and “decisive” response to the COVID-19 threat. Moselmane pointed out that China needed “tough, unswerving leadership, focused on the mammoth task ahead” in order to contain the virus’ spread. The Labor MP explained that: “For the Peoples Republic of China, President Xi stepped up and provided that leadership. He mustered the resources of the nation and together with the great people of China – fought it and contained it…. The combined phenomenal effort of the state and the people in the fight to contain the virus was breath taking.” Moselmane also contrasted China’s effective response to “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government.”

What Moselmane said was simply fact. Despite being the first country in the world to detect the new virus and despite having a rapid spread of the deadly virus in Wuhan before their own scientists or any other country in the world understood the coronavirus or could ascertain just how deadly it was, the PRC so effectively responded to the threat that the proportion of China’s huge population that have died from the virus is significantly lower than Australia’s. Moreover, while Australia is just starting to open up again following stay-at-home measures and now faces the risk of a second-wave, the PRC so effectively suppressed the virus and reduced new cases to such tiny levels that for the last two months her tourist spots, cafes and restaurants have been gradually filling up with people and her streets and public transport networks are again buzzing with lively crowds.

Although Moselmane focuses a fair bit on Xi Jinping’s leadership, we understand that the main factor behind the PRC’s breath taking response to the virus was the country’s socialistic system. It was this system in which public ownership plays the backbone role and in which the economy is controlled by a state under workers rule that enabled the PRC to concentrate resources so effectively for the pandemic response. Thus, the PRC was able to, in a matter of days, both build brand new infectious disease hospitals and to convert other facilities into makeshift hospitals. It was also this people’s control of the economy that enabled the PRC to provide space suit style protective gear for her medical workers and janitors as well as large quantities of urgently needed ventilators, testing kits, infra-red thermometers and masks. Meanwhile, the PRC’s economic system – in which collective ownership and control plays the basic role – has created a more collectivist outlook in the Chinese masses that led them to, on the one hand, be overall more willing to comply with pandemic response restrictions than their counterparts in, say, the U.S. and Australia and, on the other hand, be more motivated to mobilise in grassroots campaigns to conduct pandemic response measures.

Nevertheless, leadership was also a factor in determining how countries responded to the COVID-19 threat. Just as the likes of Scott Morrison, Donald Trump, Jair Bolsonaro, Boris Johnson and Vladimir Putin are shaped by their role at the head of states designed to serve the capitalist big end of town, Xi Jinping’s actions are shaped and, indeed, constrained by his role at the head of a workers state that was created to ensure the interests of working class people. That meant that while the leaders of the capitalist countries put the fate of their stock markets and corporate profits first, China’s president Xi, for all his faults, did put the interests of people first in responding to the virus outbreak. So Moselmane is quite factually correct when he stated that “President Xi stepped up.” Within hours of Chinese scientists confirming that human to human transmission of the virus can occur, Xi made a high profile order on January 20 for Communist Party of China (CPC) committees and governments at all levels to put people’s safety and health as the top priority and take effective measures to curb the spread of the virus. Chinese state media reported on the same day that:

“Xi ordered all-out efforts to treat patients, identify the causes of the virus infection and spread at an earlier date, strengthen monitoring and standardize treatment procedures.

“Xi spoke of the need for the timely release of information and the deepening of international cooperation.”

The PRC acted early. At the time Xi made this announcement, just three people had died of the virus in a country with a population of nearly 1.5 billion people. Overseas countries then reported just a total of four cases, two in Thailand, one in South Korea and one in Japan. Just two days after Xi’s orders were broadcast, Wuhan took the unprecedented step of announcing that from the following morning all public transportation in the city of 11 million people would be suspended, all movement out of the city through airports and railway stations would be temporarily cut off, all large-scale activities were suspended and everyone was ordered to wear masks in public. These and additional decisive measures taken by the PRC in the ensuing days became a template for the social distancing measures that many other countries, albeit often very belatedly, took.

Medical staff in China’s Wuhan celebrate on March 9 after all COVID-19 patients at the temporary hospital that they worked at were cured and discharged from hospital.

At the time that the PRC shut down Wuhan, Australia had not confirmed one single case of the new virus. Yet, by contrast to the PRC’s quick response, it took the Australian government a whole 50 days from the time that the first coronavirus case in this country was detected on January 25 until the first – and rather limited – social distancing measures were implemented on March 15. This despite having already seen how deadly the virus had been in other countries. The only early “measure” that the Morrison government took was to enact a travel ban on non-residents entering from China – which had more to do with encouraging fears of Red China than being a genuine health measure – and then enacting later bans on arrivals from Iran and then South Korea. Yet, even after China had effectively suppressed the virus, the Morrison regime maintained its politically-motivated, China-specific travel ban while for several weeks enabling people from the U.S., Italy, Spain, France, Germany and cruise ships to enter without proper testing and quarantining even after the pandemic had spread like wildfire in those places. As a result, not only was the virus allowed to spread within Australia through infections brought in overwhelmingly from the U.S., Europe and cruise ships but those infected people from these regions were not given the timely diagnosis and treatment that they needed.

Indeed, Moselmane’s comparison of the PRC’s excellent response to the new virus with “the slow, and at times baffling and confused messaging by the Morrison federal government” is actually rather understated. That has not stopped the Morrison government and this country’s top health bureaucrats from endlessly praising themselves. They have only been able to get away with this because the “response” in the likes of Trump’s America, Johnson’s Britain and Bolsonaro’s Brazil have been so frighteningly disastrous and because the mainstream media have done their best to hide and distort the successful response by the PRC and to minimize coverage of the successes of other countries that have taken effective measures to curb the virus spread, like socialistic Vietnam.

Peter Costello’s Sydney Morning Herald Leads the Charge,
Hard-Right Shock Jocks Follow

It is little surprise that it was the Sydney Morning Herald that cast the first stone in the attack against Moslemane. This paper had been targeting Moslemane ever since he made a 2018 speech hailing China’s lifting of 800 million people out of poverty. In that speech, Moselmane spoke of the need for China to gain greater influence in the global media given that this media is currently in the hands of China’s Western opponents. Moslemane pointed out how the Arab world has seen the power of Western propaganda in manipulating the public, leading to death and destruction. Alarmed that a mainstream politician had the audacity to so openly challenge the Cold War drive against the PRC and to so bluntly call out the pernicious role of Western mainstream media, the SMH looked for a way to discredit Moselmane. The best exposé that they could come up with was one seven months ago that in classic Cold War McCarthyist shock-horror fashion “exposed” how a staffer who works one day a week for Moslemane’s office once attended a training course at the Chinese Academy of Governance which the SMH says also “trains senior cadres of the Chinese Communist Party.” Big deal! What are they going to dig up next: that one of Moslemane’s staffers once ate at a Chinese restaurant where a member of the Chinese community, who had once met with a visiting Chinese Communist Party leader, once also ate at?

Led by its fanatically anti-communist Political and International editor, Peter Hartcher, the SMH has, in fact, been spearheading the Cold War fear campaign against socialistic China. It is ably assisted in this by its sister media organisations like Channel 9 and the hard right radio “news” station 2GB, all of which are part of the very same corporation that owns the SMH: Nine Entertainment Limited. The biggest stake in Nine Entertainment is held by filthy rich media mogul Bruce Gordon, with other major shareholdings owned by various wealth management funds and private equity groups. Needless to say, a media organisation owned by ultra-rich capitalists is inevitably going to produce content favourable to the political interests of the capitalist exploiting class and, thus, hostile to socialistic China. And in case anyone falls for the “balanced”, “independent” pretensions of the SMH, it is worth pointing out who the chairman of this corporation that runs it is: none other than the Treasurer in the right wing, former Howard government, Peter Costello!

The SMH journalists working under editor Peter Hartcher delight in buttressing their China-bashing propaganda by “unofficially” quoting as “sources” their mates in ASIO and other sinister Australian spy agencies. Meanwhile, Hartcher works closely in promoting anti-China hostility with Beverley O’Connor’s The World program on the ABC News channel. Peter Costello’s boy, Peter Hartcher, is also a Visiting Fellow at the Lowy Institute, the right-wing think tank that has a major influence in shaping Australian public opinion. Formed and led by Australian billionaire, Frank Lowy, and with a Board of Directors dominated by Lowy and his sons, as well as other capitalists like the chairman of the ANZ bank, the Lowy institute naturally promotes the interests of Australia’s big end of town exploiting class and, thus, is known for aggressively promoting an anti-China and broadly war-mongering agenda.

With the Lowy Institute providing the academic “expertise” and the likes of Peter Hartcher’s SMH and Beverley O’Connor’s The World providing overall political direction and a “centrist”, “liberal” cover, right-wing politicians, the Murdoch media and 2GB shock jocks are then all stocked up to sell the masses the anti-PRC agenda in sensationalist and extremist forms. And so it was with the campaign against Moselmane. In the days following the SMH’s
exposé, the anticommunist uproar against Moselmane that Peter Hartcher and Co. had hoped for duly erupted. Egged on by rabid right-wing presenters Alan Jones and Ray Hadley from 2GB and Peta Credlin from Sky News, extreme right wing politicians queued up to denounce Moselmane. Federal Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament. NSW leader of the far right One Nation party, Mark Latham, attacked Moselmane’s stance as “disgusting and indefensible.” Credlin and Hadley basically accused Moselmane of treason for simply praising another country’s response to the virus threat and for criticizing the Australian prime minister’s response. The Murdoch print media and the Daily Mail soon joined the witch-hunt too, of course. So too did hardline supporters of Israel’s genocidal oppression of Palestinian people who saw an opportunity to go after an MP known for his sympathy for the Palestinian liberation struggle. Moselmane was born in South Lebanon, the part of the Lebanon that has suffered most from the Israeli regime’s expansionist aggression.

However, it was not just the hard conservatives who went after Moselmane. The most extreme attack on him came from a minister in the former Rudd government, Stephen Conroy. Speaking on Peta Credlin’s Sky News program, Conroy branded Moselmane “an absolute disgrace to the Labor Party,” adding that it is “astonishing he’s still in parliament.” Meanwhile, NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay stabbed her upper house colleague in the back by not only refusing to defend Moselmane from the witch-hunt but, instead, fully joining in. In an interview with 2GB’s Ray Hadley, McKay viciously attacked Moselmane:

“I can assure you… he will never be in the shadow cabinet….

“His actions have been appalling, I can’t say that to you enough.”

Moselmane’s factional ally in the ALP, shadow minister for transport and corrections, Chris Minns, and Labor shadow treasurer, Walt Secord, also both joined in the attacks, respectively branding Moselmane’s comments as “inappropriate” and “extremely stupid.”

Top Scientists and Public Health Officials
Sing the Same Tune as Moselmane on China’s Response

The way that the “centrist” SMH set up Moselmane to be savaged by the Hard Right can be compared to that of the villain in an action movie who inflicts a wound on a captive and then leaves them to bleed in shark-infested waters knowing that the victim’s blood will attract killer sharks. While their sharks did their expected savaging, the SMH pretended to be serious in their coverage. To try and give authority to their attacks on Moselmane, they claimed that, “China has been widely criticised by academics and health experts for downplaying the extent of the outbreak in Wuhan.” Of course, academics and health experts are like everyone else subject to political influences. Being a middle class layer, scientists, doctors and top level academics, like other middle class layers in these reactionary times, can be quite conservative and many identify their interests with those of the ruling capitalist class. Thus, mainstream media seeking to attack Red China would no doubt always be able to find a few health experts willing to sing the tune that they would like to see amplified. Yet many serious scientists are driven by dedication to their work and to their areas of research. As a result, contrary to the misleading assertions of the SMH, the truth is that, in the face of anticommunist pressure, the majority of top Western infectious disease scientists and public health specialists have actually praised China’s response to the virus outbreak. On 19 February, 27 eminent scientists, academics, infectious disease specialists and public health officials from the U.S., Britain, Australia, Germany, The Netherlands and other regions published a “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19” in the prestigious, peer-reviewed British medical journal, The Lancet [1]. The statement lauded China’s efforts to suppress the COVID-19 threat:

“We have watched as the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China, in particular, have worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak, put in place significant measures to reduce its impact, and share their results transparently with the global health community. This effort has been remarkable.”

This, too, was the finding of a WHO investigation into China’s response to COVID-19 led by Canadian epidemiologist, Bruce Aylward, and consisting of 25 international experts from the U.S., Germany, Japan, Singapore, Nigeria, China, South Korea and Russia. The report by the investigative mission found that [2]:

“In the face of a previously unknown virus, China has rolled out perhaps the most ambitious, agile and aggressive disease containment effort in history.

“Achieving China’s exceptional coverage with and adherence to these containment measures has only been possible due to the deep commitment of the Chinese people to collective action in the face of this common threat. At a community level this is reflected in the remarkable solidarity of provinces and cities in support of the most vulnerable populations and communities. Despite ongoing outbreaks in their own areas, Governors and Mayors have continued to send thousands of health care workers and tons of vital PPE supplies into Hubei province and Wuhan city.”

Indeed, in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic, ABC News reporters were constantly disappointed as they posed leading questions to infectious disease specialists inviting them to attack China’s response only for the experts to respond with praise for China’s pandemic suppression efforts. Thus, the Australian government-funded broadcaster was forced to hop from interviewing one medical expert to the next in search of someone who would feed into their Cold War agenda. Yet the Australian government’s own top health bureaucrats also lauded China’s efforts. And let’s note that these are highly-paid government bureaucrats who have worked closely with the right wing Morrison government and have supported most of the Liberal government’s pandemic response strategies – including its initial politically-directed travel bans specifically focused on – and restricted to – the Australian regime’s adversaries. So they are hardly communist sympathizers! Yet, in a media conference on January 30 alongside health minister Greg Hunt, Australia’s Deputy Chief Medical Officer, Professor Paul Kelly, responded to a journalist’s question about whether Australia’s case numbers would stay at the then low level by saying [3]:

“It depends a lot on what happens in relation to China getting this under control, and they are doing a marvellous job at the moment and it’s a very different approach to what we experienced with SARS some years ago.”

Australia’s chief medical officer, Brendan Murphy, also hailed China’s efforts to stem the virus spread in an interview the following day [4]:

“Clearly, it is not yet contained in China. But they are making Herculean efforts to do so.”

Of course, Australia’s capitalist media ensured that the live interviews where these comments were made were the first and last time that these statements were aired. And they sure weren’t going to report on these comments praising China from Australia’s top public health officials! Yet it was not just senior public health officials and infectious disease specialists who were saying the same things that Moselmane would later say about China’s response to the coronavirus. None other than U.S. president, Donald Trump, the person who has most viciously been trying to blame China for the pandemic over the last few weeks and the man who is the talisman of the extreme right-wing shock jobs who savagely attacked Moselmane, heaped praise on China in the early days of the coronavirus outbreak. Thus, in a tweet on January 24, Trump said [5]:

China has been working very hard to contain the Coronavirus. The United States greatly appreciates their efforts and transparency. It will all work out well. In particular, on behalf of the American People, I want to thank President Xi!

So why did Trump praise China and President Xi’s response to the coronavirus in late January and why was Moselmane witch-hunted for giving similar credit to China and Xi just two months later? Well, when Trump was commending China’s response, not only he but nearly the entire capitalist ruling classes in the U.S., Europe and Australia believed their own propaganda that their social system was superior to China’s and, thus, they would be little affected by the virus then ravaging China. They expected that the damage caused by the coronavirus in China would hurt her prestige, undermine the credibility of her socialist system and weaken her economy. Trump believed that he would be facing a weakened PRC opponent in political conflicts and trade disputes and it would, therefore, pay him to sound magnanimous. Two months later the reality turned out very different. The virus caused far more death and economic damage per capita to the U.S., Britain, France, Germany and Australia than it did to China. China, on the other hand, had been able to suppress the virus spread so effectively that she was now giving huge amounts of aid to developing countries to assist them with their pandemic response. This infuriated the rulers of imperialist countries like the U.S. and Australia. For it reinforced a trend where China’s mutually beneficial relations with countries in the South Pacific, Asia, Africa, South and Central America, and the Middle East was enabling these countries to eke out some greater independence from the plundering Western powers. Moreover, far from showing the relative weaknesses in the PRC’s system, the much more successful response of China to the virus threat in comparison with the capitalist countries has shown the superiority of her socialistic system. As far as the capitalist elite in the West are concerned, for anyone to point this out is taboo. For one it would make it harder to sell to their own masses their Cold War drive to “contain” and strangle socialistic rule in China. Furthermore, for anyone to highlight China’s superior response to the pandemic touches off the greatest of all fears of the rulers of Australia and other capitalist countries: that the masses in their own countries will draw the conclusion from this that they need to get rid of the capitalist system and bring socialism to their own countries. Thus, by late March, for Shaoquett Moselmane or any other high-profile person to praise China’s response to the pandemic simply became intolerable for the capitalist ruling classes. Just as significantly, those who sought to score political points against China over the pandemic hoped that by late March, the population would have forgotten all the praise heaped upon China’s response two months earlier by scientists, Australia’s top public health officials and, of all people, Donald Trump.

Some of the medical experts who, in the early days of the pandemic, praised China’s response to the coronavirus. Left: Australia’s then Deputy Chief Medical Officer (now Acting Chief Medical Officer) Paul Kelly. On January 30, he responded to a question about Australia’s future case numbers by saying that, “it depends a lot on what happens in relation to China getting this under control, and they are doing a marvellous job at the moment ….” Centre: Australia’s then Chief Medical Officer, Brendan Murphy. On January 31, Murphy stated in an interview about the epidemic that, “clearly, it is not yet contained in China. But they are making Herculean efforts to do so.” Right: Canadian epidemiologist, Bruce Aylward, who led a team of 25 international experts in a WHO investigation into China’s response to COVID-19. In a 24 February 2020 press conference reporting on the mission, Aylward informed that: “In the face of a previously unknown disease, China has taken one of the most ancient approaches for infectious disease control and rolled out probably the most ambitious, and I would say, agile and aggressive disease containment efforts in history. China took old-fashioned measures, like the national approach to hand-washing, the mask-wearing, the social distancing, the universal temperature monitoring. But then very quickly, as it started to evolve, the response started to change. And it moved from this sort of one-size-fits-all approach to a science-and-risk-based approach, which was really tailored to allow it to use different containment approaches and measures, depending on the context, the capacity and really the nature of the coronavirus circulation…. they took this old approach and then turbo-charged it with modern science and modern technology in a way that was unimaginable even a few years ago…. What they’ve done has only been possible because of tremendous collective commitment and will of the Chinese people from the most bottom-level community leaders we met and talked to, to the governors at the top. It was an extraordinary, what we call all-of-government, all-of-society approach ….” However, as Moselmane found out, by late March, once it became clear just how poorly the capitalist countries had responded to the pandemic compared to China, any doctor, politician or other public figure praising China’s response was likely to be demonised and pilloried by Western ruling classes and their media hounds.

 “Revelations” of Moselmane’s Calling Out of White Australia Racism
Takes Witch-Hunt to White Heat

A week after their original exposé of Moselmane’s statements lauding China’s effective response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the SMH had a new revelation. They reported that in a February 5 opinion piece for the East China Normal University, Moselmane had attacked the Australian mainstream media for having “publicly played racist cards, offending and insulting many Australian citizens, especially Chinese residents” in actions that “further deepened the already great suffering of the victim.”

“Today, the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’ is once again flooding, and the theory of yellow fever has once again surfaced,” Moselmane wrote.

“Some mainstream media have bred and spread these racial viruses in our multicultural community with the purpose of inciting hatred.

“Today, media xenophobia and full-scale war against China have become the norm.”

Again Moselmane’s statements are a rather accurate description of what is happening on the ground. One has to be blind to reality or in complete denial to not know that Chinese and other East Asian background people in Australia have been subjected to numerous horrific racist attacks by “the obsolete scum of ‘white Australia’” over the last few months. People of Chinese appearance have been bashed in the streets, at supermarkets and on public transport. They have had threatening racist graffiti scrawled on their homes, had rocks thrown through their house and shop windows, been verbally abused, spat and coughed on and been ordered out of shops and other public places [6] [7] [8]. Racist scum have even abused nurses, doctors and other essential service workers (like bus drivers) of East Asian background and in some cases stalked them in a threatening manner [9] [10] [11]. It is therefore very understandable – and indeed completely necessary – that China’s Ministry of Culture and Tourism last night issued an urgent alert warning Chinese tourists not to travel to Australia. The alert correctly informed that “racial discrimination and acts of violence against Chinese and Asians in Australia have increased significantly.”

Resist the Despicable Racist Attacks against Ethnic Chinese People!

Horrific racist graffiti and death threat sprayed on the home of a Chinese-Australian family in the Melbourne suburb of Knoxfield. On another night, racist scum also threw a large rock smashing the family home’s window. As Moselmane correctly pointed out, some mainstream media have incited racial hatred by breeding and spreading racial viruses.

It is undoubtedly true that the attacks on Chinese and other Asian people have been fueled by the mainstream media and by the anti-China rants of the likes of Peter Dutton, Pauline Hanson, far right Coalition MPs George Christensen and Andrew Hastie (both of whom have previously spoken at racist rallies infested by Neo-Nazis and other white supremacists and anti-Semites) and rabid anti-PRC Labor MP, Anthony Byrne. This is proven by the fact that many of those committing racist attacks on the streets have done so while repeating the same anti-Chinese and anti-China diatribes as the right wing shock jocks and the rabid anti-China politicians [12] [13] [14].

Yet it is not only the most rabidly anti-China politicians and the most openly racist-inciting media presenters that bear responsibility for the renewed escalation of racist attacks on Asian background people over the last few months. The more “moderate” politicians in the Liberal Party and the ALP, who largely all support the Cold War drive against the PRC, and the “centrist”, liberal media who promote hostility to Red China, like the SMH and the ABC, are also guilty of breeding and spreading racial viruses. There have always been broadly two types of white supremacists in Australia. The first type are the openly rabid ones that can scarcely hide their hostility to all non-white skinned people. The second type are the more disguised types. They claim to be, or even consider themselves, non-racist and describe themselves as “centre-right”, “liberal” or even “progressive.” Many of them even like to make themselves feel good by expressing sympathy for people of colour when the latter are victims of racism. Yet, when a non-white people organise themselves into a militant anti-racist resistance force or into a powerful country, like the PRC, that challenges Western domination of the world then they think that this is absolutely unacceptable and you see all their latent prejudice oozing out. The “liberal” and “centrist” Australian media and the mainstream Australian politicians are of this second type of white supremacist. Of course, the mainstream media and politicians attacking China are not simply driven by racism. An even bigger factor is their hostility to socialistic states. Yet ever since the 1949 Chinese Revolution brought the toiling masses to power, hostility to China in the U.S. and Australia has combined anti-communist Red Peril fears with racist Yellow Peril xenophobia.

ABC and SMH journalists nevertheless insist that being anti-PRC does not mean that one is anti-Chinese. They are fond of claiming the authority of “experts” to push their Cold War agenda against the PRC. Yet many of the world’s leading scientists have drawn a direct link between the recent political attacks on China over the coronavirus and the racist attacks on Chinese people on the streets. Thus, a strongly worded editorial titled, “Stop the coronavirus stigma now” in the 7 April issue of the British scientific journal, Nature, the most prestigious scientific journal in the world, stated [15]:

“US President Donald Trump has repeatedly associated the virus with China. Brazilian lawmaker Eduardo Bolsonaro — the son of President Jair Bolsonaro — has called it `China’s fault’. Politicians elsewhere, including in the United Kingdom, are also saying that China bears responsibility.

“Continuing to associate a virus and the disease it causes with a specific place is irresponsible and needs to stop….

“Failing to do so has consequences. It’s clear that since the outbreak was first reported, people of Asian descent around the world have been subjected to racist attacks, with untold human costs — for example, on their health and livelihoods.”

Scott Morrison, Anthony Albanese and the “centrist”/liberal SMH and ABC have been just as guilty as Trump, Bolsonaro and many British politicians in promoting the “China’s fault” theory. They are, thus, just as guilty for inciting racist attacks on people of Asian descent. Of course these politicians and journalists would react with outraged denial if they were confronted with this truth. Yet they know full well that when they incite hostility to socialistic China they are doing it in a way that appeals to – and hence breeds – Yellow Peril racist fears. Afterwards they rub their sullied hands thoroughly with liberal doses of hand sanitiser and then, with all the “honesty” of Donald Trump, smugly express “shock” and “anger” when the rabid rednecks that they have just incited carry out racist attacks. But let us not be fooled by the “moderate” pretensions of the likes of SMH’s Peter Hartcher or the ABC’s Beverley O’Connor. Alongside their shock jock counterparts, the ruling class Australian politicians and the inherently divisive, dog-eat-dog nature of the capitalist system, these liberal media commentators share much responsibility for the terrifying rise in racist attacks on people of Chinese appearance over the last few months. Individually each of them may be personally responsible for just one or two percent of the racist attacks that have taken place. Yet given that there have been literally thousands of such attacks (most racist assaults and verbal threats are never reported but one Asian-Australian site collected details of over 300 separate attacks in just 5 weeks), each anti-China journalist or politician can be personally blamed for causing many individual attacks that would not have occurred had they not made their own contribution to the total dose of Red Peril and Yellow Peril hysteria. Put another way, several racist attacks would not have taken place had, say Peter Hartcher, not added to the incessant anti-PRC, “China is to blame” propaganda. We should keep this in mind when determining the methods by which we must resist these filthy, anti-China scum in the mainstream media.

Left: Political editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, Peter Hartcher, speaks at a forum of the right wing think tank, The Sydney Institute. With his fanatical anti-communist attacks on Red China, Hartcher has done as much as anyone in the media to incite anti-Asian violence in Australia. Right: One example of the result of the “blame China for the pandemic” propaganda spewed by the likes of Hartcher, the Murdoch media, 2GB and the Australian government and ALP “opposition”. One of the two white racist rednecks, screaming that Asians brought “corona here,” in the process of abusing, kicking and spitting on two Asian sisters in the Sydney suburb of Marrickville on 30 March 2020. Of course, the oh-so-“respectable” “centrist”, Hartcher, claims that he is only attacking the Communist Party of China and actually “abhors” racist violence. However, the truth is that he and his ilk know full well that when they incite hostility to socialistic China they are doing it in a manner that harnesses – and hence encourages – Yellow Peril racist prejudices.

Yet when Moselmane exposed media xenophobia against China and how Australia’s mainstream media “have publicly played racist cards”, he put his finger on a really raw, infected wound. Although capitalist rule in Australia has created one of the most racist societies on the planet, the ruling class insists on denying this. One reason is that they are well aware that their rule over this land was established through genocidal dispossession of this country’s first peoples, the Aboriginal people. They know that this truth is recalled whenever people like Moslemane, regardless of the context, speak too starkly about the reality of racism in Australia. They know that recalling this truth in turn damages the “legitimacy” of the Australian nationalist myths that they so depend on to bind the working class masses that they exploit to their self-seeking, ruling class agenda. Secondly, unlike their Western European counterparts, the immediate overseas neighbours of Australia’s ruling class are hundreds and hundreds of millions of non-white skinned peoples in the Pacific and Asia. These are the people that Australia’s imperialist rulers need for both trade and for labour to be exploited by Australian-owned multinational corporations. Any exposure of racist xenophobia within Australia damages the corporate elite’s lucrative business operations in the Asia-Pacific and their imperialist meddling in this region. For these reasons, the ruling class considers it almost as much an act of “treason” for a mainstream politician to bluntly call out White Australia racism as it is for a politician to make comments favourable to the PRC workers state. So when Moselmane’s comments attacking the mainstream media’s role in inciting racial hatred were publicised, the witch-hunt against him reached white heat. Within hours, Moslemane was forced to step down from his position as deputy president of the NSW upper house. He remains a seated member of the upper house.

The Years-Long Re-Emergence of Cold War McCarthyism

Today’s anti-China witch-hunt is, if anything, even broader in who it targets than the 1950s McCarthyist witch-hunt in the U.S. and Australia against anyone suspected of pro-communist sympathies. One does not even have to be branded a communist to be attacked today, as Moselmane found out. One has only to be a public figure who says anything positive about socialistic China. Two and a half years ago, former Labor federal senator Sam Dastyari was driven out of parliament following a 17 month-long witch-hunt for simply once saying that the South China Sea issue is an internal issue for China. However, whereas Moselmane has, to date, courageously stood by his factually correct statements applauding China’s pandemic response success, Dastyari apologised for saying what is true about the South China Sea issue and today cravenly condemns his past actions as he seeks to climb his way back into the political establishment. Yet Dastyari’s apologies at the time were not enough to stop the rabid anti-communists from howling him out of his senate seat.

Last year, there was an even more bizarre witch-hunt. The target, Gladys Liu, a Hong Kong Chinese woman is someone who is not only not a communist but actually a member of the conservative Liberal-National federal government; and a person with some pretty reprehensible right wing views to boot. Liu’s supposed “crime” is that she had once been a member of Chinese community organisations in Australia which apparently have members who are also members of other organisations that have loose ties to the Communist Party of China. For this she was viciously attacked by the media and by the ALP – the very same party that stabbed Moselmane in the back. Indeed ,the witch-hunt became so intense that members of the right wing, rabidly anti-communist Morrison government, eager to preserve their thin parliamentary majority, were able to correctly brand the ALP’s attacks on Liu as being racially-motivated and even McCarthyist.

In this stultifying anti-PRC atmosphere it is hardly just politicians who are being targeted. The capitalist media and politicians have been attacking any Chinese social organisation perceived as being sympathetic to the PRC or, otherwise, including members who are fond of Red China. In reality this means that just about any community organisation consisting of immigrants from mainland China could be targeted since the majority of migrants from mainland China are sympathetic to the PRC. 

Last year, Cold War witch-hunting increasingly targeted international students from the PRC. Especially attacked were those Chinese students who dared to express their sympathies for Red China, especially in regards to the Hong Kong events. These brave students were slandered by the mainstream media. Rabidly anti-communist academics even called for those international students that too strongly promote solidarity with China to face academic disciplinary proceedings. Then, last spring, in a move squarely aimed at silencing through repression the voice of pro-Red China international students, the Australian government announced the creation of a new taskforce to look into “foreign interference” on Australian campuses.

What do all these attacks on Australian-Chinese community organisations, pro-Red China international students and the likes of Moselmane say about the supposed “right to free speech in Australia”? Actually, attacks on dissent and whistleblowers in Australia extend beyond the persecution of those accused of being soft on socialistic China. Today, a former Australian spy, known only as “Witness K,” is facing imprisonment for having revealed that Australia had planted huge numbers of listening devices in East Timorese government buildings in order to give the Australian government the advantage in a dispute with East Timor over gas resources [16]. The Australian regime is also prosecuting Witness K’s lawyer, Bernard Collaery, and two weeks ago Collaery faced a sinister, secret pre-trial hearing [17]. Yet another whistleblower that the Australian regime is persecuting is former military lawyer, David McBride [18]. McBride faces up to 50 years in prison for leaking to the ABC details of horrific war crimes by Australian troops in Afghanistan – including the murder of unarmed civilians and children. Last June, the Australian Federal Police even raided the offices of the tame, government-funded media channel, the ABC, simply because the ABC had publicised the information from McBride [19]. It is clear that the “right to free-speech” in Australia exists in name only!

Ironically, the extreme right wing media commentators who attacked Moselmane most savagely claim to be the most strident defenders of “free speech,” especially whenever the Racial Discrimination Act is brought up. Yet the “free speech” that these people want is only the “freedom” to vilify Aboriginal people, Africans, Muslims, Asians, LGBTI communities and women’s rights activists. They want the “freedom” to incite racist riots the way that Alan Jones incited the horrific December 2005 white supremacist riot at Cronulla Beach. At the same time these shock jocks want to completely silence anyone who dares to say anything positive about socialistic China.

The truth is that the “right to free speech” in Australia has become more like the “right” to say what is tolerable to the capitalist ruling class. True, theoretically one can say what one wants… as long as one is not a whistle blower! And for people whose voice is not heard by too many people, this right can even sometimes exist in practice. But for people with a high enough profile that their voice will be heard by many, anything that they say that cuts against the exploiting class’ interests too sharply – for example, by praising socialistic China or calling out White Australia racism too bluntly – will see them vilified, threatened, hounded and ultimately driven out of their positions. Look at the way that not only Moslemane has been witch hunted but the way that Sudanese Australian media presenter, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, was abused and hounded out of this country three years ago after she made an ANZAC Day post linking the phrase “Lest we forget” to the horrific oppression of refugees in Australian detention camps at Nauru and Manus and to the brutal oppression of Palestinian people.

In many ways, the “right to free speech” in this country exists in much the same way as “democratic rights for all” does. Theoretically, everyone has an equal vote and say in “democratic Australia.” Yet in practice, under this country’s capitalist system, it is the ultra-rich big business owners who are able to mould “public opinion” and control society through their ownership of the media, through their ability to disproportionately fund political parties, pay for political advertising, finance think tanks and hire lobbyists and through their numerous ties to the upper echelons of all key state and bureaucratic institutions. And whenever their domination meets a significant challenge, they don’t hesitate to throw out any coverings of “democracy” and rely on naked state repression. This is just like how their American capitalist counterparts are today unleashing riot cops and the National Guards to viciously attack those taking part in the ongoing anti-racist resistance there.

At the same time, in a society where workers are exploited and Aboriginal people, ethnic minorities, women and LGBTI communities face such oppression, it is vital that we defend whatever limited democratic rights that we do actually have. For it is the working class masses united with all the downtrodden that is the only force that can fight against exploitation and oppression in this country. That is why it is high time that we confront the growing McCarthyist madness and rebuff the attacks on basic democratic rights. Let us say: Down with the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane! No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! The right to free speech must include the right to praise – and indeed support – socialistic countries like the PRC! Drop all charges against whistle blowers David McBride, Witness K and Bernard Collaery!

Racism and Anti-PRC Witch-hunting

As with almost everything else that is negative in Australian society, anti-Red China witch-hunting feeds off and accentuates White Australia racism: that very same racial virus infecting Australia that Moselmane dared to identify. So how did this racial virus spread? For starters, one should understand that the disease of racism is actually widespread within most capitalist societies. Exploiting classes breed racism to divide multiracial working classes. They also inflame racism in order to divert mass frustrations onto racial minorities and, thus, away from the capitalist rulers themselves. Moreover, in imperialist countries like Australia, a racial superiority mentality is transmitted in order to enlist the population behind ruling class acts of military intervention, plunder and paternalism in the poorer “Third World” countries. In Australia there is also a big additional factor spawning racism. That is the fact that capitalist rule here was founded on the genocidal dispossession of this country’s indigenous first peoples, a crime that could only be organised and “justified” by spreading the most extreme form of white supremacist prejudice imaginable.

Today, it is telling that the three politicians who have been most intensely witch-hunted in recent times for supposedly being soft on China – Shaoquett Moselmane, Gladys Liu and Sam Dastyari – are all among the very few politicians in this country from people of colour backgrounds. People who are not white simply have less leeway in this racist society. While hardcore white supremacists are opposed to all people of colour all the time, the more insidious, mainstream form of white supremacy embraced by the bulk of the ruling elite sees non-white people as acceptable until they do something which is deemed “wrong”, in which case all the prejudice gushes out and they will be attacked far more severely than a white person doing the same thing. Yassmin Abdel-Magied certainly copped that when she was cruelly driven out of the country in a barely disguised, racist and misogynist witch-hunt.

All this shows the limits of “multiculturalism” as it is practiced by the ruling class. In their warped version, people from non-Anglo backgrounds are free to practice their own cultures as long as they all accept Western domination of the world and the current social order in Australia where the capitalist big end of town rules and Aboriginal people remain dispossessed. Any non-white person who does, or even says, anything even slightly contradicting this status quo is deemed disloyal and “ungrateful.” We let you into the country so the least you could do is to… such is the attitude of ruling class-created “public opinion” towards people of colour who dare question, in even the most minimal way, the myths of the current social order. All the while this mainstream still claims to stand by “multiculturalism.” This shows that, in practice, the official form of Australian “multiculturalism” sees people of colour confined to a second class status. It is far, far from a genuinely egalitarian and anti-racist multi-racialism.

The same implicit, underlying racism that added to the severity of the campaign against Moslemane has also been evident in a vicious campaign against WHO leader Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, again for having the temerity to praise China’s effective response to the coronavirus outbreak. Dr Ghebreyesus, a microbiologist of Ethiopian background, is the first WHO chief from Africa. As far as unashamed racists are concerned, Africans are not meant to hold such senior positions in international organisations. More liberal, mainstream racists could tolerate Dr Ghebreyesus in this role as long as he did not do anything that contradicted Western imperialist agendas. When Dr Ghebreyesus simply stated the facts by praising the PRC’s response to the virus, all the underlying racism gushed out and he was subjected to incredible abuse and death threats. Although the WHO is an agency under the imperialist dominated UN, Dr Ghebreyesus has shown considerable courage to stand up to racism and colonialist attitudes. When two of France’s most senior doctors despicably called on national TV for testing COVID-19 treatments on Africans [20], Dr Ghebreyesus rightly slammed the remarks as “racist” and a “hangover from a colonial mentality” [21]. Just like when it was revealed that Moselmane had called out White Australia racism, Dr Ghebreyesus’ strong stand against racism only intensified the attacks against him. Yet he stood firm against these racist attacks too and called them out:

“I can tell you personal attacks that have been going on for more than two, three months. Abuses, or racist comments, giving me names, black or Negro. I’m proud of being black, proud of being Negro.

“I don’t care, to be honest … even death threats. I don’t give a damn.

Dr Ghebreyesus also called out that many of the attacks had been associated with supporters of Donald Trump’s favourite regime, Taiwan [22]:

“Three months ago, this attack came from Taiwan. We need to be honest. I will be straight today. From Taiwan.

“And Taiwan, the Foreign Ministry also, they know the campaign. They didn’t disassociate themselves. They even started criticizing me in the middle of all that insult and slur, but I didn’t care.”

Angered by all the attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus, the African Union came to his defence [23]. A statement released by the African Union on the very same day that Dr Ghebreyesus called out Taiwanese racism, emphasised that:

“… the Chairperson of the African Union and President of the Republic of South Africa, HE Cyril Ramaphosa reaffirms his appreciation for the exceptional leadership of the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO), Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, from the very earliest stages of this unprecedented global health crisis.

 “The African Union has also commended the management of Dr Tedros in leading the global response to the pandemic.”

As an aside, we must note that it should be little surprise that many of the racist attacks on Dr Ghebreyesus should come from supporters of the Taiwanese regime, with the implicit support of the regime itself. Taiwan was created as a de facto state when leaders of the right-wing former Kuomintang regime and members of the deposed landlord-capitalist exploiting class of China fled that country’s 1949 anti-capitalist revolution and set up base in Taiwan. Since then, the Taiwanese regime has been a stalwart of support for reactionary causes. Taiwan was one of the strongest supporters of the former Apartheid regime in South Africa. Backing the Apartheid regime against those fighting for black liberation, Taiwanese ambassador to Apartheid South Africa, H. K. Yang, stated that: “South Africa and my country are joined in the fight against communism. We are in favour of free enterprise, democracy and freedom” [24]. Taiwan, the former Apartheid rulers of South Africa and the murderously racist Israeli regime established a triangular axis of collaboration on developing nuclear weapons [25]. Taiwan was instrumental in enabling the former Apartheid regime to acquire nuclear weapons.

Cold War Witch-hunting Will Lead to
Greater Repression of All Progressive Forces

The Australian ruling class has already harnessed its drive against those accused of being “soft” on Red China to power its push to constrict the rights of broader sections of society. Thus, two years ago, under the cover of contrived fears about “Chinese interference” and the supposed “threat” posed by the activities of pro-PRC members of Australia’s Chinese community, the Liberal government, with ALP support, rammed through two new laws targeting “foreign interference” that will provide pretexts for Australian regime crackdowns on protest movements and media reporting. Then, in the midst of the Australian ruling class spearheading outrageous attacks on China over the virus outbreak, last month Peter Dutton introduced into parliament the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Amendment Bill 2020. The proposed new laws will give the regime the “right” to prevent a person under ASIO investigation from contacting their lawyer, allow ASIO to expel an interrogated person’s lawyer if they deem the lawyer to be “interrupting questioning”, gives ASIO the power to question 14 year-old children and grants them the “right” to track people without the need for a warrant [26].

The Australian regime’s drive against Red China and those deemed to be sympathetic to her at home has fuelled a “national security” obsession that has in turn made it easier for the Australian regime to target dissenters who have no direct connection with Cold War issues. It is telling that although those who blew the whistle on the Australian state’s spying in East Timor were first raided in 2013, the Australian regime did not feel that it could get away with actually laying charges on the two whistle blowers – Witness K and Bernard Collaery – until a whole five years later. Although the anti-China crusade and the suppression of those exposing the crimes of the Australian regime in East Timor are not directly connected, it is undoubted that the “national security” fixation created by the escalation of anti-PRC witch-hunting over the last few years made the government feel more confident to pursue the prosecution of whistle blowers in 2018 than they did in 2013. It is notable too that the very same Peter Dutton who demanded Moselmane’s removal from parliament was just weeks later demanding the sacking of Victoria’s Deputy Chief Health Officer, Dr Annaliese van Diemen, for merely making a very insightful tweet comparing the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic to the suffering of Aboriginal people caused by colonial invasion [27]:

“Sudden arrival of an invader from another land, decimating populations, creating terror. Forces the population to make enormous sacrifices & completely change how they live in order to survive. COVID19 or Cook 1770?”

The obsession with “protecting national interests” that the Australian ruling class have whipped up through their Cold War drive is also being used by them to justify repressive measures and laws targeting workers’ industrial action and more militant unions, both of which are branded as harmful to “national interests.”

Bottom: Some of the Trotskyist Platform placards at the 17 August 2019 demonstration in Sydney against the pro-colonial rioters in Hong Kong included messages warning that the Australian ruling class’ campaign against socialistic China is fuelling a “national security” obsession that would be used to attack people and movements not even directly connected to the Cold War drive. Top: 18 July 2019, Canberra: David McBride, the whistleblower who revealed to the media details of horrific war crimes committed by Australian troops in Afghanistan speaks at a rally in his defence. The Australian regime is prosecuting McBride with charges that could see him jailed for 50 years for his brave exposure of “the Australian Defence Force’s unethical, harmful and highly politicised leadership.” There is no doubt that McBride as well as other persecuted whistleblowers, dissident lawyers and investigative journalists are victims of the “national security” hysteria largely created by the Cold War McCarthyist witchhunt against anyone deemed to be a supporter of Red China.

More insightful people, even those who do not necessarily have sympathy for socialistic China are starting to see the threat of broader repression posed by Cold War witch-hunting. Thus, although no mainstream politician from any party and not a single journalist, that we know of, from the main media outlets have had the courage to publicly defend Moselmane, there were prominent community voices that did protest against his witch-hunt. Prominent left-liberal Stuart Rees, an Emeritus Professor at the University of Sydney and the founder director of the Sydney Peace Foundation issued a statement condemning the witch-hunt [28]. In it, Rees insisted that:

“Mosselmane was the victim of character assassination for questioning anti-Chinese sentiment and for praising Chinese leadership’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic in Wuhan.”

An article in the April 10 issue of the Australian Muslim Times newspaper also condemned the witch-hunt of Moselmane [29], noting that:

“The weak-kneed response of this onslaught against a colleague by the NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay MP is highly disappointing and shown to be a leader incapable of standing up for her colleagues and for what’s right.”

The article also quoted a protest letter to the NSW ALP leader by Chinese Community Council of Australia’s Dr Anthony Pun, where Pun stated that:

“…we are indebted to the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, who have shown empathy and compassion to our difficulties, particularly to racists taunts, racially vilification and hate speech…. We are aware of the recent media attempting to discredit him and saying that his remarks on China was inappropriate was unwarranted and simply wrong.”

The Australian Muslim Times article also reported on the statements of others who opposed the witch-hunt of Moselmane:

“Mr Bashir Sawalha, President of United Australian Palestinian Workers Association (UAPWA) has condemned the spiteful media attacks on Mr Moselmane and has also criticised the lack of support for him by Ms McKay.”

We welcome the fact that such a broad range of voices have condemned this McCarthyist witch-hunt. There needs to the broadest possible united-front push back against the Cold War persecution of people who make positive comments about the PRC or express support for her. And we need to the resist the broader attacks on democratic rights that such McCarthyist persecution is driving.

Ditch the ALP – Let’s Build a Workers Party That
Will Actually Stand Up to the Capitalists and their Media

Despite being stabbed in the back multiple times by his own ALP colleagues, Shaoquett Moselmane has reaffirmed his commitment to the Labor Party. He released a statement that, while expressing deepest gratitude to those who offered solidarity with him against the recent attacks, asserted that “it is through the Australian Labor Party that we can advance the wellbeing and welfare of all Australians” [30]. Yet many of the supporters of Moselmane, who is rather popular amongst working class communities of Middle Eastern, African, Asian and South American origins, may have other thoughts. They would have been horrified at how the ALP leadership joined in the witch-hunt of the person they see as the spokesman for their concerns and would have noted how few – perhaps none (!) – of his Labor parliamentary colleagues actually publicly came to his defence in a forceful, high-profile manner.

Some of Moselmane’s supporters are likely amongst the many working class people who support the ALP through gritted teeth. Such people have long ago lost faith in the Labor Party’s commitment, let alone ability, to deliver meaningful social change. Many of these people have seen Labor Party leaders time and again betray promises privately made to them to make greater efforts to reduce inequality, ease the shortage of affordable rental accommodation and genuinely oppose racist attacks on non-white communities. Nevertheless these people, many from migrant backgrounds or lower-paid workers, cling on to the ALP because they hope that a few good people there can at least make some headway in changing the ALP’s stance, however minimally, on a few issues: perhaps make the ALP take a stronger stand on opposing job slashing by bosses, more truly stand for genuine multiculturalism, curb its strident support for Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine and wind back its fulsome adherence to the U.S.-led Cold War drive against China. Yet, as the witch-hunt of Moselmane again confirms, these have proven to be false hopes. Despite the sincerity of rank and file ALP supporters who hold these illusions, the truth is that the ALP has never sought to curb the “right” of even profitable companies to slash jobs whenever that is what it takes to further boost their own filthy profits. And the Labor Party is just as rabid in supporting Israel’s murderous oppression of Palestinian people as the Tories are and just as fervent in lining up behind the Cold War drive against socialistic China. And as for the type of “multiculturalism” envisaged by the ALP, one has only to look at the actions of the previous two leaders of the NSW ALP. At a meeting in the Blue Mountains in September 2018, former ALP leader Michael Daley incited racial prejudice when he disgustingly blamed migrants – especially from Asia – for taking local jobs and pushing young people out of Sydney [31]. Four months earlier, Daley’s predecessor Luke Foley also inflamed hostility to people of colour by despicably claiming that refugees are swamping Western Sydney leading to a “white flight” of Anglo families from these suburbs [32]. Meanwhile, just last month, the last ALP NSW premier, Kristina Keneally, now a senior member of federal Labor’s shadow ministry, was blowing out of the same dog whistle to racism as Daley and Foley as she called for a cut to migration and for local workers to get a “first go at jobs” [33].

To all those disillusioned with the ALP because it fails to actually stand up to the big end of town and refuses to fully shed its own white nationalist prejudices let alone challenge these notions, we say that it is high time to throw the ALP into the non-recyclable bin. The ALP is useless as an instrument for progressive change. And the problem is not merely that the ALP has lost its way. The bitter truth is that the ALP was never on the right track. Let’s remember that the Labor Party was founded on the principle of the White Australia Policy exclusion of Asian and other non-white immigrants. It is true that in certain periods – like the Whitlam years – the ALP oversaw some progressive reforms. But these were only ceded because the ruling class was in a weakened position –it was losing the Vietnam War to the heroic Vietnamese communists during the Whitlam period and facing a resurgent left and workers movement – and needed to grant the masses some concessions. These measures were taken by the ALP in order to stave off a much more deep-going working class radicalisation that could have conquered still greater gains for the masses. Yet, even at the best of times, the ALP’s approach has always been to try and make some piecemeal reforms for workers while retaining the acceptance of the capitalist bigwigs. This program has been a failure because the interests of the working class and those of the capitalist business owners are completely counter-posed. Every time that ALP leaders kowtow before the capitalist class and their media, they make this ruling class stronger, which in turn puts the ALP under even greater pressure to prostrate before these bigwigs. Such is logic of the ALP’s irreversible spiral downwards. For example, by pandering to the Murdoch and Fairfax media and the likes of Hadley and Credlin in their attacks on Moselmane, NSW ALP leader Jodi McKay strengthened the authority of these capitalist media outfits. So when the Murdoch media went on a crusade against today’s Black Lives Matter protests, McKay was under more pressure to bow to the wishes of Murdoch’s media than she otherwise would have been. This she duly did. Yesterday, Jodi McKay attacked Liberal premier Gladys Berejiklian from the right for not having then banned the planned protest. “Is (Premier Berejiklian) really giving her approval for a mass rally with potentially thousands of participants, when the maximum number of people allowed to visit a private home remains just five,” McKay told Murdoch’s Daily Telegraph [34]. It was this white supremacist-pandering attack by the NSW Labor leader on Berejiklian’s supposed softness on the protest that then pushed the conservative premier to move to ban today’s antiracist demonstration.

What we need is a workers party that in direct contrast to the ALP is not interested in gaining the approval or even the tolerance of any section of the capitalist class. Such a party would be based on the understanding that the interests of the working class masses can only be advanced through consistent opposition to the entire capitalist class. It would fight to restrict the “right” of capitalist bosses to slash jobs and fight for laws that would force company owners to increase their hiring of permanent workers at the expense of their profits. The workers party that we need would understand that advancing the masses interests can only come through building genuine workers unity. That means replacing the ALP’s hypocritical platitudes to “multiculturalism” and “reconciliation” with a merciless war against all outbreaks of white supremacy. It would fight for mass union/Aboriginal/Asian/Muslim/African mobilisations to crush violent redneck attacks, for the immediate jailing of all police and prison guards responsible for the deaths of Aboriginal people in custody and for the granting of all the rights of citizenship to all refugees, guest workers and international students. Such a party would also stand by all the peoples of the world subjugated by the same Australian capitalist class that exploits workers here at home, by the peoples subjugated by Canberra’s Washington big brother ally and by all those downtrodden by the reactionary regimes supported by these U.S. and Australian imperialists. That means it would oppose Australian imperialist plunder and paternalist bullying in the South Pacific and would demand the immediate and unconditional withdrawal of all U.S. and Australian troops from Afghanistan, the Persian Gulf and all of the Middle East. It would also oppose all U.N. and U.S. economic sanctions on the peoples of North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela and Iran. A true workers party would also demand the removal of all Israeli troops and settlers from all of the West Bank and Gaza and fight for the destruction of the racial-supremacist Israeli state and its replacement by a bi-national, secular workers state where Jews and Palestinians will live together in socialist harmony. Most crucially, the international policy of a party that truly defends workers interests would emphasise the unconditional defence of socialistic rule in China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and Laos against imperialist military pressure, lying propaganda campaigns and Western-backed anti-communist forces. This policy is essential despite the bureaucratic deformations and capitalist intrusions that distort socialistic rule in these countries. In short, what we need is a party that will defend the states where workers have achieved power abroad while fighting for workers rule here in Australia.

From causing a growing gap between rich and poor to its inability to provide secure, permanent jobs to its flawed response to the pandemic to the racist state brutality that it administers, capitalist rule is every day making life more miserable for the masses. The widespread revelations of racist state terror against black people and the brutal response of police to Black Lives Matter protests not only shows the true nature of capitalist “democracy” but exposes the blatant hypocrisy of capitalist regimes when they make allegations against the PRC, DPRK and other socialistic states over “human rights”. Now in the U.S., many working class people are questioning their faith in capitalist “democracy” and for the first time in a long while have begun to take the political offensive. Here in Australia, today’s mass anti-racist protests are a sign of the potential to turn around the ruling class’ decades-long offensive against Aboriginal people, other people of colour and the broader working class masses. Yet, as we look to possibly move onto the front foot, we need to guard our rear against attack. The more that we resist, the more that the exploiting class will fear the spectre of communism and, thus, the more that they will resort to Cold War witch-hunting and propaganda campaigns. That makes it doubly important to resist the Cold War attacks on those who sympathise with, or praise, the PRC and other socialistic countries. Let us condemn the witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane and demand: No to the targeting of Australian-Chinese community organisations! Stop the persecution of pro-PRC Chinese international students! Rebuff the all-sided attacks on democratic rights that the McCarthyist anti-PRC witch-hunt is fuelling!

References

  1. Charles Calisher, Dennis Carroll, Rita Colwell, Ronald B Corley, Peter Daszak, Christian Drosten, Luis Enjuanes, Jeremy Farrar, Hume Field, Josie Golding, Alexander Gorbalenya, Bart Haagmans, James M Hughes, William B Karesh, Gerald T Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Juan Lubroth, John S Mackenzie, Larry Madoff, Jonna Mazet, Peter Palese, Stanley Perlman, Leo Poon, Bernard Roizman, Linda Saif, Kanta Subbarao and Mike Turner, Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19 (published 19 February 2020), The Lancet, Volume 395, Issue 10226, E42-E43, 7 March 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
  2. WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), Report of the WHO-China Joint Mission on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), World Health Organization (WHO) website, 28 February 2020, https://www.who.int/publications-detail/report-of-the-who-china-joint-mission-on-coronavirus-disease-2019-(covid-19)
  3. Australian Department of Health, Doorstop interview about funding for mental health initiatives and novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 30 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/ministers/the-hon-greg-hunt-mp/media/doorstop-interview-about-funding-for-mental-health-initiatives-and-novel-coronavirus
  4. Australian Department of Health, Chief Medical Officer on ABC News Breakfast about novel coronavirus, Department of Health website, 31 January 2020, https://www.health.gov.au/news/chief-medical-officer-on-abc-news-breakfast-about-novel-coronavirus-0
  5. Tucker Higgins, Trump thanks China’s Xi Jinping for handling of coronavirus, CNBC website,  24 January 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/24/trump-thanks-chinas-xi-jinping-for-handling-of-coronavirus.html
  6. Chanel Zagon, Two female students from University of Melbourne brutally bashed in CBD, Nine News website, 17 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/female-university-of-melbourne-students-brutally-bashed-in-cbd-assault/2ae42833-10bf-4e72-b55c-550a5ec06d91?ref=BP_RSS_ninenews_5_-disgusting–footage-shows-female-students-bashed-in-vile-attack_170420
  7. Jason Fang, Samuel Yang and Christina Zhou, Coronavirus has fuelled racism against Asian-Australians, but why isn’t official data showing it?, ABC News website, 5 May 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-05/coronavirus-racist-attacks-asian-australians-missing-data/12211630?nw=0
  8. Isobel Roe, Racism towards Chinese Australians over coronavirus condemned, ABC Radio PM program website, 11 February 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/pm/racism-towards-chinese-australians-over-coronavirus-condemned/11955286
  9. Chanel Zagon, Health authorities slam racist attacks on Royal Children’s Hospital staff, Nine News website, 27 February 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/health-authorities-slam-racist-attacks-on-royal-childrens-hospital-staff/97770fda-0540-497b-add7-949636f3b014?
  10. ABC News, Doctor calls for unity during coronavirus pandemic after being targeted in racist attack, 20 April 2020, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-20/coronavirus-geelong-doctor-calls-for-unity-after-racist-attack/12164282
  11. Chanel Zagon, Coronavirus: Melbourne bus driver racially abused by passenger, Nine News website, 3 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-melbourne-bus-driver-racially-abused-by-passenger/c87d83b7-36e0-4171-8409-49dffc31c986
  12. Samuel Yang, Video shows Chinese woman being racially attacked in Melbourne over coronavirus, ABC News website, https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2020-05-06/coronavirus-woman-racist-attack-in-melbourne/12216854?nw=0
  13. Rory McClaren, Horrific racist attack on Adelaide councillor, Nine News website, 8 April 2020, https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-racist-attack-adelaide-councillor/5578323a-aa21-4dc5-933b-db0394effdf7?
  14. Eliza McPhee, Man armed with a WHIP goes on a racist rant outside Chinese Consulate in Sydney and accuses visitors wearing masks of spreading coronavirus, 2 April 2020, Daily Mail Australian Edition website, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8178421/Man-armed-WHIP-goes-racist-tirade-outside-Chinese-Consulate.html
  15. Nature Editorial, Stop the coronavirus stigma now, Nature website, 7 April 2020, https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01009-0
  16. Callum Foote, Since when is it a crime to report a crime? Bernard Collaery exposes the Timor Sea betrayal, Michael West Media website, 28 April 2020, https://www.michaelwest.com.au/since-when-did-it-become-a-crime-to-report-a-crime-bernard-collaery-exposes-the-timor-sea-betrayal/
  17. Blake Foden, ‘Sad times’: Bernard Collaery laments ‘now fragile democracy’ as pre-trial hearing takes place in secret, The Canberra Times website, 25 May 2020, https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/6768177/sad-times-collaery-laments-now-fragile-democracy-as-pre-trial-hearing-takes-place-in-secret/?cs=14225
  18. Associated Press, David McBride to represent himself in court because he ‘doesn’t trust’ Defence to clear lawyer, Nine News website, 7 November 2019, https://www.9news.com.au/national/australian-army-whistleblower-david-mcbride-in-court-represent-himself/0c6279c2-1fc3-4407-8a00-dae89f16dad4
  19. Elizabeth Byrne, Afghan Files leak accused David McBride faces ACT Supreme Court for first time, ABC News website, 14 June 2019, https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-13/abc-raids-afghan-files-leak-accused-court-canberra/11206682
  20. Julian Kossoff, 2 top French doctors said on live TV that coronavirus vaccines should be tested on poor Africans, leaving viewers horrified, Business Insider Australia website, 3 April 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/coronavirus-vaccines-france-doctors-say-test-poor-africans-outrage-2020-4?r=US&IR=T
  21. Stephanie Busari and Barbara Wojazer, French doctors’ proposal to test Covid-19 treatment in Africa slammed as ‘colonial mentality’, CNN website, 7 April 2020,  https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/07/africa/french-doctors-africa-covid-19-intl/index.html
  22. William Feuer, WHO chief addresses death threats, racist insults: ‘I don’t give a damn’, CNBC website, 8 April 2020, https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/08/who-chief-addresses-death-threats-racist-insults-i-dont-give-a-damn.html
  23. African Union, African Union reaffirms its unwavering support to WHO, African Union website, 8 April 2020, https://au.int/en/pressreleases/20200408/african-union-reaffirms-its-unwavering-support-who
  24. Wikipedia, South Africa–Taiwan relations, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Africa%E2%80%93Taiwan_relations (accessed 9 May 2020)
  25. Judith Miller, 3 NATIONS WIDENING NUCLEAR CONTACTS, The New York Times, 28 June 1981, https://www.nytimes.com/1981/06/28/world/3-nations-widening-nuclear-contacts.html
  26. Greg Barns, New ASIO law one more step towards a totalitarian state, Sydney Morning Herald website, 13 May 2020, https://www.smh.com.au/national/new-asio-law-one-more-step-towards-a-totalitarian-state-20200513-p54smi.html 
  27. SBS, Scott Morrison, Peter Dutton slam Victorian health official over Captain Cook tweet, SBS website, 1 May 2020, https://www.sbs.com.au/news/scott-morrison-peter-dutton-slam-victorian-health-official-over-captain-cook-tweet
  28. Stuart Rees, Character Assassination as Journalism & Politics, John Menadue – Pearls and Irritations website, 5 May 2020, https://johnmenadue.com/stuart-rees-character-assassination-as-journalism-politics/
  29. Zia Ahmad, Witch-hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane condemned, Australian Muslim Times, 10 April 2020, https://www.amust.com.au/2020/04/witch-hunt-of-shaoquett-moselmane-condemned/
  30. The World Observer Newspaper, Letter from the Hon Shaoquett Moselmane MLC, 13 April 2020, https://theworldobserver.com.au/2020/04/13/letter-from-hon-shaoquett-moselmane-mlc/
  31. Australian Associated Press, Michael Daley claims Asian workers taking young people’s jobs in Sydney, The Guardian website, 19 March 2019, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/mar/19/michael-daley-claims-asian-workers-taking-young-peoples-jobs-in-sydney
  32. Anne Davies, Luke Foley apologises for ‘white flight’ comment, saying he now knows it’s offensive, The Guardian website, 24 May 2018, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/may/24/luke-foley-defends-white-flight-comment-but-denies-dog-whistling
  33. Euan Black, Labor’s Kristina Keneally slammed for linking immigration to unemployment, The New Daily website, 3 May 2020, https://thenewdaily.com.au/finance/finance-news/2020/05/03/kristina-keneally-immigration/
  34. Jenna Benson, NSW Government Seek To Stop Tomorrow’s Protests In Sydney, WSFM radio website, 5 June 2020, https://www.wsfm.com.au/local/nsw-government-seek-to-stop-black-lives-matter-protest-in-sydney/ (accessed 7 June 2020)

释放Chan Han Choi – 一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

释放Chan Han Choi  –
一位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯!

2019年4月13日,Chan Han Choi,这位在澳大利亚的社会主义者政治犯的支持者举行了第二次抗议行动,要求政府给他自由。 Choi是一名澳大利亚公民,从韩国移民过来差不多已经有31年了。过去16个月一直被澳大利亚政府监禁。由于他对朝鲜的同情,澳大利亚当局拒绝让他保释。

Even generic cialis levitra your doctor would happily recommend it. Know the diabetes Symptoms: Most of the diabetes complications are based on high blood glucose, and troubles for libido are not exceptions. buy generic levitra http://icks.org/n/data/conference/1482371262_report_file.pdf Now prescription free levitra in some cases cardiologists are comparing cholesterol lowering to the limbo game; “how low can you go?” What may be behind your lack of interest in sex that causes personal grief. A good sexual functioning is always cialis in canada pharmacy depends on a whole host of issues, which includes libido, desire, and brain hormones.

Choi被指控违反联合国经济制裁,帮助朝鲜出口物资。尽管当局在严酷的条件下拘禁他,但他仍然蔑视并要做“无罪”辩护。即使这些针对Choi的指控证实属实,但从工人阶级的角度来看,他当然不是罪犯。恰恰相反!如果Choi确实试图通过交易来帮助朝鲜,这只会证明他冒着巨大的个人风险来帮助朝鲜人民,他们正经受着没有任何其他国家经受过的最严厉的摧残式制裁。 Choi反对制裁不仅基于他的人道主义,而且基于他对朝鲜社会的平等主义和社区精神的热爱。无论人们如何看待朝鲜的某个特别领导人,朝鲜都是一个以所有主要银行,工业,农业用地和矿山的集体所有制为基础的工人国家。在支持这种基于公有制的社会主义国家的过程中,Choi和所有遭受以资本主义私有制为主的经济而带来的痛苦的澳大利亚人的利益是一致的。他和遭受资本主义社会造成的种族主义暴力和虐待的澳大利亚原住民以及亚洲,穆斯林和非洲少数民族社区是站在一起的。所以澳大利亚和世界的工人阶级有必要支持Chan Han Choi。我们现在必须要求清除对他所有指控。

除了拒绝Choi保释外,澳大利亚政府还限制支持者访问他,切断他的电话,阻止他的儿子去监狱里探望他,并阻止他的律师去访问。剥夺他的权利以及基于他对朝鲜的支持而否决他的保释是澳大利亚新兴的冷战式政治迫害社会主义国家支持者的一部分。这种逐渐侵入的麦卡锡主义也出现在澳大利亚华人社区的成员和中国国际学生中,他们被澳大利亚国家和媒体妖魔化,只是为了他们对红色中国的同情, 现在也受到了迫害 。这就是为什么今天行动的组织者决定在悉尼唐人街举行4月13日的抗议游行。

4月13日的抗议行动参加人数几乎是去年9月Choi的第一次集会的人数的两倍,而且更加活跃。但还有很多事情需要做。世界各地的所有人都反对帝国主义的欺凌行为,那些代表基于社会主义公有制的制度的人和反对冷战式政治迫害左翼的人有必要参加竞选活动,以要求释放Chan Han Choi。我们还有必要与Choi一起反对资本主义大国,利用制裁来对朝鲜人民进行经济恐吓,使他们默许资本主义征服,以及亿万富翁,西方银行家,房地产投机商和血汗工厂老板的收购。帝国主义对朝鲜的压力最终也是为了破坏其邻国和盟国中国的社会主义政权。

Free Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange! Free Chan Han Choi!

13 April 2019: The following statement on the recent imprisonment of Julian Assange was made by Trotskyist Platform chairwoman, Sara Fitzenmeyer at the 13 April, 2019 protest action in support of left-wing, pro-DPRK political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi (for a report on that sizable and vibrant protest go to: https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/energetic-protest-demands-freedom-for-socialist-political-prisoner-in-australia/):

Like Chelsea Manning, Assange is being persecuted because he helped to expose the war crimes of Western imperialism. In particular, Assange helped to spread details of the horrific atrocities of U.S. imperialism in Iraq and Afghanistan that Chelsea Manning so courageously provided. The Western rulers are cruelly persecuting him to deter others from exposing the ghastly crimes of U.S. and allied imperialism. Therefore, we call for freedom for Julian Assange. We also demand freedom for Chelsea Manning – perhaps the biggest hero in the events surrounding Wikileaks – who was thrown back in jail in March for bravely refusing to testify against Assange before the now not so secret Grand Jury in the US.

“At the same time we can’t help but notice that some of the people willing to defend Assange are not willing to take a stand in defence of Chan Han Choi. Perhaps some people, without even being conscious of it, are more comfortable having a white-skinned hero than an Asian one. But, actually, the case of Chan Han Choi is even more crucial for opponents of imperialism in this country than that of Julian Assange’s. Firstly, Choi is a political prisoner right here in Australia. Secondly, unlike Assange, who while having laudably exposed some of the horrific war crimes of Western imperialism later also did take some political stances which were against the interests of the toiling masses, Choi’s deeds, by assisting a socialistic state, are uniformly in the interests of the working class and oppressed of the world.

The treatment is initially started with female viagra in india bought here 25mg dosage. viagra sale Your body needs histamine in order to control and manage their ocular psoriasis symptoms. In this era, you can see a sharp increase cheapest cialis india deeprootsmag.org in body weight. When you keep browse around my store acquisition de viagra your prostate in good condition, it will ward off the chances of developing any problems with it.

So, we call on determined anti-imperialists amongst those who are rightly defending Julian Assange to also stand by Chan Han Choi. Indeed, the persecution of Assange gives us a taste of where the persecution of Choi will lead to. For first, the capitalist authorities target people like Choi who support socialistic states. And if they are allowed to get away with that then they will target others – like Assange – who are not even avowed partisans of the working class but who in some way get in the way of imperialism. That is why it is so important to stop the persecution of Chan Han Choi. We need to put an end to the emerging McCarthyite witch-hunt before it spreads just like the 1950s Cold War witch-hunt did and starts targeting broader and broader layers of activists and journalists.

So we say: Free Julian Assange! Free Chelsea Manning! Free Chan Han Choi now!

A Trotskyist Platform placard at the 13 April 2019, Sydney rally in defence of socialist political prisoner, Chan Han Choi, also demands freedom for Chelsea Manning and Julian Assange.

FREE LEFT WING POLITICAL PRISONER CHAN HAN CHOI!

Pro-DPRK Socialist Stands Firm
despite Australian Regime Stripping Him of His Rights

FREE LEFT WING POLITICAL PRISONER CHAN HAN CHOI!

22 March 2019: Four months ago, political prisoner Chan Han Choi spent his sixtieth birthday locked up in one of Australia’s harshest prison camps. An Australian citizen who migrated from South Korea 31 years ago, Choi has been imprisoned for the last 16 months. The Australian regime has denied him bail and many of the rights that should be accorded to prisoners and defendants. Why? Because of his sympathies for socialistic North Korea – that’s why!

Choi has been charged with helping North Korea to export its produce abroad in violation of United Nations economic sanctions. The Australian authorities claim that Choi attempted to broker export deals to send North Korea’s produce to entities in other Asian countries. However, despite all the pressure that has been placed on him, Choi has pleaded Not Guilty to all charges and is in jail awaiting trial.

Contrary to some media reports, none of the charges relate to Choi supporting North Korea’s development of a nuclear deterrent. The Australian Federal Police (AFP) do not even accuse him of helping North Korea to import any nuclear or missile technology. All the charges relate to the alleged export of North Korean produce except for one charge that he tried to help North Korea import petroleum products banned by UN sanctions. However, some sections of Australia’s big business-owned media have sought to sensationalise the charges in order to prejudice the public against Choi.

Although most of the “crimes” that the authorities accuse Choi of relate to the export of North Korean mineral commodities, the AFP have hyped up the case by also slapping him with two charges of “Providing Services for a Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Program.” Yet the AFP do not even accuse Choi of trying to export from North Korea any actual WMD material – whether it be nuclear, biological or chemical. Rather they claim that he tried to broker the sale of North Korean short-range missiles to an entity in another Asian country. However, not only do they admit that these weapons were never actually traded, they say that the deal was cancelled at the North Korean end! Indeed, the police acknowledge that none of the charges against Choi involve trades that were actually accomplished. Moreover, in several cases the AFP accept that Choi himself cancelled the deals! So imagine this: you are a proud trade unionist working at, say, a bank and the bosses, despite making billions in profits, want to increase their profits further by retrenching a sizeable number of workers. So you and some workers plan a protest occupation of your workplace to demand no job cuts. However, because your unions’ pro-ALP leaders baulk at giving support to such militant action, you and other staunchly pro-union workers, fearing the planned action would be isolated, decide to call off the struggle. Can the cops then claim that you are guilty of a crime because you once planned an illegal action that you then called off? That would be ridiculous! In the same way, a substantial part of the AFP “case” against Choi is made up of accusations that he committed such thought crimes. And the Australian regime then has the hide to accuse North Korea of being “totalitarian”!

The more important point is that even if the allegations against Choi turn out to be true, he is no criminal from the standpoint of the working class and oppressed people of Australia and the world. Quite the opposite! If Choi did actually try to broker deals to help North Korea export items in violation of UN sanctions this would simply prove that he was taking great personal risks to aid the people of North Korea, who are being ground down by the most severe sanctions ever imposed on any country. These sanctions, which have been repeatedly tightened over the years, now ban the people of North Korea from exporting almost any goods – including clothing, manufactured items, minerals and other commodities. This prevents North Korea from having the hard currency needed to buy the food, medicine, medical instruments and machinery that her people and economy need.

Moreover, the effects of these sanctions have been compounded by the military pressure exerted against North Korea by the U.S., Australia and other imperialist powers. This includes through the presence of 30,000 U.S. troops in South Korea and through massive U.S./South Korea/Australian war games on North Korea’s border – menacing military exercises that have only recently been scaled down after North Korea’s demonstration in late 2017 that it had succeeded in developing a nuclear deterrence that finally forced Washington and Seoul into de-escalation talks. With the memory that the U.S., Australia and South Korea killed nearly one in four of their people during the 1950-53 Korean War – when these capitalist regimes repeatedly wiped out North Korea’s cities by dropping huge amounts of bombs and napalm in a genocidal “scorched earth” policy – with this all too real nightmare seared into their collective consciousness, the people of North Korea know that Trump’s tirade made less than a year and a half ago saying that he would “totally destroy North Korea” was no idle threat. All this has forced tiny North Korea to spend far more on defence than she wants to, thus draining valuable resources from her economy.

Choi has seen first-hand the suffering that the combined effects of the grinding sanctions and military pressure have caused to the people of North Korea. He speaks of a trip he made to a rural area near Sariwon city in North Korea’s North Hwanghae province around ten years ago. As a person with a strong humanitarian conscience, when Choi saw the suffering of especially children with insufficient food to eat, it broke his heart. Although North Korea’s economy has since managed to significantly improve living conditions for her people – despite all the pressure she is facing – the UN sanctions have also been greatly tightened since then. That is why even from the dungeon that he is imprisoned in, Choi has delivered a defiant message opposing the unjust sanctions (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTlumqtaguo).

Choi’s opposition to the sanctions is not only based on his humanitarianism but also on his support for the nature of North Korean society and its social system. Choi actually only became interested in North Korea about a decade and a half ago. In his student days, he had been involved in protests against the then Park Chunghee dictatorship in South Korea. However, he then became politically inactive and was not attuned to questions about North Korea. It was after meeting some pro-North Korea people amongst the Korean expatriate population in Australia that Choi started actively researching the issue. He found that North Korea had justice on its side. He then visited the country to see for himself. Choi was immediately touched by the warmth of North Korea’s people. As Choi puts it, in other countries that he has lived in – like South Korea, Australia and Singapore – it is “money first and if you have money you can do everything”, whereas in North Korea it is “not about money”, “money is not important” it is “humans and humanism that is first.” He described how in North Korea, even at times “when people have very little [due to sanctions and pressure], they will still happily share everything.” He also described heads of enterprises being humble and respectful in the way they treat their workers. Although the media like to stress that Choi is a “supporter of the Kim Jong-un regime”, Choi himself does not speak that much about North Korea’s leaders. His support for North Korea is based on loving the society’s egalitarianism and warm community spirit.

North Koreans dance in public. When Chan Han Choi visited North Korea he was touched by the warmth and humanism of the society – a product of the country’s socialistic system based on common ownership of the means of production.
What do you know about impotence or erectile dysfunction? You, after being hit by the disease such as impotence, then you have to take the on line cialis . Being the online viagra click address first and foremost genuine medicine it is very essential to know whether the medicine is completely safe for use. Where order levitra djpaulkom.tv is the well known medicine of erectile dysfunction which is levitra . For the high performance of the medicine, some of the companies are viagra tablets india producing the same medicine with the Sildenafil citrate and in the other countries.Kamagra is totally safe for regular usage as it poses no side- effects on the human body.

The mainstream media – dominated as it is by organisations owned by billionaire capitalists like Rupert Murdoch and Channel 7 owner Kerry Stokes – would like to present Choi as a brain-washed “supporter of the Kim Jong-un regime.” Yet Choi grew up and lived the first decades of his life in the extremely anti-communist society of South Korea. He has lived and worked in several countries including South Korea, Libya, Singapore and, for the last more than three decades, Australia. Thus, Choi is cultured and cosmopolitan in his outlook. He loves Western classical music, especially symphonies – his most loved piece being Beethoven’s famous Symphony No. 5. Meanwhile, Choi’s favorite food is Japanese food – in particular, sashimi. His concerns extend beyond issues directly connected to North Korea. One of the issues most important to him is racism. He is angry at the high rate of imprisonment of Aboriginal people. While imprisoned, he has become friends with many Aboriginal inmates as well as prisoners from other ethnic backgrounds and he says that this has taught him a lot. Choi comments that racist discrimination and lack of opportunity faced by many in the Vietnamese community has led some in that community to turn to minor drug dealing which has then led to a cycle of imprisonment and a further narrowing of job prospects. Choi himself has experienced plenty of racism in Australia. He has noticed that because of his Asian origin serving staff have sometimes been especially rude to him in cafes, representatives of utility companies have abusively sworn at him and bureaucrats have hung up the phone on him because of his accent or lack of English fluency. Choi says that, by contrast, visitors to North Korea are respectfully treated regardless of their skin colour. And this is the thing about Choi: he has experienced life in many countries, he has been influenced by people from a range of backgrounds and, yet, still he loves North Korean society. He speaks of how the genuineness of North Korea’s people gives him a “heart-warming feeling” (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ro3RkGojbgY).

The relative egalitarianism of North Korean society and the respectful way that workers are treated by managers there is a result of the fact that North Korea is a workers state based on collective ownership of all the key banks, industries, agricultural land and mines. Working class rule was established after World War II when Korean communist partisans backed by the Soviet Red Army defeated the former Japanese colonial occupiers and their collaborators in the northern part of Korea. The victorious toilers then took the agricultural land from the greedy landlords and the factories from the capitalists and brought them into social ownership. This socialistic system has meant that North Korea, whose proper name is the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK), has been able to give her people guaranteed jobs, free, quality education and universal access to very low-rent public housing. To be sure, working class rule is distorted and weakened in North Korea by bureaucratic privileges for state leaders (although these are small compared to the incredibly extravagant wealth of capitalist tycoons and bosses in capitalist countries) which saps support for socialism, by a personality cult around the Kim family and by the lack of workers’ democracy.

Nevertheless, up until the late 1960s, when the U.S. started pouring huge subsidies to prop up South Korea, the working class masses in North Korea enjoyed a better overall quality of life than in the capitalist South. This is despite North Korea having been totally destroyed by U.S, Australia and other imperialist powers during the 1950-53 Korean War. However, the counterrevolutionary destruction of socialistic rule in the former Soviet Union in 1991-92 left the DPRK without its main military protector. Left to face the intense threat from the U.S. and its allies – and with her socialistic Chinese ally much weaker then – the DPRK was forced to divert much resources to her military in order to protect her people from meeting the same fate that the people of Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria have been hit with. This and the economic sanctions led to a large drop in the living standards of North Korea’s people. Nevertheless, the DPRK remains a workers state based on common ownership of the means of production. It is this system based on shared ownership and economic activities for common benefit which brings her people together and creates the warm community spirit and the honesty and genuineness of relations between her people that so warmed Choi’s heart.

In supporting a socialistic state based on public ownership, Choi is in effect standing by the interests of those in Australia suffering the effects of an economy dominated by capitalist private ownership: by those hurt by privatisation, casualisation, job slashing by greedy bosses, bullying by profit-obsessed banks and rising rents. That is, he is standing shoulder to shoulder with the working class majority of this country. He is also, in effect, standing with all the ethnic communities persecuted as a result of the need of Australia’s capitalist rulers to divide and divert the masses that they exploit. He is on the side of Australia’s deeply subjugated Aboriginal people, on the side of the brutally victimised Muslim community and on the side of Asian, African and Middle Eastern origin people that are suffering racist discrimination and violence. We working class people and oppressed ethnic minorities must in turn now support Choi! We must struggle with all our energy to demand: Free Chan Han Choi! Drop all the charges now!

We must also join Choi in opposing capitalist powers using sanctions to financially bully North Korea’s people into submission. They want to turn North Korea into a neo-colony the way that they have already made East Timor, PNG, the Philippines, Thailand, Mexico and so many other developing countries into their neo-colonies. The sanctions can be thought of as a giant battering ram to knock down the barriers stopping privatisation of the DPRK economy. All those opposed to privatisation, opposed to imperialist exploitation of former colonies and who stand for a system based on public ownership must demand an end to the sanctions on the DPRK. We must also stand by the DPRK against all attempts to undermine that workers state. We must demand the immediate, unconditional and verifiable ejection of all U.S. troops from South Korea and the irreversible end to all joint U.S.-South Korean-Australian military exercises. Australian patrol aircraft and ships get out of the waters near North Korea! U.S. troops stationed in Darwin – who are there to help the U.S. and Australian regimes target the DPRK and socialistic China – get out now! Close the joint U.S.-Australia spy bases at Pine Gap and Geraldton! If we fight for these demands we will be standing by the interests of the working class of Australia and the world and the necessary struggle to establish workers states based on public ownership in our own countries.

AUSTRALIAN REGIME STRIPS CHOI OF HIS BASIC RIGHTS

One of the rights that the Australian regime has stomped on in their dealing with the case of Chan Han Choi is the right to bail for defendants who are not an immediate threat to the community or a serious flight risk. Consider the following comparison of Choi’s case with the two most high profile cases in recent times in Australia: those of Chris Dawson and former Catholic archbishop George Pell. Pell who was found by a jury to have cruelly sexually assaulted two children was granted bail prior to the trial that convicted him of these serious charges. For his part, Chris Dawson who is charged with murdering his ex-wife Lynette was granted bail after spending just two weeks in prison. In contrast, Choi has been denied bail for 16 months! It is telling, too, that one of the magistrates at the Sydney Central court who has repeatedly knocked back bail for Choi, Robert Williams, is the very same magistrate who granted accused murderer, Chris Dawson, his bail!

This comparison becomes all the more stark when one compares the very different nature of the “crimes” that Choi has been accused of as against those that Pell and Dawson were charged with. Both of the latter two cases involve serious crimes against victims: in one, murder, and in the other, sexual assault of children. In the case of Choi, who has no criminal record, he is not accused of any crime against a victim. He is not charged with killing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, bashing anyone, verbally abusing anyone or even stealing from anyone. Choi is also not a greedy bank boss who oversaw their corporations charging dead people bank fees (as we go to press none of those bank or insurance bigwigs are anywhere close to being sent to jail). And despite all the hype about Choi’s case being a national security one, he is not even accused of spying on Australia or, indeed, any other country. There are no actual direct victims to the “crimes” that Choi is accused of. Perhaps, one could say that the Australian mainstream media would be a direct “victim” of Choi’s alleged work to help North Korea export her produce in violation of sanctions, because by contributing to North Korean consolidated revenue the country would be better able to feed, clothe, transport, house and medically care for her people thus giving the media less opportunity to create hyped-up stories about suffering in North Korea.

However, if the deals that Choi allegedly tried to broker did go through there would have been an indirect “victim” of these “crimes.” That indirect “victim” is the wealthy eight to ten percent of the Australian population that constitutes the capitalist ruling class and its henchmen. The more that the DPRK is able to export, the better will be the lives of her people and the less able will the imperialist rulers of the U.S. and Australia be to use economic strangulation to suffocate the DPRK workers state. That means the probability that billionaire Western bankers, speculators and sweatshop bosses will be able to take over North Korea’s economy becomes reduced. Moreover, the Australian ruling class is scared of the prospect of the DPRK overcoming the sanctions and growing prosperous. Australia’s capitalist bigwigs not only exploit workers within Australia but exploit the masses of neighbouring countries at an even greater rate while plundering their natural resources and making colonial style diktats to their governments. These imperialist rulers, thus, fear the rise of independent, socialistic countries in the Asia-Pacific like the Peoples Republic of China and the DPRK because that could encourage the masses of PNG, East Timor, Fiji, the Philippines and Indonesia to think that they too should give the imperialists the boot and take up the socialist path. If that were to happen, the Australian capitalists would lose tens of billions in profit as well as the power that comes from having their own neo-colonies. Yet, a more prosperous DPRK, that Choi was trying to help bring about, would not only do no harm whatsoever to the more than nine out of ten of us who are not part of the exploiting class – and especially for the 70% of the Australian population who are either employed or unemployed wage workers – it would positively benefit our overall class interests.

The mere presence of workers states like the DPRK in this region – as bureaucratically deformed as they are and in the case of the PRC, Vietnam and Laos as weakened as they also are by a level of capitalist intrusion – sets off the most mortal fear of Australia’s capitalist rulers: that the working class masses here will be inspired by the existence of workers states abroad to sweep away their capitalist rulers from power. The ruling class are all too aware of the giant strides a victorious working class in a highly developed industrialized economy like Australia could make for the sake of all the world’s toiling masses if this powerful working class finally chose to seize state power from the greedy, cloying hands of the small but influential and corrupt class of exploiters. This fear and hatred of socialistic states, the Australian ruling class are expressing in the severity of their persecution of DPRK supporter, Chan Han Choi. They have not only denied him bail but have violated many of his other rights. For example, for the last several months Choi has been blocked from making phone calls to not only his friends but his own lawyers. Indeed, earlier, for a period of several months, the Australian regime blocked his lawyers from even visiting him! The prison authorities told his lawyers that since Choi is a “National Security Interest” they must first go through a criminal history check that could take an “indefinite” period to complete! This is despite these same lawyers having already made two previous visits to him! Finally, the authorities relented and allowed the lawyers to visit but effectively blocked translators from accompanying the lawyers into the visits as translators must now also go through a security check. This is a serious problem as Choi’s English is not fluent. Although he can comfortably converse about relatively simple matters in English, it is hard for him to communicate in English about complex legal concepts and issues. And as this article is being released, we have just learnt that the authorities are again blocking Choi’s lawyers from visiting him in prison.

The timing of when the authorities started blocking his lawyers’ visits is very telling. It was at the very time that Choi was meant to enter a plea. The Australian regime hoped to make Choi feel so isolated and so lacking in legal support that he would roll over and plead guilty. Choi also faced this same blocking of legal representation in the earlier period of his imprisonment. From a few days after being arrested, Choi had to endure an approximately 50 day period when both an earlier lawyer that he selected through community connections as well as other visitors were completely barred from visiting him. It is also very noteworthy the difference between the access allowed, on the one hand, to that earlier lawyer chosen by Choi as well as Choi’s current lawyers – who were chosen by Choi through his friends – and, on the other hand, that granted to his previous government-appointed lawyer. That Australian-regime appointed lawyer was, until the time of his sacking, able to visit Choi very frequently. This previous lawyer seemed to want to keep Choi isolated from supporters and media. Indeed, in nearly all of Choi’s court mentions in the early and mid part of last year, Choi did not even appear on video link when his own matter was being heard. This lawyer also tried to push Choi into a guilty plea as the prosecution tried to pressure Choi into accepting a “deal” where he would be declared mentally incompetent in “exchange” for gaining a reduced sentence to be served at a mental institution! This was a sinister attempt to not only push Choi into surrender but to discredit as being “insane” his laudable work in support of the socialistic DPRK. Choi is, actually, perfectly mentally competent and, indeed, highly intelligent and worldly. He was savvy enough to realise that his previous lawyer had been negotiating with the prosecution behind his back and keeping him in the dark about his own case. So, Choi sacked this lawyer. Yet even when this regime-appointed lawyer told the then presiding magistrate that he was “withdrawing from the case,” he made a passing shot, outrageously prejudicing the court by telling the magistrate that he has serious concerns about Choi’s mental competency to decide on a plea. This appeared to be a creepy attempt to open the way for a possible future attempt by the authorities to have someone else – i.e. an “independent” person ultimately paid by the Australian regime – to decide on a guilty plea on Choi’s behalf!

In a still more sinister development, last November, Choi and his lawyers received letters from Legal Aid implying that Choi had sacked his current lawyers. Yet Choi did no such thing and, indeed, had absolutely no contact with Legal Aid in that period! Legal Aid’s letter suggested that they were not keen on him sacking his existing lawyers. This suggests that a shadowy third party masquerading as Choi had sent Legal Aid a false flag communication! The Australian spy agency ASIO, the AFP and the South Korean spy agency, the KCIA, are the prime suspects.

Not only has Choi’s access to lawyers been severely restricted so has his access to his own family and supporters. His only child, a 30 year-old son, has been barred from visiting him. Choi is even prevented from making phone calls to his son. To also try and break his spirit, the authorities insist that when Choi speaks to his wife by phone – and she is now the only person that he is allowed to make phone calls to – that they speak in English and not Korean despite him not being fluent in English and his wife’s English being even more limited. On occasions when they have slipped into Korean to clarify a sentence, the authorities have cruelly cut off the call. Meanwhile, the authorities have made it almost impossible for people to visit Choi. People wanting to visit must first go through a months-long “security check” after which it is left to the discretion of the Commissioner of Corrections to decide whether a visitor should be granted access. Among those denied access was a journalist from a well-known global media outlet. The very few people able to visit Choi were only granted access after waiting some four to five months after completing the required paperwork and identity checks! When they finally visited, Choi told them that this was the first visit that he had received in five months.

Yet of all the injustices that the Australian authorities have subjected Choi to, the one that burns him the most is the way they have bullied his son. When Choi was arrested, the AFP and ASIO also raided the place where his son was living. However, they did not charge his son as there was no reason to put any charges on him. Instead the AFP told his son that he would no longer be able to work in any professional role! Choi’s son had been in a high-skilled, technical-professional role at well-known American multinational technology conglomerate, CISCO Systems. Choi is furious that the Australian authorities had his son sacked from CISCO. The company realising they were in the wrong, apparently made an arrangement where he received six months paid leave before being terminated. Choi’s son now works in a lower-skilled, lower-paying, non-professional role elsewhere. This persecution of Chan Han Choi’s son is yet another attempt by the Australian regime to break Choi’s spirit and make him capitulate.

“NO HUMAN RIGHTS IN AUSTRALIA”

Part of the method that the Australian regime has used to strip Choi of his rights is by classifying him in the highest risk category of prisoner. Choi has outrageously been categorised as EHR-R/NSI: that is as an Extra High Risk – Restricted/ National Security Interest (NSI) prisoner. People are only meant to be allocated to this category if they are deemed to be an extreme risk to prison security: that is, mafia bosses and those convicted of serious terrorist offences. As we stressed earlier in this article: Choi is not charged with killing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, bashing anyone, verbally abusing anyone or even stealing from anyone. He is not even alleged to have spied on anyone. All he is accused of doing is attempting to broker deals to raise money for North Korea’s budget so as to improve her people’s livelihoods and the country’s infrastructure. Moreover, the entities he was allegedly brokering the deals with weren’t even located in Australia.

Yet, not only are Australian authorities today trampling on Choi’s rights, with the assistance of the South Korean regime, they had also engaged in a massive and expensive spying operation against him. This is clear from the “evidence” that the prosecution have brought forward. It is apparent that not only have the AFP and ASIO hacked into all of Choi’s email communications but that Australian and/or South Korean intelligence agencies also intercepted his phone and text communications in real time. This the AFP eerily refer to as LII – “Lawfully Intercepted Information”! Indeed it seems likely that the Australian and South Korean regimes are hacking into all communications to and from people with “.kp” addresses – i.e. all communications to and from Australian locals to email accounts that use the domain address of the DPRK. When former U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) contractor, Edward Snowden, unveiled classified documents in 2013, it was proven that the Australian spy agency, the Australian Signals Directorate, was part of a sinister global surveillance apparatus, also involving the American NSA, the UK’s GCHQ, Canada’s CSEC and New Zealand’s GCSB, that harvested email contact lists, searched email content and tracked the location of cell phones of millions of everyday internet users. So, forget the Australian government and media’s completely unsubstantiated insinuations that China was “likely” behind several reported high-profile hacks; as the Snowden revelations proved and as the interception of Choi’s communications confirm, the real hacker in this region that you should be afraid of is the Australian regime itself. Of course, it is not only Choi that this regime has targeted. ASIO spies on determined trade unionists, Aboriginal rights activists, anti-fascists and socialists. Meanwhile, its overseas arm ASIS has been exposed as spying on the East Timorese government to better enable the Australian rulers to rape the impoverished Timorese people’s oil and gas resources. Just as telling is who the Australian regime does not monitor. Both Australian and New Zealand authorities have admitted that they did not have the Australian white supremacist terrorist who murdered 50 Muslim people in Christchurch last week under any sort of surveillance despite this fascist having often expressed extreme racial hatred in the online chat rooms and social media pages of violent racist outfits. It is apparent that the Australian regime does almost nothing to curb the activities of violent far-right groups. For the organs of the Australian state are not here to protect the majority of us. Rather they are here for the very opposite reason: to enforce the interests of the rich, capitalist exploiting class over the working class masses. That is why the state uses surveillance and repression against those who stand up for the rights of the working class and oppressed and those, like Choi, who stand by workers states.

An Australian racist extremist murders 51 people in a horrific attack on two mosques in Christchurch. Despite making chilling online threats and posting extreme Islamophobic and racist rants on violent white supremacist websites, the Australian security agencies chose not to put the killer under any sort of surveillance. In contrast, the Australian authorities targeted Chan Han Choi in an overwhelming spying operation despite Choi not even being suspected of conducting or planning any violent attack or even any act of espionage.

As Choi has often bluntly put it: “There are no human rights in Australia.” When it comes down to it that is basically true for the majority of people in this country – for working class people. What rights are there for the growing number of workers – especially youth and women workers as well as international students – forced to toil in insecure casual jobs where they can be sacked at will and are often paid below award wages? Or for unemployed people bullied by job search agencies and forced into unpaid work for the dole schemes? Or for refugees incarcerated in off-shore hell-hole camps? Or for Muslim people – and indeed other Asian, African and Middle-Eastern-based communities – facing vilification by governments and white supremacist terror on the streets? Or for Aboriginal people facing racist state attacks as well as daily racist discrimination in every aspect of their lives? It is telling that in the very same section of Sydney’s Long Bay jail that Choi is being detained and so grossly having his rights violated, a 26 year-old Aboriginal prisoner, David Dungay, was crushed to death by racist and sadistic prison guards three and a half years ago.

Of course, by contrast, the big end of town in Australia have every “human right” imaginable. When James Packer’s Crown Group wanted to grab public land at Sydney’s Barangaroo to build an exclusive, luxury hotel-casino, the authorities bent over backwards and ignored regulations to facilitate the billionaire’s interests, despicably driving public housing tenants out of their very homes in the nearby, proudly working class inner city suburb of Millers Point in the process. For his part, late tycoon Richard Pratt, owner of packaging corporation Visy, got away with swindling ordinary people buying soap, toothpaste, soft drinks and baked beans out of $700 million by forming a cartel with “rivals” to keep packaging prices artificially high. He finally conceded to the Federal Court that he had knowingly broken the law. Yet the rich people’s legal system is such that Pratt only received a fine. It was only seven months later that Pratt was finally hit with criminal charges. Yet the media, his own paid-for spin team and high-ranking politicians – including then prime minister Kevin Rudd and former prime minister John Howard – threw massive support behind Pratt. The prosecutor dutifully caved in to this high-level support and dropped the case on the grounds of Pratt’s ill-health! Pratt was never jailed for a single day for his huge theft from the working class masses! In contrast Choi has never cheated the public out of a solitary cent let alone $700 million, yet unlike the billionaire Pratt, Choi has been imprisoned without bail in harsh conditions! And unlike the greedy tycoon Pratt, Choi’s alleged “illegal” actions were not motivated by personal gain. Even the AFP admit that Choi’s attempts to broker trade deals for North Korea were motivated out of sympathy for the DPRK. Despite Choi having previously brokered significant trade deals for the DPRK in the period before tightening UN sanctions proscribed such trade, he lived in a rented home, owns no property and has meagre savings. It is precisely because Choi is a working-class person – having worked as a hospital cleaner at the time of his arrest – with modest means and who, what is more, supported a socialistic country that he is being treated so horribly in comparison to a billionaire business owner like Richard Pratt.

LIFT THE UN ECONOMIC SANCTIONS ON NORTH KOREA!

The persecution of Chan Han Choi for allegedly attempting to violate the UN sanctions on North Korea highlights the issue of the sanctions themselves. Similar sanctions imposed on Iraq caused the deaths of over 500,000 babies in just the first eight years of their implementation from 1990 onwards. Although the DPRK’s socialistic system has enabled her to avert such catastrophic consequences, the sanctions still cause much hardship to her people. To distract from the issue of the sanctions, the Australian regime have tried to hype up the issue of WMDs in Choi’s case. Yet not only is Choi not even alleged to have brokered any deals involving mass destruction material, all his charges related to WMD are based on embarrassingly thin “evidence.” For example, one of the AFP’s main arguments that Choi was trying to broker the sale of short range missiles is that he allegedly once emailed a trade contact a link to a DPRK political propaganda video which happened to include some brief clips of DPRK military exercises that in part included the firing of missiles. The AFP allege that not only is this evidence of Choi’s pride in the DPRK’s martial capability (big deal!) but an attempt to market these capabilities for sale. So, folks: don’t ever send a person a link of a video that includes any clips of a socialistic country conducting military exercises – or else you could end up being locked up for years in harsh conditions in Long Bay jail!

The U.S. rulers and their allies like the Australian regime claim that the sanctions on North Korea are merely about stopping the latter developing nuclear weapons. However, the truth is that they are means to bring the DPRK to its knees. After all, why should the DPRK which has never invaded another country or been involved in any war outside the Korean peninsula be disarmed of the few crude nuclear weapons that it has when the U.S. and Russia each have thousands of nukes? It is the U.S. that has killed millions of civilians in predatory attacks in Korea, Vietnam, Panama, El Salvador, Iraq, Somalia, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan etc. Moreover, when North Korean leader, Kim Jong-un, was holding his summit with U.S. president, Donald Trump, last month in Hanoi, events not that far away were making a total mockery of Trump’s insistence that the DPRK must unilaterally give up its nuclear weapons. For at that very time, tensions between nuclear-armed rivals India and Pakistan dangerously turned into open military clashes with casualties on either side. Yet neither Trump nor any of the other imperialist rulers are calling for India or Pakistan to give up their nuclear weapons. This is because both countries are under capitalist rule and their regimes are anti-communist allies of the capitalist great powers whereas the DPRK is under socialistic rule and stands independently of the imperialist bullies. It is important to note, too, that while the DPRK has never killed a single person through nuclear weapons, the U.S. regime – with the backing of their Australian counterparts – actually murdered tens of thousands of innocent people by dropping atomic bombs on human beings living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

The sanctions imposed upon North Korea by the imperialist powers are an act of economic terrorist blackmail. On the one hand, the DPRK can choose to continue to maintain a nuclear deterrence – which from the point of view of the interests of the toiling masses of the world it certainly has the right to do. Yet that means being subjected to the cruel economic blockade that the North Korean people endure today. On the other hand, the DPRK can capitulate and “irreversibly” disarm. Yet that would be even worse! That would leave the DPRK open to being invaded and devastated in the way that other ex-colonies that showed inadequate submissiveness have: like Iraq which the imperialists invaded because they knew she did not have WMDs, like Libya which tragically gave up her WMDs under the promise of being treated well by the Western powers and like Syria whose people have gone through enormous suffering as a result of a Western funded and backed proxy war.

U.S. and South Korean troops amass during one of the war games held in South Korea aimed at threatening socialistic North Korea. The U.S., Australian and other Western imperialists and their South Korean allies use every means possible – including military pressure, economic sanctions and incessant propaganda – to try and undermine socialistic rule in North Korea.

The Australian regime’s persecution of Chan Han Choi for allegedly breaking UN sanctions is part of their drive to tighten the sanctions and strangle the people of North Korea into committing suicide by abandoning their right to build a self-defence capability. It is part of the capitalists’ push to not only topple socialistic rule in North Korea but, more importantly for them, to isolate and smother the DPRK’s neighbour and main ally, socialistic China. Yet the Australian ruling class also have another purpose in their witch-hunt of Choi. They want to restrict the rights of people who support socialistic states. Thus the AFP’s “rationales” for arguing against bail for Choi was in large part based on his sympathy for the DPRK. This amounted to claiming that a supporter of a socialistic state should have less rights than other citizens. Such anti-communist discrimination has not only targeted Choi. Last month, the Australian regime stripped a prominent Chinese national living in Australia, Huang Xiangmo, of his permanent residency because his advocacy sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (the PRC) was deemed a “security risk.” Meanwhile, staunchly pro-communist Chinese international students studying in Australia have been demonised by Australian media and politicians and some high-ranking academics have even practically called for them to face academic disciplinary proceedings for their pro-Red China political stance. This creeping new, Cold War-style witch-hunt comes in the context of a restricting of the right to dissent. New laws purportedly targeting “foreign interference” provide pretexts for Australian regime crackdowns on protest movements and media reporting. Most importantly, nationwide anti-union laws have curtailed the right to strike and have led to legal proceedings against over a hundred trade unionists from construction workers’ unions. However, it is not only the Australian regime that is hell-bent on persecuting Chan Han Choi but also their South Korean capitalist ally. It seems that the South Korean spy agencies were central to providing the Australian authorities with key parts of their “evidence” against Choi. Choi has stressed that it is the present Moon Jae-in administration in South Korea that took part in preparing his arrest. Sympathisers of the DPRK taken in by the presently softer approach of the current liberal South Korean government in comparison with the previous right-wing government should take note! The Seoul capitalist regime remains the mortal enemy of socialistic rule in North Korea. Let us not forget that up until the end of 2017, Moon Jae-in was joining Trump in threats and supporting terrifying war games targeting North Korea. It was only after – through successful missile and nuclear tests – the DPRK proved that it had developed a credible nuclear deterrence that Moon Jae-in realised that a purely military option would be dangerous and that the undermining of socialistic rule in North Korea would be best achieved through capitalist economic penetration and political undermining through NGOs and other “engagement.”

The capitalist ruling class of South Korea are opposed to the DPRK because in the end capitalist states and workers states cannot happily co-exist. South Korea’s capitalist rulers – whether it’s conservative wing or its liberal wing – know that if the DPRK was allowed to become a strong and prosperous workers state she could become a beacon to the working class masses in the South of the Korean Peninsula. They know that the workers state in the North of the Peninsula could thus become a political threat to the system which they oversee in the South of the Peninsula: a system where the working class masses are forced to endure long working hours, insecure forms of unemployment, persecution of trade unions, measly old-age pensions and a dog-eat-dog society that has produced one of the highest suicide rates in the world. That is why the best way that South Korean sympathisers of the DPRK can offer solidarity to the DPRK is to connect efforts to win the working class masses in South Korea to the defence of the DPRK with fulsome support to South Korean workers class struggle against their own capitalist rulers. Ultimately, only the overturn of capitalism in the South of Korea can make the embattled anti-capitalist conquests already made in the North secure.

STAND BY THE INTERESTS OF THE WORKING CLASS AND OPPRESSED
STAND BY CHAN HAN CHOI!

When the Australian authorities arrested Choi and the accusations against him were sensationalised by the media, they expected he would have no support. And when they then stripped Choi of his rights, isolated him from family, supporters and even lawyers they thought that they could break his spirit and make him plead guilty or, worse still, plead insanity! Instead Choi has pleaded Not Guilty and remains defiant and proud. Furthermore, instead of being politically isolated, leftists from Australia and around the world have expressed their solidarity with Choi: from wearing “Free Chan Han Choi” t-shirts to showing support on social media. Supporters of Choi have managed to put on YouTube his statements from prison. Most importantly, last September, Trotskyist Platform supporters were joined by representatives of diverse groups – including the Irish Republican-socialist James Connolly Association, the Western Sydney Branch of the Communist Party of Australia, the Australia-DPRK Friendship Society and the Stalin Society – in a protest rally in a multiracial working class part of Sydney to demand “Free Chan Han Choi.” The action won a sympathetic write-up from the main Korean language community newspaper and even coverage in a large circulation British tabloid-Australian website.

Yet there is so much more that must be done. Even within the context of the unfair laws proscribing any trade that violates the North Korea sanctions, there is no way the Australian courts in their standard practice would afford Choi a fair trial. These are biased pro-capitalist courts that are part of a racist, rich people’s regime. Only mass actions on our part can make the authorities realise that a biased outcome would be against their political interests. That is why we must strive to build greater support for Choi within the workers movement.

Working against us is the impact of hysterical media propaganda against the DPRK. However, for the converse reason that the capitalist rulers are persecuting Choi, it is in the very, living interests of working class people to stand by him. Opposing the persecution of Choi and the denial of his rights is essential in our necessary struggle to resist the emerging Cold War-style witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states. As we stand by Choi we are also making our stand against the broader assaults going on in Australia against leftist dissent and union struggle. Most importantly, we must oppose the cruel and pro-imperialist sanctions that have been launched against brave and socialistic North Korea. Thus, we must defend a person who is being cruelly persecuted for allegedly violating these sanctions. We must defend the DPRK workers state – no matter how bureaucratically deformed it may be – against imperialist attack and capitalist counterrevolution. Just like the building of a trade union – but on a much bigger scale – when a workers state is formed it is a huge conquest for the working class masses and must be tirelessly protected.

So let’s all work as hard as we can to oppose the UN sanctions on North Korea and to free Chan Han Choi, locked up right here in the heart of the racist, capitalist Australian state. Demand the dropping of all charges against the courageous and proud, socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi.

夹杂着白澳种族主义的冷战政治迫害死灰复燃

夹杂着白澳种族主义的
冷战政治迫害死灰复燃

2019年2 月–七个月前, 澳大利亚政府批准了一位加拿大白人至上主义者的签证, Lauren Southern 来澳进行演讲之旅。 Southern 叫嚣着要对亚非国家来的人关上国门。 2017年底, 政府还允许种族主义挑衅者Milo Yiannopoulos访澳。 Yiannopoulos 利用这次旅行诋毁土著居民创造的艺术品, 说它们 “真的像臭屎”。 然而, 虽然政府允许像Southern, Yiannopoulos 这样的人入澳, 但在几周前, 他们却禁止澳中商人黄向墨先生 再次进入澳大利亚。与澳洲政府允许进入的极右翼人士不同的是, 黄先生 并没有煽动种族仇恨。事实上, 他一直参与族群团结的活动。那么为什么黄先生受到了比这些种族分裂的传播者还糟糕的待遇?

那么为什么莫里森政府–工党没有发声- 取消了一个没有犯刑事罪的人的永久居留权呢? 这是因为黄先生发表了赞同中华人民共和国 (中国) 的声明。  澳洲安全情报组织这个间谍机构以他过去曾领导的澳大利亚中国和平统一促进会–一个与北京在台湾、香港和西藏问题上的持相同观点的团体–作为下令取消黄的居留权主要根据,。媒体对黄做了不能令人信服的指陈, 说黄利用大量的政治捐款推动了这一 亲中政治议题。即使这是真的…..。那又怎样!对北京的政治立场表示赞同并不违法,持那些观点的人士进行政治捐赠也不违法。以他们提倡红色中国的立场为由剥夺永久居民的居留权,是对民权的一个无耻的攻击。  政府的决定就像是在告诉大家对一个社会主义国家表示赞同或同情的人不应该被赋予其他居民的权利。 右翼政客和主流媒体在捍卫极端种族主义分子的 权利以煽动对种族和宗教少数群体的仇恨时, 将永远呼吁保护言论自由然而他们要遏制涉及到赞同或同情对中华人民共和国自由言论!

现在我们对作为一个亿万富翁资本家的黄几乎不敢兴趣。 然而, 黄肯定不会因为是资本家而受到澳大利亚统治阶级的攻击。 远不是这样! 黄受到迫害的原因正相反–因为出于他自己的原因, 他选择表达对一个社会主义国家的某些目标的赞同或同情。因此我们也一起说出我们的诉求, 要求政府恢复黄被取消的永久居留权。

大家应该意识到, 如果他们能如此明目张胆地践踏一个与政治精英有如此关系的人的权利, 那么他们会怎么对付我们那些谈论支持中国的只是工薪阶层的中国同胞呢?而且, 澳大利亚政府对黄采取行动的时机似乎是有恐吓的动机。剥夺他的永久居民签证是在社区庆祝农历新年的时候宣布的!

事实上, 撤销黄的居留权是统治阶级对澳大利亚华人中亲中群体不断升级的政治迫害事件。澳大利亚媒体在对黄的迫害事件中, 受到遭泄露的提供给ASIO(澳大利亚安全情报机构)和澳大利亚联邦警察 (AFP) 中匿名人士的报告的刺激。 说到 “暗地里施加影响”! 他们引用ASIO影子间谍等人的有关亲中的华人通过“污蔑”来使反华势力“的声音被压制”。对于 ASIO 间谍而言,抱怨 “声音被压制”虚伪到极点的事情 这是一个恐怖的组织, 有利用渗透和破坏来颠覆左派持不同政见者、土著活动家和其他进步团体和反种族主义势力者的活动的历史

针对亲中华人民共和国的学生

抨击华人社区的主要目标是来自中国的亲中国留学生。政府官员们几乎不加掩饰地威胁中国学生不要传播宣传或 “盲目谴责” 那些抨击中国的人。可笑的是, 他们对中国学生的抨击是以维护澳大利亚所谓的 “开放和言论自由” 的名义进行的 — 要么中国学生不应该对中国说任何积极的话, 要么暴露了那些反华舆论攻势论点中缺陷。

令人担忧的是, 针对亲华学生的运动开始从谴责转向镇压。澳洲国立大学教授 Geremie Barme进行了几乎不加掩饰的呼吁, 要求国立大学 学生雷希英(音译)面对纪律处分。为什么?因为雷制作了一系列被人疯传的热情支持红色中国的视频。想想雷似乎被追猎的待遇与国家党参议员Barry O’Sullivan从他卑劣言论中轻描淡写地脱身相比,两者有天壤之别。两天前,参议员评论到:“一些可恶的中国佬从他们的底裤前面带来他们喜爱的肉肠,违反了我们的生物安全条规”。对于这种种族主义的诽谤, 这位参议员只受到了首相的温和指责。与此相反, 当年轻的学生雷制作本分的、支持社会主义的视频时, 教授们却呼吁对他进行制裁。 与此同时, 一系列严厉的 “外来干涉法” 现在正在生效。 大家都知道, 这些法律是针对中国支持者的。这些法律可能被用来监禁那些主张北京政治立场的人。如果澳大利亚目前的进程不被抵制, 一些中国社区组织和学生团体的领导人今后很可能面临刑事起诉。

新麦卡锡主义的开始和白澳种族主义的复燃

统治阶级反对亲中华人的运动肯定有种族主义的一方面。这是一种类似于种族主义土澳分子的说法, “我们让你进入这个国家, The wholesale cialis price seeds of drumstick help to eradicate intestinal worms. If the problem is led to by diseases like urethritis, seminal vesiculitis, or prostatitis, you can choose herbal medicine Diuretic and Anti-inflammatory http://djpaulkom.tv/video-dj-paul-and-gangsta-boo-talk-new-mixtape-the-devil-and-more-with-power-105s-the-breakfast-club/ viagra prescription free Pill to cure the disease. Men with ED online viagra prescription often feel depressed and do not enjoy their sexual life. Kamagra tablets, usa cheap viagra , cialis etc. are some of the various kinds of the pouches which you can get when you go out globally to buy packets. 所以你至少可以做的是……”[闭嘴, 远离政治!] “接下来, 还有哪些少数族群将成为他们的目标, 因为他们表达了澳大利亚政权认为不遵从他们规定的 “澳大利亚价值观” 的观点 — 抗议华盛顿和堪培拉在委内瑞拉煽动右翼政变努力的拉美裔人士?

澳大利亚政府试图剥夺华人社区中一大部分人应和其他人一样正享有的政治权利的行为与澳大利亚政府给北领地土著人制定的歧视性法律一样, 被相同的白人至上主义方式玷污了。现在,肯定不止是北领地地区,澳大利亚的某些其他地区一样因为这些歧视性的法律使他们无法获得与其他公民相同的社会福利。同时, 主流媒体对亲中社区组织和学生的政治迫害, 与他们对穆斯林和非洲族群的种族主义污蔑是分不开的。

然而, 种族主义并不是这里的唯一因素。毕竟, 如果一个香港背景的亲帝国主义人士表示反对香港重新回归中国, 他的居留资格会被取消吗?没有可能!你看, 试图压制华人社区亲中的群体不仅是种族歧视, 而且是反共。这是澳大利亚政权试图压制任何捍卫社会主义中国或任何其他工人国家而发表的言论。现在, 黄先生作为一个资本主义商人几乎不可能是共产主义者。然而, 即使是黄和前工党 参议员萨姆·达斯特亚里这样的人士也可能受到迫害, 这表明了真正左派今天面临的危险。事实上, 他们因对中国共产党表现出最轻微的 “亲昵” 而受害的方式, 让人想起了20世纪40年代末和50年代澳洲和美国发生的冷战政治迫害 (在那里被称为麦卡锡主义)。那时, 任何对当时最强大的社会主义国家–苏联–不够不满的人, 或者与当地共产党的人有任何联系的人, 都会被贴上卖国贼的标签, 被赶出工作岗位或入狱。

有一个因素使正在出现的冷战政治迫害可能比其早期版本更加危险。这就是反华种族主义在今天新的麦卡锡主义中起着更大作用。对红色中国的反共敌意和白澳种族主义的结合, 已经导致针对中国背景居民的种族主义暴力激增。2 0 1 7年 1 0月, 3名中国高中生在堪培拉公交站遭到种族主义分子的人身攻击。在这之前两个月, 澳洲国立大学 的一名白人至上主义学生在上课时掏出一个棒球棒, 殴打并试图杀死他的中国裔助教和另外四名中国学生。

澳大利亚正在出现的冷战政治迫害开始扩大, 已经不仅仅针对中国的支持者。这一点在澳大利亚亲朝鲜的社会主义政治犯Chan Han Choi的案件中很为明显。在过去14个月中, 他被无耻地拒绝保释, 部分原因是他是朝鲜支持者, 对此,检方声称这意味着他对澳大利亚没有忠诚。因此, 就像诽谤亲华学生一样, 又发生了人们因赞同或同情社会主义国家而被剥夺权利的案件。

抵制对亲中华人社区的攻击!抵制新麦卡锡主义!

今天, 华人社区中的亲华群体不仅面临着重新兴起的针对这个国家所有有色人的白澳种族主义, 而且还面临着在正在出现的新冷战时期对社会主义中国支持者的政治迫害环境下的特意污蔑。这需要通过大规模动员群众,走上街头来抵制。然而, 这不仅是华人社区的任务, 也是澳大利亚整个左翼和工人阶级运动的任务。因为澳大利亚政府对华人社区中很大一部分人的攻击是对所有工人阶级的攻击。首先, 政府煽动的种族主义, 分化工人阶级从而削弱了我们团结起来为我们的权利而战的能力。其次, 对红色中国支持者的迫害很可能变成对工会会员和左派的更广泛的政治迫害。第三, 美澳对中华人民共和国帝国主义式的打击是不符合工人阶级利益的。尽管北京政府已经允许了太多的对中国的资本入侵, 但中国仍然是一个工人国家, 在那里所有关键部门都归公有。这对世界上所有必须得到保护的工人和被压迫者来说是巨大的财富。和中华人民共和国一条阵线,保卫并加强中国的社会主义制度!

反抗对亲中华人社区的种族主义、扣赤色分子帽子式的政治迫害!反对澳大利亚政府对土著居民、穆斯林、非洲裔青年和难民的所有种族主义攻击!捍卫中华人民共和国的支持者表达我们的观点的权利! 为营救澳州政治犯社会主义者Chan Han Choi而斗争!抵制对左派进行新的冷战政治迫害的黑流!

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns … Mixed With White Australia Racism

From Labelling Chinese Students as Communist “Spies” to
Persecuting a Socialist Political Prisoner:

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns
… Mixed With White Australia Racism

21 February 2019 – Seven months ago, the Australian government granted a visa for Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to come here on a speaking tour. Southern calls to keep out people from Asia and Africa, ridiculously claiming that immigration leads to “white genocide.” In late 2017, the government also allowed racist provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos, to tour. A misogynist who calls for women to be banned from driving, Yiannopoulos used this tour to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Emboldened by his rants, neo-Nazi groups unleashed violent assaults against the African community living in the Kensington suburb where his Melbourne event was held. Yet while the government has allowed the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos to enter, two weeks ago they banned Chinese-Australian businessman, Huang Xiangmo, from re-entering Australia. Unlike the far-right figures that the Australian regime have allowed in, Mr Huang, has not been inciting racial hatred. In fact, he has been involved in events supporting racial unity. Moreover, while the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos have no residency status here, Huang is actually a permanent resident of Australia – one whose wife and son live here. So why is Mr Huang being treated much worse than purveyors of racial division have been?

For the Australian government to revoke the permanent residency of a person who has committed no criminal offence is not only highly unusual: it is, perhaps, completely unprecedented. So why has the Morrison government – with the ALP’s acquiescence – banned Huang? It is because he has made statements sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The ASIO spy agency cited his past leadership of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Re-unification of China – a group that shares Beijing’s views on the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Tibet issues – as one of the main reasons why it ordered the cancellation of Huang’s residency. The media claim that Huang has used large political donations to push this pro-PRC agenda. Even if that were actually true – and it is far more likely that Mr Huang’s donations are merely yet another case of wealthy businessmen protecting their interests by currying favour with politicians – then so what! It is not illegal to express sympathy for political positions held by Beijing and it is not illegal for people who hold those views to make political donations. To strip a person of permanent residency based on their advocacy for positions held by Red China is an outrageous attack on democratic rights. The decision amounts to asserting that a person who expresses sympathy for a socialistic country should not be accorded the rights of other residents. Right-wing politicians and the mainstream media will speak forever about protecting “freedom of speech” when they defend the “right” of extreme racists to whip up hatred against racial and religious minorities. Yet they want to curb any “free speech” that involves sympathy for the Peoples Republic of China! There is another irony to this saga. The PRC is, by far, Australia’s largest source of export income.  Yet, while the ruling class is happy to make a fortune selling goods to the PRC they are determined to stop anyone saying anything positive about her! 

Now as a billionaire businessman Huang Xiangmo is hardly our cup of tea. All capitalist businessmen – including Mr Huang – are the class enemies of working class people. However, Huang is certainly not being attacked by the Australian ruling class because he is a capitalist exploiter (or else it would be the likes of Andrew Forest, Gina Rinehart and Clive Palmer who would have had their rights stripped long ago). Far from it! Mr Huang is being persecuted, in fact, in the opposite way – because for his own reasons he has chosen to express sympathy for certain goals of a socialistic country. In short, he is being attacked for the wrong reasons by the wrong people. Therefore, we add our voice to those demanding that Huang Xiangmo’s cancelled permanent residency be immediately restored.

While welcoming prominent overseas racists like Milo Yiannopoulos and Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to enter Australia and spread their racist filth, in February the Australian government banned permanent resident Huang Xiangmo from re-entering Australia because of his participation in groups sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China. Above: Huang Xiangmo at an October 2017 gala event of the Australian Council for Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China, which he then headed, to commemorate the 42nd anniversary of the implementation of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act. The Sydney event which united 2,000 people from different races featured performers from more than thirty different ethnicities including from Indian, Korean, Arabic, European and Chinese backgrounds. A month after this event organised by Huang Xiangmo’s group, despicable Milo Yiannopoulos was allowed to enter Australia for a speaking tour which he used to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Below: Milo Yiannopoulos enters a speaking event at parliament house where he gave encouragement to this country’s most extreme racist politicians. Waiting to listen are One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts in the front row, fascist Fraser Anning in the second row on the left and bigoted Nationals MP George Christensen elsewhere in the audience.

Of course, the government knows that the masses – for good reason – dislike billionaires. That is why it is convenient for them to ratchet up their attacks on pro-PRC Chinese people by targeting a person like Mr Huang. Yet what others should realise is that if they can so blatantly trample on the rights of a person with such connections to the political elite then what are they going to do to working class people of Chinese background who speak positively about the PRC? The Australian regime’s timing of their move against Huang seems to be designed to intimidate. The ripping up of his permanent resident’s visa was announced right when the community were marking New Year’s Day! The message has not been lost on the community who to their credit have refused to take this attack lying down. There is a small anti-communist part of the Chinese community who hate the PRC because their landlord/capitalist ancestors were deposed from their tyrannical domination of China by the 1949 Revolution or because they are linked to the capitalist classes who still rule Taiwan and Hong Kong and these people celebrated the attack on Huang. However, 128 Chinese community organisations signed a statement declaring that, “What happened to Mr Huang Xiangmo today may happen to any of us tomorrow.” The statement rightly insisted that:

“The unfair treatment suffered by Mr Huang has dealt a heavy blow to the legitimate political participation of people from Chinese or other ethnic minorities. It made the underprivileged people from the Chinese community and other ethnic minorities even more vulnerable.”

Indeed, the revoking of Mr Huang’s residency is but the latest event in the ruling class’ escalating witch-hunt against the large, pro-PRC portion of Australia’s Chinese community. Mainstream media are running hysterical articles condemning local Chinese organisations, student groups and Chinese-language media for supposedly “threatening Australian sovereignty” by “covertly exerting influence” as proxies of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Ironically, the media group spearheading the claim that most of Australia’s Chinese media are not independent and, instead, are covertly controlled by Beijing is the itself not at all independent ABC which is owned and thus controlled by the Australian capitalist state! Not surprisingly, the ABC’s board of directors is dominated by corporate bigwigs and heads of business associations. The ABC and other media have, as in the persecution of Mr Huang, been spurred on by leaked statements from anonymous figures in ASIO and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as “senior diplomatic figures.” Talk about “covertly exerting influence”! Shadowy ASIO spies and others are quoted complaining about pro-PRC Chinese “silencing” anti-PRC forces through “vilification.” For ASIO spies to complain about “voices being silenced” is the height of hypocrisy.  This is a feared organisation with a history of using infiltration and sabotage to disrupt the activities of leftist dissidents, Aboriginal rights activists and other progressive and anti-racist forces.

Pro-PRC Students Targeted

The main target of attacks on the Chinese community have been pro-PRC international students from China. They have not only been slandered by the media but have faced attacks from the likes of, now former, foreign minister Julie Bishop and Australia’s highest-ranked foreign affairs bureaucrat, Frances Adamson. These officials have made thinly veiled threats warning Chinese students not to spread propaganda or “blindly condemn” those within university circles who attack the PRC. Laughably, their attacks on Chinese students have been made in the name of upholding Australia’s supposed “openness and freedom of speech.” Except that Chinese students are not supposed to say anything positive about the PRC or to expose the flaws in the arguments of anti-PRC crusaders.

Worryingly, the campaign against pro-PRC students is starting to move from denunciations to repression. ANU Professor, Geremie Barme, made a thinly veiled call for ANU student, Lei Xiying, to face disciplinary action. Why? Because Lei made a series of passionately pro-Red China videos that went viral. Consider the difference with the way Lei has been hounded with how lightly Nationals senator Barry O’Sullivan has gotten off for his despicable comment two days ago about “us having a biosecurity breach from some bloody old Chinaman that brings in his favourite sausage down the front of his undies.” Meanwhile, a package of draconian “foreign interference laws” are now going into force that everyone knows are aimed at supporters of China. The laws could be used to jail those who advocate political positions held by Beijing. If Australia’s current course is not resisted, some leaders of Chinese community organisations and student groups could well face criminal prosecution in the future.

The Beginning of a New McCarthyism and
the Resurgence of White Australia Racism

There definitely is a racist aspect to the ruling class campaign against pro-PRC Chinese people. It is an expression of the refrain of racist rednecks that “we let you into the country so the least you could do is … [shut up and stay out of politics!]” It amounts to making people of Chinese background second-class citizens. Which other ethnic minority will next be targeted for expressing a view that the Australian regime deems to not adhere to what they decree to be “Australian values”? Palestinian community members who campaign for the liberation of Palestine? People from Latin American backgrounds who protest against Washington and Canberra’s efforts to incite a right-wing coup in Venezuela?

The Australian government’s attempts to deny a big part of the Chinese community the political rights formally accorded to others is stained with the same white supremacist methodology as the discriminatory laws it has placed on Aboriginal people in the NT – and now certain other parts of Australia – that prevent them having the same access to social welfare as other citizens. Moreover, the mainstream media’s witch-hunting of Chinese community organisations and PRC international students cannot be separated from their racist vilification of the Muslim community and African youth. Similarly, the Australian regime’s demonisation of Huang Xiangmo and their cancellation of his visa has parallels to the way that Peter Dutton brands refugees as “rapists”; and to the way that both the Liberals and ALP insist on denying these persecuted refugees residency in Australia.

However, racism is not the only factor here. After all would a pro-imperialist person of Hong Kong background have his residency cancelled if he expressed opposition to Hong Kong’s re-integration into China? Not a chance! The attempts to silence the pro-PRC part of the Chinese community is not only racist, it is anti-communist. It is an attempt by the Australian regime to gag any voice speaking in defence of socialistic China or any other workers state. Now Mr Huang, as a capitalist businessman is hardly a communist. Rather, knowing that the right to capitalist exploitation is not guaranteed in Red China – a reality that is good for China’s masses – Huang and some other Chinese capitalists seek to stave off their businesses from being nationalised by trying to ingratiate themselves with the CPC. Similarly, former Labor senator Sam Dastyari, who was unfairly witch-hunted out of politics for having once made the patently true statement that the South China Sea issue is China’s internal affair, is no revolutionary. Yet, that even Huang and Dastyari could be persecuted shows the dangers that actual leftists and supporters of the PRC workers state face today. Indeed the way that they were victimised for the slightest displays of “softness” on the CPC is reminiscent of the Cold War witch-hunt in late-1940s and 1950s Australia and the U.S. (where it became known as McCarthyism). Back then anyone not critical enough of the then most powerful socialistic state – the USSR – or who had any They suffer in silence and follow cialis samples the point to ‘keep quiet and carry on’. Suffering from erectile dysfunction once or twice is 25mg barato viagra bad enough that they are suffering from this disease in private now they have to discuss it with people and explain what’s wrong with them. For instance, 10 mg tablets of Lipitor for a 30 day supply may cost you $80 or more in America but only $40 or viagra fast less in Canada. How does it work? This is cialis viagra canada a common question heard from people across the world. connection with people in the local communist parties was branded a traitor and driven out of their job. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia (CPA) leaders were jailed alongside communist trade unionists. In a witch-hunting atmosphere that almost saw the CPA banned in 1951, the government even raided CPA offices. 

Is this what is going to happen again? Ten screenwriters and directors in the U.S. and their families protest their impending imprisonment. The people, who became known as the Hollywood 10, were jailed by the American regime in 1948 for up to a year for refusing to answer questions about their possible communist sympathies. The late 1940s-1950s anti-communist witch-hunt saw hundreds of Hollywood actors, writers and directors driven out of their jobs and blacklisted. Thousands upon thousands of teachers, wharfies, seamen, university academics and government employees also lost their jobs on the basis of the slightest alleged sign of communist association. Meanwhile, hundreds of communists and alleged communists were jailed. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia leaders were imprisoned alongside communist trade unionists.

Anyone who thinks that such an anti-communist witch-hunt could never happen again because “society has progressed” should look around the world and think again. Less than five years ago, South Korea’s capitalist regime banned the country’s third largest parliamentary party (the Unified Progressive Party) and jailed several of its leaders, because that party was not hostile enough to North Korea. In the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Latvia and Lithuania laws are in force banning people from displaying communist symbols. In the Ukraine, these laws are used to prevent the country’s pro-communist parties from standing in elections. Moreover, in the Australian state’s latest attacks on pro-PRC Chinese, the methods of 1950s McCarthyism are being re-deployed. This is seen in the line spun by ASIO that they knows things about Mr Huang but can’t tell us … because it’s secret so you just have to believe them! This apes FBI director J. Edgar Hoover’s “Loyalty Security Reviews” during the U.S. Cold War witch-hunt where suspected communists were not allowed to know who was accusing them and were often not even told what they were accused of! Meanwhile, the media’s branding of PRC students as “spies for the Communist Party of China,” Canberra’s exclusions of Chinese tech giant Huawei because of “security concerns” and the media’s ritual blaming of China for every cyber hack without any evidence all have more than a whiff of an impending McCarthyite witch-hunt.

There is a factor that makes this impending Cold War witch-hunt potentially more dangerous than its earlier version. That is the fact that the main country targeted by today’s Red Scare is an Asian one (rather than the majority white Soviet Union) and the fact that there is a large diaspora from that country living here. This makes White Australia racism even more a component of today’s new McCarthyism than its earlier variety – all the more so because it dovetails with a period of increasing racist attacks on all people of colour. Already, the combination of anti-communist hostility to Red China and White Australia racism have led to a surge in racist violence against Chinese background residents. In October 2017, three Chinese high-school students were bashed by racists at a Canberra bus stop. Two months before this, a white supremacist student at ANU pulled out a baseball bat during a lesson and beat and tried to kill his tutor of Chinese origin and four other Chinese students. Especially when one knows the post-1788 history of this country – from the Gold Rush anti-Chinese pogroms to the 19th century anti-Chinese laws to the White Australia Policy – it is understandable why some people of Chinese descent are fearful.

The emerging Cold War witch-hunt in Australia is starting to expand beyond targeting supporters of the PRC. This is seen most clearly in the case of Chan Han Choi, a socialist political prisoner in Australia. Choi is facing charges of helping the DPRK to export its produce in violation of cruel UN economic sanctions which if true would only make him a great humanitarian and partisan of socialism. He has outrageously been denied bail over the last 14 months, in part, on the grounds that he is a DPRK supporter, which the prosecution claims means that he has no loyalty to Australia. Thus this is, as with the persecution of Mr Huang and the slandering of pro-PRC students, yet another case of people being denied the rights accorded to others on the basis of their sympathy for a socialistic state.

13 April 2019, Sydney: A placard at the rally in defence of socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi, connects Choi’s imprisonment with the broader emerging new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states.

The Real Truths About “Democracy” and “Foreign Interference”

Supporters of socialistic states have always faced the threat of repression in capitalist countries. For they embody the greatest fear of capitalist rulers: that the exploited masses will unite to depose them from power. If in many periods, socialists have been able to operate legally in Australia it is only because the ruling class thinks that it is more effective to rule the masses by maintaining a facade of “democracy.” Yet no one should be fooled into thinking that the Australian government democratically represents the needs of the majority. Under this country’s current system it is the big business owners who, through their ownership of the media and their huge resources to fund political parties, pay for political advertising, establish think tanks and hire lobbyists who thoroughly shape political discourse. The whole state machinery – including ASIO, police and bureaucrats – has been created for enforcing the rule of the capitalist exploiters at home and enforcing the superexploitation of the peoples of Australia’s neo-colonies abroad (ASIS the overseas operation’s counterpart of the ASIO organisation that is targeting the pro-PRC Chinese community at home has for example been involved in spying on East Timorese officials during negotiations over the Australian ruling class’ attempts to normalise its plunder of Timorese oil resources). That is why no matter who wins elections, the resulting governments always enable tycoons to leach incredible wealth while overseeing a large amount of homelessness, poor living conditions for so many Aboriginal people and the frequent throwing of large numbers of workers out of their livelihoods at the whim of greedy bosses. Today, these same governments – as well as top bureaucrats and ASIO spies – are warning Chinese students that their political discourse must comply with what they deem to be “Australian values.” However, a state machine that does not govern for the interests of the majority should have no right to determine which values people are supposed to adhere to. So we hope that more people – both citizens and international students – will refuse to be bound by the values decreed by a regime that only governs for the interests of the greedy, big end of town.

The Australian ruling class is actually not even truly wedded to the notions of “free speech” and “democracy” that it claims to be defending against Red China’s influence. To be sure, they do find it easier to rule by maintaining some formalities of “democracy.” Yet when they feel the need to dispense with these – as they did during the late 1940s and early 1950s – they will not hesitate to try and do so. Today, we are again entering such a period. The ruling class is slowly moving away from the norms of “free speech” and “democracy” (all in the name of saving these!) because they are shaken by a crisis of confidence. The Great Recession that struck the capitalist world a decade ago really did damage the self-belief of the capitalist ruling classes of the world. Although Australia did not suffer a recession, Australia’s capitalist rulers know that their economy was only saved by exports to China’s booming, socialistic state-owned enterprises. Meanwhile, capitalist rulers around the world see growing resentment amongst the masses. Although, at the moment, mass disgruntlement has led more to support for far-right forces and only to some degree to a leftist radicalisation, the exploiting classes know that this could quickly change. Moreover, they see a socialistic power in China going from strength to strength – and it terrifies them!  Very immediately, the influence of a socialistic power in the South Pacific is enabling countries like PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu to start to free themselves from Australian imperialist domination.

In this context, the Australian ruling class has an interest in manufacturing a “China threat” and an “agents of Chinese influence” scare. This helps them to “justify” to the public an expensive military build-up aimed against socialistic China and North Korea, aggressive policies against Chinese assistance to South Pacific countries and greater political support to anti-communist movements within the PRC. On the other hand, the Red China scare also enables the Australian regime to defend moves to curb leftist dissent and civil liberties within Australia. Moreover, their vilification of a big chunk of the Chinese community helps them to divert the working class masses that they exploit away from the real source of the masses’ troubles. Although much of their scare-mongering about CPC interference is contrived, to some degree they are also truly concerned about the influence of PRC students in Australia. For example, what happens when the Australian class mates of these students find out that these PRC students, who they know have experienced life in both the PRC and Australia, actually like the PRC and don’t feel repressed there? How will the Australian ruling class be able to justify a hostile policy against its biggest trading partner then? And what if the friends and classmates of some Chinese students even start thinking that China’s socialistic system has certain advantages? Heaven forbid!

Although the Australian ruling class is today hyping up the issue of “foreign interference” they actually have no specific stance on the issue per sé. They are hostile to pro-socialist influence but welcome any foreign interference that serves their capitalist interests. Thus, the ruling class welcomes U.S. interference as they need U.S. power to guarantee their predatory neo-colonial subjugation of South Pacific countries. The Australian state welcomes large numbers of U.S. troops in Darwin, hosts U.S. military bases at several locations and established the U.S. Studies Centre at Sydney University to promote U.S. influence in Australia.

The PRC actually goes out of its way to avoid interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Even all but the most extreme anti-China hawks in Australia do not claim that the PRC is actually trying to change Australia’s political system. Supposed PRC “interference” is at most aimed at ameliorating Canberra’s hostility to the PRC and at opposing anti-communist Chinese groups exiled in Australia. However, the assumptions behind Beijing’s attempted “non interference” policy is flawed for a couple of key reasons. For one, all countries – and key events within them – inevitably affect other countries whether it is by design or not. On the negative side, for example, the rise of extreme right-wing forces around the globe has definitely encouraged fascist groups within Australia. This is partly through white supremacists here being emboldened by seeing the ascendancy of Trump and far-right parties in the likes of Italy and Austria and partly through Australian speaking tours by interfering far-right bigwigs like Southern and Yiannopoulos. On the other hand, the Aboriginal rights struggle in Australia drew inspiration from the militant black liberation movement in the U.S. and vice versa.

The second problem with Beijing’s policy of “non interference” is that it is premised on the expectation that if the PRC does not interfere in the affairs of capitalist countries, the latter will, in turn, not interfere in China’s internal affairs. However such a reality is not what is happening! Although the PRC genuinely does not seek to threaten the social system in the capitalist countries, the capitalist powers do everything possible to undermine socialistic rule in China. Washington – with Canberra’s support – provides massive financial, media and political support to anti-communist groups within China from “pro-democracy” neo-liberals to yuppy Hong Kong students sympathetic to British colonialism to a tiny but violent minority within the Uighur community of right-wing anti-communist, religious extremists. That is why the PRC should take the gloves off and abandon the CPC leadership’s failed policy of “non interference.” It should seek to influence events in the capitalist world – not by covert methods – but by openly proclaiming the advantages of the socialist system, by attributing its own economic successes to socialistic public ownership and by supporting the struggles of the working class and oppressed in the capitalist world. A powerful example of the latter was when the PRC, in the early 1970s, twice feted delegations of some of Australia’s leading Aboriginal rights activists (see: http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/images/history/1970s/china/chinadx2.html).

One thing that the rising tensions between the PRC and capitalist Australia have proved is that no matter how much the PRC tries to avoid interfering in the affairs of an imperialist country, she will still face prejudice and accusations of “interference”. That is why, in a sense, the PRC has nothing to lose if it were to start openly and aggressively promoting the socialist cause within countries like Australia. If she did so she would start to win significant sympathy amongst Australia’s working class people. For example, if the Australian masses, angry at the greed of the local banks, heard that the PRC has a sound financial system based on public ownership of all its key banks, they would find that rather attractive. And it would provide badly needed encouragement to their own struggle for socialism.

Resist the Attacks on the Pro-PRC Chinese Community!
Resist the New McCarthyism!

Today, the pro-PRC section of the Chinese community is facing not only the resurgent White Australia racism that is targeting all people of colour in this country but particular vilification in the context of an emerging, new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of the socialistic PRC. This needs to be resisted by mass mobilisations on the streets. However, this is the task of not only the Chinese community but the entire left-wing and working class movement in Australia. For the Australian regime’s attacks on a large section of the Chinese community is an attack on all working class people. For one, the racism that this campaign is inciting divides working class people and thus weakens our ability to unite to fight for our rights. Secondly, the persecution of supporters of Red China could well turn into a broader witch-hunt against trade unionists and leftists. The McCarthyite witch-hunt in the U.S. first began with persecution of supporters of the USSR and then progressed to repression against all communists and eventually targeted people who advocated for social welfare and public health which were seen as communist policies. In Australia, the late 1940s and 1950s Cold War witch-hunt saw the regime first attacking communists and then using that to target all trade union militants. If the Australian ruling class’ current campaign against PRC supporters is not pushed back we can imagine that soon all avowed communists within Australia will face persecution; and later trade union militants and those who advocate policies that are also pursued by Beijing – such as extensive public housing and public ownership of key industries – will be targeted. Thirdly, the U.S. and Australian imperialist drive against the PRC is against the interests of working class people. Although the PRC’s government has allowed too much capitalist intrusion into China, the PRC remains a workers state where all the key sectors are under public ownership. This is a great treasure for all the workers and downtrodden of the world that must be protected.

With the capitalist rulers increasingly insecure, ever more worried about their system’s decay and ever more fearful about the stunning development of socialistic China we will only be able to put an end to racist scapegoating and Cold War-style witch-hunting when we sweep away this capitalist system for good. However, to advance the struggle towards that goal we need to fight right now to resist racist attacks on any victimised community and to oppose all crackdowns on pro-socialist political expression. And our struggle for workers liberation here will surely be stronger if we can ensure that the world’s most populous country continues to remain a workers state.

Fight back against the racist, red-baiting witch-hunt against the pro-PRC Chinese community! Oppose all the Australian regime’s racist attacks on Aboriginal people, Muslims, youth of African descent and refugees! Defend the right of supporters of the PRC to express our views! Resist the drift towards a new Cold War witch-hunt against leftists! Fight to free socialist political prisoner in Australia Chan Han Choi! Stand by the PRC defend and strengthen socialistic rule in China!

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns … Mixed With White Australia Racism

From Labelling Chinese Students as Communist “Spies” to
Persecuting a Socialist Political Prisoner:

Cold War Witch-Hunting Returns
… Mixed With White Australia Racism

21 February 2019 – Seven months ago, the Australian government granted a visa for Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to come here on a speaking tour. Southern calls to keep out people from Asia and Africa, ridiculously claiming that immigration leads to “white genocide.” In late 2017, the government also allowed racist provocateur, Milo Yiannopoulos, to tour. A misogynist who calls for women to be banned from driving, Yiannopoulos used this tour to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Emboldened by his rants, neo-Nazi groups unleashed violent assaults against the African community living in the Kensington suburb where his Melbourne event was held. Yet while the government has allowed the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos to enter, two weeks ago they banned Chinese-Australian businessman, Huang Xiangmo, from re-entering Australia. Unlike the far-right figures that the Australian regime have allowed in, Mr Huang, has not been inciting racial hatred. In fact, he has been involved in events supporting racial unity. Moreover, while the likes of Southern and Yiannopoulos have no residency status here, Huang is actually a permanent resident of Australia – one whose wife and son live here. So why is Mr Huang being treated much worse than purveyors of racial division have been?

For the Australian government to revoke the permanent residency of a person who has committed no criminal offence is not only highly unusual: it is, perhaps, completely unprecedented. So why has the Morrison government – with the ALP’s acquiescence – banned Huang? It is because he has made statements sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). The ASIO spy agency cited his past leadership of the Australian Council for the Promotion of the Peaceful Re-unification of China – a group that shares Beijing’s views on the Taiwan, Hong Kong and Tibet issues – as one of the main reasons why it ordered the cancellation of Huang’s residency. The media claim that Huang has used large political donations to push this pro-PRC agenda. Even if that were actually true – and it is far more likely that Mr Huang’s donations are merely yet another case of wealthy businessmen protecting their interests by currying favour with politicians – then so what! It is not illegal to express sympathy for political positions held by Beijing and it is not illegal for people who hold those views to make political donations. To strip a person of permanent residency based on their advocacy for positions held by Red China is an outrageous attack on democratic rights. The decision amounts to asserting that a person who expresses sympathy for a socialistic country should not be accorded the rights of other residents. Right-wing politicians and the mainstream media will speak forever about protecting “freedom of speech” when they defend the “right” of extreme racists to whip up hatred against racial and religious minorities. Yet they want to curb any “free speech” that involves sympathy for the Peoples Republic of China! There is another irony to this saga. The PRC is, by far, Australia’s largest source of export income.  Yet, while the ruling class is happy to make a fortune selling goods to the PRC they are determined to stop anyone saying anything positive about her! 

Now as a billionaire businessman Huang Xiangmo is hardly our cup of tea. All capitalist businessmen – including Mr Huang – are the class enemies of working class people. However, Huang is certainly not being attacked by the Australian ruling class because he is a capitalist exploiter (or else it would be the likes of Andrew Forest, Gina Rinehart and Clive Palmer who would have had their rights stripped long ago). Far from it! Mr Huang is being persecuted, in fact, in the opposite way – because for his own reasons he has chosen to express sympathy for certain goals of a socialistic country. In short, he is being attacked for the wrong reasons by the wrong people. Therefore, we add our voice to those demanding that Huang Xiangmo’s cancelled permanent residency be immediately restored.

While welcoming prominent overseas racists like Milo Yiannopoulos and Canadian white supremacist, Lauren Southern, to enter Australia and spread their racist filth, in February the Australian government banned permanent resident Huang Xiangmo from re-entering Australia because of his participation in groups sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China. Above: Huang Xiangmo at an October 2017 gala event of the Australian Council for Promotion of the Peaceful Reunification of China, which he then headed, to commemorate the 42nd anniversary of the implementation of Australia’s Racial Discrimination Act. The Sydney event which united 2,000 people from different races featured performers from more than thirty different ethnicities including from Indian, Korean, Arabic, European and Chinese backgrounds. A month after this event organised by Huang Xiangmo’s group, despicable Milo Yiannopoulos was allowed to enter Australia for a speaking tour which he used to brand Muslims as “rapists” and to insult the art produced by Aboriginal people as “really shit.” Below: Milo Yiannopoulos enters a speaking event at parliament house where he gave encouragement to this country’s most extreme racist politicians. Waiting to listen are One Nation senators Pauline Hanson and Malcolm Roberts in the front row, fascist Fraser Anning in the second row on the left and bigoted Nationals MP George Christensen elsewhere in the audience.

Of course, the government knows that the masses – for good reason – dislike billionaires. That is why it is convenient for them to ratchet up their attacks on pro-PRC Chinese people by targeting a person like Mr Huang. Yet what others should realise is that if they can so blatantly trample on the rights of a person with such connections to the political elite then what are they going to do to working class people of Chinese background who speak positively about the PRC? The Australian regime’s timing of their move against Huang seems to be designed to intimidate. The ripping up of his permanent resident’s visa was announced right when the community were marking New Year’s Day! The message has not been lost on the community who to their credit have refused to take this attack lying down. There is a small anti-communist part of the Chinese community who hate the PRC because their landlord/capitalist ancestors were deposed from their tyrannical domination of China by the 1949 Revolution or because they are linked to the capitalist classes who still rule Taiwan and Hong Kong and these people celebrated the attack on Huang. However, 128 Chinese community organisations signed a statement declaring that, “What happened to Mr Huang Xiangmo today may happen to any of us tomorrow.” The statement rightly insisted that:

“The unfair treatment suffered by Mr Huang has dealt a heavy blow to the legitimate political participation of people from Chinese or other ethnic minorities. It made the underprivileged people from the Chinese community and other ethnic minorities even more vulnerable.”

Indeed, the revoking of Mr Huang’s residency is but the latest event in the ruling class’ escalating witch-hunt against the large, pro-PRC portion of Australia’s Chinese community. Mainstream media are running hysterical articles condemning local Chinese organisations, student groups and Chinese-language media for supposedly “threatening Australian sovereignty” by “covertly exerting influence” as proxies of the Communist Party of China (CPC). Ironically, the media group spearheading the claim that most of Australia’s Chinese media are not independent and, instead, are covertly controlled by Beijing is the itself not at all independent ABC which is owned and thus controlled by the Australian capitalist state! Not surprisingly, the ABC’s board of directors is dominated by corporate bigwigs and heads of business associations. The ABC and other media have, as in the persecution of Mr Huang, been spurred on by leaked statements from anonymous figures in ASIO and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) as well as “senior diplomatic figures.” Talk about “covertly exerting influence”! Shadowy ASIO spies and others are quoted complaining about pro-PRC Chinese “silencing” anti-PRC forces through “vilification.” For ASIO spies to complain about “voices being silenced” is the height of hypocrisy.  This is a feared organisation with a history of using infiltration and sabotage to disrupt the activities of leftist dissidents, Aboriginal rights activists and other progressive and anti-racist forces.

Pro-PRC Students Targeted

The main target of attacks on the Chinese community have been pro-PRC international students from China. They have not only been slandered by the media but have faced attacks from the likes of, now former, foreign minister Julie Bishop and Australia’s highest-ranked foreign affairs bureaucrat, Frances Adamson. These officials have made thinly veiled threats warning Chinese students not to spread propaganda or “blindly condemn” those within university circles who attack the PRC. Laughably, their attacks on Chinese students have been made in the name of upholding Australia’s supposed “openness and freedom of speech.” Except that Chinese students are not supposed to say anything positive about the PRC or to expose the flaws in the arguments of anti-PRC crusaders.

Worryingly, the campaign against pro-PRC students is starting to move from denunciations to repression. ANU Professor, Geremie Barme, made a thinly veiled call for ANU student, Lei Xiying, to face disciplinary action. Why? Because Lei made a series of passionately pro-Red China videos that went viral. Consider the difference with the way Lei has been hounded with how lightly Nationals senator Barry O’Sullivan has gotten off for his despicable comment two days ago about “us having a biosecurity breach from some bloody old Chinaman that brings in his favourite sausage down the front of his undies.” Meanwhile, a package of draconian “foreign interference laws” are now going into force that everyone knows are aimed at supporters of China. The laws could be used to jail those who advocate political positions held by Beijing. If Australia’s current course is not resisted, some leaders of Chinese community organisations and student groups could well face criminal prosecution in the future.

The Beginning of a New McCarthyism and
the Resurgence of White Australia Racism

There definitely is a racist aspect to the ruling class campaign against pro-PRC Chinese people. It is an expression of the refrain of racist rednecks that “we let you into the country so the least you could do is … [shut up and stay out of politics!]” It amounts to making people of Chinese background second-class citizens. Which other ethnic minority will next be targeted for expressing a view that the Australian regime deems to not adhere to what they decree to be “Australian values”? Palestinian community members who campaign for the liberation of Palestine? People from Latin American backgrounds who protest against Washington and Canberra’s efforts to incite a right-wing coup in Venezuela?

The Australian government’s attempts to deny a big part of the Chinese community the political rights formally accorded to others is stained with the same white supremacist methodology as the discriminatory laws it has placed on Aboriginal people in the NT – and now certain other parts of Australia – that prevent them having the same access to social welfare as other citizens. Moreover, the mainstream media’s witch-hunting of Chinese community organisations and PRC international students cannot be separated from their racist vilification of the Muslim community and African youth. Similarly, the Australian regime’s demonisation of Huang Xiangmo and their cancellation of his visa has parallels to the way that Peter Dutton brands refugees as “rapists”; and to the way that both the Liberals and ALP insist on denying these persecuted refugees residency in Australia.

However, racism is not the only factor here. After all would a pro-imperialist person of Hong Kong background have his residency cancelled if he expressed opposition to Hong Kong’s re-integration into China? Not a chance! The attempts to silence the pro-PRC part of the Chinese community is not only racist, it is anti-communist. It is an attempt by the Australian regime to gag any voice speaking in defence of socialistic China or any other workers state. Now Mr Huang, as a capitalist businessman is hardly a communist. Rather, knowing that the right to capitalist exploitation is not guaranteed in Red China – a reality that is good for China’s masses – Huang and some other Chinese capitalists seek to stave off their businesses from being nationalised by trying to ingratiate themselves with the CPC. Similarly, former Labor senator Sam Dastyari, who was unfairly witch-hunted out of politics for having once made the patently true statement that the South China Sea issue is China’s internal affair, is no revolutionary. Yet, that even Huang and Dastyari could be persecuted shows the dangers that actual leftists and supporters of the PRC workers state face today. Indeed the way that they were victimised for the slightest displays of “softness” on the CPC is reminiscent of the Cold War witch-hunt in late-1940s and 1950s Australia and the U.S. (where it became known as McCarthyism). Back then anyone not critical enough of the then most powerful socialistic state – the USSR – or who had any The other typical terms of this generic drugs the most effective drug to cure men’s erection issues. prices cialis Kamagra is an anti-ED solution that helps with hardening of the erection and maintaining the same for a period of three times each viagra rx online day. For soft viagra tabs urine pH level has close relation to excessive stress. Raising your hormone level with testosterone appalachianmagazine.com buy cialis online may improve your libido and thus erections will improve as well. connection with people in the local communist parties was branded a traitor and driven out of their job. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia (CPA) leaders were jailed alongside communist trade unionists. In a witch-hunting atmosphere that almost saw the CPA banned in 1951, the government even raided CPA offices. 

Is this what is going to happen again? Ten screenwriters and directors in the U.S. and their families protest their impending imprisonment. The people, who became known as the Hollywood 10, were jailed by the American regime in 1948 for up to a year for refusing to answer questions about their possible communist sympathies. The late 1940s-1950s anti-communist witch-hunt saw hundreds of Hollywood actors, writers and directors driven out of their jobs and blacklisted. Thousands upon thousands of teachers, wharfies, seamen, university academics and government employees also lost their jobs on the basis of the slightest alleged sign of communist association. Meanwhile, hundreds of communists and alleged communists were jailed. In Australia, several Communist Party of Australia leaders were imprisoned alongside communist trade unionists.

Anyone who thinks that such an anti-communist witch-hunt could never happen again because “society has progressed” should look around the world and think again. Less than five years ago, South Korea’s capitalist regime banned the country’s third largest parliamentary party (the Unified Progressive Party) and jailed several of its leaders, because that party was not hostile enough to North Korea. In the Ukraine, Bulgaria, Latvia and Lithuania laws are in force banning people from displaying communist symbols. In the Ukraine, these laws are used to prevent the country’s pro-communist parties from standing in elections. Moreover, in the Australian state’s latest attacks on pro-PRC Chinese, the methods of 1950s McCarthyism are being re-deployed. This is seen in the line spun by ASIO that they knows things about Mr Huang but can’t tell us … because it’s secret so you just have to believe them! This apes FBI director J. Edgar Hoover’s “Loyalty Security Reviews” during the U.S. Cold War witch-hunt where suspected communists were not allowed to know who was accusing them and were often not even told what they were accused of! Meanwhile, the media’s branding of PRC students as “spies for the Communist Party of China,” Canberra’s exclusions of Chinese tech giant Huawei because of “security concerns” and the media’s ritual blaming of China for every cyber hack without any evidence all have more than a whiff of an impending McCarthyite witch-hunt.

There is a factor that makes this impending Cold War witch-hunt potentially more dangerous than its earlier version. That is the fact that the main country targeted by today’s Red Scare is an Asian one (rather than the majority white Soviet Union) and the fact that there is a large diaspora from that country living here. This makes White Australia racism even more a component of today’s new McCarthyism than its earlier variety – all the more so because it dovetails with a period of increasing racist attacks on all people of colour. Already, the combination of anti-communist hostility to Red China and White Australia racism have led to a surge in racist violence against Chinese background residents. In October 2017, three Chinese high-school students were bashed by racists at a Canberra bus stop. Two months before this, a white supremacist student at ANU pulled out a baseball bat during a lesson and beat and tried to kill his tutor of Chinese origin and four other Chinese students. Especially when one knows the post-1788 history of this country – from the Gold Rush anti-Chinese pogroms to the 19th century anti-Chinese laws to the White Australia Policy – it is understandable why some people of Chinese descent are fearful.

The emerging Cold War witch-hunt in Australia is starting to expand beyond targeting supporters of the PRC. This is seen most clearly in the case of Chan Han Choi, a socialist political prisoner in Australia. Choi is facing charges of helping the DPRK to export its produce in violation of cruel UN economic sanctions which if true would only make him a great humanitarian and partisan of socialism. He has outrageously been denied bail over the last 14 months, in part, on the grounds that he is a DPRK supporter, which the prosecution claims means that he has no loyalty to Australia. Thus this is, as with the persecution of Mr Huang and the slandering of pro-PRC students, yet another case of people being denied the rights accorded to others on the basis of their sympathy for a socialistic state.

13 April 2019, Sydney: A placard at the rally in defence of socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi, connects Choi’s imprisonment with the broader emerging new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states.

The Real Truths About “Democracy” and “Foreign Interference”

Supporters of socialistic states have always faced the threat of repression in capitalist countries. For they embody the greatest fear of capitalist rulers: that the exploited masses will unite to depose them from power. If in many periods, socialists have been able to operate legally in Australia it is only because the ruling class thinks that it is more effective to rule the masses by maintaining a facade of “democracy.” Yet no one should be fooled into thinking that the Australian government democratically represents the needs of the majority. Under this country’s current system it is the big business owners who, through their ownership of the media and their huge resources to fund political parties, pay for political advertising, establish think tanks and hire lobbyists who thoroughly shape political discourse. The whole state machinery – including ASIO, police and bureaucrats – has been created for enforcing the rule of the capitalist exploiters at home and enforcing the superexploitation of the peoples of Australia’s neo-colonies abroad (ASIS the overseas operation’s counterpart of the ASIO organisation that is targeting the pro-PRC Chinese community at home has for example been involved in spying on East Timorese officials during negotiations over the Australian ruling class’ attempts to normalise its plunder of Timorese oil resources). That is why no matter who wins elections, the resulting governments always enable tycoons to leach incredible wealth while overseeing a large amount of homelessness, poor living conditions for so many Aboriginal people and the frequent throwing of large numbers of workers out of their livelihoods at the whim of greedy bosses. Today, these same governments – as well as top bureaucrats and ASIO spies – are warning Chinese students that their political discourse must comply with what they deem to be “Australian values.” However, a state machine that does not govern for the interests of the majority should have no right to determine which values people are supposed to adhere to. So we hope that more people – both citizens and international students – will refuse to be bound by the values decreed by a regime that only governs for the interests of the greedy, big end of town.

The Australian ruling class is actually not even truly wedded to the notions of “free speech” and “democracy” that it claims to be defending against Red China’s influence. To be sure, they do find it easier to rule by maintaining some formalities of “democracy.” Yet when they feel the need to dispense with these – as they did during the late 1940s and early 1950s – they will not hesitate to try and do so. Today, we are again entering such a period. The ruling class is slowly moving away from the norms of “free speech” and “democracy” (all in the name of saving these!) because they are shaken by a crisis of confidence. The Great Recession that struck the capitalist world a decade ago really did damage the self-belief of the capitalist ruling classes of the world. Although Australia did not suffer a recession, Australia’s capitalist rulers know that their economy was only saved by exports to China’s booming, socialistic state-owned enterprises. Meanwhile, capitalist rulers around the world see growing resentment amongst the masses. Although, at the moment, mass disgruntlement has led more to support for far-right forces and only to some degree to a leftist radicalisation, the exploiting classes know that this could quickly change. Moreover, they see a socialistic power in China going from strength to strength – and it terrifies them!  Very immediately, the influence of a socialistic power in the South Pacific is enabling countries like PNG, Fiji and Vanuatu to start to free themselves from Australian imperialist domination.

In this context, the Australian ruling class has an interest in manufacturing a “China threat” and an “agents of Chinese influence” scare. This helps them to “justify” to the public an expensive military build-up aimed against socialistic China and North Korea, aggressive policies against Chinese assistance to South Pacific countries and greater political support to anti-communist movements within the PRC. On the other hand, the Red China scare also enables the Australian regime to defend moves to curb leftist dissent and civil liberties within Australia. Moreover, their vilification of a big chunk of the Chinese community helps them to divert the working class masses that they exploit away from the real source of the masses’ troubles. Although much of their scare-mongering about CPC interference is contrived, to some degree they are also truly concerned about the influence of PRC students in Australia. For example, what happens when the Australian class mates of these students find out that these PRC students, who they know have experienced life in both the PRC and Australia, actually like the PRC and don’t feel repressed there? How will the Australian ruling class be able to justify a hostile policy against its biggest trading partner then? And what if the friends and classmates of some Chinese students even start thinking that China’s socialistic system has certain advantages? Heaven forbid!

Although the Australian ruling class is today hyping up the issue of “foreign interference” they actually have no specific stance on the issue per sé. They are hostile to pro-socialist influence but welcome any foreign interference that serves their capitalist interests. Thus, the ruling class welcomes U.S. interference as they need U.S. power to guarantee their predatory neo-colonial subjugation of South Pacific countries. The Australian state welcomes large numbers of U.S. troops in Darwin, hosts U.S. military bases at several locations and established the U.S. Studies Centre at Sydney University to promote U.S. influence in Australia.

The PRC actually goes out of its way to avoid interfering in the internal affairs of other countries. Even all but the most extreme anti-China hawks in Australia do not claim that the PRC is actually trying to change Australia’s political system. Supposed PRC “interference” is at most aimed at ameliorating Canberra’s hostility to the PRC and at opposing anti-communist Chinese groups exiled in Australia. However, the assumptions behind Beijing’s attempted “non interference” policy is flawed for a couple of key reasons. For one, all countries – and key events within them – inevitably affect other countries whether it is by design or not. On the negative side, for example, the rise of extreme right-wing forces around the globe has definitely encouraged fascist groups within Australia. This is partly through white supremacists here being emboldened by seeing the ascendancy of Trump and far-right parties in the likes of Italy and Austria and partly through Australian speaking tours by interfering far-right bigwigs like Southern and Yiannopoulos. On the other hand, the Aboriginal rights struggle in Australia drew inspiration from the militant black liberation movement in the U.S. and vice versa.

The second problem with Beijing’s policy of “non interference” is that it is premised on the expectation that if the PRC does not interfere in the affairs of capitalist countries, the latter will, in turn, not interfere in China’s internal affairs. However such a reality is not what is happening! Although the PRC genuinely does not seek to threaten the social system in the capitalist countries, the capitalist powers do everything possible to undermine socialistic rule in China. Washington – with Canberra’s support – provides massive financial, media and political support to anti-communist groups within China from “pro-democracy” neo-liberals to yuppy Hong Kong students sympathetic to British colonialism to a tiny but violent minority within the Uighur community of right-wing anti-communist, religious extremists. That is why the PRC should take the gloves off and abandon the CPC leadership’s failed policy of “non interference.” It should seek to influence events in the capitalist world – not by covert methods – but by openly proclaiming the advantages of the socialist system, by attributing its own economic successes to socialistic public ownership and by supporting the struggles of the working class and oppressed in the capitalist world. A powerful example of the latter was when the PRC, in the early 1970s, twice feted delegations of some of Australia’s leading Aboriginal rights activists (see: http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/images/history/1970s/china/chinadx2.html).

One thing that the rising tensions between the PRC and capitalist Australia have proved is that no matter how much the PRC tries to avoid interfering in the affairs of an imperialist country, she will still face prejudice and accusations of “interference”. That is why, in a sense, the PRC has nothing to lose if it were to start openly and aggressively promoting the socialist cause within countries like Australia. If she did so she would start to win significant sympathy amongst Australia’s working class people. For example, if the Australian masses, angry at the greed of the local banks, heard that the PRC has a sound financial system based on public ownership of all its key banks, they would find that rather attractive. And it would provide badly needed encouragement to their own struggle for socialism.

Resist the Attacks on the Pro-PRC Chinese Community!
Resist the New McCarthyism!

Today, the pro-PRC section of the Chinese community is facing not only the resurgent White Australia racism that is targeting all people of colour in this country but particular vilification in the context of an emerging, new Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of the socialistic PRC. This needs to be resisted by mass mobilisations on the streets. However, this is the task of not only the Chinese community but the entire left-wing and working class movement in Australia. For the Australian regime’s attacks on a large section of the Chinese community is an attack on all working class people. For one, the racism that this campaign is inciting divides working class people and thus weakens our ability to unite to fight for our rights. Secondly, the persecution of supporters of Red China could well turn into a broader witch-hunt against trade unionists and leftists. The McCarthyite witch-hunt in the U.S. first began with persecution of supporters of the USSR and then progressed to repression against all communists and eventually targeted people who advocated for social welfare and public health which were seen as communist policies. In Australia, the late 1940s and 1950s Cold War witch-hunt saw the regime first attacking communists and then using that to target all trade union militants. If the Australian ruling class’ current campaign against PRC supporters is not pushed back we can imagine that soon all avowed communists within Australia will face persecution; and later trade union militants and those who advocate policies that are also pursued by Beijing – such as extensive public housing and public ownership of key industries – will be targeted. Thirdly, the U.S. and Australian imperialist drive against the PRC is against the interests of working class people. Although the PRC’s government has allowed too much capitalist intrusion into China, the PRC remains a workers state where all the key sectors are under public ownership. This is a great treasure for all the workers and downtrodden of the world that must be protected.

With the capitalist rulers increasingly insecure, ever more worried about their system’s decay and ever more fearful about the stunning development of socialistic China we will only be able to put an end to racist scapegoating and Cold War-style witch-hunting when we sweep away this capitalist system for good. However, to advance the struggle towards that goal we need to fight right now to resist racist attacks on any victimised community and to oppose all crackdowns on pro-socialist political expression. And our struggle for workers liberation here will surely be stronger if we can ensure that the world’s most populous country continues to remain a workers state.

Fight back against the racist, red-baiting witch-hunt against the pro-PRC Chinese community! Oppose all the Australian regime’s racist attacks on Aboriginal people, Muslims, youth of African descent and refugees! Defend the right of supporters of the PRC to express our views! Resist the drift towards a new Cold War witch-hunt against leftists! Fight to free socialist political prisoner in Australia Chan Han Choi! Stand by the PRC defend and strengthen socialistic rule in China!