Tag Archives: Chan Han Choi

Australia’s Repressive
Capitalist Regime
Releases Chan Han Choi
From Detention

Above Photo: Freed socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi, hours after his sentencing judgement was handed down does something that he has been prevented from doing for over three and a half years: take a walk in a park.
Choi is now busy seeking employment as well as accommodation – following through on an application for public housing, given that it is almost impossible for ex-prisoners to obtain tenancies from private landlords.
Photo credit: Trotskyist Platform

Australia’s Repressive Capitalist Regime Releases Chan Han Choi From Detention

FOLLOWING A DETERMINED CAMPAIGN OF SUPPORT,
SOCIALIST POLITICAL PRISONER IN AUSTRALIA IS FREED

23 July 2021: Chan Han Choi is finally free. This left-wing political prisoner in Australia had been imprisoned in especially harsh conditions for almost three years from December 2017. Then for the last eight and a half months, Choi has been under house arrest on bail. Today, Choi was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months imprisonment. It is absolutely outrageous that he should receive any punishment for what he did let alone such a tough sentence! However, given that this sentence is less than the aggregate time that he has already been jailed and under house arrest, the 62 year-old South Korean-born, Australian citizen is at long last free.

Chan Han Choi was the victim of an intense Cold War witch-hunt. He was largely imprisoned for his political sympathy for socialistic North Korea and his opposition to the cruel United Nations economic sanctions on that country. Nominally, the charges that Choi was sentenced over were that he had tried to broker deals to help the people of North Korea evade economic sanctions. However, if Choi had been sentenced fairly, even under the blatantly unfair laws enforcing the killer sanctions, he would have only received a small fine. This is because his “offending” was on the very low-end of the scale. None of the deals that Choi tried to broker ever went through. No goods or technology were exchanged and no money ever changed hands. Additionally, if the evidence had been looked at impartially, it would be apparent that in all the five proscribed trades Choi tried to broker, Choi himself cancelled the negotiations well before he was arrested.

It is telling that at the sentencing hearing, the Crown Prosecutors were unable to provide one single victim impact statementThat is because there are no victims to the “crimes” that Chan Han Choi was sentenced for! Indeed, if Choi had gone further in his “offences” and actually brokered the deals to their successful conclusion then there would have only been beneficiaries – not victims. How many lives would have been saved or made easier in North Korea had the people of North Korea been able to receive badly needed hard currency from the export deals that Choi, for a period, tried to organise?

The actual reason that Choi received such a big jail sentence today instead of a small fine is because the court politically discriminated against Choi for his pro-DPRK (Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, that is North Korea) sympathies. Indeed, for the last more than three and half years, Chan Han Choi has been subjected to political persecution from a range of Australian state agencies ranging from the courts to the Commonwealth DPP (Director of Public Prosecutions), the AFP (Australian Federal Police), ASIO, “Corrective Services” NSW (the prison system), Legal Aid and Justice Health (the state agency responsible for providing medical care for prisoners).

The judge did not divide today’s judgement into a non-parole period and a period that Choi could be released on parole due to Choi having already completed the entire period of sentence. If this had not been the case and Choi had been released on bail much earlier and under normal conditions of bail then typically the non-parole period would be about 60% of the entire sentence. That would mean that today’s sentence would have likely been divided into about two years imprisonment without parole and then a further eighteen months under parole – parole which is typically nowhere as harsh as the house arrest conditions that Choi faced for the last eight and a half months. That means that Choi ended up enduring as much as a year longer in prison than he would have had he been released on bail earlier and then a further eight and a half months in much more severe conditions than typical parole. Thus, while today’s sentencing judgement is blatantly biased and outrageously severe, the fact that several judges repeatedly denied Choi bail for nearly three years prior to trial is even more despicable. The Commonwealth DPP and AFP had opposed Choi’s bail bids, in good part, on the claim that Choi’s “offending” was objectively more serious because of Choi’s political loyalty to the DPRK. In other words, they claimed that Choi’s political sympathy for the DPRK made his “offending” more serious than if he had other political sympathies or if he was purely motivated by personal economic gain. This is crystal clear, pure Cold War McCarthyism, where a person is treated worse by the law and denied rights accorded to others – in this case the right to bail before trial – on the basis of their support for socialistic states. Indeed, if there had not been such an active campaign in solidarity with Choi by leftist opponents of Cold War neo-McCarthyism in Australia, with others internationally taking a stand too, then the regime would never have given Choi bail prior to trial at all and would have sentenced him for even longer. In the early period following Choi’s arrest, before the on-the-streets campaign in his defence started mobilising and before Australia’s ruling class realised how much resulting political damage they would experience from their persecution of Choi, regime officials were speaking of locking up Choi for between 8 to 15 years. Thus today’s sentencing result reflects both a grossly unjust Cold War persecution but also the impact of the leftist, anti-Cold War defence campaign in pushing back against that persecution.

A Compassionate, Intelligent Person Motivated by
Humanitarian Concern for the People of North Korea

In February, Choi accepted a plea deal in which the Commonwealth DPP dropped some of its blatantly false, hyped-up charges. Choi in turn accepted that he had tried to help the people of North Korea organise exports of iron, coal, instrumentation and arms in violation of UN sanctions that ban almost all of North Korea’s exports. Choi had also tried to help North Korea import petrol which is also restricted by the murderous sanctions.

The trade that Choi was trying to help organise is very similar to the trade that Australia engages in. But the people of North Korea are cruelly prevented from carrying out such trade. The resulting shortages and lack of hard currency needed to import food, medicine, medical equipment and agricultural machinery causes immense suffering to North Korea’s people. An independent international report prepared by Western-based medical and aid workers titled, The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea, found that the UN sanctions had caused the deaths of thousands of people in North Korea – mostly children – in 2018 alone. It is out of deep humanitarian concern for the people of North Korea that Choi tried to help her people trade. At his sentencing hearing last week, Choi, while making clear that he was totally committed to, from now on, following all of Australian laws, bravely continued to expose the unjust nature of the sanctions on North Korea. He explained that he would, from now on, oppose the sanctions through protest and other legal means. 

One of the victims of earlier UN sanctions – the ones imposed on Iraq from 1990. Seven-month-old Sahra, dehydrated and malnourished is comforted by her grandmother in Baghdad, 1998. Even according to one of the UN’s own agencies, UNICEF, these sanctions caused the premature deaths of half a million Iraqi babies in the first ten years of their implementation. The sanctions imposed on the people of North Korea are even more stringent than the sanctions that were imposed on Iraq. Although the DPRK’s socialistic system allows her to better manage the scarcity and damage done by the sanctions, an independent study shows that the sanctions still killed thousands of people in North Korea (mostly children) in 2018 alone.

Chan Han Choi sought no personal gain from his efforts to help the people of North Korea to trade. Choi lived an austere life. When he was arrested, he lived in a modest rented apartment, owned no property, had no car and had just $6,000 in savings. At the time of his arrest, Choi was working as a hospital cleaner. Choi is really only “guilty” of doing very understandable acts. He should not have spent one second behind bars and should never have been charged in the first place!

The real criminals in this matter are the imperialist rulers who repeatedly arm twisted the world to acquiesce to successively more severe sanctions on the DPRK. Chief of these were the leaders of the United States. But they were enthusiastically supported by the Australian, Japanese, South Korean and British regimes. Donald Trump, Barack Obama, George Bush, Scott Morrison, Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Shinzo Abe: these are biggest criminals in this matter. They have helped enact sanctions on the people of North Korea that are an indirect form of mass murder. The ASIO and Australian Federal Police officers, prosecutors and judges involved in Choi’s persecution – and, thus, in enforcing these sanctions – also bear some responsibility for the death and suffering that these sanctions are causing.

For three and half years, the AFP and Commonwealth DPP pushed the line that Choi was motivated by “loyalty to the DPRK” and a higher “patriotic duty.” They said that he was an “economic agent of the DPRK.” They then opposed bail successfully for nearly three years in good part on the basis of Choi’s “loyalty to the DPRK.” Yet around three weeks ago, the Crown did a 180 degree U-turn. They started claiming that Choi was instead partly motivated by personal profit (and when that claim was exposed as false, created a really bizarre theory that Choi just wanted to deal in arms for the sake of it). The judge, in part, bought into this “personal profit” rubbish. In today’s judgement, although she accepted the truth that Choi was motivated by a desire “to assist the people of North Korea”, she also claimed that he was partly motivated by personal financial gain. The idea that Choi was seeking personal financial gain by trying to breach the sanctions is, of course, ridiculous! If one was really motivated by personal financial gain, trying to act as a broker for North Korea, especially for a person living in a country with a rabidly anti-communist regime like Australia, is the worst course to take. The sanctions on North Korea are extremely tightly policed by the U.S., Japan, Australia and other imperialist powers. Moreover, any broker on the North Korean side could never make much money from such trades because North Korea can only entice potential buyers to break the sanctions and accept North Korean produce if they offer buyers a much lower price than the world market price. If someone in Australia really wanted to make money from brokering illegal trades they would simply be a drug dealer, which Choi is definitely not. Furthermore, in the period before the sanctions reached their current level of severity, Choi focused on putting people in touch with each other so that they could themselves arrange deals – which were then legal – between themselves; so in these cases no money changed hands through Choi and, thus, he could not be making personal gain from this work.

The sudden attempt by the Crown – in part backed up by the judge – to paint Choi as someone partly motivated by personal gain is a crude, last minute, attempt by the regime to partly de-politicise a case that they have politicised from the very beginning. It is a realisation by the regime that their Cold War imprisonment of pro-DPRK political prisoner Chan Han Choi has done them a lot of political harm and now they want to do their best to show that Choi was never a political prisoner and … his prosecution was never all that much about politics after all!

Given that the Australian ruling are doing their best to obscure what actually drove Chan Han Choi and – more importantly for them – what he represents, let’s clarify who Chan Han Choi really is and what motivated his “offending” actions. Chan Han Choi is a very compassionate and polite human being. He was brought up in capitalist South Korea and then has lived the last 34 years of his life in Australia. For most of his life, Choi bought the anti-DPRK propaganda that he was fed from childhood. However, from the mid-noughties, Choi began to do his own research on the question. Then in 2007 he made his first trip to North Korea. Like many people who go to North Korea with a truly open mind and without the expressed aim of themselves adding to anti-DPRK hostility, Choi really liked North Korean society. Choi fell in love with the egalitarianism of a society where he found that workers seem to have more rights at work than factory directors, where people’s interrelationships are not driven by money and where the warmth of friendship between ordinary people is very evident. At the same time, Choi saw economic hardships caused by the effects of sanctions, economic blockade and U.S.-led military pressure – the latter forcing North Korea to divert considerable resources to self-defence in order to avoid her people meeting the same fate as Iraq’s people. So he resolved to do what he could do to help North Korea’s economy and, thereby, improve the life of her people. Choi volunteered himself as an unofficial trade representative for the DPRK’s public sector enterprises that dominate her economy (note that the label thrown around by the AFP, the Crown Prosecutors and the media that Choi is an “economic agent” of North Korea is deliberately intended to make something so very benign as being a trade representative sound sinister). Choi helped to put North Korean exporting firms together with contacts in China, South Korea and elsewhere so that the respective parties could themselves arrange deals. Partly through the efforts of people like Choi and even more so through the work of North Korea’s own people and with the help of increased trade with socialistic China’s booming economy, by the time ten years had passed since Choi’s first trip to North Korea, North Korea was actually able to better feed all her people than the majority of other developing countries in Asia. However, Choi watched with horror in 2016 and 2017 as successively more draconian sanctions were imposed on North Korea. He rightly feared that North Korea’s people would now have to endure even more hardships than those which he saw in his early trips to North Korea in the mid-late noughties. So in the latter half of 2017, Choi made a renewed push to broker trade deals for North Korea’s people. However, by then the goal posts had been moved. The deals that he had brokered previously, which had once been legal, were now proscribed by the sanctions. Worried about the plight of the people and society that he so cared about, Choi pushed through with some brokering efforts. But seeing the stringency of the imperialist policing of sanctions, Choi pulled back and cancelled the deals. This is the sum total of what Choi’s “offending” consists of and what drove it. In a fair society Choi would be given medals and awards for compassion and courage. But here he was demonised and thrown into prison.

Choi was Demonised and Persecuted to “Justify”
the Capitalist Rulers’ Cold War Drive

The obvious reason for the severity of the Australian capitalist state’s persecution of Choi is that this state is hell-bent on enforcing the sanctions on North Korea. The imperialist powers want to use these crippling sanctions to crush socialistic rule in North Korea and thus undermine socialistic rule also in North Korea’s neighbour and ally, the Peoples Republic of China, the world’s largest workers state. Although socialistic rule in North Korea and China is deformed by bureaucratic privileges and a lack of real workers democracy – and in China by the presence of a capitalist exploiting class (although fortunately one which does not hold state power as in the capitalist countries) – the existence of workers states in these countries is not only a massive advance for the working class masses but a serious challenge to the interests of imperialist ruling classes. Socialistic rule in the likes of China, North Korea and Cuba prevents those countries from being turned into giant sweatshops for Western multinationals to exploit the way that workers in, say, the Philippines, Indonesia and Bangladesh are. It is also an example to the toiling masses in the capitalist neo-colonial countries that could inspire them to have “bad thoughts” about throwing off their local exploiters and their American, Australian, British and Japanese overlords. Moreover, the mere existence of workers states abroad incites the greatest fear of the capitalist rulers in Australia, India, the U.S. and Brazil: that the working class masses in their own countries will see that it is possible for them to also make their own anti-capitalist revolutions and take over power.

1950: An elderly woman and her grandchild walk in a dazed state as they inspect the damage to their neighbourhood following a U.S. bombing raid on North Korea during the Korean War. The U.S. and its allies, like the Australian imperialists, dropped more bombs on the people of North Korea during the Korean War than were used in the entire Pacific theatre of World War II. They especially used napalm as a Weapon of Mass Destruction burning whole North Korean cities to the ground as part of killing some three million North Korean people (more than 25% of the country’s entire population!) in their genocidal, but ultimately unsuccessful, attempt to crush socialistic North Korea. The imperialist powers are prepared to kill millions in their drive to crush workers states – including by imposing starvation economic sanctions on their populations.
Photo credit: Keystone/Getty Images

However, the persecution of Choi was not only about – and perhaps not even mainly about – enforcing the sanctions on the DPRK. When Choi was arrested it was accompanied by a massive attempt on the part of then prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, as well as the AFP and the mainstream media to hype up a supposed North Korean threat. As well as listing the items that Choi actually really did try to help North Korea trade – like petrol, coal and iron – the regime initially hit Choi with completely bogus charges that he had tried to assist North Korea to export Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) technology. They even sensationally claimed that Choi was trying to organise North Korean experts to help private traders to make ICBMs to sell around the world. All these claims have now been discredited. The Commonwealth DPP had to drop their bogus WMD charges, and in the face of compelling evidence, step-by-step retreated from the claim that Choi was trying to organise the export of North Korean technology for the production of any ballistic missiles, let alone ICBMs. The judge had to concede too in today’s judgement that in relation to the arms particular of one charge, it could not be established that Choi had tried to broker any more than the export of North Korean technology for the production of MANPADs (which is what Choi had admitted all along since he accepted the plea bargain) – which are small, hand-held weapons used for shooting down low-flying military aircraft and helicopter gunships. And that is a massive difference from all the earlier hype claiming that Choi had tried to broker the export of WMD and ICBM technology!

Yet all these truly fanciful – and now discredited – claims about Choi’s activities had a purpose. Australia’s imperialist ruling class want to manufacture a “North Korea” threat in order to scare us into accepting their ever more aggressive participation in the U.S.-led Cold War drive against North Korea and her giant socialistic neighbour and ally, Red China. Moreover, the capitalist rulers want to “justify” their intensification of McCarthyist repression against supporters of socialistic states at home. Since Choi’s arrest and the escalation of the anti-China Cold War, Chinese journalists have been raided by the AFP and ASIO, Chinese international students who organised a Sydney rally in support of Red China’s sovereignty over Hong Kong were subjected to a terrifying interrogation by Australian secret police and a respected member of the Indochinese-Chinese community in Melbourne has been charged under the “foreign interference” laws. Last year, even a NSW upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane, was hit with an intimidating 16-hour raid of his family home by the AFP and ASIO after merely stating the simple fact that China responded very effectively to the pandemic.

Meanwhile, the hysterical rubbish about a supposed “North Korea threat” that surrounded Choi’s arrest, the witch-hunt against those sympathetic to the PRC and the generally repressive Cold War climate have all combined to create such a national security obsession that even dissidents not involved in Cold War issues have been targeted by Australia’s increasingly authoritarian, capitalist regime. Within nine months of Choi’s arrest, whistle-blowers David McBride, Witness K and lawyer Bernard Collaery were all hit with serious charges – each for alleged “offences” committed several years earlier. Meanwhile, the same AFP that targeted these whistle-blowers and Chan Han Choi have also conducted intimidating raids against trade unions like the CFMEU. Moreover, it is undeniable that the national security obsession, in part churned up by the hysteria surrounding Choi’s December 2017 arrest, has made it easier for Australia’s rulers to be complicit in the horrendous persecution of Julian Assange by Canberra’s allies in Washington and London.

The political benefit that Australia’s capitalists gained from demonising Choi meant that the regime that serves them spent literally millions of dollars of public money on his prosecution. The resources that they unleashed against Choi included intercepting his phone calls for months prior to his arrest, unleashing dozens of police in the operation, hacking into Choi’s E-mails and bank records, enlisting numerous international and local “experts” and engaging for over three years a large legal team including a crack senior counsel, a reputed junior counsel, a high-powered senior solicitor and numerous legal researchers. Moreover, in mid-2018, two AFP officers, assisted by the U.S. FBI, went on a, at minimum two-week long, trip from one coast of the U.S. to the other to organise “experts” – mostly rabid, war-mongering neoconservatives – to assist in the prosecution of Choi. The cost of that trip alone to the public budget is estimated at $30,000 to $50,000. We do not know of how many other overseas trips AFP and ASIO officers went on to advance their prosecution of Choi. And yet while millions overall were spent on persecuting Chan Han Choi, today Australian governments have proved incapable and/or unwilling to provide adequate vaccines and virus testing capacity for the people and adequate PPE for health care and other at-risk workers resulting in a deadly COVID outbreak that has forced nearly 60% of this country’s people into lockdown.

This highlights the priorities, and indeed the fundamental nature, of Australia’s capitalist regime; a character trait that does not decisively change whether it is the Liberals, the ALP or the Greens who are warming the ministerial seats of governments. Just as telling as is the contrast between the prosecution of Choi and the failed pandemic response, in the period when the AFP was devoting huge resources to preparing Choi’s arrest and then his prosecution, they and ASIO were not conducting any surveillance whatsoever of the Australian white supremacist who murdered 51 people in the horrific March 2019 terror attack on two mosques in Christchurch. This is despite the fact that this fascist, who would go on to become Australia’s biggest single terrorist, made many threatening racist statements online. Persecuting and demonising supporters of socialistic states is a priority for the capitalist regime but stopping murdering racists is certainly not. Neither is holding finance sector corporate bigwigs to account. Thus, after Australia’s corporate regulator, ASIC, sent two briefs of evidence to the Commonwealth DPP last August about laying criminal charges against AMP for its notorious practice of charging customers fees for no service – that is, basically stealing from customers – the Commonwealth DPP last week declared that no charges would be laid after … “weighing the relevant public interest factors”! This is the very same Commonwealth DPP that ferociously spearheaded the prosecution of Chan Han Choi.

Choi Was Imprisoned Under Brutal Conditions

Choi’s many supporters are very happy today that Choi is finally free. However, let us not forget how much he has suffered over the last three and a half years. Choi spent most of his time in jail in one of the Australian regime’s most notorious prison camps – Long Bay. Choi was incarcerated at the very same prison and section of the jail where, in December 2015, six racist prison guards crushed to death 26 year-old Aboriginal man, David Dungay, in circumstances very similar to the infamous racist police murder of George Floyd in the USA.

Even though Choi was not accused of any violent offence, had no prior criminal record and was not even accused of any espionage, he was imprisoned as a National Security Interest (NSI) prisoner. This meant that Choi had no access to amenities, employment opportunities or educational opportunities due to his NSI classification. Moreover, prison records show that for the first 89 days of his custody, Choi was placed in “segregated custody” which is the prison system’s understated way of saying solitary confinement. Then when friends sought to visit, Corrective Services used all sorts of tricks to ensure that the visitors were delayed four and a half months before being properly approved and notified that they could visit Choi in jail. Later, for the last two years of his incarceration, the authorities prevented Choi from making telephone calls to these friends. Choi was by then only allowed to telephone his wife. However, even though Choi’s English is poor, authorities prevented Choi from his speaking on the telephone to his wife in Korean. In February 2019, Corrective Services’ intelligence officers even threatened to send Choi to Goulburn Supermax prison should be speak on the phone to his wife in Korean.

Corrective Services even obstructed Choi’s lawyers from making face to face visits to him. After an initial visit, Choi’s earlier legal team was only allowed one visit to him in a 12-month period! Moreover, language interpreters were obstructed from accompanying legal visits to such an extent that Choi did not get one single face to face visit with this legal team that was actually accompanied by an interpreter until some 17 months after they first entered the matter!  

Most seriously, authorities endangered Choi’s life by repeatedly knocking back his requests to see a prison doctor as his diabetes severely deteriorated during the first eight months of 2020. Choi’s prison health records prove, as was conceded at Choi’s sentencing hearing by Dr Ette, a doctor under the pay of Justice Health, that for an eight and a half month period from mid-December 2019 to the end of August 2020, Choi, who by then was on oral diabetic medication, did not have his Blood Sugar Level (BSL) monitored even once. This is despite the fact that on the last date that his BSL was actually monitored before this period, Choi’s BSL was already too high as confirmed by Dr Ette. As a result Choi endured months of diabetic symptoms – including severe weight loss, very itchy rashes, fungal infections, urinating problems etc – with no treatment. Choi became so desperate to treat unbearably itchy skin rashes – that unknown to him at the time were diabetic-induced – that he applied on his skin the hospital grade disinfectant given to prisoners to clean their toilet bowls! By late August 2020, Choi’s diabetes was out of control. In today’s judgement, the judge conceded that “the offender was referred for ‘urgent diabetes clinical review’, which Dr Ette regarded as having become ‘urgent’ because he had not been reviewed between December 2019 and August 2020.” Indeed, Choi’s situation became so desperate that when he was finally able to see medical staff in late August 2020, he had to be given emergency doses of insulin. As his BSL swung wildly, Choi was at immediate risk of brain damage, heart failure and strokes. Moreover, the only reason that Choi finally received treatment at the end of last August was because he had weeks before (with help to write in English from fellow prisoners) sent a strongly worded protest letter to Justice Health, which his supporters then published online, saying that they are “indirectly trying to murder me” by denying him medical care. The UN states that: “The intentional withholding of medical treatment from persons in places of detention or in other State institutions such as orphanages or from persons injured by an act attributable to public officials falls within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on torture” (https://www.bak.gv.at/en/Downloads/files/UNO/UNO_Folter_Konvention.pdf).  In short, under the UN definition of torture, socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi was tortured by the Australian capitalist regime for a period of several months in 2020.

The hospital-grade disinfectant that Chan Han Choi was forced to apply to his body to try and relieve severely itchy, diabetic induced rashes that had broken out throughout his body in early-mid 2020. Choi had to resort to such desperate measures after he was refused access to prison medical doctors and had his diabetic condition left dangerously untreated for several months. Even the sentencing judge had to concede that Choi was being truthful about his feelings about his conditions of custody when he told the doctor who performed his pre-sentencing assessment, Dr Furst, that:
“The whole time was very stressful. I suffered three times more than other prisoners. I felt as though I was less than animal. Sub-human.”

Chan Han Choi’s Growing Number of Supporters

Today, Chan Han Choi expressed his deepest appreciation for all the people who have supported him. Everyone who supported the campaign to free Choi should be congratulated. We acknowledge the groups that supported the nine united-front street rallies and marches held in solidarity with Choi, including Anti-War West Sydney, the Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, the Communist Party of Australia – Western Sydney branch, Communist Party of Australia – Wollongong Branch, Aust-DPRK Solidarity and ourselves in Trotskyist Platform who are proud to have initiated this united-front campaign. Other groups including the Social Justice Network, the Lebanese Communist Party, the Communist League (publishers of the Militant newspaper) and the Irish Republican socialist group, the James Connolly Association, also joined in the campaign at various stages. These actions have galvanised others to show solidarity with Choi. When a protest march was conducted by Chan Han Choi’s supporters in Chester Hill last December, right at the very heart of Sydney’s multiracial working class southwest that has been so vilified by the ruling class during this recent COVID upsurge, large numbers of people tooted their horns and waved in support of the protest. Moreover, in recent months, additional groups on the Left came on board the struggle to defend Choi and issued articles demanding Choi’s freedom including Socialist Alliance through its Green Left Weekly publication and the Melbourne-based leftist website, Class Conscious. Meanwhile, significant sections of the Korean community in Sydney swung behind Choi. This was reflected in the fair coverage of the case by the main Korean language community newspaper in Australia, Hanho Daily, whose online articles have received comments that are mostly in support of Choi. Meanwhile, the most popular online Chinese language news sites in Sydney, like 今日悉尼 (Sydney Today), have covered protests in support of Choi sympathetically. Meanwhile, support for Choi has spread internationally. In Russia, articles and documentaries in support of Choi produced by a Russian-speaking journalist in Australia have gone viral in both online media and social media. Meanwhile, from New Zealand to Greece to Britain and to the U.S., groups have declared their solidarity with Choi and published articles and statements condemning his persecution.

All this growing support for Choi and the work of Choi’s supporters in exposing the injustice of his persecution meant that Australia’s capitalist rulers were paying a significant political price for every day that they continued to persecute Chan Han Choi. The capitalist regime’s claims to stand for “rule of law” and “freedom of conscience” were being starkly exposed as a fraud and their ability to meddle abroad under the guise of “human rights” was being damaged. In the end, what Choi’s supporters managed to do was to take a situation that what was heading toward an extremely, extremely horrific injustice and divert that into being just a plain horrific injustice. That may not sound like much of an achievement but to Choi it meant the difference between being imprisoned for ten to fifteen years as the regime threatened when they initially arrested him with cruel fanfare and the three years that Choi finally ended up enduring.

23 November 2019: One of the nine street protests held in Sydney that demanded freedom for Chan Han Choi and an end to the brutal UN sanctions on the people of North Korea.

Moreover, the campaign to free Choi has had another important achievement. It has raised the consciousness of many people about the cruelty and injustice of the UN sanctions on North Korea. Out of Choi’s suffering, his continued outspoken condemnation of the unjust nature of the sanctions and the efforts of his supporters, the opposition to the anti-DPRK sanctions within Australia is stronger than at any previous time. Furthermore, the struggle to free Choi was implicitly a struggle against Cold War McCarthyist witch-hunting more generally. THE CAMPAIGN TO FREE CHOI WAS INDEED THE FIRST ORGANISED PUSH BACK AGAINST THE RULING CLASS’ McCARTHYIST OFFENSIVE THAT HAS SWEPT THIS COUNTRY OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS.

However, the work of Choi’s supporters remains unfinished. We are, of course, delighted that Choi is finally free, while being furious at the severity of the sentence handed down today and, indeed, angry that any punishment was decreed at all. But the immediate cause of Choi’s imprisonment, the crippling UN sanctions on the people of North Korea, remains. We need to re-double our efforts to oppose these sanctions. We can take encouragement that many countries are now openly calling for an easing of these sanctions – most notably China. Countries are also starting to vote with their feet and not police the sanctions, which is allowing some small amount of precious trade with North Korea to take place, thus saving many lives. An international movement demanding the lifting of the sanctions will encourage those countries now opposing the sanctions to more boldly take such a stance.

Primary school children in North Korea with their teacher. As in all countries battered by sanctions, children and women are the hardest hit by the cruel economic sanctions on North Korea. These sanctions are a form of Nazi-like “collective punishment” imposed by the imperial powers on the people of North Korea. We must re-double our efforts to fight for the lifting of all these sanctions.

Our work in opposing McCarthyist witch-hunting is also far from over. Chan Han Choi has been the biggest single victim of Cold War witch-hunting but he certainly is not the only one. We must defend the large, pro-Red China section of the Chinese community against the hysterical attacks that they are facing for their sympathy for socialistic China. We must all stand by others being witch-hunted for similar views. We also need to defend the indirect victims of McCarthyism – those whose persecution has been indirectly facilitated by the national security obsession created by the new Cold War conditions. We must demand the dropping of all charges against David McBride and Bernard Collaery and the quashing of the sentence against Witness K. And we must call for immediate freedom for another Australian political prisoner, Julian Assange.

Most fundamentally, we must seek to dig out the root cause of Choi’s persecution the Cold War drive of the U.S, Australian and other capitalist rulers against socialistic China and her DPRK neighbour and ally. This Cold War drive is against the interests of more than 90% of Australia and the world’s population because it attacks states based on the public ownership system that favours working class people. That is why we must urgently defend the workers states in North Korea and China as well as in Cuba, Vietnam and Laos. That means that we must resist the propaganda campaign of lies over “human rights” that is unleashed against these socialistic states.

With Choi no longer under threat of being sent back to prison, one injustice to do with Long Bay Prison “Hospital” is over. But another one has no closure. The family of Aboriginal man, David Dungay, who was killed by racist guards at that very same prison have still not received any justice. All those people who stood by Choi must urgently support the Dungay family’s struggle for justice and the fight for justice for all victims of racist state terror against Aboriginal people.

Everyone who participated in the campaign to free Chan Han Choi must draw lessons from the campaign and from his treatment. And the key lesson is that in Australia – as in all capitalist states – the police, courts, prisons, army and bureaucracy do not exist to serve the people as a whole but were created and are maintained to enforce the interests of the wealthy capitalist ruling class against the interests of the working class masses. Many people who participated in this campaign have acquired an enhanced understanding of this truth. We need to spread this understanding widely. Every struggle against injustice within capitalist society – whether it be the struggle against workplace exploitation, the fight for workers’ job security, the fight to stop the sell-off of public housing, the fight to defend Aboriginal people and people of colour against racist attack, the struggle for women’s liberation and more – can become powerful to the extent that those in struggle truly understand that the institutions of the current capitalist state can never be their allies. So out of the cruelty of the three and half years of suffering endured by Choi, let us work hard to spread this class conscious understanding as we build the basis for the fight for a future socialist Australia.

FREE LEFT-WING POLITICAL PRISONER CHAN HAN CHOI!

RESIST THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITALIST STATE’S COLD WAR REPRESSION!

FREE LEFT-WING POLITICAL PRISONER CHAN HAN CHOI!

  • It is out of deep humanitarian concern for the people of North Korea that Chan Han Choi tried to help her people trade in violation of UN sanctions. He sought no personal gain from these activities.
  • The sanctions on North Korea are a form of “legal”, mass murder.
  • Australia’s capitalist rulers persecute and slander Choi to “justify” their Cold War drive against socialistic China and socialistic North Korea.
  • We must resist the tormenting of Chan Han Choi because by persecuting him for his sympathy for a socialistic state, the Australian regime is attacking the struggle for socialism and is thus attacking the interests of more than 90% of Australia and the world’s population.
  • Those who are standing by Chan Han Choi are, by doing so, also resisting the Cold War McCarthyism and repression that Choi’s cruel persecution is meant to fuel.
  • If in the hypothetical case that Choi is sentenced fairly, even in accordance with the unfair sanctions laws that he is prosecuted under, he would just get a small fine. None of the five deals that he tried to broker ever went through. Moreover, in all five “forbidden” trades that Choi had started to broker, Choi himself cancelled the negotiations before he was arrested.
  • Chan Han Choi will not get a fair sentencing judgement.
  • Prison authorities endangered Choi’s life by repeatedly knocking back his requests to see a prison doctor as his diabetes severely deteriorated during the first eight months of 2020.
  • Given growing support for Choi, Australia’s ruling class is suffering considerable damage to their reputation by continuing their persecution of Choi.
  • We cannot allow compassionate human being, Chan Han Choi, to be thrown back into prison again.
  • Let’s fight to lift the economic sanctions that are so devastating the people of North Korea!

16 July 2021: Yesterday, the three-day long sentencing hearing of socialist political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi came to an end. The judge has reserved her decision. The judgement is expected within an approximately one to three week period. Choi had been imprisoned in extremely harsh conditions by the Australian capitalist state for three years since his arrest in late 2017. After finally being granted bail last November, Choi has been under strict house arrest for the last eight months. If Choi is sentenced to a jail period less than what he has already endured, he will finally be free. However, if he is hit with a sentence with a non-parole period greater than the imprisonment period that he has already suffered, he will be thrown back into prison.

In February, Choi accepted a plea deal in which the Commonwealth DPP (Director of Public Prosecutions) dropped some of its blatantly false, hyped-up charges. Choi in turn accepted that he had tried to help the people of North Korea organise exports of iron, coal, instrumentation and arms in violation of crippling UN economic sanctions that ban almost all of North Korea’s exports. Choi had also tried to help North Korea import petrol which is also restricted by the murderous sanctions.

The trade that Choi was trying to help organise is very similar to the trade that Australia engages in. But the people of North Korea are cruelly prevented from carrying out such trade. The resulting shortages and lack of hard currency needed to import food, medicine, medical equipment and agricultural machinery causes immense suffering to North Korea’s people. It is out of deep humanitarian concern for the people of North Korea that Choi tried to help her people trade. He sought no personal gain from these activities. Choi is really only “guilty” of doing very understandable acts. Let’s fight to demand: Free Chan Han Choi! Lift the brutal sanctions on North Korea now!

At his sentencing hearing, Choi, while making clear that he was totally committed to, from now on, following all Australian laws, bravely continued to expose the unjust nature of the sanctions on North Korea. He explained that he would, from now on, oppose the sanctions through protest and other legal means. 

It is telling that at the sentencing hearing, the Crown Prosecutors were unable to provide one single victim impact statement. That is because there are no victims to the “crimes” that Chan Han Choi is being sentenced for! Indeed if Choi had gone further in his “offences” and actually brokered the deals to there successful conclusion, then there would have only been beneficiaries – not victims. How many lives would have been saved in North Korea or made easier had the people of North Korea been able to receive badly needed hard currency from the export deals that Choi, for a period, tried to organise?

An independent international report prepared by Western-based medical and aid workers found that the UN sanctions had caused the deaths of nearly 4,000 North Korean people – mostly children – in 2018 from the obstruction that the sanctions caused to the work of aid organisations alone. Even more deaths resulted from the damage that the sanctions did to North Korea’s own provision of food and other basic needs for her people. This October 2019 report titled, The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea, also found that: “Sanctions also interfere with the ability of North Koreans to develop their economy, earn a livelihood, and attain an adequate standard of living.” Moreover, the report detailed the particular harsh suffering that the sanctions caused to North Korean women:

“Sanctions destabilize North Korean society in ways that have a disproportionate impact on women, resonating with patterns observed in other sanctioned countries….

“Sanctions are directly interfering with the livelihood of women by targeting sectors in which they are heavily represented, such as textiles (82 per cent of workers).”

UN economic sanctions imposed on North Korea and successively tightened to extreme levels in 2016 and 2017 has devastated North Korea’s trade and thus caused immense suffering to her people. The following chart was retrieved from the 2019 report, The Human Costs and Gendered Impact of Sanctions on North Korea

Australia’s Capitalist Rulers Persecute and Slander Choi to “Justify” Their
Cold War Drive Against Socialistic China and Socialistic North Korea

Sanctions similar to the ones now arrayed against North Korea were imposed by the UN on the people of Iraq from 1990 onwards. They caused the premature deaths of half a million infants in just the first decade of their implementation! In North Korea, the sanctions are also causing terrible suffering. Fortunately, North Korea’s socialistic system allows her to better manage the scarcity resulting from the sanctions and ensure that her people do not suffer to the same degree that Iraqi children did. Even a year after the UN sanctions on North Korea became really extreme in 2016, WHO data showed that the proportion of children who are underweight in North Korea due to malnourishment is considerably lower than in many capitalist ex-colonial countries in Asia like India, Indonesia, Sri Lanka and the Philippines. Nevertheless, as the 2019 report referred to above described, the sanctions are still causing the premature death of thousands of people every year. Moreover, in the second half of 2017, the very period when Choi attempted to help the people of North Korea to evade the sanctions, the imperial powers ratcheted up the sanctions to still more brutal levels.

Yet the existence of that socialistic system that is protecting her people from suffering to the same degree that Iraqi people did when hit with similar sanctions, is precisely the reason why the imperialist powers are so determined to crush North Korea through sanctions. Although socialistic rule in North Korea is deformed by bureaucratic privileges and a lack of real workers democracy, North Korea has a system based on public ownership which her masses won in a brave struggle to defeat the landlords and capitalist exploiters. This system of collective ownership of the means of production by all of society has created a warm community spirit among North Korea’s people and a friendly society. It is this humanism and egalitarianism of North Korea that has endeared Choi (who came into political consciousness later in life and is thus not especially ideological or versed in Marxist theory) to North Korean society and her people. Yet for the capitalist powers, the existence of any workers state is a huge obstacle to furthering their interests. Washington and Canberra want to destroy socialistic rule in North Korea and thereby also strike a blow against socialistic rule in the world’s largest workers state, the Peoples Republic of China, which is North Korea’s neighbour and ally. They want to do this so that they can turn these countries into huge sweatshops where the corporate bosses that they serve can make fabulous profits from exploiting workers. Capitalist powers also hate the existence of such socialistic states because their mere existence could encourage the masses in other ex-colonial countries to think that they too should give their own Western imperialist overlords and local capitalist enforcers the boot. That would mean a huge loss in profits for the American, Australian and Japanese corporations that loot such wealth out of countries like PNG, Indonesia, Thailand, Philippines and East Timor.

So when Australia’s capitalist state is so cruelly persecuting Choi just for trying to help the people of North Korea to trade, what they are really trying to do is strike blows against socialism by enforcing sanctions on a socialistic state. Moreover, when Choi was arrested it was accompanied by massive hype about a supposed North Korean threat from then prime minister, Malcolm Turnbull, from the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and from the mainstream media. As well as listing the items that Choi actually really did try to help North Korea trade – like petrol, coal and iron – the regime initially hit Choi with completely bogus charges that he had tried to assist North Korea to export Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) technology. At various times, the Murdoch and other media mis-reported this, almost certainly deliberately, claiming that Choi was charged with trying to help North Korea’s own WMD program. This was of course a blatant lie. Choi was never even charged with trying to import such technology into North Korea. However, equally false was the allegation that Choi had tried to help North Korea export such technology. As a result, this February, the Prosecution had to drop these bogus “WMD charges” as part of Choi’s plea deal. However, the Prosecution continued to claim that Choi had tried to help North Korea export technology for the production of ballistic missiles right up to ICBMs (Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles). Presented with irrefutable evidence to the contrary, the Prosecution a few months ago retreated to the claim that Choi had tried to broker the export of North Korean expertise for the production of now, short and medium range ballistic missiles. However, during Choi’s sentencing hearing, this claim also crumbled in the face of the evidence. The Crown backed off from their claim that Choi had been involved with brokering services to assist a ballistic missile program and instead retreated some distance towards the position that Choi had admitted all along since he accepted the plea bargain: that he had tried for a short period to broker North Korea’s export of technology for the production of MANPADs – which are small, hand-held weapons used for shooting down military aircraft and helicopter gunships. That is a massive difference from all their earlier hype claiming that Choi had tried to broker the export of WMD and ICBM technology!

The Crown’s now discredited assertions depended on them carefully cherry-picking their supposed technical and military “experts.” They chose, exclusively, rabid neoconservatives working for warmongering think tanks like the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism and C4ADS. Like Australia’s own Cold War fanatics in ASPI (Australian Strategic Policy Institute) these supposedly “independent” think tanks are in fact largely funded by major Western defence contractors and Western government agencies all of whom have an interest in hyping up the “threat” from socialistic countries and other “disobedient” states. The IISS was in fact the main source of the infamous “evidence” used by then British prime minister Tony Blair and then U.S. president George Bush to dishonestly claim that Iraq was an imminent WMD threat, which they then used to “justify” launching the horrific U.S./British/Australian invasion of Iraq. Therefore, through their promotion of outright lies and exaggerations about Iraq’s military capabilities and intentions, the IISS have much responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians that resulted from this brutal invasion. Over the last three years, the now-discredited IISS and other similar neoconservative “NGOs” have been at it again – this time providing “expert” evidence to support the Crown’s earlier fanciful assertions that Choi had tried to organise a handful of North Korean experts to go to an underdeveloped third country and help a private company build ICBMs and WMDs. In fact had this proposition not been used to demonise Choi and throw him into prison, then it was so ludicrous as to be of serious comic value. Just, think about it: The Crown and AFP were claiming, purely on the basis of their interpretation of code words about pine trees used by Choi in phone conversations with an East Asian-based private trader, that three to five North Korean technicians would turn up with a few drawings and help the company that this relatively small-time trader was representing to establish a factory in Cambodia for making ballistic missiles – one of the most difficult to produce items imaginable which the very few governments able to manufacture have only been able to do so after tens of thousands of their own scientists, engineers and technicians have spent decades working on their development and manufacture; and which not one single non-state entity (not even those closest to powerful states) has ever been able to manufacture! This absurdly almost implies that ballistic missiles are so easy to build that a person could say to one of his friends:

“Hey, I have some mates who know how to make ICBMs. Why don’t I ask three of them to bring a DIY (Do It Yourself) manual about how to make them down to the park on Sunday afternoon and you, me and the gang can meet them there and build us some ICBMs. By the way if I ask my mates to E-mail us a list, can you go down to Bunnings on Sunday morning and buy the parts?”

Yet all these truly fanciful – and now discredited – claims about Choi’s activities had a purpose. Australia’s capitalist ruling class want to manufacture a “North Korea” threat in order to scare us into accepting their ever more aggressive participation in the U.S.-led Cold War drive against North Korea and her giant socialistic neighbour and ally, Red China. Both the Liberals and the ALP want the masses to accept the diversion of hundreds of billions of dollars of public money – public money that should be used for badly needed public housing, public aged care centres, childcare, public transport infrastructure, TAFE, public hospitals and public schools – into the Australian regime’s ever expanding military budget. Indeed, while the Crown now has to concede that Choi was never involved with deals related to long-range missiles, the Morrison government announced a year ago that it would itself be buying large numbers of long-range missiles. Meanwhile, there are maniacs in the government like Peter Dutton and plenty more in influential right-wing think tanks likes ASPI that are actually pushing towards a hot war with China. It is hardly polite, mild-mannered Chan Han Choi that we need to be afraid of! It is Australia’s war-mongering ruling elite that we should be terrified of! The capitalist rulers are willing to drag us into a catastrophic war with China that could kill millions just to protect their mega-profits and their system of exploitation.

But while confronting North Korea and China is good for the big end of town, such Cold War attacks are harmful to 90% of this country’s – and indeed the world’s – population. For the interests of all working class people – and most middle class people too – lies with defending the socialistic rule that exists in China, North Korea, Cuba, Vietnam and Laos, however as yet incomplete and obstructed are their transitions to socialism. The existence of these socialistic states will inevitably strengthen the struggle here for workers rights and for a future society based on public ownership – the system that favours working class people. Only a socialist course can free working class people from the reality under capitalism of insecure jobs, bullying bosses, casualisation and unaffordable housing and will finally create the conditions for a society where women can participate fully in all economic, social and political life and where Aboriginal people, refugees, Asians, Muslims and other people of colour will no longer have to worry about the threat of racist cop and/or redneck attacks. And it is a socialist world that will ensure that the Western imperialist bombardments and war crimes that the people of Palestine, Afghanistan and the Middle East have been subjected to will finally be things of the past.

We must resist the tormenting of Chan Han Choi because by persecuting him for his sympathy for a socialistic state, the Australian regime is attacking the struggle for socialism and is thus attacking the interests of more than 90% of Australia and the world’s population. Working class people, opponents of the imperialist bullying of the former colonies, fighters against privatisation and supporters of public ownership and public housing must all stand by Chan Han Choi.

In standing by Chan Han Choi, we should also oppose the Cold War drive that his witch-hunting is designed to justify. We must defend the workers states in North Korea and China as well as in Cuba, Vietnam and Laos. That means that we must resist the propaganda campaign of lies over “human rights” that is unleashed against these socialistic states.

Escalating Cold War McCarthyism in Australia

The government, police and media hype about a supposed “North Korea threat” that accompanied Choi’s high-profile arrest was not only aimed at furthering the Australian ruling class’ Cold War drive abroad but at justifying their intensification of McCarthyist repression against supporters of socialistic states at home. Just months after Choi’s arrest, the Australian government instituted draconian laws aimed at crushing expressions of sympathy for China under the guise of opposing “foreign interference.” Meanwhile, since Choi’s arrest and the escalation of the anti-China Cold War, Chinese journalists have been raided by the AFP and ASIO, Chinese international students who organised a Sydney rally in support of Red China’s sovereignty over Hong Kong were subjected to a terrifying interrogation by Australian secret police, a respected member of the Indochinese-Chinese community in Melbourne has been charged under the “foreign interference” laws and the pro-Beijing part of Australia’s Chinese community has been intimidated. Last year, even a NSW upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane was witch-hunted by right-wing shock jocks and his own Labor Party for merely stating the simple fact that China responded very effectively to the pandemic. Weeks later, Moselmane was hit with an intimidating 16-hour raid of his family home by the AFP and ASIO and then subjected to months of smear and the suspension of his parliamentary seat … before the AFP finally admitted that he had no case to answer.

Meanwhile, the hysterical rubbish about a supposed “North Korea threat” that surrounded Choi’s arrest, the witch-hunt against those sympathetic to the PRC and the generally repressive Cold War climate have all combined to create such a national security obsession that even dissidents and activists not involved in Cold War issues have been targeted by Australia’s, increasingly authoritarian, capitalist regime. It is telling that, while the whistleblower Witness K – and his lawyer Bernard Collaery – who exposed the Australian regime’s spying on East Timor (to aid its despicable theft of East Timor’s gas resources) were first raided by ASIO in 2013, the Commonwealth DPP did not feel confident that they could actually get away with charging the pair until some five years later in June 2018, which was just six months after the high-profile arrest of Chan Han Choi. Then just three months later, David McBride, the former military lawyer who exposed horrific war crimes by the Australian military in Afghanistan, was charged for his whistleblowing acts done in 2016. Meanwhile, the same AFP that targeted these whistleblowers and Chan Han Choi have also conducted intimidating raids against trade unions like the CFMEU. Those who are standing by Chan Han Choi, are by doing so, also resisting the new McCarthyism and repression that Choi’s cruel persecution is meant to fuel.

Chan Han Choi Will Not Get a Fair Sentencing Judgement

Choi’s sentencing hearing took place by Audio Visual Link as the city where the hearing took place has been put into lockdown as a result of a massive COVID spread. Therefore, the Sydney protest rally demanding Chan Han Choi’s freedom that Choi’s supporters had organised to coincide with the start of his sentencing hearing had to be put off. Today, literally half of this country’s population has had to be locked down. This is in good part because of the shambolic vaccine rollout by the Morrison government. Despite this, the Liberal government keeps on telling us that Australia’s pandemic response has been “world-beating”. This is actually a blatant lie! It is true, that benefitting from Australia’s very low population density and by implementing an authoritarian fortress strategy that has virtually banned international travel, Australia so far has a lower death rate from the virus than the U.S. and most of Europe. However, Australia’s death rate per person is eleven times higher than socialistic China’s and 65 times higher than in socialistic Laos. Moreover, the regime here has had to turn to lockdowns far more often than China has, where none of her 1.4 billion people are currently under any sort of lockdown. Furthermore, even numerous capitalist countries like Nigeria, the Ivory Coast and Uzbekistan have much lower death rates than here. In this country, the response is hampered by the failure of the regime and the system to ensure adequate protective clothing (PPE) for cleaners, nurses, paramedics and other crucial frontline workers and enough COVID testing services, especially in the multi-racial working class suburbs where many frontline workers live. As a result, on Tuesday, the first day of Choi’s sentencing hearing, residents in Sydney’s Fairfield Local Government Area, which happens to be where Choi is staying during his house arrest, had to queue for up to six hours just to get tested for COVID!

Yet, while the Australian capitalist regime has failed to provide the masses with adequate vaccines, COVID testing services and PPE it has succeeded in mobilising massive resources to persecute Chan Han Choi – from intercepting Choi’s phone calls prior to his arrest, to unleashing dozens of police in the operation, to the hacking into of Choi’s E-mails and bank records, to the enlistment of numerous international and local “experts” to the engagement of a large team of crack barristers, lawyers and researchers. What all this indicates is that the Australian regime is far more interested in enforcing the interests of the small capitalist exploiting class – a class whose immediate interests lie with crushing workers states through sanctions and Cold War – than it is in protecting the people. In all capitalist countries, the prisons, the courts, the police, the military and the bureaucracy were created – and are daily replenished – for the specific purpose of enforcing the interests of the capitalist business owners against those of the working class and their supporters. This is the case here whether it is the Liberals, the ALP or the Greens who are in office. That is why greedy construction bosses get away with no criminal punishment for getting workers killed by neglecting workplace safety. Yet representatives from the construction workers unions, like the CFMEU, get hit with criminal convictions just for supposedly, “illegally,” inspecting unsafe work sites.

Now it is true that when Australia’s legal system hears say a murder or assault matter which does not have a political dimension to it, it is quite possible that the matter will indeed be dealt with under the “rule of law” principle that the capitalist rulers claim to stand by. However, even in these cases, this is only provided that the matters don’t intersect with questions of class and race. In the latter cases, the anti-working class and racist bias of the system distorts the “rule of law.” That is after all why not one single cop or prison guard has ever been convicted for killing an Aboriginal person in custody despite hundreds of such racist killings in Australia over the last several decades. Moreover, if a case is political, especially where on one side lies the interests of the working class and on the other the capitalists and their regime, the political bias of the racist, rich people’s regime becomes overwhelming. Furthermore, the bigger and higher profile the case, the greater the bias. And one cannot get a higher profile case where the interests of the capitalists and those of the working class are clearly on opposite sides, than the one of Chan Han Choi. Capitalist interests lie with the Crown prosecution and their push to enforce the killer sanctions on the people of a workers state and to incite Cold War hostility to socialistic countries, while the side of the working class and most middle class people lies with Choi. That is why Choi’s sentencing outcome will be decided at least 90% by politics and at most 10% by the law. That is why there is no way that Choi will get a fair sentencing result.

Everything that has happened to Choi since his arrest in 2017 confirms that the regime will not sentence him fairly, even under the unfair laws that he is convicted under. The courts repeatedly rebuffed Choi’s bail bids after the Crown opposed the bail applications, in good part, on the basis of Choi’s political sympathy for the DPRK. This is chemically pure McCarthyism, where a person is denied rights on the basis of their support for socialistic states. In jail, authorities placed special restrictions on Choi – obstructing visits to him by lawyers, translators and friends. For large periods, they even outright blocked visits. Even though Choi was not accused of any violent offence, had no prior criminal record and was not even accused of any espionage, he was imprisoned as a National Security Interest (NSI) prisoner. This meant especially brutal conditions of imprisonment. As an affidavit by the Governor of the prison that Choi spent most of his custody in admitted, Choi had no access to amenities, employment opportunities or educational opportunities due to his NSI classification. Moreover, Choi, whose English is poor, could not even speak on the phone in his native Korean unless he got special permission. Yet when he made a written application to speak to his wife in Korean in the first few months of his imprisonment, the regime rejected this. As a result, Choi could not communicate with his wife properly on the phone, even though by December 2018 she became the only family member or friend that the regime would allow him to telephone.  Most seriously, authorities endangered Choi’s life by repeatedly knocking back his requests to see a prison doctor as his diabetes severely deteriorated during the first eight months of 2020. During examination at Choi’s sentencing hearing, a doctor under the pay of Justice Health – the NSW government authority charged with providing medical care to prisoners – Jacques Ette, who incredibly claimed in an earlier written submission that Choi was provided proper medical care while imprisoned, admitted that for an eight and a half month period from mid-December 2019 to the end of August 2020, Choi, who by then was on oral diabetic medication, did not have his Blood Sugar Level (BSL) monitored even once. This is despite the fact that on the last date that his BSL was actually monitored before this period, on 12 December 2019, Choi’s BSL by Dr Ette’s admission was already too high. Dr Ette further admitted under oath that the reason that Choi’s diabetes was out of control by late August 2020 was because his diabetes had not been monitored in the earlier period. Indeed, Choi’s situation became so desperate that when he was finally able to see medical staff in late August 2020, he had to be given emergency doses of insulin – medication that he had previously never needed. His BSL then swung wildly for several days from extremely high to very low thus putting him at immediate risk of brain damage, heart failure, strokes and other life threatening conditions.

Choi’s “Offending” is at the Very Low End –
Even within the Unfair Laws that He is Prosecuted Under

If in the hypothetical case that Choi is sentenced fairly, even in accordance with the completely unfair sanctions laws that he is prosecuted under, he would just get a small fine. And given that he has already done nearly three years in prison and eight months under strict house arrest, the fine would not need to be paid. The reason that Choi should only get a small fine is because all his “offences” were at the very bottom of the range within the laws that he is prosecuted under. Even the judge who despicably knocked back Choi’s second bail bid alluded to this in his December 2019 bail judgement. In the judgement, Justice Harrison conceded that: “… there is a possibly of a fine as a complete substitute for the s 11 offences, if he were convicted or pleaded guilty. The same position applies to the other offences with which he is charged.” Moreover, that was when Choi was facing eight charges. Now he is being sentenced on just two of the charges with both the totally bogus WMD charges and a coal export deal to Vietnam charge completely dropped and three of the other charges rolled into one. Therefore, there is even more reason for Choi to get a very low penalty than there was when Harrison made his bail judgment.

Choi’s “offending” is on the very low end of the sanctions laws because none of the five deals that he tried to broker ever went through. Nothing was ever traded. Moreover, as became clear in the sentencing hearing, in four of the five deals, Choi himself cancelled the negotiations before he was arrested. Although the Prosecution claims that Choi only “suspended” the trades, Choi in fact quashed the deals because the imperial powers were policing the sanctions too tightly; and has he told the court on Wednesday, only intended to try and re-broker the trades once a partial easing of sanctions made the deals legal again. In the other matter, that of a navigation system known as an IMU, which can be used for both civilian ships, planes and drones as well as military applications, Choi’s sum total of “brokering” consisted of forwarding the rough specifications for the device from the inquiring trader to North Korean companies along with the specifications for a much lower quality, civilian-only device that (slipping through the cracks of the draconian sanctions laws) happened to be one of the very few products that the DPRK is actually allowed to legally export. Choi then stopped trying to broker the proscribed type of device and instead sought to organise for the DPRK to export technology to make the product still permissible under the sanctions laws (unfortunately due to the highly deceptive misinterpretation of Choi’s intercepted E-mails and phone calls by the Crown and completely wrong technical evidence by the Crown’s star “expert” witness this truth was obscured from the court). In other words, in all five “forbidden” trades that Choi had started to broker, Choi himself cancelled the negotiations before he was arrested. If one wants an analogy, consider this. Imagine that you drive to a party where you plan to drink alcohol at the party and then drive home. However, at the end of the night, after you get into your car to drive home drunk, you realise that there will be police everywhere and at the last minute you change your mind and call a cab instead. Are you then still guilty of drink driving?

Pushing Back Against the Bias of the Capitalist Legal System

Although Chan Han Choi will not be sentenced fairly, even under the unfair sanctions laws that he is charged under, there are limits as to how much Australia’s authoritarian capitalist regime can persecute him. You see, when the regime first arrested Choi and it and the tycoon and regime-owned media subjected him to a campaign of demonisation, the ruling class expected that most people would hate Choi and he would have no support. Yet nine months later, a protest movement in support of Choi began holding its first actions. Since then the united-front movement demanding freedom for Choi has grown in strength and recognition. Eight further street actions have since been conducted in support of Choi including marches through the city. Although not huge, the street actions in support of Choi have actually been the largest protests in support of any person facing criminal charges in Australia since the movement leading up to the 2008 trial and sentencing of Aboriginal resistance hero Lex Wotton, the leader of the 2004 Palm Island uprising that responded to the horrific racist killing of 36 year-old Mulrunji Doomadgee by a Queensland police officer. Alongside ourselves in Trotskyist Platform, among the groups that have participated in, or supported, the street protests demanding freedom for Choi are Anti-War West Sydney, the Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, the Communist Party of Australia – Western Sydney branch, Communist Party of Australia – Wollongong Branch, Aust-DPRK Solidarity, Social Justice Network and the Irish Republican socialist group, the James Connolly Association. These actions have galvanised others to show solidarity with Choi. When a protest march was conducted by Chan Han Choi’s supporters in Chester Hill last December, right at the very heart of Sydney’s multiracial working class southwest that has been so vilified by the ruling class during this recent COVID upsurge, the overwhelming response from passers by was sympathy. Large numbers of people tooted their horns and waved in support of the protest. Moreover, in recent months, additional groups on the Left have also issued articles expressing their support for Choi including Socialist Alliance through its Green Left Weekly publication. Meanwhile, significant sections of the Korean community in Sydney have swung behind Choi. This has been reflected in the fair coverage of the case by the main Korean language community newspaper in Australia, Hanho Daily, whose online articles have received comments that are mostly in support of Choi. This Korean New Year (which is at the same time as Chinese New Year), Choi was delivered a special New Year’s food gift to his house arrest address from a Korean community cultural association. Meanwhile, sizable chunks of the Chinese community are also behind Choi. The most popular online Chinese language news sites in Sydney, like 今日悉尼 (Sydney Today), have covered protests in support of Choi sympathetically. Meanwhile, support for Choi has spread internationally. From Genoa, Italy, proudly pro-class struggle dock workers asked us to send the design of “Free Chan Han Choi” t-shirts so that they could print out and wear them around Genoa. In Russia, articles and documentaries in support of Choi produced by a Russian-speaking journalist in Australia have gone viral in both online media and social media – with hundreds of thousands of views and tens of thousands of likes and overwhelmingly sympathetic comments. Meanwhile, from New Zealand to Greece to Britain to the U.S., groups have declared their solidarity with Choi and published articles and statements condemning his persecution. Meanwhile, even those not wholly in solidarity with Choi’s pro-DPRK stance have expressed outrage at the violations of his human rights by the Australian regime.

As a result, Australia’s capitalist rulers are paying a significant political price for their persecution of Chan Han Choi. One way that they are doing so stems from the fact that this ruling class is seeking to be at the very forefront of the U.S.-led Cold War against socialistic China and North Korea. To wage this Cold War – which some fanatics in their ranks even want to be a hot war – the regime needs complete unity at home behind this anti-working class campaign. They cannot tolerate even small cracks in this consensus given that they are trying to wage this campaign against the world’s most populous country and one which moreover buys some 40% of this country’s exports. Yet their persecution of Chan Han Choi is already causing cracks in this consensus. Unexpectedly for the ruling class, people are solidarsing with Choi. And in standing by a pro-DPRK political prisoner and opposing the economic sanctions on North Korea, people are implicitly also opposing the entire Cold War against North Korea and by extension that against her giant neighbour and ally, the PRC. Secondly, the cruelty of their persecution of Choi has made many question the claims of the ruling class to stand for “democracy” and “rule of law.” For others already suspicious of these claims, becoming aware of this persecution of a left-wing political prisoner has destroyed their last vestiges of hope in Australia’s state machinery. Thirdly, exposure of the regime’s persecution of Chan Han Choi has undermined the Australian ruling class’s reputation abroad. This is especially harmful since, like other Western imperialist powers, the Australia’s capitalist rulers seek to use “human rights” – invariably in a bogus way – as a stick with which to strike political blows against their adversaries. The fact that the political prisoner that they are tormenting happens to be sympathetic to the DPRK, one of the main targets of Australian and U.S. “human rights” attacks, makes the exposure of their persecution of Choi all the more embarrassing.

April 2019: One of the many street marches and rallies held in Sydney demanding freedom for Chan Han Choi.
This medication is taken one hour before implication act, it acts by expanding the impacts of a substance the body for the most part frees into the male genital organ when sexually fortified. buy viagra in india The http://icks.org/n/bbs/content.php?co_id=FALL_WINTER_2018 buy cialis generic medicine works faster in 15 minutes with erections that last for hours. The decision to buy Kamagra medicines or not is one that the ED sufferer needs to take, while keeping their needs and wants in mind. http://icks.org/n/data/ijks/1482461379_ij_file.pdf cialis overnight online is among the famous drugs that treats erectile dysfunction appropriately if taken 1 hour before the actual intercourse. Here is how viagra generic india can help women:Several studies have been conducted that show this drug can help women with voiding issues.

In the end the Australian regime will decide whether they should send Choi back to prison by weighing the political benefits of such a course versus the political costs. An indication of the regime’s ambivalence on the issue was seen by the fact that at the sentencing hearing, while the Crown was pushing very hard and certainly was not saying that Choi had already served his sentence, nevertheless did not explicitly call for Choi to be thrown back into prison. Instead they insisted only that his overall sentence (backdated from the time of his 2017 imprisonment) be a full-time custodial sentence, with a large proportion of it non-parole.

As different components and factions of the Australian regime debate what to do about Chan Han Choi’s sentencing they are very much in agreement on one very crucial point – they all want to discredit Choi and, more crucially for them, what Choi represents. This is seen by the dramatic about face done by the Crown on what Choi’s motivations were. For three and half years, the AFP and Commonwealth DPP pushed the line that Choi was motivated by a “higher patriotic duty” and by “loyalty to the DPRK.” They said that he was an “economic agent of the DPRK.” They then opposed bail successfully for nearly three years in good part on the basis of Choi’s “loyalty to the DPRK.” Yet just over two weeks ago, the Crown did a 180 degree U-turn. They started claiming that Choi was instead motivated by personal profit. This is of course ridiculous! If one was really motivated by personal financial gain, trying to act as a broker for North Korea, especially for a person living in a country with a rabidly anti-communist regime like Australia, is the worst course to take. The sanctions on North Korea are extremely tightly policed by the U.S., Japan, Australia and other imperialist powers. Moreover, any broker on the North Korean side could never make much money from such trades because North Korea can only entice potential buyers to break the sanctions and accept North Korean produce if they offer buyers a much lower price than the world market price. If someone in Australia really wanted to make money from brokering illegal trades they would simply be a drug dealer, which Choi is definitely not. The sudden attempt by the Crown to paint Choi as someone motivated by personal gain is a crude, last minute, attempt by the regime to de-politicise a case that they have politicised from the very beginning. It is a realisation by the regime that their Cold War imprisonment of pro-DPRK political prisoner Chan Han Choi has done them a lot of political harm and now they want their best to show that Choi was never a political prisoner and … his matter was never about politics!

At the sentencing hearing, Choi emphatically stated that none of the commissions that he was slated to receive were going to be used for his own personal benefit. He clearly explained how any commissions that he was to have received were to be put back into helping develop new trade for the DPRK. Choi was able to point to the Crown’s own evidence which included an E-mail detailing how Choi was to use money made from the proposed coal export deal to Indonesia to pay for a delegation from North Korea for another of the planned deals. As a result of the sanctions – and due to over compliance by banks seeking to avoid regulatory punishment –it is very hard for the DPRK to send money out. Moreover foreign hotels and airlines are reluctant to receive payment sent out from North Korea. As a result, foreigners like Choi need to pay for any trade delegations from the DPRK. Moreover, that Choi was not seeking personal profit from his brokering work for North Korea is confirmed by the fact that, although Choi brokered some pretty big, commodities export contracts for North Korea in the period when ever-tightening sanctions had not yet proscribed such trade, Choi lived an austere life. When he was arrested, he lived in a modest rented apartment, owned no property, had no car and had just $6,000 in savings. At the time, Choi was working as a hospital cleaner.

In the face of this truth, the Prosecution came up with a third and most bizarre theory about Choi’s motivations. Speaking about one of the particulars of one of the charges, the prosecution quietly backed away from claiming that Choi was seeking personal gain from the once-planned deal but also insisted that the DPRK would not benefit from the deal either! Instead they claimed that Choi just wanted to deal in arms – implying, but not quite saying, that Choi was akin to an evil villain in a James Bond-type movie who seeks destruction for destruction’s sake. Cross-examining Choi, the lead prosecutor put to Choi that he had no regard for the deaths that would be caused by the arms deal that he had once tried to broker. Choi calmly responded that unfortunately all arms can kill people and it does not matter which country makes them. We should add that it is extremely hypocritical for the Australian regime to complain about people trying to trade arms. In July 2017, Australia’s then defence industry minister announced that he wants Australia to become one of the top arms exporters in the world. By then Australian had already become the world’s 20th largest weapons exporter (https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/defence-industry-minister-christopher-pyne-wants-australia-to-become-major-arms-exporter-20170715-gxbv4m.html) despite only being the world’s 53rd most populous country. Over the last few years, Australian arms manufacturers have been exporting large quantities of weapons to Saudi Arabia and UAE who are both engaged in a bloody war in Yemen that has created the world’s worst humanitarian disaster (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jul/25/australian-weapons-shipped-to-saudi-and-uae-as-war-rages-in-yemen). We could further add that given that the countries causing most of the death and destruction in the world – that is the Western imperialist powers and their proxies, the ones who killed hundreds of thousands of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan (including the Australian special forces in Afghanistan who on many occasions tortured and murdered Afghan farmers and prisoners and who shot dead all the Afghan farmers in one neighbourhood just to ensure no witnesses to one of their earlier murders), who regularly unleash terror against the Palestinian people, who destroyed Libya, who are devastating the people of Yemen etc – are always able to get their own sources of weapons, it is possible that arms manufactured by smaller entities may actually find their way into forces fighting genuine liberation struggles. Palestinian liberation fighters, as well as Kashmiri people standing up to India’s murderous occupation of their land, sure do need weapons to defend their people. Had the Palestinian people of Gaza had effective MANPADs, would the Israeli military be so unrestrained in launching air strikes against Gaza’s residential apartment blocks? More importantly, given that the extreme tightening of sanctions against North Korea in 2017 threatens wholesale immisiration of many of her people, it is morally and politically justifiable for North Korea to try and sell almost anything to get the hard currency needed to meet her people’s basic needs. For the actual killing is not being done right now by any weapons that North Korea may manage to sell but by the heinous sanctions against her people. The sanctions on North Korea, like the ones on Iran, are a form of “legal”, mass murder. And the real killers are the imperialist rulers who repeatedly arm twisted much of the world to acquiesce to successively more severe sanctions. The ASIO and AFP officers, prosecutors and judges involved in Choi’s persecution and thus in enforcing these sanctions also bear some responsibility for the death and suffering that these sanctions have caused.

Throughout the sentencing hearing, it seemed that although the Crown was pushing extremely hard to hit Choi with as tough a sentence as possible, they were perhaps even more obsessed with trying to destroy Choi’s reputation. The judge too got in the act. Towards the very end of the hearing, she made an intervention to this effect from left field, after all the witnesses had already given their testimony. Despite Choi never raising mental health as a factor that should influence his sentencing and despite the Prosecution, in this case actually quite correctly, submitting that a psychiatric report performed weeks before the hearing found that Choi had no “mental illness or disorder as contributing to the commission of the offence”, the judge suggested that maybe mental health issues were a factor. She pointed to an old report done by a doctor in April 2020 which assessed that while Choi was fit for trial and even to self-represent at a trial, also claimed that Choi had symptoms of a “delusional disorder.” However, what the doctor described as “delusions” may have more to do with difficulties in translation and the doctors’ own frank admission that he had “difficulty following his [i.e. Choi’s] account due to a combination of cultural factors, language and likely my limited understanding of the political landscape about which I am no expert.” Moreover, that April 2020 report was based on interviews with Choi when he was still in custody under brutal conditions and in a very poor emotional state. Choi was at the time furious about his repeated requests to see a prison doctor being rejected. Unknown to him at the time, Choi’s then physical symptoms which he sought treatment for were caused by his diabetes condition badly deteriorating. Uncontrolled diabetes is known to cause intense mood swings. When the same doctor assessed Choi weeks after he was granted bail and after his diabetes had been brought under control, the doctor concluded that “I would not diagnose him with a psychiatric condition.” Then the report performed by another doctor, weeks prior to Choi’s sentencing, found not only that “Mr Choi does not have any cognitive impairment and does not have a mental illness or mental disorder” but that Choi is “functional intelligent.” So why would the judge then even mention mental health in relation to Choi’s matter? Well it seems like the judge was laying the basis to, in her final judgement, raise the possibility (she will not be able to go any further than this given the overwhelming evidence given by doctors to the contrary) that Choi’s actions were, in part, influenced by a “delusional disorder.” That way the judge – who while being a woman of considerable intellect and no doubt personal integrity too is well-known to be a political conservative, that is a right-winger – can impute that people wanting to help North Korea breach economic sanctions and anyone having solidarity with the DPRK and her system are pushed to such a stance by their own mental illness. That may end up being part of the judge’s means to “solve” an issue that has troubled the ruling class from about 24 hours after they, with great sensationalism and hype, arrested Chan Han Choi in 2017: How do we respond to the inevitable reality that people are going to ask themselves why a person who has lived in both South Korea and Australia would have such sympathy for North Korea and her people that they would want to put their own freedom at great peril to help North Korea trade in violation of economic sanctions? Australia’s capitalist rulers fear that other “functional intelligent” people exploring what could be Choi’s motives will break through the wall of anti-DPRK propaganda and themselves realise that a lot of what capitalist powers say about North Korea is a lie; and that the economic sanctions on North Korea are murderously cruel measures that are not only unjust but are causing enormous suffering to North Korea’s people.

From the Crown’s spectacular, eleventh-hour gymnastic performance of flips and backflips as to Choi’s motivation to the judge’s last minute lobbing of mental health as a factor, the Australian ruling are doing their best to obscure what actually drove Chan Han Choi and – more importantly for them – what he represents. So let’s clarify who is Chan Han Choi and what motivated his “offending” actions. Chan Han Choi is a very compassionate and polite human being. He grew up in capitalist South Korea and then has lived the last 34 years of his life in Australia. At the time of his arrest he was an Australian citizen. Choi has worked as a civil engineer on major construction projects and as an engineering consultant on housing and smaller-scale developments. He has also worked as a cleaner. For most of his life, Choi bought the anti-DPRK propaganda that he was fed from childhood. However, from the mid-noughties, Choi began to do his own research on the question. Then in 2007 he made his first trip to North Korea. Like many people who go to North Korea with a truly open mind and without the expressed aim of themselves adding to anti-DPRK hostility – which is certainly why mainstream Western journalists go to North Korea – he really liked North Korean society. Choi fell in love with the egalitarianism of a society where he found that workers seem to have more rights at work than factory directors, where people’s interrelationships are not driven by money and where the warmth of friendship between ordinary people is very evident. At the same time, Choi saw economic hardships caused by the effects of sanctions, economic blockade and U.S.-led military pressure – the latter forcing North Korea to divert considerable resources to self-defence in order to avoid her people meeting the same fate as Iraq’s people. The suffering seen in one journey to a rural area during Choi’s first trip to North Korea had a particularly profound effect on him. He resolved to do what he could do to help North Korea’s economy and thereby improve the life of her people. Choi volunteered himself as an unofficial trade representative for the DPRK’s public sector enterprises that dominate her economy (note the label thrown around by the AFP, the Crown Prosecutors and the media for three and a half years, that Choi is an “economic agent” of North Korea, is deliberately intended to make something so very benign as being a trade representative sound sinister. After all, are Australia’s own trade representatives and those of her capitalist corporations ever referred to as “economic agents”?). Choi had considerable success in brokering trade deals for North Korea, deals which at the time were legal. Bank records and E-mails hacked into by the police after they arrested Choi showed that in a two-month period in 2008 alone, Choi organised two export deals for the sale of North Korean coal and pig iron respectively that were together worth $US1.3 million. Later Choi helped to put North Korean exporting firms together with contacts in China, South Korea and elsewhere so that the respective parties could themselves arrange deals. He also brokered bartering deals where North Korea coal, iron and other commodities would be directly exchanged for rice and corn from China. Partly through the efforts of people like Choi and even more so through the work of North Korea’s own people and with the help of increased trade with socialistic China’s booming economy, by ten years after Choi’s first trip to North Korea, North Korea was actually able to better feed all her people than the majority of other developing countries in Asia. However, Choi watched with horror in 2016 and 2017 as successively more draconian sanctions were imposed on North Korea. He rightly feared that North Korea’s people would now have to endure even more hardships than that which he saw in his early trips to North Korea in the mid-late noughties. So in the latter half of 2017, Choi made a renewed push to broker trade deals for North Korea’s people. However, the goal posts had moved. The deals that he had brokered previously, which had once been legal, were now proscribed by the sanctions. Worried about the plight of the people and society that he so cared about, Choi pushed through with some brokering efforts. But seeing the stringency of the imperialist policing of sanctions, Choi pulled back and cancelled the deals. This is the sum total of what Choi’s “offending” consists of and what drove it. In a fair society Choi would be given medals and awards for compassion. But here he was demonised and thrown into prison in especially brutal conditions for three years.

We cannot allow this compassionate human being, Chan Han Choi, to be thrown back into prison again. And we cannot allow them to prolong Choi’s suffering by hitting him with a period of parole either. In the last few days before the sentencing judgement is handed down and while the regime weighs up its political benefits versus political costs of prolonging Choi’s suffering, let us do our best to increase those political costs by building more support for Choi and popularising knowledge of the cruel violations of his rights while imprisoned. In doing so, let’s simultaneously resist the anti-working class, Cold War drive that the demonisation of Choi was designed to “justify”! And let’s fight to lift the economic sanctions that are so devastating the people of North Korea!

Choi’s Efforts to Help the People of North Korea Evade Killer Sanctions Were Heroic

Free Chan Han Choi – Socialist Political Prisoner in Australia

Choi’s Efforts to Help the People of North Korea Evade Killer Sanctions Were Heroic

The Imperialist Warmongers Who Crafted the Sanctions Are the Real Criminals!

  • Chan Han Choi accepts plea deal.
  • Choi tried to broker import of oil to North Korea and export of North Korean coal, pig iron and other items.
  • Prosecution withdraws bogus charges about brokering assistance to WMD programs.
  • Choi no longer charged with brokering export of missiles but accepts charge of export of arms.
  • It was to help the people of North Korea provide for themselves that Choi brokered deals to help them trade in violation of the cruel economic sanctions.
  • Lift the starvation sanctions on the people of North Korea!
  • The sentencing hearing will not be fair! All organs of the Australian capitalist state discriminate against Choi because of his sympathy and allegiance to the socialistic DPRK.
  • McCarthyist repression in Australia threatens the workers movement, whistleblowers and democratic rights.
  • In supporting a socialistic system, Choi is also standing by the more than 90% of Australia’s and the world’s population who would benefit from such a system. We must now stand by him.
  • Let’s demand: No criminal conviction at all for Chan Han Choi!
  • In a fair society Choi would be given not jail time but showered with awards and medals for heroism and compassion!

10 February 2021– Chan Han Choi today pleaded guilty to two charges of attempting to broker trade deals that would have violated crippling United Nations economic sanctions on the people of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK, i.e. North Korea). This followed a plea deal with the Australian regime which saw the capitalist regime withdraw its two most sinister sounding charges against Choi. Those charges had alleged that Choi tried to broker deals to help the DPRK export items that could help a weapons of mass destruction (WMD) program. As we have long said, those WMD charges were thrown in purely to hype up the case and build up public hostility against Choi. They never had a factual basis. The regime’s dropping of these two charges confirms the witch-hunting motivation behind their inclusion in the original indictment.

Sixty-two year-old Choi will soon face a sentencing hearing. This will likely be within two to four months. He had already been imprisoned for nearly three years from the time of his arrest in December 2017 until he was finally granted bail last November. Even when Choi was granted bail, the bail conditions imposed on him were one of house arrest. So even as Chan Han Choi heads into his sentencing hearing, this Australian citizen, who migrated from South Korea 33 years ago, remains a left-wing political prisoner in Australia. Now prosecutors want to throw Choi back into jail arguing that the three years in prison is not enough.

Today the Australian regime’s prosecutors tried to have Choi’s bail revoked in the lead up to his sentencing hearing. However, the judge rejected their bid. The prosecutors’ main argument was the same wacko conspiracy theory that they had pushed at all his earlier bail hearings: that North Korean agents would sneak into Australia and secretly spirit Choi away. Like the creators of the loony, far-right, QAnon “theory”, the Australian regime does not itself believe this conspiracy theory that it is spreading.

In today’s deal, Choi pleaded guilty to trying to broker the export of coal from the DPRK to an entity in Indonesia. The other charge Choi pleaded guilty to sees several attempted deals brokered by Choi rolled into a single charge – the import of petroleum products from Iran to the DPRK, the export of DPRK inertial measurement units (used for steering aircraft, drones and other items) and the export of arms from the DPRK. An additional concession by Choi was that he attempted to broker the sale of pig iron from North Korea to a company in South Korea. This brokering service will, however, (as per a schedule pursuant to Section 16BA of the Crimes Act) not receive a separate sentence but may be taken into account at his sentencing on the two actual charges.

Lift the Starvation Sanctions on the People of North Korea!

The capitalist regime and the big business and regime-owned media have tried to hype Choi’s case by focusing on one of the original charges that the regime alleged against Choi – that he attempted to broker the export of North Korean missiles abroad. The prosecution ended up making a concession on this by modifying the charge to one of brokering the sale of arms rather than missiles. What these arms actually are is being contested between the prosecution and defence. But most of the deals Choi tried to organise are ironically some of the very same quantities that form the bulk of Australia’s own trade. He tried to organise the exports from the DPRK of iron and coal and the import of petroleum products. Yet, while entities in Australia are able to engage in huge amounts of such trade, the people of North Korea are prohibited from engaging in any such trade by the UN sanctions. Indeed, the sanctions are so severe that they ban almost all of North Korea’s exports. Given that North Korea is a country with steep mountains and harsh winters with a population almost identical to that of Australia’s, while having a 64 times smaller area, the country must import food and medicines to feed and provide health care for her people. Thus, by cutting off her exports and thus her ability to acquire the hard currency needed to buy food, medicines and other essential items for her people, the UN sanctions are causing the premature deaths of tens of thousands of Korean people. The sanctions imposed upon the people of North Korea are the most severe sanctions ever imposed on any people of any country. Less severe sanctions imposed on the people of Iraq from 1990 onwards caused the premature deaths of some 1.7 million people. Even the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF), an agency under the very same United Nations that imposed the sanctions on Iraq, admitted that in the first ten years of the sanctions about half a million Iraqi children under age of five had been killed by the sanctions (see: https://www.independent.ie/world-news/sanctions-have-killed-500000-iraqi-children-26114461.html).Although the DPRK’s economic system based on public ownership and socialist planning is better able to manage the extreme scarcity caused by sanctions than capitalist Iraq was, the sanctions still cause enormous suffering to her people.

Dehydrated and malnourished, seven-month-old Sahra is comforted by her grandmother in Baghdad, 1998. At that time, 30 percent of Iraq’s children under five were malnourished because of the shortage of food and medicine as a result of the UN sanctions. By attempting to help people in the DPRK trade with people abroad in violation of even crueller sanctions than the ones imposed previously on Iraq, Chan Han Choi committed truly heroic, humanitarian deeds aimed at helping the people of North Korea avert the kind of calamity that Iraqi children and adults endured. Photo credit: GICJ/Al-Arabiya
A most ideal approach to store in an impermeable box. sildenafil 100mg tab levitra prescription http://djpaulkom.tv/crakd-get-your-finger-out-of-my-va-jayjay/ Other popular ED drugs are Vardenafil and Tadalafil. You can get huge discounts on http://djpaulkom.tv/dj-paul-and-drumma-boy-clash-on-their-newest-mixtape/ order levitra by using the levitra available on our website .Order the medication by visiting our product section, pay through a secure and reliable online pharmacy you will be able to save quite a considerable amount of money. To know more, please talk to female viagra uk a physical trainer before including cycling in your daily routine.

It was to help the people of North Korea feed and provide for themselves that Choi organised deals to help them trade with people abroad in violation of the cruel economic sanctions. Choi was motivated by a compassionate desire to help the people battered by sanctions and not at all by personal gain. Especially after seeing first hand the suffering of people living in rural areas caused by both the sanctions and the military pressure that the U.S.-led imperial powers have imposed on North Korea (which has forced North Korea to divert much greater resources to defence than she would want to), Choi resolved to do whatever he could to help the people.

Chan Han Choi thanks supporters waiting at a park to cheer him on as he travels back to his residence of house arrest from his mandatory reporting at a police station. The supporters had gathered following a protest march on 17 December 2020 demanding the dropping of all charges against this socialist political prisoner.

Choi’s actions can be compared to that of a handful of Solomon Islanders and Australians who in the 1990s used speedboats to run a blockade of Bougainville Island and smuggle in medicines to the people of the island. The people of the PNG island of Bougainville had risen up in the late 1980s after Australian-owned mining giant CRA (now part of Rio Tinto) arrogantly refused to compensate the Bougainville people for destroying a large part of the island through a massive copper and gold mine. In order to protect the super profits of CRA’s corporate bosses, the Australian regime provided arms, training, mercenaries and military advisers to its PNG puppets in order to get them to wage war on Bougainville’s people. The blockade alone killed some 15,000 people. However, the actions of the heroes who violated the blockade to provide medicines to the Bougainville people saved the lives of so many who would have otherwise also died.

Chan Han Choi’s efforts to help the people of North Korea evade sanctions can also be compared to those people who during the Nazi regime in Germany and the Nazi occupation of other countries risked their own lives to provide sanctuary to communists, Jews, Roma and gays and lesbians being hunted down by the fascist regime. Like the deeds that Choi has pleaded guilty to, their actions were also illegal but completely correct, heroic and compassionate.

Chan Han Choi at his bail residence where he is under house arrest.
Photo credit: Trotskyist Platform

Although we completely defend and honour Choi’s brave efforts to help the people of North Korea evade crippling sanctions, we strongly urge people in Australia not to themselves attempt such actions. For although such deeds would be completely correct from a moral point of view, the chances of getting caught are way too high. When one is aware of the massive policing and spy resources unleashed in the surveillance, arrest and prosecution of Choi – including intercepts of phone calls – it becomes obvious just how focused the Australian regime is on persecuting supporters of socialistic states. After all, the police and spy agencies in capitalist countries like Australia exist not to defend the interests of the masses but only those of a small wealthy exploiting class. And part of enforcing the interests of the capitalist exploiting class is to attack those states formed from the overthrow of capitalism – like the DPRK, Cuba and the Peoples Republic of China. We do not want other kind-hearted people who see the cruelty of the sanctions on the people of North Korea to suffer the way that Choi has. Let’s not forget that Choi was not only imprisoned for three years but made to endure especially harsh conditions in jail. Choi spent most of his time in prison in one of the Australian regime’s most notorious prison camps – Long Bay Prison “Hospital.” This was the very same prison and section of Long Bay jail where six racist prison guards crushed to death 26 year-old Aboriginal man, David Dungay, in circumstances very similar to the infamous racist police murder of George Floyd in the U.S. in May of last year.

We in Trotskyist Platform believe that the best strategy to serve the interests of working class people is not individual covert action – however heroic – but open, collective, mass action. We call on all those who see the terrible cruelty of the sanctions on the DPRK to join the political campaign to get the sanctions lifted. And here again Chan Han Choi is significant. Because by standing strong on his political opposition to the sanctions and even bravely denouncing these sanctions while in prison (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTlumqtaguo), Choi has inspired opposition to these sanctions. Choi’s brave stance combined with the political movement in his defence, which has from the start combined the demand to free Choi with the call for the lifting of the economic sanctions on North Korea, has meant that the campaign against the sanctions is now stronger in Australia than it has ever been. And with China now openly calling for the easing of the sanctions on North Korea, a determined global activist campaign against these sanctions can have a serious impact.

The Real Criminals and What Drives Them

The list of real criminals involved in Choi’s matter definitely does not include Chan Han Choi himself. The biggest criminals involved are the imperialist rulers who repeatedly arm twisted the world to acquiesce to successively more severe sanctions on the DPRK. Chief of these were the leaders of the United States. But they were enthusiastically supported by the Australian, Japanese, South Korean and British regimes. Donald Trump, Barack Obama, George Bush, Scott Morrison, Malcolm Turnbull, Tony Abbott, Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard, Shinzo Abe: these are biggest criminals in this matter. They have helped enact sanctions on the people of North Korea that are an indirect form of murder. The ASIO and Australian Federal Police officers, prosecutors and judges involved in Choi’s persecution – and, thus, in enforcing these sanctions – also bear some responsibility for the death and suffering that these sanctions have caused.

The excuse that the imperialist rulers make for imposing sanctions on the people of North Korea is that it is punishment for the DPRK’s nuclear weapons program. This is breathtaking hypocrisy! The U.S. has 5,800 nuclear warheads, France 290, Britain 215, India 150 and Israel 90 while the DPRK has just 30 to 40. Meanwhile, just two weeks ago, Australia joined with other countries most opposed to the DPRK like the U.S., Britain, France, Japan and South Korea in refusing to sign the UN Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Let’s never forget too that it is not the DPRK that has dropped atomic weapons on human beings. It was the U.S. regime that did that when they heinously dropped nuclear weapons on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Indeed, completely contrary to all the Western propaganda about North Korea, the DPRK is no military threat to any peoples. The DPRK and the PRC are, in fact, the only two nuclear powers that have not been involved in any wars over the last forty years. It is not North Korea’s army that killed hundreds of thousands of people by invading and occupying first Afghanistan and then Iraq. That was the American, British and Australian regimes that committed those crimes. 

The DPRK’s development of nuclear weapons is not for predatory imperialist purposes but as deterrence against attack from the capitalist powers. Their aim is to protect the people of socialistic North Korea from a capitalist attack like that seen during the 1950-1953 Korean War. That war resulted in some two to three million North Korean people perishing when the DPRK was attacked by a combined force of the U.S., Australia, South Korea and other U.S. allies who heinously and repeatedly obliterated entire North Korean cities by burning them to the ground with napalm dropped from the air (the DPRK with the PRC’s assistance did heroically manage to fight the invading armies to a standstill in that war).

The DPRK’s intentions are proven by what happened soon after the DPRK achieved a demonstrable nuclear deterrence capability at the end of 2017. The DPRK’s development of a deterrence capability actually quickly led to greater stability in the region – at least in the short and medium terms. The U.S. and South Korean regimes realized that the DPRK could not be bullied as easily as previously. The South Korean capitalist regime went from joining the U.S. and Australia in massive threatening war games against North Korea to jointly fielding an ice hockey team with their North Korean counterparts at the February 2018 Winter Olympics – the first time that the two Koreas have ever fielded a joint team at an Olympic Games. Two months later – just five months after North Korea’s last and most successful intercontinental ballistic missile test – the first summit in 11 years between the leaders of North and South Korea was held. A further six weeks later, the first ever summit between a leader of North Korea and a president of the U.S. was held – which was less than nine months after then U.S. president Trump had threatened to “totally destroy” North Korea.

So why are the rulers of the U.S., Japan, Australia and certain other countries so hell-bent on squeezing the people of North Korea? There are two closely related reasons. Firstly, the DPRK is a socialistic state where the working class masses hold state power – albeit in a bureaucratically deformed manner. Secondly the DPRK is a neighbour and ally of the world’s most powerful socialistic state, the Peoples Republic of China. By putting the squeeze on the people of North Korea through severe economic sanctions, the capitalist powers hope to undermine socialistic rule in both North Korea and China. They want to do this for three reasons. Firstly, as long as the working class hold state power in China and North Korea – in however an imperfect and tenuous form – the powerful capitalists who dominate the economies of the richer countries are not able to “freely”exploit the working class masses of these countries the way that their corporations superexploit and plunder the capitalist developing countries in Asia like the Philippines, Bangladesh, India, Thailand and Indonesia. Secondly, the mere existence of states like the DPRK and PRC that have freed themselves from domination by wealthy Western and Japanese capitalists frightens the imperialist rulers of the U.S., Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Britain. For they fear that this could encourage the masses of the ex-colonial countries to themselves give the imperialists the boot. Thirdly, there is the U.S. and Australian capitalists’ still greater fear. That is that if socialistic rule succeeds in the likes of China, North Korea and Cuba, workers in their own countries will be inspired to themselves start to challenge capitalist rule. When they see threats to their profits, the greedy capitalists will not recoil from using any means – even if that involves starving people through killer economic sanctions.

In that light, it is not at all wrong for a workers state whose people are being strangled by sanctions to raise money by selling arms. Choi’s attempts to raise badly needed hard currency for the people of North Korea by brokering the sale of arms is actually a life-saving act. Moreover, it is the height of hypocrisy for the Australian regime to be repressing others for allegedly selling weapons. The right-wing Coalition has openly proclaimed its intention to make Australia a top ten global arms exporter. Meanwhile, as an exposé by The Guardian revealed, Australian company Electro Optics Systems (EOS) has shipped large quantities of weapons to the militaries of Saudi Arabia and the UAE – the very militaries which have been spearheading the brutal Saudi-led war on Yemen that has killed over 233,000 people, displaced another three million people and brought mass starvation in what is today the world’s worst humanitarian disaster (see: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jul/25/australian-weapons-shipped-to-saudi-and-uae-as-war-rages-in-yemen). Among the weapons that Canberra allows EOS to sell to the murderous Saudi and UAE militaries is the R400s weapons station for remotely operating missile launchers and cannons.

An Australian soldier shoots dead an unarmed Afghan prisoner in cold blood. One of the huge number of war crimes committed by the Australian military in Afghanistan. Because the regimes most hostile to North Korea are one and the same as the regimes most responsible for imperialist invasions and heinous murders of civilians and prisoners, any arms sold by North Korea will at least not end up in the hands of the biggest warmongers and war criminals in the world

To be sure weapons do kill. However, the fortunate thing about any arms sold by the DPRK is that because the most dangerous imperialist warmongers are also the DPRK’s greatest enemies, one can be confident that any arms sold by the DPRK do not end up being used in the most hideous imperialist invasions and acts of national oppression. So we can be confident that DPRK arms will not end up in the hands of the troops that torture and massacre unarmed Afghan peasants and civilians (Australia’s SAS special forces), the forces that committed unspeakable atrocities in their invasion of Iraq (the U.S.-British-Australian forces), the militaries that killed tens of thousands of Libyan people and sent Libya into bloody turmoil ever since through their 2011 regime-change invasion (the U.S./NATO militaries) and the army that murderously oppresses the Palestinian people (the Israeli military). Instead, DPRK arms could actually end up with genuine liberation forces like Palestinian resistance movements.

Let’s Demand: No Criminal Conviction for Chan Han Choi!

None of the deals that Choi has pleaded guilty to brokering were actually finalised let alone proceeded to the actual trade of goods. In nearly all, if not all, the brokering that Choi did, even the prosecutors acknowledge that Choi himself cancelled the deals before he was arrested by police. If one wants an analogy, consider this. Imagine that you drive to a party where you plan to drink alcohol at the party and then drive home. Your friends tell you during the party that you should stop drinking because you plan to drive home. But you rebuff them. At the end of the night you get into your car to drive home drunk but at the last minute you change your mind and call a cab instead. Are you guilty of drink driving? No! But Choi is deemed guilty of brokering services because the laws enforcing the sanctions on the DPRK are so severe that even if you once try to broker a deal that you then cancel, that is deemed an offence. Of course the above analogy has limitations. Drink driving can be dangerous and can cause accidents that in the worst case can be fatal. In complete contrast, if Choi went ahead with the deals and was able to bring them to fruition he would have brought scarce hard currency to the consolidated revenue of the DPRK which would have enabled her to buy desperately needed food, medicine, fuel and agricultural machinery for her people. This would have actually saved people’s lives.

Given that what Choi is accused of are largely thought crimes and that none of the deals he brokered for a period actually came to fruition his offending is on the very low end of the laws that he has been prosecuted under. Moreover, Chan Han Choi has no prior criminal record whatsoever. All this means that even under the profoundly unjust laws that he is charged under, Choi should not get any punishment approaching a custodial sentence, let alone one in excess of three years that he has already been imprisoned for. Choi should only get a modest fine. However, that is only if the sentencing hearing is fair – notwithstanding the unfair laws that he is being charged under. The problem is that the sentencing hearing will not be fair! Everything that has happened to Choi since his December 2017 arrest proves that all organs of the Australian capitalist state discriminate against Choi because of his sympathy and allegiance to the socialistic DPRK. As Trotskyist Platform chairwoman, Sarah Fitzenmeyer, stated about Choi’s period in jail at a February 1 rally held in Choi’s defence:

“Prison authorities obstructed Choi’s access to legal representation. His previous legal team was not able to make a physical visit to Choi for almost a whole year. Furthermore Korean-English interpreters were not allowed to accompany legal visits for a period of 16 months. The prison system also specially blocked Choi from being able to make phone calls to friends and even some family members. They also obstructed visits to Choi. They used dirty tricks to do this. For example, when friends first applied to visit Choi, Corrective Services for weeks said that they were processing the applications but then suddenly no applications could be found in their system. The following year when a key friend who was finally able to visit had to renew his annual permit to visit Choi, Corrective Services conveniently claimed to have again lost the application.

“The worst example of the discrimination that Choi has faced from the Australian regime occurred when prison health authorities refused his repeated written appeals to see a prison doctor over more than an eight month period. Choi’s health was deteriorating. He was suffering from severe unintended weight loss, stomach problems, rampant rashes and more. He was only finally seen by a doctor after he wrote a letter to Justice Health saying that they are indirectly trying to murder me and his supporters published this letter online. When finally he was allowed to receive treatment for this [it became apparent that] his diabetes had spiraled out of control. They found that this was the cause of most of his symptoms. The medical staff found that Choi’s blood sugar level had reached emergency levels. He needed emergency doses of insulin. However, he should have been receiving insulin treatment much earlier. The simple fact that he did not receive such treatment put him at great risk of suffering a heart attack or a stroke. Even the United Nations states that the withholding of medical treatment from persons in places of detention is a form of torture.”

Meanwhile, for nearly three years, the capitalist regime rejected bail for Choi largely not because of the actual charges that he was facing but on the basis of the prosecution’s insistence that his political sympathy for the DPRK and his outspoken opposition to the cruel sanctions on the people of North Korea were a reason to reject bail. In other words, Choi’s imprisonment was a classic case of Cold War McCarthyist witch-hunting where a person’s sympathy for a socialistic state is deemed enough of a reason to deny that person’s rights – in this case the right to bail – that is otherwise afforded to others. Then when Choi went on trial last week (today’s plea deal ended the trial part-way through), he faced a playing field sloped steeply against him. Despite the research needed to address the complex technical aspects of his case, Legal Aid only allowed funding for Choi to have one barrister (who only came aboard in recent weeks after Legal Aid restored the funding that they had earlier cut off); while the regime arrayed massive resources dedicated to persecuting Choi including a legal team consisting of two barristers and an instructing solicitor who have spent years on the case; as well as a large number of police who have spent more than three years collecting “evidence” and seeking out “expert” witnesses. During the trial, the prosecution sought to sway the jury by slickly appealing to anti-communist prejudices that have been stirred up amongst the population by government and mainstream media and also by calling as witnesses war-mongering “experts” belonging to neo-conservative think tanks. Rather than exposing the obvious political bias of these “experts,” Choi’s Legal Aid-organised then barrister joined with the neo-conservatives in attacking North Korea and thus further prejudicing the jury against Choi. Due to a non-publication order imposed by the judge, we are unable to report why this barrister and Choi parted company two days ago. The judge ordered that the trial was to re-commence today at 10am after a new legal representative later announced to the court that he had taken up Choi’s case. However, the plea deal negotiated by Choi’s new legal representative and the Prosecutors went through this morning instead. The judge has censored all reporting of the circumstances that provided particular challenges to Choi’s new legal representative who took up the case just yesterday. However, we can report that these difficulties influenced Choi’s decision to accept a plea bargain on the eve of the trial’s scheduled re-commencement this morning.

In addition to the particular features of the way that Choi’s aborted trial proceeded there is over-riding political bias in the entire Australian court system. The courts are key organs of a capitalist state – that also includes the police, military, spy agencies, prisons and bureaucracy – that was created and is maintained for enforcing the interests of the numerically small, labour-exploiting class against the gigantic masses of the working class. A person could not rise to become a judge – especially a Supreme Court judge – unless they had already proven their loyalty to the capitalist order countless times on their way up. Although judges may preside over, let us say, a complicated murder trial in a fine way provided that the case does not intersect the questions of class and race, whenever a case touches these questions or, more so, when a case sees the interests of the working class and capitalist class arrayed on opposing sides, then the pro-capitalist bias of the judiciary comes to the fore. Chan Han Choi’s case is entirely a political one. And as a sympathiser of a socialistic state prosecuted for his acts in support of that state, Choi is fully on the receiving end of the pro-capitalist bias of the courts.

The capitalist regime really wants to impose a severe penalty on Choi. For one they want to deter others from helping the people of North Korea evade crippling sanctions. However, the regime’s main motivation to hype up Choi’s “offences” is to create an irrational fear of North Korea and by extension her PRC neighbor and ally. The Australian ruling class wants to use such fears to justify to the masses their incessant Cold War drive against the PRC and DPRK. They want us to wear the $270 billion of public funds that could be used for badly needed public housing, public aged care, TAFE and childcare being diverted into the purchase of new long-range missiles and other weapons. They want us to accept ever more repressive laws justified on the basis of “protecting national security” – like the draconian “foreign interference” laws. And they want us to acquiesce to a witch-hunt against other supporters of socialistic states – particularly sympathizers of Red China within Australia’s Chinese community.

Fortunately, there are also factors that give the Australian regime pause in how aggressively they hound Choi. For by engaging in an obviously political persecution of Chan Han Choi, the capitalist regime exposes the fraudulence of its stated commitment to the “rule of law” and “democracy.” This in turn undermines the ability of the regime to meddle abroad and attack its Cold War enemies on the basis of supposed “human rights” concerns. This is doubly so when one of the people that they are persecuting at home happens to be a supporter of one of the main targets of their [false] attacks over “human rights”. None of this bothered the capitalist regime when they first arrested Choi in December 2017. They expected that he would have no support and that the whole population would follow their demonisation of Choi like sheep. However, much to the Australian capitalist ruling class’ surprise things have turned out quite differently. A determined and active united front protest movement has been built in defence of Choi. The movement has exposed to people at home and abroad the ways that Choi’s rights have been violated and has brought to the fore the injustice inherent in the prosecution of a person trying to help people evade starvation sanctions. Now there is a political cost to the regime if it engages in the further persecution of Chan Han Choi. In the end that is why they had to reluctantly grant him bail last November. However, we defenders of Chan Han Choi should not rest on our laurels. The political climate can turn for the worse quickly and significant components of the capitalist regime are still hell bent on sending Choi to prison again.

Western Sydney, 17 December 2020: Demonstrators gather in the multi-racial working class suburb of Chester Hill to demand freedom for Chan Han Choi.

That is why in the lead up to Choi’s sentencing we must intensify our agitation and action in his defence. Let us build on the united front rally that we held early in the morning of February 1 in the lead up to Choi’s pre-trial hearing (see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hup24xnKxUQ). We need to especially look to mobilize politically aware workers behind the campaign. This is very possible because defending Chan Han Choi is definitely in the interests of working class people. For one, as well as being a great humanitarian, Choi is a socialist who sympathises with North Korea because he likes that society’s egalitarianism. Whatever one thinks of North Korea’s leaders, the fact is that her people have built a system based upon socialist public ownership of the key banks, industries, agricultural land and mines. In supporting a socialistic system, Choi is also standing by the more than 90% of Australia’s and the world’s population who would benefit from having such a system themselves. To those hurt by the present capitalist system that causes such economic insecurity for working class people, that denies millions of youth stable, permanent jobs and that inflames such racist far-right violence and such turmoil in the U.S., Australia, India, Israel and other capitalist countries, we say that Choi has stood by you. We must now stand by him!

By defending Choi we are opposing the imperialist Cold War drive that his persecution is meant to fuel. The Australian capitalist regime’s Cold War drive is squarely against working class people’s interests. In targeting workers states abroad, this Cold War drive will inevitably be accompanied by attacks on workers’ unions and other workers’ organizations at home – just like the last Cold War against the Soviet Union. We don’t want exports to China that provides every Australian household with $17,000 extra in income on average to be disrupted because of the capitalist class’ obsession with crushing socialistic states.

What is also at stake in Choi’s trial is the future of the Australian regime’s anti-communist witch-hunt that Choi’s own persecution is very much part of. Many supporters of socialistic China have also been targeted in this McCarthyist witch-hunt. After organising a mass rally in Sydney in August 2019 that supported Red China’s sovereignty over its Hong Kong autonomous region, Chinese international students were subjected to threatening interrogations by ASIO. Even a NSW ALP politician was witch-hunted merely for praising China’s response to the pandemic. Meanwhile, Cold War repression has created such a national security obsession that it has made it easier for the Australian regime to persecute others with no direct connection to Cold War issues. Within nine months of their arrest of Choi, the Australian capitalist regime charged whistleblowers Bernard Collaery and Witness K for exposing the Australian state’s spying on East Timor and then David McBride for revealing the extent of Australia’s brutal and so shameful war crimes in Afghanistan. At the same time the national security obsession has enabled the Federal Police to conduct intimidating raids on trade unions like the CFMEU and the AWU. It has also made it easier for the regime to abet the U.S. and Britain’s persecution of Julian Assange.

McCarthyist repression in Australia threatens the workers movement, whistleblowers and democratic rights. Let’s strike a blow against it by defending its biggest victim: socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi. Let’s also strike a blow against the Cold War drive more broadly – a war drive that is completely against the interests of more than 90% of Australia and the world’s people. And let’s strengthen the movement against the cruel economic sanctions on the people of North Korea. Let’s do all this by mobilizing with great energy to stand by compassionate human being, Chan Han Choi, in the lead up to his upcoming sentencing hearing. Chan Han Choi must not receive any criminal record whatsoever let alone be thrown back into prison for trying to help the people of North Korea evade killer sanctions. In a fair society Choi would be given not jail time but showered with awards and medals for heroism and compassion!

停止在澳大利亚对CHAN HAN CHOI的冷战式迫害

停止在澳大利亚对CHAN
HAN CHOI的冷战式迫害

撤销对左翼政治犯的一切控诉

CHOI自由,不再居家软禁

Low testosterone also reduces sexual desire in viagra prescription australia them. It also improves semen load to enjoy intense pleasure with your female. cute-n-tiny.com viagra buy on line canadian viagra 100mg Usually, men and women over 40 years of age. For such man even purchase viagra no prescription Sildenafil Citrate should be used strictly as directed by your doctor.

2020年12月20日: 历尽三年的监禁,在没有被判任何指控的情况下,澳大利亚公民Chan Han Choi,一位社会主义者,终于在11月12日获得保释。所有参加过要求释放,捍卫他的系列活动的人士都做得很棒 。不过,Chan Han Choi在明年2月仍面临审讯。此外,即使现在,他还是很不自由. 他的保释条件相当于居家软禁. 除了每天两次向警方报到和接受基本医疗外,他不得离开住所。

Chan Han Choi被指控违反联合国经济制裁,试图帮助朝鲜将他们的产品出口到国外。即使针对他的指控属实,从工人阶级的角度来看,他也不是罪犯。恰恰相反!这只会证明他是一个伟大的人道主义者,他帮助正受到对任何国家人民来说都是最极端和最残酷制裁下的朝鲜人民。Choi也是一个同情朝鲜的社会主义者,因为他喜欢朝鲜社会的均平主义。无论人们怎么看朝鲜领导人,事实是,朝鲜人民已经建立了一个以社会主义公有制为基础的制度,在那里,关键性的银行、工业、农业用地和矿山都是公有的。Chan Han Choi支持社会主义制度,他也和能受益于这个制度的这个国家和全世界的人民中90%以上的人站在一起。对于那些受到现行资本主义制度伤害而困囧和经济不安全的澳洲人民,我们说Choi也已经在支持你们。现在轮到工人阶级的我们支持他了!此外,通过支持Chan Han Choi,我们也反对使勇敢的朝鲜人民遭受残酷之至的经济制裁。

当局拒绝了Chan Han Choi先前的保释申请,主要是因为他对社会主义朝鲜的同情. 他们还阻碍了律师、翻译和朋友到监狱探视他. 甚至后来他的糖尿病恶化,当局还一再拒绝了他去看监狱医生的要求。对Choi的迫害是麦卡锡主义迫害的教科书级案例, 个人因支持社会主义国家而被剥夺权利。许多其他的人被陷于这种政治迫害中。11月4日,墨尔本东南亚华人社区受人尊敬的成员Sunny Duong成为澳大利亚首位根据极端的所谓”外国干涉”法而受指控的人士——这些法律旨在压制那些同情社会主义中国和其他工人国家的人的声音。澳大利亚的ASIO(澳大利亚安全局)秘密警察和澳大利亚联邦警察(AFP)也对在这里工作的中国记者以及敢于表达对红色中国同情的中国留学生进行了恐吓性审讯和突袭。所有这些冷战政治迫害引起的国家安全“痴迷”, 使AFP(澳洲联邦警察)能够随心所欲地对 CFMEU 建筑工人工会进行恐吓性突袭, 并以巨大指控打击像大卫 · 麦克布赖德(David McBride)和伯纳德 · 科莱里(Bernard Collaery)这样的告密者。让我们反击这种日益增长的迫害,反对新的麦卡锡主义政治迫害和推助它的反对社会主义中国和朝鲜的冷战。停止对CHAN HAN CHOI的冷战式迫害! 撤销对左翼政治犯的一切控诉! 还CHOI自由,不再居家软禁!

Momentum Builds in Campaign to Free Socialist Political Prisoner in Australia

Above photo: Chan Han Choi thanks supporters waiting at a park to cheer him on as he travels back to his residence of house arrest from his mandatory reporting at a police station. The supporters had gathered following a protest march on 17 December 2020 demanding the dropping of all charges against this socialist political prisoner.

Down With the Cold War Persecution of Chan Han Choi!

Momentum Builds in Campaign to Free Socialist Political Prisoner in Australia

18 December 2020: Support continues to grow for left-wing political prisoner in Australia, Chan Han Choi. Yesterday, braving stormy weather, Choi’s supporters conducted the biggest of our three protests in his defence that we have held during this year of pandemic. Some of the participants were joining an action in defence of Choi for the first time and one group also newly joined the campaign.

Chan Han Choi is now under house arrest after being released on bail last month. He had spent nearly three years in prison in extremely harsh conditions despite not being convicted of any charge. He will finally go to trial this February. Yesterday’s demonstration demanded, “Freedom for Choi – Not House Arrest” and also demanded, “Drop the Charges Against this Left-Wing Political Prisoner.”

Choi is charged with attempting to organise trade deals to help North Korea export her produce abroad – and in one case attempt to import petroleum products – in violation of crippling United Nations economic sanctions on the people of North Korea. However, as the call out for yesterday’s action stressed:

“Even if the claims against him turn out to be true, he is no criminal from the working class standpoint. Quite the opposite! It would simply prove that he is a great humanitarian aiding people who are being ground down by the most extreme and brutal sanctions ever imposed on the people of any country.

“Choi is also a socialist who sympathises with North Korea because he likes that society’s egalitarianism. Whatever one thinks of North Korea’s leaders, the fact is that her people have built a system based upon socialist public ownership of the key banks, industries, agricultural land and mines. In supporting a socialistic system, Choi is also standing by the more than 90% of this country and the world who would benefit from such a system. To those hurt by the present capitalist system causing such misery and economic insecurity for Australia’s working class people, we say that Choi has stood by you. Working class people must in turn now stand by him! Moreover, by defending Chan Han Choi we will also be opposing the murderously crippling economic sanctions that have so devastated the brave people of North Korea.”

As the chair of yesterday’s rally, Sarah Fitzenmeyer – who is also the chairwoman of Trotskyist Platform – stressed, although Choi has been charged with attempting to help the people of North Korea evade the cruel economic sanctions, “the reason that he was denied bail until recently and outrageously kept in prison for nearly three years without being convicted of any charge was because of his pro-North Korea political views.” The rally emcee further explained:

“Whenever Chan Han Choi applied for bail, the Australian Federal Police and Commonwealth prosecutors openly stated that bail should be opposed because of Choi’s sympathy for the DPRK and because he had made statements from prison condemning the economic sanctions on the people of North Korea as being unjust and unfair. This is blatant political discrimination. They are effectively saying that if you support a socialistic country you should have less rights than others.

“… One of the very worrying things about Choi’s persecution is that it is part of a pattern of repression against those who express sympathy for socialistic countries. Last month, a Chinese Australian man, Sunny Duong, became the first person charged under Australia’s draconian, so-called “foreign interference” laws that are aimed at quashing the voices of those sympathetic to socialistic China. Sunny is a highly respected member of Melbourne’s South-East Asian Chinese community. You can bet that this is another beat up!

“Six months ago, a NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane was forced out of his elected senate seat for several months after the Australian Federal Police made an extraordinarily heavy-handed raid on his home. Their excuse for the raid was that he belonged to a social media chat group where other people made pro-China comments. Can you believe it? And this regime calls itself a democracy! Two months before being raided, Moselmane was witch-hunted out of his position as deputy president of the NSW upper house just because he told the plain truth that China responded very well to the pandemic. So much for free speech!

“Sisters and brothers, by coming out here with courage to defend the biggest victim of McCarthyist persecution, Chan Han Choi, you are pushing back against this new Cold War witch-hunt.”

Yesterday’s protest was held to mark the third anniversary of Chan Han Choi’s arrest. The demonstration was addressed by representatives of Trotskyist Platform, the Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, Therefore in order to stop this malfunction from destroying one’s physical abilities they have introduced the anti-impotency solution cheapest tadalafil uk this that has sildenafil citrate. To be sure, the history of hair loss treatments, hair loss sufferers should approach laser hair therapy with cialis prices in india caution. Some buy bulk viagra users often run out of medication while in the middle of something. Not cheap viagra to mention that with your new found confidence in your sexual performance. Anti-War West Sydney and an activist heavily involved in the campaign to free Julian Assange. Other than supporters of these groups, also participating in the action were representatives of the Communist League as well as individuals who are members of the Communist Party of Australia and of the Australia-Cuba Friendship Society. The action saw some thirty people march through the streets of Chester Hill chanting, “Free Chan Han Choi, Lift the Sanctions Now!” The march route replicated the journey that Choi has been taking for his mandatory reporting to a police station. To the delight of demonstrators, we saw Choi walking just a few metres ahead of us on his way to his evening report to the police station. Then as demonstrators waited in a park near the police station, our hero Chan Han Choi walked past us on his way back to his residence, bowing and waving to supporters. Later back at his residence, Choi expressed his deepest appreciation to all those who joined the protest.


Western Sydney, 17 December 2020: Demonstrators gather in the multi-racial working class suburb of Chester Hill to demand the dropping of all charges against Chan Han Choi.

Yesterday’s march won much solidarity from Chester Hill residents. Many people walking or driving past the protest waved in solidarity, yelled out encouragement or tooted their horns in sympathy. Most people in multi-racial, working class Chester Hill are all too aware of the bias against low-income people and those from racial minorities of Australia’s legal and prison system. Thus their natural instinct is to solidarise with someone like Choi who is in the cross-hairs of the regime. Moreover, many of those expressing their appreciation for yesterday’s protest come from backgrounds from the Middle East and other former colonial countries – experiences that have thought them to both hate Western imperialism and to understand the suffering caused by UN economic sanctions, sanctions which when imposed on the people of Iraq between 1990 and 2003 caused the premature deaths of 1.7 million people! Thus these people feel a warm connection with a supporter of the DPRK (i.e. North Korea), a state which they associate with staunch defiance of predatory imperialism. That connection is doubly strong when that person happens to be persecuted for his opposition to murderous economic sanctions. 

Yet, when Chan Han Choi was first arrested, Australia’s capitalist rulers expected that he would have no support. They wanted to demonise Choi in order to create an irrational fear amongst Australia’s population of North Korea and her socialistic Chinese neighbour and ally. The entire mainstream media demonised Choi and then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull hysterically denounced him. The witch-hunt of Chan Han Choi was to be one of the means that the capitalist regime would use to “justify” intensifying their Cold War drive against the socialistic countries. It was to help rationalise their massive Cold War military build up. It was to aid their push to both give even greater powers to Australia’s ASIO secret police and to introduce draconian so-called “foreign interference” laws. The hype against Choi was also one of the regime’s means to “rationalise” their planned state repression against sympathisers of North Korea’s socialistic neighbour, the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). They didn’t count on people supporting Choi! They are very worried about this support. You see by standing by a political prisoner who has been harshly imprisoned for his sympathy for North Korea, we blow to smithereens the credibility of Australia’s capitalist ruling class when they attack North Korea and the PRC over supposed “human rights abuses.” The capitalist rulers thus hate this exposure of their political persecution of Chan Han Choi in the same way that they went apoplectic when a Chinese official tweeted a political cartoon that called out the true horror of the Australian military’s war crimes in Afghanistan.

In the end that is why Australia’s capitalist regime finally had to grant bail to Chan Han Choi last month. They wanted to minimise the political damage to themselves by making this concession. So well done to all those who have participated in the campaign to free Chan Han Choi. Today, the Australian regime made a further very minor concession. Although rebuffing Choi’s plea to be freed from house arrest, they agreed to allow Choi to visit Chester Hill shopping centre on his way from daily reporting at the police station and to reduce his required number of police station reporting from two per day to one per day and with Sunday now made a day off from reporting.

However as Trotskyist Platform spokesman, Samuel Kim stressed at yesterday’s action:

“… let’s remember that our work is far from over. Even today Choi is not free as he is under house arrest. Come February [when Choi faces trial] Choi possibly might be locked up in prison again. For him there is no rule of law but a gangster like rule of the exploiting class ….

“It is not just the laws serving the exploiters that are unfair but the entire legal system that put him [Choi] there is also unfair. The military, the courts, the police, the prisons in Australia form part of a capitalist state that exists to enforce the interests of the corporate exploiters against those of the working class masses and their supporters. This is the case whether it is the Liberals or ALP or Greens who take power. They all have deeply entwined servitude to the sheer domination of the exploiting class. The capitalist system with its drive for profits, its war against workers, cannot be trusted to give Choi a fair hearing. So therefore, that is why we are mobilised here today. And in the future we need more mobilisations, more like-minded souls, more workers, poor, unemployed, students [as] part of our struggle in order to help free Choi….

“We demand: Drop all charges against Chan Han Choi! Down with the barbaric sanctions on the people of North Korea! Resist the Cold War drive against socialistic China and socialistic North Korea!”  

Australian Regime Releases Socialist Political Prisoner into House Arrest

Above: Chan Han Choi at his residence of house arrest shortly after his release from prison on bail on the evening of 12 November 2020. Choi is here reading a copy of the main Korean language community newspaper in Sydney, Hanho Daily. The then current issue of Hanho Daily contained an article on the campaign to free this socialist political prisoner.
Photo Credit: Trotskyist Platform

Free Chan Han Choi – Drop All Charges Now!

Australian Regime Releases Socialist Political Prisoner into House Arrest

13 November 2020 – After nearly three years in prison without being convicted of any charge, Chan Han Choi was yesterday finally released on bail. However, the bail conditions imposed on him are so strict that they amount to house arrest. Choi is not allowed to leave his bail residence except for his twice daily reporting to a nearby police station or for essential medical care. Apart from being subjected to a strict curfew, his use of the internet is greatly restricted. Moreover, Choi “must, on request, disclose to the officer in charge any caller or phone number appearing on his accounts.” This is a blatant attempt to assist the police to carry out intimidation and surveillance of Choi’s many friends and supporters.

Despite the harsh bail conditions imposed on him, Choi is certainly happy to be out of prison. He spent most of his nearly three years in prison in one of the Australian regime’s most notorious prison camps. Moreover, the capitalist regime imposed extra severe conditions on this socialist political prisoner. They obstructed visits to Choi by lawyers, translators and friends. They banned him from making any telephone calls to his friends whatsoever – a right accorded to other prisoners. More recently, they failed to monitor his diabetes and repeatedly knocked back his requests to see a prison doctor over an eight and a half month period as his diabetes significantly worsened. Choi was finally allowed medical care again only after sending off a strong August 15 letter to prison health authorities stating “that they are trying indirectly to murder me” by rebuffing his repeated written requests to be seen by a prison doctor. By the time that Choi was seen by prison medical staff on August 27, his blood sugar levels had reached alarmingly dangerous levels. He required emergency doses of insulin. Later he was put on a program of daily insulin injections and thrice daily sugar level monitoring. It turned out that, unbeknownst to Choi at the time, most of the symptoms that he was desperately seeking medical attention for – severe unintended weight loss, rashes all over his body, very itchy fungal infections etc – were the result of his diabetes going out of control. The fact is that Choi should have been receiving daily insulin up to eight months before he was finally treated in this way. The regime’s delay in treating his diabetes not only caused the symptoms that he suffered from but put Choi at greatly increased risk of suffering a heart attack or stroke. Apart from being potentially deadly, the Australian regime’s refusal of medical care to this left-wing political prisoner caused him extreme stress that for a period affected his mental health.

Even on his very last day in jail prior to being released on bail, the callous neglect of Choi’s health needs continued. Yesterday, Choi asked to see the nurse on duty so that he could get a certificate about the medication that he is taking in order to give it to a doctor once he is released. However, senior guards blocked him from accessing a nurse. Thus prevented from having any official record of the medication that he has been prescribed, today Choi and his supporters spent the afternoon in a panic as they feverishly attempted to deduce – with the help of his new GP and pharmacist – what daily insulin dose he was being prescribed and what other diabetes and high cholesterol medication he requires.

16 November 2020: Chan Han Choi with some of his supporters at his own COVID-safe birthday party held at his residence of house arrest. Choi was coincidentally released from bail just four days before his 62nd birthday.
Photo Credit: Trotskyist Platform
Work pressure results in levitra cheap depression and anxiety disorders and conduct. In vitro fertilization is used to help women become pregnant by mixing the sperm and egg outside the body, then implanting the embryo into the pfizer viagra woman’s uterus (like with IVF). Sildenafil Citrate is one viagra online from india icks.org of the prime elements of this medicine. Where tadalafil 20mg no prescription is $15.00 per pill, the other viagra is a little bit costly.

Chan Han Choi is accused of trying to help North Korea’s people conduct trade with entities abroad in violation of UN economic sanctions. He is scheduled to face trial next February. All the eight charges against Choi relate to alleged brokering of the export of produce from North Korea to entities in third countries, except for one of the charges. That latter charge alleges that Choi attempted to broker the import of petroleum products from Iran to the DPRK. Choi has pleaded not guilty to all the eight charges. However, as asserted by the chair of a united front rally held in Choi’s defence on the Saturday prior to his November 10 bail hearing:

“We say that whether the charges are true or not, Choi should be freed and all the charges dropped. Because even if they are true, he has committed no crime from the standpoint of working class people. On the contrary he would have carried out a great act of humanitarianism. Because these sanctions are cruel and brutal. Similar sanctions imposed on the people of Iraq, in just their first eight years of implementation, from 1990 to 1998, killed half a million Iraqi babies. They caused a half a million babies to die prematurely through a lack of food and medicine – this is according to the United Nations, the body that imposed the sanctions. In the end about 1.7 million people in Iraq died as a result of those sanctions. Now, North Korea has a socialistic system so they’re better able to protect their people from these sanctions. But still it causes enormous suffering. Choi has been to rural areas of North Korea and he has seen that suffering caused by the sanctions. And that is why he is opposed to these sanctions and wants to help the people of North Korea.

“But Chan Han Choi is also a socialist. He likes North Korea’s egalitarianism. He likes the society’s community spirit. Now people can have different ideas about North Korea’s leadership. But the fact is that the people of North Korea have built a socialistic system based on public ownership of the banks, the mines, the factories and the agricultural land. Now that system is a system that favours working class people. So by standing by such a system, Chan Han Choi has stood by all the people in Australia and around the world hurt by the capitalist system. He has stood by the millions of workers, many young and women workers, who’ve been forced into insecure casual labour. He has stood by the hundreds of thousands of workers who have been thrown out of their jobs over the last few months after their toil made their bosses huge profits… He has stood by the people who are struggling with rent or mortgage repayments because there is so little public housing. He has stood by the people hurt by privatisation. So by standing by a system of public ownership, he has stood by 90% of Australia’s population. We must now stand by him!”

An Australian SAS soldier murders an unarmed Afghan person in cold blood. A report by the Australian regime itself – only partly made public – reveals that the Australian military killed at least 39 civilians or unarmed prisoners. Among those that they murdered were children. The racist troops also tortured a large number of prisoners, often just for sport. Yet despite some of these crimes having occurred eight or more years ago and being exposed by courageous whistleblowers years ago, not a single soldier committing a war crime has thus far been charged with any crime. By contrast, Chan Han Choi who is not charged with killing anyone, assaulting anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, stealing from anyone or even with espionage was imprisoned for nearly three years without facing trial.

Resist the Rise of Cold War McCarthysim!

Although Choi was initially charged for allegedly trying to break the sanctions on the people of North Korea, the reason he was imprisoned and denied bail until now was largely because of his sympathy for socialistic North Korea. In their submissions opposing each of Choi’s bail applications, the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) insisted on each occasion that Choi’s stated sympathy for the DPRK was a strong reason to reject bail. Meanwhile, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) claimed that Choi’s statements from prison that he is a political prisoner and attacking the economic sanctions on the DPRK as unfair and unjust are also reasons to deny bail. In other words, because of Choi’s sympathy for a socialistic country and his avowed opposition to the cruel sanctions on the people of that country, the Australian regime is insisting that Choi should have less rights than others. This is blatant political discrimination! It is what Cold War McCarthyism is all about – where people’s sympathy for a socialistic country or advocacy of communism is equated with criminal acts. It makes a mockery of the Australian regime’s claims to run a “democratic system” where “everyone has the same rights regardless of their political stance.” Such discrimination against sympathisers of socialistic states is all the more disgusting because those standing by such systems based on public ownership and working class rule – in however a bureaucratically deformed manner that it may currently exist in North Korea and the Peoples Republic China – are standing by the interests of the entire working class of Australia and the world; and most of the middle class as well.

Meanwhile, the CDPP and AFP also opposed Choi’s bail on the grounds that his supporters providing bail surety and bail residence to him are associated with groups like Trotskyist Platform, “that make statements undermining the Australian legal system and showing a lack of respect for the processes associated with adjudicating criminal guilt.” Thus, people expressing distrust in Australia’s capitalist legal system – a system that is both racist and biased towards the rich business owning class – are branded as being necessarily more likely to commit criminal acts than others. Indeed, the regime went even further. They made a big deal about the people offering bail surety having, on certain days, worn t-shirts containing the flag of the DPRK! Shock horror! Their Cold War anti-communism is so intense that they even deem people wearing t-shirts with the flag of a socialistic country as would-be criminals.

Alongside such fanatical anti-communist arguments, the CDPP and AFP also resorted to other spurious “grounds” for opposing bail. For one they constructed a completely bonkers conspiracy theory that Chinese, North Korean or even Russian agents would assist Choi to flee Australia – despite the COVID ban on travel out of this country – should Choi be granted bail. Then, they made a huge song and dance about Choi’s family’s supposed minimal contact with him since his arrest. However, as Choi’s legal team noted, his family members were themselves raided at the time that Choi was arrested and there “is an irresistible inference that the lack of contact between the Applicant [Choi] and his family, and vice versa, may be prompted out of fear for the safety” of family members “as opposed to a permanent state of degradation in their familial relationship, and hence the diminishment of the Applicant’s community ties.” Moreover, until well into 2019, Choi had regularly been speaking to his wife on the phone. This communication only ceased after two members of the Corrections Intelligence Group visited Choi in prison and made the chilling threat that should he ever speak on the phone in Korean again, he would be sent to Goulburn Supermax prison. Soon, Choi found that he could not adequately communicate with his wife since both are far from fluent in English. Moreover, there was a danger that either one of them could unthinkingly break into Korean during a phone conversation which could cause Choi to be sent to Goulburn Supermax and out of easy reach of the friends who have been visiting him in custody. As a result he stopped calling his wife. However, making a mockery of the prosecution’s emphasis on his supposed “minimal contact with family members,” the first thing that Choi did this morning – after having been given an approved phone late last night – was to make phone contact with his family… and a lengthy conversation followed!

Upon his release from prison into house arrest, Choi expressed his deepest appreciation to all the people who have supported him. He said that without their support and actions there is no way that he would have been released on bail. When Choi was arrested in December 2017, then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull, Australian Federal Police leaders and the mainstream media launched vicious verbal attacks on him. They sought to use the case to create a hysterical fear of North Korea. Choi was a bogeyman for the Australian capitalist regime to justify increased McCarthyist repression at home and a greatly intensified military build up against the DPRK and her socialistic PRC neighbour and ally. However, soon, the regime and the capitalist class that it serves found that many people did not buy their propaganda. Many sympathized with Choi and a vibrant movement mobilising street protests in defence of this socialist political prisoner emerged. The regime realised that the Choi case, rather than being a propaganda bonanza, has turned into a headache for them. In particular, the efforts of Choi’s supporters to expose the regime’s cruel treatment of this political prisoner and the resulting sympathy for Choi emerging from within a sizeable section of Australia’s Korean community (see: http://www.hanhodaily.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=64867) – and part of the Chinese community too – was threatening to lay bare to many the fraudulent nature of the ruling class’ claims to stand for “rule of law” and “human rights.” Thus, the exposure of the Australian regime’s profoundly unjust persecution of Choi is also undermining its attempts to attack the PRC, DPRK and other socialistic countries over supposed “human rights abuses.” It seems that decisive sections of the Australian ruling class have hence calculated that its interests would be better served by releasing Choi into house arrest until his trial.

7 November 2020: Supporters of Chan Han Choi rally in Sydney’s Chinatown to demand his freedom and to assert their opposition to the return of Cold War McCarthyism. The protesters then marched to Sydney Town Hall.

Congratulations to all those who have joined the street protests in defense of Chan Han Choi and supported him in other ways. You made a real difference! Alongside Trotskyist Platform, many other groups joined this united front campaign. Among the organisations that have either participated in or supported the various rallies supporting Choi are Trotskyist Platform, Anti-War West Sydney, Social Justice Network, Australia-DPRK Friendship Society, Communist Party of Australia – Wollongong branch, Communist Party of Australia –Western Sydney branch, Aust-DPRK Solidarity, Lebanese Communist Party and the Irish Republican socialist group James Connolly Association.

However, we supporters of Choi cannot rest on our laurels. His trial is approaching fast. Moreover, there is a lot at stake. For, although Choi is the biggest victim of Cold War McCarthyism in this country he is far from the only target. Just a week before Choi was released from prison, a Chinese Australian man, Sunny Duong, became the first person charged under Australia’s draconian so-called “foreign interference” laws – laws that are aimed at quashing the voice of those sympathetic to socialistic China and the other workers states. Sunny is a highly respected member of Melbourne’s South-East Asian Chinese community. The Australian regime have given scant details about the charges. But you can bet that this is another beat up! They say that he was conspiring to interfere in Australia’s political affairs. What do they mean by that: was he was planning to merely issue some social media posts sympathetic to China?

Five months ago, a NSW Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane was forced out of his elected senate seat for several months after the Australian Federal Police made a heavy-handed and intimidating raid on his home. It turns out that he never had any case to answer. Their excuse for the raid was that he belonged to a social media chat group where other people made pro-China comments. Can you believe that? And the regime here calls itself a democracy! Two months before being raided, Moselmane was witch-hunted out of his position as deputy president of the NSW upper house just because he told the truth and said that China responded very well to the pandemic. So much for free speech!

Meanwhile, last year, Chinese international students were subjected to an intimidating interrogation by Australia’s ASIO secret police. The students were targeted because they organised a large march in Sydney opposing the pro-colonial, anti-China rioters in Hong Kong. Then this year, ASIO and the Federal police staged a Gestapo-style raid on Chinese journalists working in Australia, seizing their computers and phones and terrifying their children.

Like all bullies, those leading the Cold War McCarthyist drive in Australia depend on their potential victims being intimidated. That is after all how witch-hunts work. First the witch-hunters target one person and hope that others who would support that target are intimidated and stay silent to avoid being targeted themselves. Then the persecutors move on to the next victim who often could be one of the people who decided to stay silent. That is why we must not stay silent when anyone is being persecuted for their sympathy for socialistic states; or in Moselmane’s case for having merely said a few words in praise of China. Now is the time to put our heads up – not duck for cover! The way to defeat witch-hunts is through courage! We must say an injury to one is an injury to all! By working harder to defend the biggest victim of McCarthyist persecution in Australia, Chan Han Choi, we are pushing back against this Cold War witch-hunt on all fronts.

The struggle to win freedom for Choi and to oppose the broader McCarthyist witch-hunt will need to be waged through mass street actions and political exposure. We can have no illusions in justice originating from the Australian regime’s legal system. As Trotskyist Platform spokesman, Samuel Kim, concluded in a speech made at the 7 November “Free Chan Han Choi” protest:

“The prisons, the courts, the police and the state bureaucracy in this capitalist country exist to enforce the interests of the corporate owners against those of the working class masses and their supporters. This is the case whether it is the Liberals, the ALP or the Greens who are in office as the capitalists also heavily influence these political parties. That is why greedy construction industry bosses get away with industrial manslaughter and murder – where on average 30 construction industry workers are killed on the job every year. Yet representatives from the construction workers unions get hit with criminal convictions for inspecting unsafe work sites.

“This system is geared towards the rich and powerful – and Choi, a hospital cleaner and someone charged with standing up for a workers state will receive discrimination from this system. So that is why we have mobilised on the streets with our physical bodies and we are loudly voicing these injustices. The only way we can bring true justice for Choi or any working class struggle like for higher wages, struggles against police brutality or for affordable housing is through street actions and protest actions of the good people. We need future mass actions of politically aware working class people and our allies. This, comrades and friends, is the most powerful way to oppose the decaying capitalist system of increasing inequality. We demand:

“Freedom for Chan Han Choi!

“Down with the barbaric sanctions, military threats, and trade war on the people of North Korea!

“Down with the Cold War witch-hunt against supporters of socialistic states!

Left-Wing Political Prisoner in Australia Had Serious Diabetic Condition Left Untreated for Months

Chan Han Choi Pleads: “They Are Indirectly Trying to Murder Me”

Left-Wing Political Prisoner in Australia Had Serious Diabetic Condition
Left Untreated for Months

11 October 2020 – Socialist political prisoner Chan Han Choi had a serious and worsening diabetic condition left untreated for over eight and a half months. This greatly endangered his health. Prison authorities refused Choi’s repeated written requests to be seen by a prison doctor. The anguish at seeing his health rapidly deteriorate and the horror of being repeatedly denied treatment caused Choi such severe emotional stress that for a while it caused him serious long-term memory loss. Fortunately Choi’s memory has gradually recovered since.

Chan Han Choi has been imprisoned by the Australian regime since December 2017 on charges of trying to organise trade deals to help the people of North Korea bypass crippling United Nations economic sanctions. He is currently imprisoned without being convicted. By the time that Choi finally goes to trial next February, he would have spent three years and two months in prison! All the charges against Choi refer to his alleged attempts to help North Korea export its produce abroad except for one charge of allegedly attempting to help North Korea import petroleum products. All opponents of imperialism, supporters of socialism and partisans of workers rights should stand by Chan Han Choi regardless of whether the allegations against him are true or not. As Trotskyist Platform spokesman, Samuel Kim, stated at a March 9 united front rally to demand freedom for Choi:

“If Choi turns out to be `guilty’ as charged that means that he sacrificed his freedom to help the people of North Korea bypass these killer sanctions. That would make him a great humanitarian. A humanitarian who should be freed from prison immediately. And if he is found not guilty, he should never have been imprisoned in the first place.”

For over five months in the mid-part of this year, Choi had been pleading to be seen by a prison doctor at the jail where he is incarcerated: Long Bay Prison Hospital. As well as housing inmates on remand like Choi, Long Bay Prison Hospital holds prisoners with medical conditions. Therefore, there are actually more doctors assigned to treat inmates at that particular prison. Yet, the authorities repeatedly refused to allow Choi to see a prison doctor. This is despite health records showing that he submitted at least five written applications to have a doctor’s consultation in that five month period: on March 27, March 31, May 25, June 26 and August 12. Choi maintains that he also submitted additional written requests on at least two other occasions as well: June 30 and July 12.

It would have been visually obvious to prison authorities that Choi was unwell. His friends who had Audio-Visual Link (AVL) “visits” with him during that period reported that Choi had lost much weight and that his face looked gaunt. Furthermore, most of the symptoms that Choi was complaining about – severe weight loss, rashes all over his body, serious stomach problems and very itchy fungal infections – are classic symptoms of diabetes,  a condition that prison authorities knew that Choi was already afflicted with. On 31 October of last year, prison doctors prescribed him the oral diabetic medication Metformin. Moreover, 61 year-old Choi was prescribed medication for his high cholesterol.

It was only after Choi sent a protest letter to the director of Justice Health in August stating that “they are indirectly trying to murder me” by denying him medical treatment, that the authorities finally allowed Choi to see a prison doctor. That consultation occurred on August 31. The doctor found that his diabetes condition that previously did not require insulin injections had deteriorated seriously, reporting “declining glycaemic control.” Mr Choi now requires daily insulin injections. However, given that he was suffering from the very same symptoms for months and was not provided with insulin during that time (because he was prevented from even being able to see a doctor) that meant that his diabetes had not been adequately treated for a lengthy period. Untreated diabetes can cause damage to the eyes, kidneys and nerves, increases the risk of strokes and heart attacks and can cause diabetic emergencies involving a serious reduction of a person’s consciousness. Meanwhile, the sudden onset of treatment after it has not been provided in due time can cause unconsciousness or even permanent brain damage.

The top part of the record of a prison doctor’s consultation with Choi. The record shows that when Choi was finally allowed to see a doctor after over eight months of repeated requests, the doctor found that he had Type 2 diabetes with “declining glycaemic control” and now required treatment with insulin. The failure to have treated Choi’s worsening diabetic condition for several months could have had disastrous consequences.
People are seemed to buy generic viagra be struggling from various sexual disorders. And one viagra purchase uk of the best ways to boost overall blood flow and testosterone secretion. Only single medication of Lovegra must be ingested in addition with Look At This buying cialis in spain. order viagra levitra If you feel allergic to sildenafil citrate or dapoxetine and consequently one must quit utilizing the super p Force medication comes into play.

That August 31 consultation was the first time that Choi had been seen by a doctor in ten months, despite Choi submitting at least seven (and possibly up to ten) written requests to see a doctor from 23 December last year. Indeed health records show that when Choi was attended to by a nurse just four days prior to this late August consultation, this was the first time the known diabetic sufferer had had his blood sugar level checked in eight and a half months! What makes this all the more appalling is that when authorities had previously checked his blood sugar on 12 December last year, the level had been too high and on an increasing trajectory. A person’s blood sugar levels are meant to be between 4 and 8 mmol/L. However, by 12 December 2019 Choi’s levels had reached 11.1 mmol/L rising from 8.4 mmol/L on 15 November 2019 and then 10.5 mmol/L on 28 November 2019. When a nurse finally checked Choi’s blood sugar levels again eight and a half months later it had risen to 13.4 mmol/L and a few days later it was at an alarming 20.6 mmol/L. It was around this time, that the doctor prescribed Choi emergency doses of rapid acting insulin. The situation had become so critical that on 28 August, Justice Health (the government prison agency responsible for providing health care to prisoners) was compelled to put a health problem notification alert to prison guards warning them that Chan Han Choi had “Unstable Type 2 diabetes” with potential symptoms that included confusion, excessive sweating and unconsciousness.

The notification form that medical staff at Long Bay Prison Hospital issued to prison officers in late August warning them of the serious symptoms that Choi could suffer due to his then uncontrolled diabetes. By leaving his worsening diabetes condition unmonitored for eight and a half months, Justice Health caused Choi’s diabetic condition to reach emergency levels before it was finally brought under control.

All-Sided “Maximum Pressure” Campaign to Break the Spirit of this Political Prisoner

Fortunately, Choi’s blood sugar levels have finally been brought under control and he now takes regular insulin injections and has his blood sugar levels monitored three times daily. However, the question remains why was his diabetes left unmonitored for so long, why were Choi’s obvious symptoms of a worsening diabetes condition ignored and why were his desperate pleas to be seen by a doctor repeatedly rebuffed?

To help answer these questions, we need to point out that Choi’s diabetes was once well managed in prison. Indeed, in the ten week period leading up to 12 December last year, Choi’s blood sugar levels were monitored on nine different occasions. Yet when this blood sugar reached unacceptably high levels in the last two recordings in that period and on a steeply increasing trajectory – they stopped checking Choi’s blood sugar for eight and a half months! This, even as Choi repeatedly complained of symptoms that trained medical staff would know are diabetic induced problems!

Choi’s health records show that from the start of October 2019 to 12 December 2019, Choi’s Blood Glucose [Sugar] Levels (“BGL”) was monitored nine times. However once the levels rose to unacceptable high levels at the last two recordings, Justice Health abruptly stopped monitoring Choi’s Blood Glucose Levels for a further eight and a half months, when they “realised” that Choi’s BGL had reached emergency levels.

Moreover, Choi’s prison medical records show that during a four a half month period during the early days of his incarceration from mid-January 2018 to early May 2018, Justice Health monitored Choi’s blood sugar levels on 30 separate days. This was furthermore during the period when Choi’s diabetes was well under control and nowhere near as serious as it is now. So why the change in attitude? Well that early part of the period of Choi’s incarceration was at a time when the Australian regime thought that Choi would be totally isolated and intimidated and would roll over and plead guilty to all charges and show “remorse”. The situation has changed a lot since then. The regime has found that this political prisoner is defiant and proud. Far from rolling over he has spoken out bravely from prison against the denial of his human rights and what’s more has denounced the economic sanctions, that he is alleged to have tried to help North Korea to evade, as being “unjust” and “unfair.” By late November last year, Choi was in court pushing a motion for a Permanent Stay in the proceedings against him on the grounds that his rights as a prisoner and defendant were being violated and was openly telling the court that “he is a political prisoner incarcerated because of his socialist political beliefs.” Moreover, this period at the end of last year was a time when Choi was just weeks from going to trial which had at that time been scheduled for February this year. The denial of medical treatment to Choi thus has a distinct smell of being an attempt to apply “maximum pressure” to this political prisoner in the lead up to his trial. Perhaps it was an attempt to pressure Choi into acquiescing to a prosecution plea bargain “offer” that was unacceptable to him. Whatever may be the exact reason behind the denial of medical care to Choi, it needs to be seen in the context of the all-sided “maximum pressure” campaign that has been waged against this political prisoner – from the taking away of his right to telephone friends to the repeated obstructions placed on family, friends and even lawyers and their interpreters gaining access to him.

To be sure on 29 September, Justice Health sent off a letter to Choi apologising for the “delay in care.” But that was after Choi had sent a desperate, strongly worded letter the previous month stating that:


“I’ve put in request form after request form and receive no care for my illnesses. I have rashes all over me and have issues going to the toilet and put medical forms in with no reply. Whatever I ask for gets no reply. I have no human rights here so I am [of the] strong belief that they are trying indirectly to murder me.”

And Justice Heath also likely only sent the apology letter to Choi after they realised that Choi’s supporters had exposed online their repeated refusal to respond to this post 60, known diabetic with high cholesterol’s desperate requests for medical treatment.

Letter to Chan Han Choi from Justice Health, with typical bureaucratic understatement of failings, apologises for their “delay in care” to Choi. The letter from a senior Justice Health official puts the responsibility on the “Nursing Unit Manager.” However, the blatant and repeated nature of the denial of care to Choi over a more than eight month period suggests a more conscious effort to exert “maximum pressure” on Choi, likely prescribed by high level officials.

The Australian regime knows full well the growing support for Choi that there is amongst pro-working class and anti-imperialist activists. They had better realise that should Choi’s health needs again be denied in the future because of their “maximum pressure” campaign against this political prisoner, Choi’s supporters in both Australia and abroad would surely take their revenge out on Australia’s authoritarian capitalist regime. We would do so by quadrupling our efforts to expose the unjust persecution of Chan Han Choi; and by working still harder to lay bare the connection between the regime’s persecution of this political prisoner and the other crimes that it commits in its relentless drive to further the interests of the exploiting class. Choi’s supporters would be energised to struggle all the more feverishly to unmask the deception behind the regime’s claims to stand for “human rights” and the “rule of law.” We would with renewed vehemence expose to the masses, both here and abroad, the Australian regime’s persecution in the courts of scores of staunch trade union activists (especially those working in the construction industry), their brutal racist killings of Aboriginal people in state custody, their prosecution of whistleblowers and journalists, their McCarthyist repression of those sympathetic to socialistic states, their arrogant trampling of the peoples of the South Pacific and the horrific execution-style murders of unarmed civilians and children that their Nazi and Confederate-flag waving, special forces troops commit in Afghanistan.

Australia’s Authoritarian Capitalist Regime Has Been
Torturing This Socialist Political Prisoner

The repeated denial of medical care to Choi was a blatant violation of Rule 25 of the UN’s Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which states that: “The medical officer shall have the care of the physical and mental health of the prisoners and should daily see all sick prisoners, all who complain of illness, and any prisoner to whom his attention is specially directed” (https://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/TreatmentOfPrisoners.aspx). Let’s remember that the UN is a capitalist-dominated agency that the Australian regime claims to uphold and that it is in the very name of enforcing UN sanctions that the regime here is persecuting Choi. Yet Australia’s authoritarian capitalist regime violates the UN’s own rules. The UN further states that: “The intentional withholding of medical treatment from persons in places of detention or in other State institutions such as orphanages or from persons injured by an act attributable to public officials falls within the mandate of the Special Rapporteur on torture” (https://www.bak.gv.at/en/Downloads/files/UNO/UNO_Folter_Konvention.pdf).  In other words, under the UN definition of torture, by repeatedly withholding medical care to Chan Han Choi over a lengthy period, the Australian regime had been torturing this political prisoner

The withholding of medical care is hardly the only violation of Choi’s rights that the Australian regime has been guilty of. They have made it extremely difficult for Choi’s friends and family to speak to him. The few people able to visit Choi report that it originally took them four to five months to gain approval to visit him and that they then need to get re-approved each year which takes a further couple of months each time. However, the authorities have still banned Choi from making telephone calls to these friends. Moreover, Choi has been prevented from speaking to his infant grand-daughters because Corrective Services NSW blocked his application to make telephone calls to his daughter-in-law. All this is a gross violation of Rule 92 of the UN’s Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, which states that: “An untried prisoner shall be allowed to inform immediately his family of his detention and shall be given all reasonable facilities for communicating with his family and friends, and for receiving visits from them, subject only to restrictions and supervision as are necessary in the interests of the administration of justice and of the security and good order of the institution.” This rule should obviously apply to the authorities detaining Choi. He is clearly an untried prisoner – indeed he has already spent two and three quarter years in custody without being tried. And Choi is definitely no threat to the “security and good order” of the prison: not only does he have no criminal record he is not even charged with committing or attempting to commit any sort of violent act or indeed any sort of act against a victim full stop.

The Australian regime has also violated Rule 90 of the UN’s rules on prisoners, which states that: “An untried prisoner shall be allowed to procure at his own expense or at the expense of a third party such books, newspapers, writing materials and other means of occupation as are compatible with the interests of the administration of justice and the security and good order of the institution.” In particular, the regime blocked repeated attempts by Choi’s friends to pass through the prison system to him issues of the popular Australian Korean-language community newspapers, Hanho Daily and Korean Today, some of which contained articles about Choi’s own case.

One of the most striking violations of Australian citizen Choi’s rights has been the Australian regime’s obstruction of his access to lawyers. They do this, in part, by requiring lawyers to go through a months-long special approval process before they can again access to Choi. As a result, Choi’s new lawyers, who were engaged at his instructions by his friends were for two months not only not able to visit Choi but have even been prevented from speaking to him over the telephone! Moreover, in a 3 November 2019 letter to Choi’s previous lawyers, the Commissioner of Corrective Services NSW (CSNSW), Peter Severin, admitted that his officers had been listening in on their privileged communications (see: https://www.trotskyistplatform.com/socialist-political-prisoner-cannot-get-a-fair-trial-in-australia/). He stated that: “phone calls with `national security interest’ (NSI) inmates, such as Choi, are monitored by CSNSW officers to ensure that they are in English and are with approved contacts.” Such monitoring of phone calls are a blatant violation of Rule 93 of the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners which states that: “Interviews between the prisoner and his legal adviser may be within sight but not within the hearing of a police or institution official.”

Chan Han Choi: A Victim of the New McCarthyist Witch-Hunt

The withholding of medical care to Chan Han Choi recalls the Australian regime’s record of very frequently refusing to grant Aboriginal prisoners timely medical care. Many Aboriginal people have died in state custody after police or prison guards fatally delayed granting them access to urgently needed medical care. Kamilaroi man, Eric Whittaker, died of a ruptured brain aneurysm on 2 July 2017 after guards at Parklea Correctional Centre refused to give him medical care for some three and a half hours after he first started making desperate appeals to get access to care. Thirty-six year-old Whittaker made 20 emergency calls begging for help from 4.52am but guards murderously ignored his pleas. When staff finally attended to Whittaker at 8.08am, he was found crouched in the rear of his cell shouting “please help me” and having urinated, vomited and defecated on himself (https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/please-help-me-eric-whittaker-made-20-emergency-calls-before-he-died-in-custody-20191014-p530gg.html). Fifteen months later, another thirty-six year-old Aboriginal man, Nathan Reynolds, also died after authorities again fatally delayed giving him medical care. A diagnosed serious asthmatic, Reynolds had repeatedly buzzed for help and screamed out, “I can’t breathe.” Other distressed inmates started buzzing for help as they could see Reynolds deteriorating before their very eyes and turning blue in the face. It took forty minutes for help to arrive. One hour and twenty minutes after crying out for help the Anaiwan father of one was dead (https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/aug/25/why-does-it-take-so-long-the-desperate-wait-for-answers-after-a-death-in-custody). Earlier in August 2014, 22 year-old Aboriginal woman, Julieka Dhu, died in police custody in WA of a bacterial infection because police criminally prevented her from getting the medical care that she so desperately cried out for. The night before she died, Ms Dhu had cried out in pain all night but police refused her pleas to see a doctor. They continued to murderously obstruct her getting medical care the next morning even after she vomited repeatedly for over an hour. Instead, a cop threateningly told her, “you will f_cking sit this out.”

Aboriginal people suffer the most intense racist state oppression in Australia. As a person of Asian background, racism is no doubt a factor in Choi’s ill-treatment too. However, there is another more over-riding reason why Choi is suffering the same intense brutality that the racist, rich people’s regime unleashes against Aboriginal people. That is because he is being persecuted for his sympathy for a socialistic state – in this case the DPRK (the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea, i.e. “North Korea”). The last few years has seen an escalating anti-communist witch hunt in Australia. This persecution of supporters of the DPRK and more often those sympathetic to the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) is part of the Australian rulers’ role in the U.S.-led Cold War drive against the socialistic PRC and her socialistic neighbour and ally, the DPRK. This witch hunt mirrors the 1950s campaign in the U.S. and Australia against communists and others who expressed even the slightest sympathy towards the then Soviet Union – and to a lesser extent back then also the PRC and the DPRK. A large number of communists, trade unionists, artists and intellectuals, including those who had merely not been “condemnatory enough” of communism, ended up being jailed or purged from their jobs. The ideology of the witch hunt became known as McCarthysim, after the U.S. senator Joseph McCarthy who helped drive the witch hunt with smear tactics and unsubstantiated accusations (extreme right wing federal Liberal MP and Chair of the Parliamentary Committee on Intelligence and Security, Andrew Hastie, is a modern day Australian equivalent of Joseph McCarthy).

The McCarthyist nature of Chan Han Choi’s all-sided persecution has been most evident during his bail applications. In their submissions opposing each of Choi’s bail applications last year, the Crown made Choi’s stated sympathy for the DPRK a central point of their argument. Indeed, they listed as the very second point of their argument on why they claim that, “the Applicant’s alleged offending is objectively serious,” “the Applicant’s repeated statements that he is a loyal subject of the DPRK ….” In other words, because of this Australian citizen’s political sympathy for a socialistic state, the Australian regime insists that he should have less rights – in this case the right to bail – than other people. That is simply an expression of the very basic premise of McCarthyism. And that very same McCarthyist premise was very evident in the judges’ rejection of his bail applications. Two different judges rejected Choi’s two bail bids even though he is not even accused of killing anyone, sexually assaulting anyone, bashing anyone, stealing from anyone, any terrorist acts, espionage or even planning any of these things. By contrast, accused murderers and pedophile high-ranking priests are readily granted bail in Australia.

Chan Han Choi is not the only victim of the new McCarthyist witch hunt. International students from China who organised a thousands-strong demonstration in Sydney in August 17 last year that opposed the anti-PRC forces in Hong Kong were interrogated and intimidated by Australian security agencies (https://news.have8.tv/2636880.html). Australian regime agents told a key female organizer of the march that her actions may have violated Australia’s foreign interference laws and threatened that she could face visa problems. When the Australian secret police intrusively asked her about her family and she responded, “You all know a lot!” the cops menacingly retorted, “Yes, so you have to be careful” and settle down [and stay out of politics!]. Then, four months ago, Australia’s ASIO secret police and the Australian Federal Police (AFP) – the very agencies spearheading the persecution of Chan Han Choi – raided the homes of four PRC journalists based in Sydney (http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-09/12/c_139361950.htm).  They interrogated the reporters, seized their computers and smartphones and even demanded that they not report the raids.

Most infamously, the Australian ruling class and its media have launched a witch hunting campaign against NSW upper house MP, Shaoquett Moselmane. Moselmane was pilloried by the mainstream media, Liberal politicians and leaders of his own Labor Party for having the temerity to praise China’s highly successful response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result, on April 6, Moselmane was forced to step down from his position as assistant president of the NSW Legislative Council. Then, just seven weeks later, ASIO and the AFP raided Moselmane’s home and parliamentary office. The more than 12 hour-long operation was unleashed under the pretext that “Chinese government agents” had infiltrated his office and were using him as part of a “foreign interference” operation. It has now been revealed who these “agents” are and what their supposed “foreign interference operation” was. The “agents” – the Chinese media reporters who were raided in Sydney and a part-time staffer for Moselmane, John Zhang – supposedly “interfered” because they were in the same social media chat group as Moselmane and had had contact with China’s Sydney Consul. How utterly ridiculous is it to portray that as some sort of sinister “foreign interference”! Yet the Australian media and regime depicted Moselmane as a traitor even though he was not even a suspect in the authoritarian raid. NSW politicians forced him to take leave from his elected position as a state senator and, to this very day, those NSW voters who elected Moselmane remain disenfranchised from their voice in parliament.

Let’s Work Harder to Demand Freedom for Chan Han Choi

The McCarthyist witch hunting is all about silencing the voices of anyone who speaks favourably, however mildly in the case of Moselmane, about a socialistic country. That is, after all, why the Australian regime had denied Choi medical care for a lengthy period, refuses him bail and has stripped him of many of his rights as a defendant and prisoner. Because Choi has stood by his political beliefs and even from prison bravely spoke out about his love for the egalitarianism of North Korean society and against the unfairness of the UN economic sanctions on North Korea, the Australian authoritarian regime wants to punish him, isolate him and demoralise him into submission. They also don’t want him getting bail as they know that this would enable him to speak more easily to the world about the injustice of the UN sanctions and the cruelty of his treatment while in prison.

Yet behind the capitalist ruling class’ strong state repression is, actually, fear. However, it is not Chan Han Choi, PRC journalists, international students from China, Moselmane or Chinese social organisations that they are ultimately most scared of. No, who they are ultimately scared of are the entire working class masses that they exploit. Australia’s capitalists know all too well that on average for every $100,000 of value that a worker adds to an enterprise, they, the capitalists, steal a full $50,000 out of that amount in profit. They know that young workers are frustrated that more than half of them do not have a stable job – and are, instead, consigned to being either unemployed, having less work hours than they want or to working as insecure casuals, gig workers or employees on short-term contract. The capitalist rulers know too that low-income people are angry at the lack of affordable low-rent accommodation. The regime is nervous that Aboriginal people and other anti-racists are furious at ever worsening racist state brutality. They know too that politically aware workers are seething at the job cuts and reduced work hours that workers have copped during the pandemic even as corporate profits surge through the roof. So, the capitalist exploiters are terrified that anyone speaking positively about the world’s largest socialistic country, that is the PRC – or even about her much maligned, small but staunch DPRK neighbour – could make the masses here realise that there is an alternative to capitalism. The capitalist rulers are fearful that this would, in turn, cause an explosion in mass resistance against them. Therefore, the lances that the capitalist regime is stabbing Choi and others with in their Cold War witch hunts are actually meant to pierce right through their immediate victims and onto the rebellious hearts of the broader oppressed masses. That is why it is very much a matter of self defence for the working class and oppressed in Australia to oppose the McCarthyist repression. Let us mobilise in action to demand: Free Chan Han Choi – Drop all the charges now! Down with the persecution of Chinese journalists, pro-PRC international students and parliamentary staffer, John Zhang! Repeal Australia’s draconian “Foreign Interference” laws!  Stop the witch hunt of Shaoquett Moselmane – allow this elected MP to resume his seat in parliament immediately!

Chan Han Choi is not merely a victim of Cold War persecution. His arrest, then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull’s fanatical tirade against Choi at the time of his arrest and the media hysteria surrounding this supposed “North Korean economic agent” were meant to help propel the new McCarthyist witch hunt throughout broader society. And it has! Just six months after Choi’s arrest, the Australian government rammed through its authoritarian “foreign interference” laws. These laws will not only attack those with sympathies for the PRC and the DPRK – its main immediate targets – but also dissident journalists as well as leftists and trade unionists with international connections. And that is a crucial point. The Cold War witch hunt is creating such an obsession with “national security” that its victims are already starting to be much broader than simply those who speak positively about the PRC and DPRK. It is notable that while ASIO first raided the homes of remorseful former Australian spy, Witness K, and his lawyer Bernard Collaery in 2013 – for revealing to the media and the East Timorese government that Australia’s ASIS spy agency had planted listening devices in Timorese government buildings to give the Australian government the advantage in negotiations over an oil and gas dispute with East Timor – the Australian regime did not feel that they could actually lay charges against the two until June 2018, that is in the months following the red scare hysteria that surrounded Choi’s arrest and after the China-bashing campaign had reached new heights. Similarly, military lawyer, David McBride, who faces up to 50 years in jail for informing the media of horrific war crimes by Australian elite forces in Afghanistan and the ABC journalist, Dan Oakes, who broke the story – whom the AFP have called to be charged – are indirect victims of the “national security” obsession that the Cold War witch hunt has created, even though they are not themselves accused of any sympathy for a socialistic state. We should add that the “national security”-obsessed climate created by the new McCarthyist campaign has made it easier, too, for the Australian regime to brush off its despicable complicity in Washington and London’s persecution of Australian Wikileaks journalist, Julian Assange.

That is why those within the political Left who think that they do not need to defend Choi and oppose the new McCarthyism, just because they are not amongst the sections of the Left courageous enough to stand by the socialistic PRC and DPRK, had better think again. Just like the original 1950s McCarthyist witch hunt, its contemporary version is creating such a stifling, repressive political climate that it will eventually target all sections of the Left. Already in the U.S., Trump and his fascistic hard-core supporters brand staunch supporters of black liberation or proponents of universal public health care as China-loving communists. If the new Cold War repression is not resisted, inevitably in Australia, in the future, supporters of public housing, nationalisation of the banks and public ownership of industry will be attacked as “agents of Red China-like and North Korea-like policies.”

The ruling class’ fear-mongering surrounding Chan Han Choi and their railings against “Communist Chinese influence” are meant to also justify their foreign policy agenda. And top of that agenda is to increase military and political pressure on socialistic China and her socialistic North Korean ally and neighbour. Three and a half months ago, the right wing Australian government announced a massive $270 billion defence upgrade targeting the PRC and DPRK. The military build up would see Australia acquire long-range missiles. Why is the Australian ruling class doing this? Crushing socialistic rule in China and North Korea would, by dashing hopes that there is a viable alternative to capitalism, help secure the rule of exploitation by Australia’s capitalist class. However, such a victory for capitalism would be disastrous for working class people. For although socialistic rule in both China and North Korea is fragile and bureaucratically deformed, the PRC and DPRK are, nevertheless, workers states formed through the overturn of capitalist rule by the toiling classes and with economies based on the dominant role of socialist public ownership. Seventy years of socialist rule have brought immense benefits to China’s masses and are an inspiration to every downtrodden person around the world who aspires for justice and a better life. When it comes to uplifting people out of poverty, providing decent health care to all and advancing social equality for women, Red China has far surpassed the other populous countries that were also raped by colonialism but which have remained under capitalist rule (such as India, Indonesia, Pakistan, the Philippines, Egypt, Brazil and Peru) – whether these capitalist developing countries be nominal “democracies” or ones administered by notoriously strong state regimes. Today, the PRC and even the sanctions-ravaged DPRK, along with the other workers states in Cuba, Vietnam and Laos, have been far more effective in protecting their people from the deadly COVID-19 pandemic than most of the capitalist world. The continued existence of these workers states gives hope to the most politically aware activists – amongst the 90% of Australia’s people who would benefit from the overturn of capitalist rule – that we can eventually achieve such a revolutionary victory. In standing by one of these workers states, Chan Han Choi has, thus, bravely stood by 90% of Australia’s people. We must now in turn stand by him!

The Australian regime’s torture of Choi (through their withholding of medical care) proves that there is no way that he can get a fair trial – not even a fair trial under the unjust laws that he is charged under. And the capitalist regime’s violation of many of Choi’s rights as a defendant and untried prisoner prove the very same thing too. Like all capitalist states, the Australian state is a state biased towards the interests of the rich exploiting class and biased against the interests of the working class and those like Choi who stand by the socialist system that favours the working class masses. And if someone like Choi could never get a fair trial in capitalist Australia this is triply so during the current atmosphere of intense anti-communist witch hunting. That is why it is up to class conscious workers, anti-imperialists and opponents of increasing state repression in Australia to stand by Chan Han Choi. In the lead up to Choi’s trial next February, let us work ever harder to build the campaign to demand freedom for this political prisoner – a prisoner who has suffered so much cruelty for his pro-socialist beliefs.